[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Atish Patra]

This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
it again.

RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233

This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.

# numactl --hardware
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
node 0 size: 486 MB
node 0 free: 470 MB
node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
node 1 size: 424 MB
node 1 free: 408 MB
node distances:
node   0   1 
  0:  10  20 
  1:  20  10 
# numactl -show
policy: default
preferred node: current
physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
cpubind: 0 1 
nodebind: 0 1 
membind: 0 1 

For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313

The patches are also available at

https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2

There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
if required.

[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754

Atish Patra (4):
numa: Move numa implementation to common code
arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform

Greentime Hu (1):
riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
.../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h

--
2.24.0

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Atish Patra]

This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
it again.

RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233

This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.

# numactl --hardware
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
node 0 size: 486 MB
node 0 free: 470 MB
node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
node 1 size: 424 MB
node 1 free: 408 MB
node distances:
node   0   1 
  0:  10  20 
  1:  20  10 
# numactl -show
policy: default
preferred node: current
physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
cpubind: 0 1 
nodebind: 0 1 
membind: 0 1 

For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313

The patches are also available at

https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2

There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
if required.

[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754

Atish Patra (4):
numa: Move numa implementation to common code
arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform

Greentime Hu (1):
riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
.../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h

--
2.24.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code

[Atish Patra]

ARM64 numa implementation is generic enough that RISC-V can reuse that
implementation with very minor cosmetic changes. This will help both
ARM64 and RISC-V in terms of maintanace and feature improvement

Move the numa implementation code to common directory so that both ISAs
can reuse this. This doesn't introduce any function changes for ARM64.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
 arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
 drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
 drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
 .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     |  0
 include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
 rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (100%)
 create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 6d232837cbee..955a0cf75b16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
 # Common NUMA Features
 config NUMA
 	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
+	select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
 	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
 	select OF_NUMA
 	help
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
index 626ad01e83bf..8c8cf4297cc3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -3,49 +3,6 @@
 #define __ASM_NUMA_H
 
 #include <asm/topology.h>
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-
-#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
-
-int __node_distance(int from, int to);
-#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
-
-extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
-
-extern bool numa_off;
-
-/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
-extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
-void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
-const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
-#else
-/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
-static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
-{
-	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
-}
-#endif
-
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
-int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
-void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
-void __init numa_free_distance(void);
-void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
-void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
-void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-
-#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
-
-static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
-static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
-
-#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
 
 #endif	/* __ASM_NUMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
index d91030f0ffee..928c308b044b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ obj-y				:= dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
 obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE)	+= dump.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS)	+= ptdump_debugfs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= numa.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL)	+= physaddr.o
 KASAN_SANITIZE_physaddr.o	+= n
 
diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index 8d7001712062..c5956c8845cc 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -210,4 +210,10 @@ config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
 	  appropriate scaling, sysfs interface for reading capacity values at
 	  runtime.
 
+config GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
+	bool
+	help
+	  Enable support for generic NUMA implementation. Currently, RISC-V
+	  and ARM64 uses it.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
index 157452080f3d..c3d02c644222 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += pinctrl.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += devcoredump.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN) += platform-msi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA) += arch_numa.o
 
 obj-y			+= test/
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
rename to drivers/base/arch_numa.c
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2718d5a6ff03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
+#define __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+
+#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
+
+int __node_distance(int from, int to);
+#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
+
+extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+
+extern bool numa_off;
+
+/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
+extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
+void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
+const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
+#else
+/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
+static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
+{
+	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
+}
+#endif
+
+void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
+int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
+void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
+void __init numa_free_distance(void);
+void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
+void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
+void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+
+#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
+static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
+static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
+static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
+static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
+static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
+#endif	/* __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H */
-- 
2.24.0

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code

[Atish Patra]

ARM64 numa implementation is generic enough that RISC-V can reuse that
implementation with very minor cosmetic changes. This will help both
ARM64 and RISC-V in terms of maintanace and feature improvement

Move the numa implementation code to common directory so that both ISAs
can reuse this. This doesn't introduce any function changes for ARM64.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
 arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
 drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
 drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
 .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     |  0
 include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
 rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (100%)
 create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 6d232837cbee..955a0cf75b16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
 # Common NUMA Features
 config NUMA
 	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
+	select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
 	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
 	select OF_NUMA
 	help
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
index 626ad01e83bf..8c8cf4297cc3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -3,49 +3,6 @@
 #define __ASM_NUMA_H
 
 #include <asm/topology.h>
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-
-#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
-
-int __node_distance(int from, int to);
-#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
-
-extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
-
-extern bool numa_off;
-
-/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
-extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
-void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
-const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
-#else
-/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
-static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
-{
-	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
-}
-#endif
-
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
-int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
-void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
-void __init numa_free_distance(void);
-void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
-void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
-void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-
-#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
-
-static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
-static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
-
-#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
 
 #endif	/* __ASM_NUMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
index d91030f0ffee..928c308b044b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ obj-y				:= dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
 obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE)	+= dump.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS)	+= ptdump_debugfs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= numa.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL)	+= physaddr.o
 KASAN_SANITIZE_physaddr.o	+= n
 
diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index 8d7001712062..c5956c8845cc 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -210,4 +210,10 @@ config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
 	  appropriate scaling, sysfs interface for reading capacity values at
 	  runtime.
 
+config GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
+	bool
+	help
+	  Enable support for generic NUMA implementation. Currently, RISC-V
+	  and ARM64 uses it.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
index 157452080f3d..c3d02c644222 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += pinctrl.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += devcoredump.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN) += platform-msi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA) += arch_numa.o
 
 obj-y			+= test/
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
rename to drivers/base/arch_numa.c
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2718d5a6ff03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
+#define __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+
+#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
+
+int __node_distance(int from, int to);
+#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
+
+extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+
+extern bool numa_off;
+
+/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
+extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
+void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
+const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
+#else
+/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
+static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
+{
+	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
+}
+#endif
+
+void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
+int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
+void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
+void __init numa_free_distance(void);
+void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
+void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
+void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+
+#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
+static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
+static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
+static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
+static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
+static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
+#endif	/* __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H */
-- 
2.24.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Atish Patra]

As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
name to indicate that generic implementation.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
 drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
 
 	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
 }
-
-int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = acpi_numa_init();
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
 	max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
 	min_low_pfn = min;
 
-	arm64_numa_init();
+	arch_numa_init();
 
 	/*
-	 * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
+	 * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
 	 * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
 	 * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
 	 */
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
 #include <asm/acpi.h>
+#endif
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 
 struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
@@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = acpi_numa_init();
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+#else
+int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+#endif
+
 /**
- * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
+ * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
  *
  * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
  * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
  */
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
+void __init arch_numa_init(void)
 {
 	if (!numa_off) {
-		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
+		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
 			return;
 		if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
 			return;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
 }
 #endif
 
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
+void __init arch_numa_init(void);
 int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
 void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
 void __init numa_free_distance(void);
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
 static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
 static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
+static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
 static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
-- 
2.24.0

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Atish Patra]

As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
name to indicate that generic implementation.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
 drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
 
 	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
 }
-
-int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = acpi_numa_init();
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
 	max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
 	min_low_pfn = min;
 
-	arm64_numa_init();
+	arch_numa_init();
 
 	/*
-	 * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
+	 * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
 	 * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
 	 * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
 	 */
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
 #include <asm/acpi.h>
+#endif
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 
 struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
@@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = acpi_numa_init();
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+#else
+int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+#endif
+
 /**
- * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
+ * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
  *
  * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
  * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
  */
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
+void __init arch_numa_init(void)
 {
 	if (!numa_off) {
-		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
+		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
 			return;
 		if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
 			return;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
 }
 #endif
 
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
+void __init arch_numa_init(void);
 int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
 void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
 void __init numa_free_distance(void);
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
 static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
 static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
+static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
 static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
-- 
2.24.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init

[Atish Patra]

Currently, we perform some memory init functions in paging init. But,
that will be an issue for NUMA support where DT needs to be flattened
before numa initialization and memblock_present can only be called
after numa initialization.

Move memory initialization related functions to a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c        | 1 +
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c             | 6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index eaea1f717010..515b42f98d34 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static inline void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enabl
 extern void *dtb_early_va;
 void setup_bootmem(void);
 void paging_init(void);
+void misc_mem_init(void);
 
 #define FIRST_USER_ADDRESS  0
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 2c6dd329312b..07fa6d13367e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 #else
 	unflatten_device_tree();
 #endif
+	misc_mem_init();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
 	swiotlb_init(1);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 188281fc2816..8f31a5428ce4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -568,8 +568,12 @@ static void __init resource_init(void)
 void __init paging_init(void)
 {
 	setup_vm_final();
-	sparse_init();
 	setup_zero_page();
+}
+
+void __init misc_mem_init(void)
+{
+	sparse_init();
 	zone_sizes_init();
 	resource_init();
 }
-- 
2.24.0

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init

[Atish Patra]

Currently, we perform some memory init functions in paging init. But,
that will be an issue for NUMA support where DT needs to be flattened
before numa initialization and memblock_present can only be called
after numa initialization.

Move memory initialization related functions to a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c        | 1 +
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c             | 6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index eaea1f717010..515b42f98d34 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static inline void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enabl
 extern void *dtb_early_va;
 void setup_bootmem(void);
 void paging_init(void);
+void misc_mem_init(void);
 
 #define FIRST_USER_ADDRESS  0
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 2c6dd329312b..07fa6d13367e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 #else
 	unflatten_device_tree();
 #endif
+	misc_mem_init();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
 	swiotlb_init(1);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 188281fc2816..8f31a5428ce4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -568,8 +568,12 @@ static void __init resource_init(void)
 void __init paging_init(void)
 {
 	setup_vm_final();
-	sparse_init();
 	setup_zero_page();
+}
+
+void __init misc_mem_init(void)
+{
+	sparse_init();
 	zone_sizes_init();
 	resource_init();
 }
-- 
2.24.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

[Atish Patra]

From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>

These two functions are used to distinguish between PROT_NONENUMA
protections and hinting fault protections.

Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 515b42f98d34..2751110675e6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -183,6 +183,11 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
 	return (unsigned long)pfn_to_virt(pmd_val(pmd) >> _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT);
 }
 
+static inline pte_t pmd_pte(pmd_t pmd)
+{
+	return __pte(pmd_val(pmd));
+}
+
 /* Yields the page frame number (PFN) of a page table entry */
 static inline unsigned long pte_pfn(pte_t pte)
 {
@@ -286,6 +291,21 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkhuge(pte_t pte)
 	return pte;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+/*
+ * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
+ */
+static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return (pte_val(pte) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROT_NONE)) == _PAGE_PROT_NONE;
+}
+
+static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
+{
+	return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd));
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Modify page protection bits */
 static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
 {
-- 
2.24.0

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

[Atish Patra]

From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>

These two functions are used to distinguish between PROT_NONENUMA
protections and hinting fault protections.

Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 515b42f98d34..2751110675e6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -183,6 +183,11 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
 	return (unsigned long)pfn_to_virt(pmd_val(pmd) >> _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT);
 }
 
+static inline pte_t pmd_pte(pmd_t pmd)
+{
+	return __pte(pmd_val(pmd));
+}
+
 /* Yields the page frame number (PFN) of a page table entry */
 static inline unsigned long pte_pfn(pte_t pte)
 {
@@ -286,6 +291,21 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkhuge(pte_t pte)
 	return pte;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+/*
+ * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
+ */
+static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return (pte_val(pte) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROT_NONE)) == _PAGE_PROT_NONE;
+}
+
+static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
+{
+	return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd));
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Modify page protection bits */
 static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
 {
-- 
2.24.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform

[Atish Patra]

Use the generic numa implementation to add NUMA support for RISC-V.
This is based on Greentime's patch[1] but modified to use generic NUMA
implementation and few more fixes.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233

Co-developed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/Kconfig              | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h   |  8 ++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h    | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c       | 10 ++++++++--
 arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c     | 12 +++++++++++-
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c            |  4 +++-
 7 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index df18372861d8..7beb6ddb6eb1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ config PAGE_OFFSET
 	default 0xffffffe000000000 if 64BIT && MAXPHYSMEM_128GB
 
 config ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE
-	def_bool y
+	def_bool !NUMA
 
 config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
 	def_bool y
@@ -295,6 +295,35 @@ config TUNE_GENERIC
 
 endchoice
 
+# Common NUMA Features
+config NUMA
+	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
+	select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
+	select OF_NUMA
+	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
+	help
+	  Enable NUMA (Non-Uniform Memory Access) support.
+
+	  The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the
+	  local memory of the CPU and add some more NUMA awareness to the kernel.
+
+config NODES_SHIFT
+	int "Maximum NUMA Nodes (as a power of 2)"
+	range 1 10
+	default "2"
+	depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
+	help
+	  Specify the maximum number of NUMA Nodes available on the target
+	  system.  Increases memory reserved to accommodate various tables.
+
+config USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
+	def_bool y
+	depends on NUMA
+
+config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
+	def_bool y
+	depends on NUMA
+
 config RISCV_ISA_C
 	bool "Emit compressed instructions when building Linux"
 	default y
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fa17e01d9ab2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
+#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+
+#include <asm/numa.h>
+
+extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
+#define NODE_DATA(nid)		(node_data[(nid)])
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
+#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8c8cf4297cc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_NUMA_H
+#define __ASM_NUMA_H
+
+#include <asm/topology.h>
+#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
+
+#endif	/* __ASM_NUMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
index 1c473a1bd986..658e112c3ce7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -32,6 +32,20 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
 	/* always show the domain in /proc */
 	return 1;
 }
+
+#ifdef	CONFIG_NUMA
+
+static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	return dev_to_node(&bus->dev);
+}
+#ifndef cpumask_of_pcibus
+#define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus)	(pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ?		\
+				 cpu_all_mask :				\
+				 cpumask_of_node(pcibus_to_node(bus)))
+#endif
+#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
 #endif  /* CONFIG_PCI */
 
 #endif  /* _ASM_RISCV_PCI_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 07fa6d13367e..53a806a9cbaf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -101,13 +101,19 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 
 static int __init topology_init(void)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	for_each_online_node(i)
+		register_one_node(i);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		struct cpu *cpu = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, i);
 
 		cpu->hotpluggable = cpu_has_hotplug(i);
-		register_cpu(cpu, i);
+		ret = register_cpu(cpu, i);
+		if (unlikely(ret))
+			pr_warn("Warning: %s: register_cpu %d failed (%d)\n",
+			       __func__, i, ret);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
index 96167d55ed98..5e276c25646f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <asm/numa.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 #include <asm/sbi.h>
@@ -45,13 +46,18 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 {
 	int cpuid;
 	int ret;
+	unsigned int curr_cpuid;
+
+	curr_cpuid = smp_processor_id();
+	numa_store_cpu_info(curr_cpuid);
+	numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid);
 
 	/* This covers non-smp usecase mandated by "nosmp" option */
 	if (max_cpus == 0)
 		return;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpuid) {
-		if (cpuid == smp_processor_id())
+		if (cpuid == curr_cpuid)
 			continue;
 		if (cpu_ops[cpuid]->cpu_prepare) {
 			ret = cpu_ops[cpuid]->cpu_prepare(cpuid);
@@ -59,6 +65,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 				continue;
 		}
 		set_cpu_present(cpuid, true);
+		numa_store_cpu_info(cpuid);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -79,6 +86,7 @@ void __init setup_smp(void)
 		if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
 			BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
 			found_boot_cpu = 1;
+			early_map_cpu_to_node(0, of_node_to_nid(dn));
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (cpuid >= NR_CPUS) {
@@ -88,6 +96,7 @@ void __init setup_smp(void)
 		}
 
 		cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpuid) = hart;
+		early_map_cpu_to_node(cpuid, of_node_to_nid(dn));
 		cpuid++;
 	}
 
@@ -153,6 +162,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
 	current->active_mm = mm;
 
 	notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid);
+	numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid);
 	update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid);
 	set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, 1);
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 8f31a5428ce4..bc484babb9ca 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <asm/soc.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/ptdump.h>
+#include <asm/numa.h>
 
 #include "../kernel/head.h"
 
@@ -188,7 +189,6 @@ void __init setup_bootmem(void)
 
 	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
 	memblock_allow_resize();
-	memblock_dump_all();
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
 		unsigned long start_pfn = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
@@ -573,9 +573,11 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 
 void __init misc_mem_init(void)
 {
+	arch_numa_init();
 	sparse_init();
 	zone_sizes_init();
 	resource_init();
+	memblock_dump_all();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
-- 
2.24.0

[RFC/RFT PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform

[Atish Patra]

Use the generic numa implementation to add NUMA support for RISC-V.
This is based on Greentime's patch[1] but modified to use generic NUMA
implementation and few more fixes.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233

Co-developed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/Kconfig              | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h   |  8 ++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h    | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c       | 10 ++++++++--
 arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c     | 12 +++++++++++-
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c            |  4 +++-
 7 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index df18372861d8..7beb6ddb6eb1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ config PAGE_OFFSET
 	default 0xffffffe000000000 if 64BIT && MAXPHYSMEM_128GB
 
 config ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE
-	def_bool y
+	def_bool !NUMA
 
 config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
 	def_bool y
@@ -295,6 +295,35 @@ config TUNE_GENERIC
 
 endchoice
 
+# Common NUMA Features
+config NUMA
+	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
+	select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
+	select OF_NUMA
+	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
+	help
+	  Enable NUMA (Non-Uniform Memory Access) support.
+
+	  The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the
+	  local memory of the CPU and add some more NUMA awareness to the kernel.
+
+config NODES_SHIFT
+	int "Maximum NUMA Nodes (as a power of 2)"
+	range 1 10
+	default "2"
+	depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
+	help
+	  Specify the maximum number of NUMA Nodes available on the target
+	  system.  Increases memory reserved to accommodate various tables.
+
+config USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
+	def_bool y
+	depends on NUMA
+
+config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
+	def_bool y
+	depends on NUMA
+
 config RISCV_ISA_C
 	bool "Emit compressed instructions when building Linux"
 	default y
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fa17e01d9ab2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
+#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+
+#include <asm/numa.h>
+
+extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
+#define NODE_DATA(nid)		(node_data[(nid)])
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
+#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8c8cf4297cc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_NUMA_H
+#define __ASM_NUMA_H
+
+#include <asm/topology.h>
+#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
+
+#endif	/* __ASM_NUMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
index 1c473a1bd986..658e112c3ce7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -32,6 +32,20 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
 	/* always show the domain in /proc */
 	return 1;
 }
+
+#ifdef	CONFIG_NUMA
+
+static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	return dev_to_node(&bus->dev);
+}
+#ifndef cpumask_of_pcibus
+#define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus)	(pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ?		\
+				 cpu_all_mask :				\
+				 cpumask_of_node(pcibus_to_node(bus)))
+#endif
+#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
 #endif  /* CONFIG_PCI */
 
 #endif  /* _ASM_RISCV_PCI_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 07fa6d13367e..53a806a9cbaf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -101,13 +101,19 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 
 static int __init topology_init(void)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	for_each_online_node(i)
+		register_one_node(i);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		struct cpu *cpu = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, i);
 
 		cpu->hotpluggable = cpu_has_hotplug(i);
-		register_cpu(cpu, i);
+		ret = register_cpu(cpu, i);
+		if (unlikely(ret))
+			pr_warn("Warning: %s: register_cpu %d failed (%d)\n",
+			       __func__, i, ret);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
index 96167d55ed98..5e276c25646f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <asm/numa.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 #include <asm/sbi.h>
@@ -45,13 +46,18 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 {
 	int cpuid;
 	int ret;
+	unsigned int curr_cpuid;
+
+	curr_cpuid = smp_processor_id();
+	numa_store_cpu_info(curr_cpuid);
+	numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid);
 
 	/* This covers non-smp usecase mandated by "nosmp" option */
 	if (max_cpus == 0)
 		return;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpuid) {
-		if (cpuid == smp_processor_id())
+		if (cpuid == curr_cpuid)
 			continue;
 		if (cpu_ops[cpuid]->cpu_prepare) {
 			ret = cpu_ops[cpuid]->cpu_prepare(cpuid);
@@ -59,6 +65,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 				continue;
 		}
 		set_cpu_present(cpuid, true);
+		numa_store_cpu_info(cpuid);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -79,6 +86,7 @@ void __init setup_smp(void)
 		if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
 			BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
 			found_boot_cpu = 1;
+			early_map_cpu_to_node(0, of_node_to_nid(dn));
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (cpuid >= NR_CPUS) {
@@ -88,6 +96,7 @@ void __init setup_smp(void)
 		}
 
 		cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpuid) = hart;
+		early_map_cpu_to_node(cpuid, of_node_to_nid(dn));
 		cpuid++;
 	}
 
@@ -153,6 +162,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
 	current->active_mm = mm;
 
 	notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid);
+	numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid);
 	update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid);
 	set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, 1);
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 8f31a5428ce4..bc484babb9ca 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <asm/soc.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/ptdump.h>
+#include <asm/numa.h>
 
 #include "../kernel/head.h"
 
@@ -188,7 +189,6 @@ void __init setup_bootmem(void)
 
 	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
 	memblock_allow_resize();
-	memblock_dump_all();
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
 		unsigned long start_pfn = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
@@ -573,9 +573,11 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 
 void __init misc_mem_init(void)
 {
+	arch_numa_init();
 	sparse_init();
 	zone_sizes_init();
 	resource_init();
+	memblock_dump_all();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
-- 
2.24.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init

[Greentime Hu]

Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> 於 2020年9月12日 週六 上午9:34寫道：
>
> Currently, we perform some memory init functions in paging init. But,
> that will be an issue for NUMA support where DT needs to be flattened
> before numa initialization and memblock_present can only be called
> after numa initialization.
>
> Move memory initialization related functions to a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c        | 1 +
>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c             | 6 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index eaea1f717010..515b42f98d34 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static inline void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enabl
>  extern void *dtb_early_va;
>  void setup_bootmem(void);
>  void paging_init(void);
> +void misc_mem_init(void);
>
>  #define FIRST_USER_ADDRESS  0
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 2c6dd329312b..07fa6d13367e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  #else
>         unflatten_device_tree();
>  #endif
> +       misc_mem_init();
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>         swiotlb_init(1);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 188281fc2816..8f31a5428ce4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -568,8 +568,12 @@ static void __init resource_init(void)
>  void __init paging_init(void)
>  {
>         setup_vm_final();
> -       sparse_init();
>         setup_zero_page();
> +}
> +
> +void __init misc_mem_init(void)
> +{
> +       sparse_init();
>         zone_sizes_init();
>         resource_init();
>  }

Thank you, Atish.
Reviewed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init

[Greentime Hu]

Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> 於 2020年9月12日 週六 上午9:34寫道：
>
> Currently, we perform some memory init functions in paging init. But,
> that will be an issue for NUMA support where DT needs to be flattened
> before numa initialization and memblock_present can only be called
> after numa initialization.
>
> Move memory initialization related functions to a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c        | 1 +
>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c             | 6 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index eaea1f717010..515b42f98d34 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static inline void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enabl
>  extern void *dtb_early_va;
>  void setup_bootmem(void);
>  void paging_init(void);
> +void misc_mem_init(void);
>
>  #define FIRST_USER_ADDRESS  0
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 2c6dd329312b..07fa6d13367e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  #else
>         unflatten_device_tree();
>  #endif
> +       misc_mem_init();
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>         swiotlb_init(1);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 188281fc2816..8f31a5428ce4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -568,8 +568,12 @@ static void __init resource_init(void)
>  void __init paging_init(void)
>  {
>         setup_vm_final();
> -       sparse_init();
>         setup_zero_page();
> +}
> +
> +void __init misc_mem_init(void)
> +{
> +       sparse_init();
>         zone_sizes_init();
>         resource_init();
>  }

Thank you, Atish.
Reviewed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:


Hi Atish,

I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
at v2.

Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> it again.
> 
> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> 
> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> 
> # numactl --hardware
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> node 0 size: 486 MB
> node 0 free: 470 MB
> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> node 1 size: 424 MB
> node 1 free: 408 MB
> node distances:
> node   0   1 
>   0:  10  20 
>   1:  20  10 
> # numactl -show
> policy: default
> preferred node: current
> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
> cpubind: 0 1 
> nodebind: 0 1 
> membind: 0 1 
> 
> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> 
> The patches are also available at
> 
> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> 
> There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> if required.
> 
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> 
> Atish Patra (4):
> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> 
> Greentime Hu (1):
> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> 
> arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> 
> --
> 2.24.0
> 

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:


Hi Atish,

I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
at v2.

Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> it again.
> 
> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> 
> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> 
> # numactl --hardware
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> node 0 size: 486 MB
> node 0 free: 470 MB
> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> node 1 size: 424 MB
> node 1 free: 408 MB
> node distances:
> node   0   1 
>   0:  10  20 
>   1:  20  10 
> # numactl -show
> policy: default
> preferred node: current
> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
> cpubind: 0 1 
> nodebind: 0 1 
> membind: 0 1 
> 
> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> 
> The patches are also available at
> 
> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> 
> There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> if required.
> 
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> 
> Atish Patra (4):
> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> 
> Greentime Hu (1):
> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> 
> arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> 
> --
> 2.24.0
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:37 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:

> ARM64 numa implementation is generic enough that RISC-V can reuse that
> implementation with very minor cosmetic changes. This will help both
> ARM64 and RISC-V in terms of maintanace and feature improvement
> 
> Move the numa implementation code to common directory so that both ISAs
> can reuse this. This doesn't introduce any function changes for ARM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
>  arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
>  drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
>  drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
>  .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     |  0
>  include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (100%)
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 6d232837cbee..955a0cf75b16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
>  # Common NUMA Features
>  config NUMA
>  	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> +	select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
>  	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
>  	select OF_NUMA
>  	help
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> index 626ad01e83bf..8c8cf4297cc3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -3,49 +3,6 @@
>  #define __ASM_NUMA_H
>  
>  #include <asm/topology.h>
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -
> -#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
> -
> -int __node_distance(int from, int to);
> -#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> -
> -extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> -
> -extern bool numa_off;
> -
> -/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> -extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> -void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> -const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> -#else
> -/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> -static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> -{
> -	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> -int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> -void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> -void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> -void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> -void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> -void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> -void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> -
> -#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> -
> -static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> -static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> -
> -#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
>  
>  #endif	/* __ASM_NUMA_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> index d91030f0ffee..928c308b044b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ obj-y				:= dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE)	+= dump.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS)	+= ptdump_debugfs.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= numa.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL)	+= physaddr.o
>  KASAN_SANITIZE_physaddr.o	+= n
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> index 8d7001712062..c5956c8845cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> @@ -210,4 +210,10 @@ config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
>  	  appropriate scaling, sysfs interface for reading capacity values at
>  	  runtime.
>  
> +config GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
> +	bool
> +	help
> +	  Enable support for generic NUMA implementation. Currently, RISC-V
> +	  and ARM64 uses it.
> +
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
> index 157452080f3d..c3d02c644222 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += pinctrl.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += devcoredump.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN) += platform-msi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA) += arch_numa.o
>  
>  obj-y			+= test/
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> rename to drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2718d5a6ff03
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
> +
> +int __node_distance(int from, int to);
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +extern bool numa_off;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> +	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> +void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> +void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> +
> +#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif	/* __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H */

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:37 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:

> ARM64 numa implementation is generic enough that RISC-V can reuse that
> implementation with very minor cosmetic changes. This will help both
> ARM64 and RISC-V in terms of maintanace and feature improvement
> 
> Move the numa implementation code to common directory so that both ISAs
> can reuse this. This doesn't introduce any function changes for ARM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
>  arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
>  drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
>  drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
>  .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     |  0
>  include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (100%)
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 6d232837cbee..955a0cf75b16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
>  # Common NUMA Features
>  config NUMA
>  	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> +	select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
>  	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
>  	select OF_NUMA
>  	help
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> index 626ad01e83bf..8c8cf4297cc3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -3,49 +3,6 @@
>  #define __ASM_NUMA_H
>  
>  #include <asm/topology.h>
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -
> -#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
> -
> -int __node_distance(int from, int to);
> -#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> -
> -extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> -
> -extern bool numa_off;
> -
> -/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> -extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> -void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> -const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> -#else
> -/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> -static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> -{
> -	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> -int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> -void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> -void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> -void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> -void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> -void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> -void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> -
> -#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> -
> -static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> -static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> -
> -#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
>  
>  #endif	/* __ASM_NUMA_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> index d91030f0ffee..928c308b044b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ obj-y				:= dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE)	+= dump.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS)	+= ptdump_debugfs.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= numa.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL)	+= physaddr.o
>  KASAN_SANITIZE_physaddr.o	+= n
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> index 8d7001712062..c5956c8845cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> @@ -210,4 +210,10 @@ config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
>  	  appropriate scaling, sysfs interface for reading capacity values at
>  	  runtime.
>  
> +config GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
> +	bool
> +	help
> +	  Enable support for generic NUMA implementation. Currently, RISC-V
> +	  and ARM64 uses it.
> +
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
> index 157452080f3d..c3d02c644222 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += pinctrl.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += devcoredump.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN) += platform-msi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA) += arch_numa.o
>  
>  obj-y			+= test/
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> rename to drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2718d5a6ff03
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
> +
> +int __node_distance(int from, int to);
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +extern bool numa_off;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> +	return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> +void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> +void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +#else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> +
> +#endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif	/* __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H */



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:

> As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> name to indicate that generic implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>

A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
at than anything important.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
>  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
>  
>  	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
>  }
> -
> -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = acpi_numa_init();
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
> -	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  	max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
>  	min_low_pfn = min;
>  
> -	arm64_numa_init();
> +	arch_numa_init();
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> +	 * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
>  	 * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
>  	 * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
>  	 */
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#endif

Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.

>  #include <asm/sections.h>
>  
>  struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = acpi_numa_init();

I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
and srat_disabled()

At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
> - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
>   *
>   * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
>   * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
>   */
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (!numa_off) {
> -		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> +		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
>  			return;
>  		if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
>  			return;
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
>  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
>  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
>  void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>  static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
>  static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
>  static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
>  static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
>  
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:

> As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> name to indicate that generic implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>

A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
at than anything important.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
>  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
>  
>  	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
>  }
> -
> -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = acpi_numa_init();
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
> -	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  	max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
>  	min_low_pfn = min;
>  
> -	arm64_numa_init();
> +	arch_numa_init();
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> +	 * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
>  	 * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
>  	 * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
>  	 */
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#endif

Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.

>  #include <asm/sections.h>
>  
>  struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = acpi_numa_init();

I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
and srat_disabled()

At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
> - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
>   *
>   * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
>   * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
>   */
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (!numa_off) {
> -		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> +		if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
>  			return;
>  		if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
>  			return;
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
>  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
>  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
>  void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>  static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
>  static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
>  static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
>  static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
>  
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Atish Patra]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> > name to indicate that generic implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
>
> A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
> at than anything important.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> >  arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
> >  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
> >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> >
> >       node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> >  }
> > -
> > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > -{
> > -     int ret;
> > -
> > -     ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > -     if (ret) {
> > -             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > -             return ret;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > -}
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> >       max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> >       min_low_pfn = min;
> >
> > -     arm64_numa_init();
> > +     arch_numa_init();
> >
> >       /*
> > -      * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > +      * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> >        * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> >        * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> >        */
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> >  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> > +#endif
>
> Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
> and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.
>

Sure. will do that.

> >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> >
> >  struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     ret = acpi_numa_init();
>
> I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
> as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
> and srat_disabled()
>

I guess you mean adding a stub in acpi.h and acpi_numa.h ?
As it would touch x86 related code as well, I think it is better to do
it as a followup
series when we try to unify x86 numa code as well (at least some part of it) ?

> At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.
>
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > +             return ret;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /**
> > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> >   *
> >   * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> >   * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> >   */
> > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> > +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> >  {
> >       if (!numa_off) {
> > -             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> > +             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> >                       return;
> >               if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> >                       return;
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >
> > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> > +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> >  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> >  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> >  void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> >  static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> >  static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> >  static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> >  static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> >
> >  #endif       /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Atish Patra]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> > name to indicate that generic implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
>
> A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
> at than anything important.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> >  arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
> >  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
> >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> >
> >       node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> >  }
> > -
> > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > -{
> > -     int ret;
> > -
> > -     ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > -     if (ret) {
> > -             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > -             return ret;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > -}
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> >       max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> >       min_low_pfn = min;
> >
> > -     arm64_numa_init();
> > +     arch_numa_init();
> >
> >       /*
> > -      * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > +      * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> >        * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> >        * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> >        */
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> >  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> > +#endif
>
> Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
> and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.
>

Sure. will do that.

> >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> >
> >  struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     ret = acpi_numa_init();
>
> I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
> as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
> and srat_disabled()
>

I guess you mean adding a stub in acpi.h and acpi_numa.h ?
As it would touch x86 related code as well, I think it is better to do
it as a followup
series when we try to unify x86 numa code as well (at least some part of it) ?

> At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.
>
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > +             return ret;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /**
> > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> >   *
> >   * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> >   * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> >   */
> > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> > +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> >  {
> >       if (!numa_off) {
> > -             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> > +             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> >                       return;
> >               if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> >                       return;
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >
> > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> > +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> >  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> >  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> >  void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> >  static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> >  static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> >  static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> >  static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> >
> >  #endif       /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Atish Patra]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
> for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> at v2.
>

My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
I will send out a v3 soon and update those.

Thanks for reviewing the patches.
> Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > it again.
> >
> > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >
> > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> >
> > # numactl --hardware
> > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > # numactl -show
> > policy: default
> > preferred node: current
> > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > cpubind: 0 1
> > nodebind: 0 1
> > membind: 0 1
> >
> > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >
> > The patches are also available at
> >
> > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> >
> > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > if required.
> >
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> >
> > Atish Patra (4):
> > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >
> > Greentime Hu (1):
> > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.24.0
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Atish Patra]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
> for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> at v2.
>

My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
I will send out a v3 soon and update those.

Thanks for reviewing the patches.
> Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > it again.
> >
> > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >
> > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> >
> > # numactl --hardware
> > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > # numactl -show
> > policy: default
> > preferred node: current
> > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > cpubind: 0 1
> > nodebind: 0 1
> > membind: 0 1
> >
> > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >
> > The patches are also available at
> >
> > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> >
> > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > if required.
> >
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> >
> > Atish Patra (4):
> > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >
> > Greentime Hu (1):
> > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.24.0
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2810 bytes --]

Hi Atish,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-testing]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master linus/master v5.9-rc5 next-20200914]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core asm-generic/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Atish-Patra/Unify-NUMA-implementation-between-ARM64-RISC-V/20200912-093951
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git 0de7511695680425aa1e6e1e1c7a7c24e6250491
config: arm64-randconfig-r032-20200913 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project b2c32c90bab09a6e2c1f370429db26017a182143)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/base/arch_numa.c:463:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_acpi_numa_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
              ^
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:463:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
   int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
   ^
   static 
   1 warning generated.

# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/6862a785b7ab5092f214251c211893cb92aa9769
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Atish-Patra/Unify-NUMA-implementation-between-ARM64-RISC-V/20200912-093951
git checkout 6862a785b7ab5092f214251c211893cb92aa9769
vim +/arch_acpi_numa_init +463 drivers/base/arch_numa.c

   448	
   449	#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
   450	int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
   451	{
   452		int ret;
   453	
   454		ret = acpi_numa_init();
   455		if (ret) {
   456			pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
   457			return ret;
   458		}
   459	
   460		return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
   461	}
   462	#else
 > 463	int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
   464	{
   465		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
   466	}
   467	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 38199 bytes --]

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:32:41 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> > > name to indicate that generic implementation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>  
> >
> > A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
> > at than anything important.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >  
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> > >  arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
> > >  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
> > >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> > >
> > >       node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> > >  }
> > > -
> > > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > -{
> > > -     int ret;
> > > -
> > > -     ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > > -     if (ret) {
> > > -             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > > -             return ret;
> > > -     }
> > > -
> > > -     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > > -}
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > >       max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> > >       min_low_pfn = min;
> > >
> > > -     arm64_numa_init();
> > > +     arch_numa_init();
> > >
> > >       /*
> > > -      * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > > +      * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > >        * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> > >        * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> > >        */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > >  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> > > +#endif  
> >
> > Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
> > and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.
> >  
> 
> Sure. will do that.
> 
> > >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> > >
> > >  struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     int ret;
> > > +
> > > +     ret = acpi_numa_init();  
> >
> > I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
> > as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
> > and srat_disabled()
> >  
> 
> I guess you mean adding a stub in acpi.h and acpi_numa.h ?
> As it would touch x86 related code as well, I think it is better to do
> it as a followup
> series when we try to unify x86 numa code as well (at least some part of it) ?

It would only affect x86 not using ACPI.  
If that happened, you wouldn't expect it to current call these stubs anyway.

Sure, can leave it for later.

Jonathan

> 
> > At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.
> >  
> > > +     if (ret) {
> > > +             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > > +             return ret;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > > +}
> > > +#else
> > > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > >   *
> > >   * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> > >   * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> > >   */
> > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> > > +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> > >  {
> > >       if (!numa_off) {
> > > -             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> > > +             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> > >                       return;
> > >               if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> > >                       return;
> > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> > > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> > >  }
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> > > +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> > >  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> > >  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> > >  void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> > > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > >  static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > >  static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > >  static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> > > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> > >  static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> > >
> > >  #endif       /* CONFIG_NUMA */  
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv  
> 
> 
> 

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:32:41 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> > > name to indicate that generic implementation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>  
> >
> > A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
> > at than anything important.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >  
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> > >  arch/arm64/mm/init.c          |  4 ++--
> > >  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |  4 ++--
> > >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> > >
> > >       node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> > >  }
> > > -
> > > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > -{
> > > -     int ret;
> > > -
> > > -     ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > > -     if (ret) {
> > > -             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > > -             return ret;
> > > -     }
> > > -
> > > -     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > > -}
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > >       max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> > >       min_low_pfn = min;
> > >
> > > -     arm64_numa_init();
> > > +     arch_numa_init();
> > >
> > >       /*
> > > -      * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > > +      * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > >        * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> > >        * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> > >        */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > >  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> > > +#endif  
> >
> > Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
> > and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.
> >  
> 
> Sure. will do that.
> 
> > >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> > >
> > >  struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     int ret;
> > > +
> > > +     ret = acpi_numa_init();  
> >
> > I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
> > as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
> > and srat_disabled()
> >  
> 
> I guess you mean adding a stub in acpi.h and acpi_numa.h ?
> As it would touch x86 related code as well, I think it is better to do
> it as a followup
> series when we try to unify x86 numa code as well (at least some part of it) ?

It would only affect x86 not using ACPI.  
If that happened, you wouldn't expect it to current call these stubs anyway.

Sure, can leave it for later.

Jonathan

> 
> > At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.
> >  
> > > +     if (ret) {
> > > +             pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > > +             return ret;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > > +}
> > > +#else
> > > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > >   *
> > >   * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> > >   * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> > >   */
> > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> > > +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> > >  {
> > >       if (!numa_off) {
> > > -             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> > > +             if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> > >                       return;
> > >               if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> > >                       return;
> > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> > > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> > >  }
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> > > +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> > >  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> > >  void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> > >  void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> > > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > >  static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > >  static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > >  static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> > > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> > >  static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> > >
> > >  #endif       /* CONFIG_NUMA */  
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv  
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8984 bytes --]

Hi Atish,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-testing]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.9-rc5]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core linux/master asm-generic/master next-20200916]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Atish-Patra/Unify-NUMA-implementation-between-ARM64-RISC-V/20200912-093951
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git 0de7511695680425aa1e6e1e1c7a7c24e6250491
config: riscv-randconfig-r013-20200916 (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/printk.h:7,
                    from include/linux/kernel.h:15,
                    from include/linux/list.h:9,
                    from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
                    from include/linux/of.h:17,
                    from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                    from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                    from drivers/base/arch_numa.c:11:
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c: In function 'numa_register_nodes':
>> include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%Lx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:12:22: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      12 | #define KERN_WARNING KERN_SOH "4" /* warning conditions */
         |                      ^~~~~~~~
   include/linux/printk.h:349:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_WARNING'
     349 |  printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:359:4: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_warn'
     359 |    pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
         |    ^~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:359:56: note: format string is defined here
     359 |    pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
         |                                                  ~~~~~~^
         |                                                        |
         |                                                        long long unsigned int
         |                                                  %#010x
   In file included from include/linux/printk.h:7,
                    from include/linux/kernel.h:15,
                    from include/linux/list.h:9,
                    from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
                    from include/linux/of.h:17,
                    from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                    from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                    from drivers/base/arch_numa.c:11:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%Lx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:12:22: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      12 | #define KERN_WARNING KERN_SOH "4" /* warning conditions */
         |                      ^~~~~~~~
   include/linux/printk.h:349:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_WARNING'
     349 |  printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:359:4: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_warn'
     359 |    pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
         |    ^~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:359:64: note: format string is defined here
     359 |    pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
         |                                                          ~~~~~~^
         |                                                                |
         |                                                                long long unsigned int
         |                                                          %#010x
   In file included from include/linux/printk.h:7,
                    from include/linux/kernel.h:15,
                    from include/linux/list.h:9,
                    from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
                    from include/linux/of.h:17,
                    from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                    from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                    from drivers/base/arch_numa.c:11:
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c: In function 'dummy_numa_init':
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%Lx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   include/linux/printk.h:369:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     369 |  printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:433:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
     433 |  pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
         |  ^~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:433:39: note: format string is defined here
     433 |  pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
         |                                 ~~~~~~^
         |                                       |
         |                                       long long unsigned int
         |                                 %#018x
   In file included from include/linux/printk.h:7,
                    from include/linux/kernel.h:15,
                    from include/linux/list.h:9,
                    from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
                    from include/linux/of.h:17,
                    from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                    from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                    from drivers/base/arch_numa.c:11:
>> include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%Lx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   include/linux/printk.h:369:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     369 |  printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:433:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
     433 |  pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
         |  ^~~~~~~
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c:433:47: note: format string is defined here
     433 |  pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
         |                                         ~~~~~~^
         |                                               |
         |                                               long long unsigned int
         |                                         %#018x
   drivers/base/arch_numa.c: At top level:
>> drivers/base/arch_numa.c:463:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_acpi_numa_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     463 | int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
         |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/5281a162c9e16b33068a8b3937d2a33d4fc3c5a5
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Atish-Patra/Unify-NUMA-implementation-between-ARM64-RISC-V/20200912-093951
git checkout 5281a162c9e16b33068a8b3937d2a33d4fc3c5a5
vim +5 include/linux/kern_levels.h

314ba3520e513a Joe Perches 2012-07-30  4  
04d2c8c83d0e3a Joe Perches 2012-07-30 @5  #define KERN_SOH	"\001"		/* ASCII Start Of Header */
04d2c8c83d0e3a Joe Perches 2012-07-30  6  #define KERN_SOH_ASCII	'\001'
04d2c8c83d0e3a Joe Perches 2012-07-30  7  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31493 bytes --]

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:33:59 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Atish,
> >
> > I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
> > for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> > at v2.
> >  
> 
> My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
> I will send out a v3 soon and update those.
> 
> Thanks for reviewing the patches.

Hi Atish,

I just noticed this was also not sent to <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
which will rather cut down on the relevant audience!  Add that list to the
cc for v3.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> > Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >  
> > > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > > it again.
> > >
> > > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> > >
> > > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> > >
> > > # numactl --hardware
> > > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > > node distances:
> > > node   0   1
> > >   0:  10  20
> > >   1:  20  10
> > > # numactl -show
> > > policy: default
> > > preferred node: current
> > > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > cpubind: 0 1
> > > nodebind: 0 1
> > > membind: 0 1
> > >
> > > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> > >
> > > The patches are also available at
> > >
> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> > >
> > > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > > if required.
> > >
> > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> > >
> > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> > >
> > > Greentime Hu (1):
> > > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> > > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.24.0
> > >  
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv  
> 
> 
> 

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:33:59 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Atish,
> >
> > I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
> > for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> > at v2.
> >  
> 
> My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
> I will send out a v3 soon and update those.
> 
> Thanks for reviewing the patches.

Hi Atish,

I just noticed this was also not sent to <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
which will rather cut down on the relevant audience!  Add that list to the
cc for v3.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> > Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >  
> > > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > > it again.
> > >
> > > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> > >
> > > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> > >
> > > # numactl --hardware
> > > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > > node distances:
> > > node   0   1
> > >   0:  10  20
> > >   1:  20  10
> > > # numactl -show
> > > policy: default
> > > preferred node: current
> > > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > cpubind: 0 1
> > > nodebind: 0 1
> > > membind: 0 1
> > >
> > > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> > >
> > > The patches are also available at
> > >
> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> > >
> > > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > > if required.
> > >
> > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> > >
> > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> > >
> > > Greentime Hu (1):
> > > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> > > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.24.0
> > >  
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv  
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Atish Patra]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:06 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:33:59 -0700
> Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
> > <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> > > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Atish,
> > >
> > > I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
> > > for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> > > at v2.
> > >
> >
> > My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
> > I will send out a v3 soon and update those.
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the patches.
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> I just noticed this was also not sent to <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> which will rather cut down on the relevant audience!  Add that list to the
> cc for v3.
>
Ah yes. Thanks for noticing that. I am surprised that
get-maintainers.pl did not add linux-arm-kernel mailing list
for this series.

Anyways, I will include that in v3 which I was about to send :).

> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > > Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > >
> > > > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > > > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > > > it again.
> > > >
> > > > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > > > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> > > >
> > > > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > > > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > > > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > > > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > > > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > > > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> > > >
> > > > # numactl --hardware
> > > > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > > > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > > > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > > > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > > > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > > > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > > > node distances:
> > > > node   0   1
> > > >   0:  10  20
> > > >   1:  20  10
> > > > # numactl -show
> > > > policy: default
> > > > preferred node: current
> > > > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > > cpubind: 0 1
> > > > nodebind: 0 1
> > > > membind: 0 1
> > > >
> > > > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > > > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> > > >
> > > > The patches are also available at
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> > > >
> > > > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > > > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > > > if required.
> > > >
> > > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> > > >
> > > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > > > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > > > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > > > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> > > >
> > > > Greentime Hu (1):
> > > > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > > > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > > > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > > > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > > > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > > > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > > > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> > > > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > > > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.24.0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Atish

Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

[Atish Patra]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:06 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:33:59 -0700
> Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
> > <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> > > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Atish,
> > >
> > > I'm not seeing a change log from v1.  Putting one in makes it easier
> > > for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> > > at v2.
> > >
> >
> > My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
> > I will send out a v3 soon and update those.
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the patches.
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> I just noticed this was also not sent to <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> which will rather cut down on the relevant audience!  Add that list to the
> cc for v3.
>
Ah yes. Thanks for noticing that. I am surprised that
get-maintainers.pl did not add linux-arm-kernel mailing list
for this series.

Anyways, I will include that in v3 which I was about to send :).

> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > > Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > >
> > > > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > > > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > > > it again.
> > > >
> > > > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > > > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> > > >
> > > > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > > > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > > > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > > > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > > > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > > > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> > > >
> > > > # numactl --hardware
> > > > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > > > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > > > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > > > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > > > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > > > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > > > node distances:
> > > > node   0   1
> > > >   0:  10  20
> > > >   1:  20  10
> > > > # numactl -show
> > > > policy: default
> > > > preferred node: current
> > > > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > > cpubind: 0 1
> > > > nodebind: 0 1
> > > > membind: 0 1
> > > >
> > > > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > > > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> > > >
> > > > The patches are also available at
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> > > >
> > > > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > > > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > > > if required.
> > > >
> > > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> > > >
> > > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > > > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > > > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > > > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> > > >
> > > > Greentime Hu (1):
> > > > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > > > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 45 +----------------
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 13 -----
> > > > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> > > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> > > > arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 +++++++++++-
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 ++++++
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> > > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 ++++-
> > > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> > > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> > > > drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> > > > drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> > > > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 29 +++++++++--
> > > > include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > > > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.24.0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv