All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] rbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
@ 2020-05-07 19:19 Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2020-05-08  7:54 ` Ilya Dryomov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-05-07 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilya Dryomov, Sage Weil; +Cc: Dongsheng Yang, ceph-devel, linux-kernel

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/block/rbd_types.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd_types.h b/drivers/block/rbd_types.h
index ac98ab6ccd3b..a600e0eb6b6f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd_types.h
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd_types.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct rbd_image_header_ondisk {
 	__le32 snap_count;
 	__le32 reserved;
 	__le64 snap_names_len;
-	struct rbd_image_snap_ondisk snaps[0];
+	struct rbd_image_snap_ondisk snaps[];
 } __attribute__((packed));
 
 


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
  2020-05-07 19:19 [PATCH] rbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2020-05-08  7:54 ` Ilya Dryomov
  2020-05-12 18:14   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2020-05-08  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: Sage Weil, Dongsheng Yang, Ceph Development, LKML

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:15 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
>
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
>
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
>
> sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
> members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
> which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
> zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
> some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
> help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
>
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/block/rbd_types.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd_types.h b/drivers/block/rbd_types.h
> index ac98ab6ccd3b..a600e0eb6b6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd_types.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct rbd_image_header_ondisk {
>         __le32 snap_count;
>         __le32 reserved;
>         __le64 snap_names_len;
> -       struct rbd_image_snap_ondisk snaps[0];
> +       struct rbd_image_snap_ondisk snaps[];
>  } __attribute__((packed));
>
>
>

Applied (folded into libceph patch).

Thanks,

                Ilya

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
  2020-05-08  7:54 ` Ilya Dryomov
@ 2020-05-12 18:14   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-05-12 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilya Dryomov; +Cc: Sage Weil, Dongsheng Yang, Ceph Development, LKML

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:54:12AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> 
> Applied (folded into libceph patch).
> 

Thanks, Ilya. 

--
Gustavo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-12 18:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-07 19:19 [PATCH] rbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-08  7:54 ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-05-12 18:14   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.