* Does anything still use the separate ceph-qa-suite repo?
@ 2017-11-01 22:56 John Spray
2017-11-02 2:37 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: John Spray @ 2017-11-01 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development
I think all the old stable branches got their own merge into the
ceph.git qa/ directory, so is there anything out there that would
still want the separate repo at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite
?
If not, it seems like it's been long enough to just go ahead and
remove this entirely now? The value of keeping it around for
archaeology is probably less than the cost of it occasionally
confusing folks.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Does anything still use the separate ceph-qa-suite repo?
2017-11-01 22:56 Does anything still use the separate ceph-qa-suite repo? John Spray
@ 2017-11-02 2:37 ` Sage Weil
2017-11-06 18:55 ` Ilya Dryomov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2017-11-02 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Spray; +Cc: Ceph Development
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, John Spray wrote:
> I think all the old stable branches got their own merge into the
> ceph.git qa/ directory, so is there anything out there that would
> still want the separate repo at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite
> ?
>
> If not, it seems like it's been long enough to just go ahead and
> remove this entirely now? The value of keeping it around for
> archaeology is probably less than the cost of it occasionally
> confusing folks.
+1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Does anything still use the separate ceph-qa-suite repo?
2017-11-02 2:37 ` Sage Weil
@ 2017-11-06 18:55 ` Ilya Dryomov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2017-11-06 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: John Spray, Ceph Development
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, John Spray wrote:
>> I think all the old stable branches got their own merge into the
>> ceph.git qa/ directory, so is there anything out there that would
>> still want the separate repo at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite
>> ?
>>
>> If not, it seems like it's been long enough to just go ahead and
>> remove this entirely now? The value of keeping it around for
>> archaeology is probably less than the cost of it occasionally
>> confusing folks.
>
> +1
I found myself engaged in said archaeology today and remembered about
this email. Removing ceph-qa-suite repo would break a lot of links in
the tracker, eliminate (however occasional) PR discussions, etc.
Does it really cause that much confusion? If "DEPRECATED; see
ceph.git/qa" in the title isn't enough, perhaps add it to README as
well instead?
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-06 18:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-01 22:56 Does anything still use the separate ceph-qa-suite repo? John Spray
2017-11-02 2:37 ` Sage Weil
2017-11-06 18:55 ` Ilya Dryomov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.