All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET
@ 2018-10-05 16:15 Arnd Bergmann
  2018-10-05 17:19 ` Joe Stringer
  2018-10-05 19:02 ` Song Liu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2018-10-05 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, David S. Miller
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, John Fastabend, Martin KaFai Lau, Toshiaki Makita,
	Lawrence Brakmo, Andrey Ignatov, Jesper Dangaard Brouer,
	Jakub Kicinski, Mathieu Xhonneux, David Ahern, netdev,
	linux-kernel

The newly added TCP and UDP handling fails to link when CONFIG_INET
is disabled:

net/core/filter.o: In function `sk_lookup':
filter.c:(.text+0x7ff8): undefined reference to `tcp_hashinfo'
filter.c:(.text+0x7ffc): undefined reference to `tcp_hashinfo'
filter.c:(.text+0x8020): undefined reference to `__inet_lookup_established'
filter.c:(.text+0x8058): undefined reference to `__inet_lookup_listener'
filter.c:(.text+0x8068): undefined reference to `udp_table'
filter.c:(.text+0x8070): undefined reference to `udp_table'
filter.c:(.text+0x808c): undefined reference to `__udp4_lib_lookup'
net/core/filter.o: In function `bpf_sk_release':
filter.c:(.text+0x82e8): undefined reference to `sock_gen_put'

The compiler can optimize it out and avoid those references for
the most part, but we are missing a few steps here:

- sk_lookup() should always have been marked 'static', this also
  avoids a warning about a missing prototype when building with
  'make W=1'.
- The BPF_CALL_x() macro needs a little change to allow marking
  the unneeded BPF call as 'static' and having the compiler
  drop them.
- The reference to the bpf_func_proto must be made conditional.

Fixes: 6acc9b432e67 ("bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 include/linux/filter.h |  2 +-
 net/core/filter.c      | 18 +++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 6791a0ac0139..d9ec9d908bbe 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -428,9 +428,9 @@ struct sock_reuseport;
 		  u64, __ur_3, u64, __ur_4, u64, __ur_5)
 
 #define BPF_CALL_x(x, name, ...)					       \
+	u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));	       \
 	static __always_inline						       \
 	u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__));   \
-	u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));	       \
 	u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__))	       \
 	{								       \
 		return ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x,__BPF_CAST,__BPF_N,__VA_ARGS__));\
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 30c6b2d3ef16..dd5fe021f44c 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4817,7 +4817,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh_proto = {
 };
 #endif /* CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF */
 
-struct sock *sk_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple,
+static struct sock *sk_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple,
 		       struct sk_buff *skb, u8 family, u8 proto)
 {
 	int dif = skb->dev->ifindex;
@@ -4902,13 +4902,13 @@ bpf_sk_lookup(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple, u32 len,
 	return (unsigned long) sk;
 }
 
-BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_tcp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
+static BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_tcp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 	   struct bpf_sock_tuple *, tuple, u32, len, u64, netns_id, u64, flags)
 {
 	return bpf_sk_lookup(skb, tuple, len, IPPROTO_TCP, netns_id, flags);
 }
 
-static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto = {
+static const __maybe_unused struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_sk_lookup_tcp,
 	.gpl_only	= false,
 	.pkt_access	= true,
@@ -4920,13 +4920,13 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto = {
 	.arg5_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
 
-BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_udp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
+static BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_udp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 	   struct bpf_sock_tuple *, tuple, u32, len, u64, netns_id, u64, flags)
 {
 	return bpf_sk_lookup(skb, tuple, len, IPPROTO_UDP, netns_id, flags);
 }
 
-static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto = {
+static const __maybe_unused struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_sk_lookup_udp,
 	.gpl_only	= false,
 	.pkt_access	= true,
@@ -4938,14 +4938,14 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto = {
 	.arg5_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
 
-BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sk_release, struct sock *, sk)
+static BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sk_release, struct sock *, sk)
 {
 	if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE))
 		sock_gen_put(sk);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_release_proto = {
+static const __maybe_unused struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_release_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_sk_release,
 	.gpl_only	= false,
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
@@ -5158,12 +5158,14 @@ tc_cls_act_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	case BPF_FUNC_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id:
 		return &bpf_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id_proto;
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_INET
 	case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_tcp:
 		return &bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp:
 		return &bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_sk_release:
 		return &bpf_sk_release_proto;
+#endif
 	default:
 		return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
 	}
@@ -5264,12 +5266,14 @@ sk_skb_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		return &bpf_sk_redirect_hash_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage:
 		return &bpf_get_local_storage_proto;
+#ifdef CONFIG_INET
 	case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_tcp:
 		return &bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp:
 		return &bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_sk_release:
 		return &bpf_sk_release_proto;
+#endif
 	default:
 		return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
 	}
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET
  2018-10-05 16:15 [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET Arnd Bergmann
@ 2018-10-05 17:19 ` Joe Stringer
  2018-10-05 19:02 ` Song Liu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Stringer @ 2018-10-05 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: arnd
  Cc: ast, daniel, David Miller, john fastabend, Martin KaFai Lau,
	makita.toshiaki, brakmo, rdna, Jesper Brouer, jakub.kicinski,
	m.xhonneux, dsahern, netdev, LKML

On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 09:16, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> The newly added TCP and UDP handling fails to link when CONFIG_INET
> is disabled:
>
> net/core/filter.o: In function `sk_lookup':
> filter.c:(.text+0x7ff8): undefined reference to `tcp_hashinfo'
> filter.c:(.text+0x7ffc): undefined reference to `tcp_hashinfo'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8020): undefined reference to `__inet_lookup_established'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8058): undefined reference to `__inet_lookup_listener'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8068): undefined reference to `udp_table'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8070): undefined reference to `udp_table'
> filter.c:(.text+0x808c): undefined reference to `__udp4_lib_lookup'
> net/core/filter.o: In function `bpf_sk_release':
> filter.c:(.text+0x82e8): undefined reference to `sock_gen_put'
>
> The compiler can optimize it out and avoid those references for
> the most part, but we are missing a few steps here:
>
> - sk_lookup() should always have been marked 'static', this also
>   avoids a warning about a missing prototype when building with
>   'make W=1'.
> - The BPF_CALL_x() macro needs a little change to allow marking
>   the unneeded BPF call as 'static' and having the compiler
>   drop them.
> - The reference to the bpf_func_proto must be made conditional.
>
> Fixes: 6acc9b432e67 ("bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---

Thanks for the fix.

>  include/linux/filter.h |  2 +-
>  net/core/filter.c      | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index 6791a0ac0139..d9ec9d908bbe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -428,9 +428,9 @@ struct sock_reuseport;
>                   u64, __ur_3, u64, __ur_4, u64, __ur_5)
>
>  #define BPF_CALL_x(x, name, ...)                                              \
> +       u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));         \
>         static __always_inline                                                 \
>         u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__));   \
> -       u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));         \
>         u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__))          \
>         {                                                                      \
>                 return ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x,__BPF_CAST,__BPF_N,__VA_ARGS__));\

For what it's worth, other similar cases in net/core/filter.c avoid
this by just wrapping the relevant sections of the code in the #ifdef
as well.

Might be a bit simpler to follow that style (only checked with make
M=net/core W=1):

$ git di
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 30c6b2d3ef16..4bbc6567fcb8 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4817,8 +4817,9 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto
bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh_proto = {
};
#endif /* CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF */

-struct sock *sk_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple,
-                      struct sk_buff *skb, u8 family, u8 proto)
+#ifdef CONFIG_INET
+static struct sock *sk_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple,
+                             struct sk_buff *skb, u8 family, u8 proto)
{
       int dif = skb->dev->ifindex;
       bool refcounted = false;
@@ -4951,6 +4952,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto
bpf_sk_release_proto = {
       .ret_type       = RET_INTEGER,
       .arg1_type      = ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET,
};
+#endif /* CONFIG_INET */

bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(void *func)
{
@@ -5158,12 +5160,14 @@ tc_cls_act_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id
func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
       case BPF_FUNC_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id:
               return &bpf_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id_proto;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_INET
       case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_tcp:
               return &bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto;
       case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp:
               return &bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto;
       case BPF_FUNC_sk_release:
               return &bpf_sk_release_proto;
+#endif
       default:
               return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
       }
@@ -5264,12 +5268,14 @@ sk_skb_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id,
const struct bpf_prog *prog)
               return &bpf_sk_redirect_hash_proto;
       case BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage:
               return &bpf_get_local_storage_proto;
+#ifdef CONFIG_INET
       case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_tcp:
               return &bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto;
       case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp:
               return &bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto;
       case BPF_FUNC_sk_release:
               return &bpf_sk_release_proto;
+#endif
       default:
               return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
       }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET
  2018-10-05 16:15 [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET Arnd Bergmann
  2018-10-05 17:19 ` Joe Stringer
@ 2018-10-05 19:02 ` Song Liu
  2018-10-05 19:07   ` Daniel Borkmann
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Song Liu @ 2018-10-05 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, David S . Miller,
	John Fastabend, Martin KaFai Lau, makita.toshiaki,
	Lawrence Brakmo, Andrey Ignatov, Jesper Dangaard Brouer,
	Jakub Kicinski, Mathieu Xhonneux, dsahern, Networking, open list

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:18 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> The newly added TCP and UDP handling fails to link when CONFIG_INET
> is disabled:
>
> net/core/filter.o: In function `sk_lookup':
> filter.c:(.text+0x7ff8): undefined reference to `tcp_hashinfo'
> filter.c:(.text+0x7ffc): undefined reference to `tcp_hashinfo'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8020): undefined reference to `__inet_lookup_established'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8058): undefined reference to `__inet_lookup_listener'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8068): undefined reference to `udp_table'
> filter.c:(.text+0x8070): undefined reference to `udp_table'
> filter.c:(.text+0x808c): undefined reference to `__udp4_lib_lookup'
> net/core/filter.o: In function `bpf_sk_release':
> filter.c:(.text+0x82e8): undefined reference to `sock_gen_put'
>
> The compiler can optimize it out and avoid those references for
> the most part, but we are missing a few steps here:
>
> - sk_lookup() should always have been marked 'static', this also
>   avoids a warning about a missing prototype when building with
>   'make W=1'.
> - The BPF_CALL_x() macro needs a little change to allow marking
>   the unneeded BPF call as 'static' and having the compiler
>   drop them.
> - The reference to the bpf_func_proto must be made conditional.
>
> Fixes: 6acc9b432e67 ("bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/filter.h |  2 +-
>  net/core/filter.c      | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index 6791a0ac0139..d9ec9d908bbe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -428,9 +428,9 @@ struct sock_reuseport;
>                   u64, __ur_3, u64, __ur_4, u64, __ur_5)
>
>  #define BPF_CALL_x(x, name, ...)                                              \
> +       u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));         \
>         static __always_inline                                                 \
>         u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__));   \
> -       u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));         \
>         u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__))          \
>         {                                                                      \
>                 return ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x,__BPF_CAST,__BPF_N,__VA_ARGS__));\
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 30c6b2d3ef16..dd5fe021f44c 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4817,7 +4817,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh_proto = {
>  };
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF */
>
> -struct sock *sk_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple,
> +static struct sock *sk_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple,
>                        struct sk_buff *skb, u8 family, u8 proto)
>  {
>         int dif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> @@ -4902,13 +4902,13 @@ bpf_sk_lookup(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple, u32 len,
>         return (unsigned long) sk;
>  }
>
> -BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_tcp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
> +static BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_tcp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
>            struct bpf_sock_tuple *, tuple, u32, len, u64, netns_id, u64, flags)
>  {
>         return bpf_sk_lookup(skb, tuple, len, IPPROTO_TCP, netns_id, flags);
>  }

BPF_CALL_x() has static already (before this patch). We should not
need change that
for all the BPF_CALL_?(). Joe's version looks better to me.

Thanks,
Song

>
> -static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto = {
>         .func           = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp,
>         .gpl_only       = false,
>         .pkt_access     = true,
> @@ -4920,13 +4920,13 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto = {
>         .arg5_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
>  };
>
> -BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_udp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
> +static BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sk_lookup_udp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
>            struct bpf_sock_tuple *, tuple, u32, len, u64, netns_id, u64, flags)
>  {
>         return bpf_sk_lookup(skb, tuple, len, IPPROTO_UDP, netns_id, flags);
>  }
>
> -static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto = {
>         .func           = bpf_sk_lookup_udp,
>         .gpl_only       = false,
>         .pkt_access     = true,
> @@ -4938,14 +4938,14 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto = {
>         .arg5_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
>  };
>
> -BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sk_release, struct sock *, sk)
> +static BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sk_release, struct sock *, sk)
>  {
>         if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE))
>                 sock_gen_put(sk);
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_release_proto = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_release_proto = {
>         .func           = bpf_sk_release,
>         .gpl_only       = false,
>         .ret_type       = RET_INTEGER,
> @@ -5158,12 +5158,14 @@ tc_cls_act_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>         case BPF_FUNC_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id:
>                 return &bpf_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id_proto;
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>         case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_tcp:
>                 return &bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto;
>         case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp:
>                 return &bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto;
>         case BPF_FUNC_sk_release:
>                 return &bpf_sk_release_proto;
> +#endif
>         default:
>                 return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
>         }
> @@ -5264,12 +5266,14 @@ sk_skb_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>                 return &bpf_sk_redirect_hash_proto;
>         case BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage:
>                 return &bpf_get_local_storage_proto;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>         case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_tcp:
>                 return &bpf_sk_lookup_tcp_proto;
>         case BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp:
>                 return &bpf_sk_lookup_udp_proto;
>         case BPF_FUNC_sk_release:
>                 return &bpf_sk_release_proto;
> +#endif
>         default:
>                 return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
>         }
> --
> 2.18.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET
  2018-10-05 19:02 ` Song Liu
@ 2018-10-05 19:07   ` Daniel Borkmann
  2018-10-08  8:40     ` Daniel Borkmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2018-10-05 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Song Liu, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, David S . Miller, John Fastabend,
	Martin KaFai Lau, makita.toshiaki, Lawrence Brakmo,
	Andrey Ignatov, Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Jakub Kicinski,
	Mathieu Xhonneux, dsahern, Networking, open list

On 10/05/2018 09:02 PM, Song Liu wrote:
[...]
> BPF_CALL_x() has static already (before this patch). We should not
> need change that
> for all the BPF_CALL_?(). Joe's version looks better to me.

My preference as well, thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET
  2018-10-05 19:07   ` Daniel Borkmann
@ 2018-10-08  8:40     ` Daniel Borkmann
  2018-10-08 18:24       ` Joe Stringer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2018-10-08  8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Song Liu, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, David S . Miller, John Fastabend,
	Martin KaFai Lau, makita.toshiaki, Lawrence Brakmo,
	Andrey Ignatov, Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Jakub Kicinski,
	Mathieu Xhonneux, dsahern, Networking, open list

On 10/05/2018 09:07 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 10/05/2018 09:02 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> [...]
>> BPF_CALL_x() has static already (before this patch). We should not
>> need change that
>> for all the BPF_CALL_?(). Joe's version looks better to me.
> 
> My preference as well, thanks!

ping, can someone send an updated patch?

Thanks,
Daniel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET
  2018-10-08  8:40     ` Daniel Borkmann
@ 2018-10-08 18:24       ` Joe Stringer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Stringer @ 2018-10-08 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: daniel
  Cc: liu.song.a23, arnd, ast, David Miller, john fastabend,
	Martin KaFai Lau, makita.toshiaki, brakmo, rdna, Jesper Brouer,
	jakub.kicinski, m.xhonneux, dsahern, netdev, LKML

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 01:41, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2018 09:07 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 10/05/2018 09:02 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > [...]
> >> BPF_CALL_x() has static already (before this patch). We should not
> >> need change that
> >> for all the BPF_CALL_?(). Joe's version looks better to me.
> >
> > My preference as well, thanks!
>
> ping, can someone send an updated patch?

I will send a fresh version shortly.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-08 18:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-05 16:15 [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-05 17:19 ` Joe Stringer
2018-10-05 19:02 ` Song Liu
2018-10-05 19:07   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-10-08  8:40     ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-10-08 18:24       ` Joe Stringer

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.