* Can decnet be deprecated?
@ 2018-11-25 0:12 David Ahern
2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2018-11-25 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, David Miller
IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
2018-11-25 0:12 Can decnet be deprecated? David Ahern
@ 2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
2018-11-25 1:35 ` David Ahern
2018-11-25 11:30 ` Bjørn Mork
2018-11-25 11:38 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-11-27 0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2018-11-25 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsahern; +Cc: netdev
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list
"Don't, we're using that!"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
@ 2018-11-25 1:35 ` David Ahern
2018-11-25 11:30 ` Bjørn Mork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2018-11-25 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev
On 11/24/18 6:25 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>
>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list
> "Don't, we're using that!"
>
Ugh, I was afraid of that response. I guess I will have to work around
it for the neighbor changes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
2018-11-25 1:35 ` David Ahern
@ 2018-11-25 11:30 ` Bjørn Mork
2018-11-25 18:31 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bjørn Mork @ 2018-11-25 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: dsahern, netdev
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>
>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list
> "Don't, we're using that!"
Not sure about that. What I can see is a claim that it has no bugs:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837484/
The V1 received only support for removal:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837261/
But no one claimed they were using decnet.
Bjørn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
2018-11-25 0:12 Can decnet be deprecated? David Ahern
2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
@ 2018-11-25 11:38 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-11-27 0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Loganaden Velvindron @ 2018-11-25 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsahern; +Cc: netdev, David Miller
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 4:14 AM David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> David
Kill it :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
2018-11-25 11:30 ` Bjørn Mork
@ 2018-11-25 18:31 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2018-11-25 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bjorn; +Cc: dsahern, netdev
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:30:26 +0100
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
>> From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>>
>>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>>
>> Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list
>> "Don't, we're using that!"
>
> Not sure about that. What I can see is a claim that it has no bugs:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837484/
>
> The V1 received only support for removal:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837261/
>
> But no one claimed they were using decnet.
Ok, if people want to try and deprecate it again we can try.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
2018-11-25 0:12 Can decnet be deprecated? David Ahern
2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
2018-11-25 11:38 ` Loganaden Velvindron
@ 2018-11-27 0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2018-11-27 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern; +Cc: netdev, David Miller
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> David
I have no problem with dropping decnet support from iproute first.
Presumably anyone still using it is going to be on old distro tools anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-27 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-25 0:12 Can decnet be deprecated? David Ahern
2018-11-25 1:25 ` David Miller
2018-11-25 1:35 ` David Ahern
2018-11-25 11:30 ` Bjørn Mork
2018-11-25 18:31 ` David Miller
2018-11-25 11:38 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-11-27 0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.