From: Paul Mulders <justinkb@gmail.com> To: frank-w@public-files.de Cc: broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com Subject: Re: BUG: [PATCH v2] isoc: mediatek: Check for error clk pointer Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:26:51 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAOn50SJrdS+uRnJ=e1vrb6n5e1TSWLBiLDdZe=7tSCXRVwtTjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) I guess this breaks all MT7622 SoCs since it'll prematurely exit init_clks (and subsequently init_scp) completely once devm_clk_get fails to get a reference to the mm clock producer (which happens to be the first one tried). This is because MT7623 has a GPU (so no mm clock) and MT7622 doesn't, and as a result the other clock producer pointers never get initialized (and other stuff in init_scp after returning from the error never happens). The patch seems fundamentally flawed, I guess it was either not tested at all, or only tested on a MT7623. The initialization functions seem designed with the idea that it's ok if some clocks aren't present, so stopping the initialization when one of them isn't present seems wrong. (For example, there is also a MT7622B variant of the MT7622 which probably also lacks some clocks MT7622(A) does have).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mulders <justinkb@gmail.com> To: frank-w@public-files.de Cc: broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com Subject: Re: BUG: [PATCH v2] isoc: mediatek: Check for error clk pointer Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:26:51 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAOn50SJrdS+uRnJ=e1vrb6n5e1TSWLBiLDdZe=7tSCXRVwtTjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) I guess this breaks all MT7622 SoCs since it'll prematurely exit init_clks (and subsequently init_scp) completely once devm_clk_get fails to get a reference to the mm clock producer (which happens to be the first one tried). This is because MT7623 has a GPU (so no mm clock) and MT7622 doesn't, and as a result the other clock producer pointers never get initialized (and other stuff in init_scp after returning from the error never happens). The patch seems fundamentally flawed, I guess it was either not tested at all, or only tested on a MT7623. The initialization functions seem designed with the idea that it's ok if some clocks aren't present, so stopping the initialization when one of them isn't present seems wrong. (For example, there is also a MT7622B variant of the MT7622 which probably also lacks some clocks MT7622(A) does have). _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 14:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-28 14:26 Paul Mulders [this message] 2022-01-28 14:26 ` BUG: [PATCH v2] isoc: mediatek: Check for error clk pointer Paul Mulders -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2022-01-30 2:43 Jiasheng Jiang 2022-01-30 2:43 ` Jiasheng Jiang 2022-02-01 22:19 ` Daniel Golle 2022-02-01 22:19 ` Daniel Golle 2022-02-01 22:19 ` Daniel Golle 2022-01-28 14:31 Paul Mulders 2022-01-28 14:31 ` Paul Mulders 2021-12-22 1:51 Jiasheng Jiang 2022-01-28 9:51 ` BUG: " Frank Wunderlich 2022-01-28 9:51 ` Frank Wunderlich 2022-01-28 9:51 ` Frank Wunderlich 2022-02-06 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck 2022-02-06 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck 2022-02-06 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAOn50SJrdS+uRnJ=e1vrb6n5e1TSWLBiLDdZe=7tSCXRVwtTjQ@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=justinkb@gmail.com \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.