All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:08:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCU+mg13P609kut2cK9igmyepOvDc4kU-EzXsdjde7D_RpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921164947.000048e1@Huawei.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:11:35 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > it again.
> >
> > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >
> > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
>

Any thoughts on the maintenanership of this code ?

> Was fairly sure this set was a noop on arm64 ACPI systems, but ran a quick
> sanity check on a 2 socket kunpeng920 and everything came up as normal
> (4 nodes, around 250G a node)
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> For patches 1 and 2.  Doesn't seem relevant to the rest :)
>

Thanks a lot!

> >
> > # numactl --hardware
> > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > # numactl -show
> > policy: default
> > preferred node: current
> > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > cpubind: 0 1
> > nodebind: 0 1
> > membind: 0 1
> >
> > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >
> > The patches are also available at
> >
> > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v3
> >
> > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > if required.
> >
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> >
> > Changes from v2->v3:
> > 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> > 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> > 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >
> > Changes from v1->v2:
> > 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> > 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> > 3. Fixed few typos.
> >
> > Atish Patra (4):
> > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >
> > Greentime Hu (1):
> > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 31 ++++++++++--
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 17 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:08:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCU+mg13P609kut2cK9igmyepOvDc4kU-EzXsdjde7D_RpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921164947.000048e1@Huawei.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:11:35 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > it again.
> >
> > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >
> > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
>

Any thoughts on the maintenanership of this code ?

> Was fairly sure this set was a noop on arm64 ACPI systems, but ran a quick
> sanity check on a 2 socket kunpeng920 and everything came up as normal
> (4 nodes, around 250G a node)
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> For patches 1 and 2.  Doesn't seem relevant to the rest :)
>

Thanks a lot!

> >
> > # numactl --hardware
> > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > # numactl -show
> > policy: default
> > preferred node: current
> > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > cpubind: 0 1
> > nodebind: 0 1
> > membind: 0 1
> >
> > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >
> > The patches are also available at
> >
> > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v3
> >
> > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > if required.
> >
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> >
> > Changes from v2->v3:
> > 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> > 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> > 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >
> > Changes from v1->v2:
> > 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> > 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> > 3. Fixed few typos.
> >
> > Atish Patra (4):
> > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >
> > Greentime Hu (1):
> > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 31 ++++++++++--
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 17 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:08:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCU+mg13P609kut2cK9igmyepOvDc4kU-EzXsdjde7D_RpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921164947.000048e1@Huawei.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:11:35 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > it again.
> >
> > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >
> > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
>

Any thoughts on the maintenanership of this code ?

> Was fairly sure this set was a noop on arm64 ACPI systems, but ran a quick
> sanity check on a 2 socket kunpeng920 and everything came up as normal
> (4 nodes, around 250G a node)
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> For patches 1 and 2.  Doesn't seem relevant to the rest :)
>

Thanks a lot!

> >
> > # numactl --hardware
> > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > # numactl -show
> > policy: default
> > preferred node: current
> > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > cpubind: 0 1
> > nodebind: 0 1
> > membind: 0 1
> >
> > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >
> > The patches are also available at
> >
> > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v3
> >
> > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > if required.
> >
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> >
> > Changes from v2->v3:
> > 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> > 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> > 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >
> > Changes from v1->v2:
> > 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> > 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> > 3. Fixed few typos.
> >
> > Atish Patra (4):
> > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >
> > Greentime Hu (1):
> > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 31 ++++++++++--
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 17 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 20:11 [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` [RFT PATCH v3 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` [RFT PATCH v3 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-21  9:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-21  9:01     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-21  9:01     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-21 23:50     ` Atish Patra
2020-09-21 23:50       ` Atish Patra
2020-09-21 23:50       ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` [RFT PATCH v3 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` [RFT PATCH v3 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11 ` [RFT PATCH v3 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 20:11   ` Atish Patra
2020-09-21 15:49 ` [RFT PATCH v3 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-21 15:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-21 15:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-22  0:08   ` Atish Patra [this message]
2020-09-22  0:08     ` Atish Patra
2020-09-22  0:08     ` Atish Patra
2020-09-22 11:29     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-22 11:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-22 11:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-22 21:04       ` Atish Patra
2020-09-22 21:04         ` Atish Patra
2020-09-22 21:04         ` Atish Patra
2020-10-01 22:02         ` Atish Patra
2020-10-01 22:02           ` Atish Patra
2020-10-01 22:02           ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOnJCU+mg13P609kut2cK9igmyepOvDc4kU-EzXsdjde7D_RpQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.