All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1
@ 2016-02-11  6:17 Abhishek Varshney
  2016-02-17  6:41 ` Abhishek Varshney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abhishek Varshney @ 2016-02-11  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yehuda; +Cc: Ceph Development, Loic Dachary

Hi Yehuda,

The next infernalis release as found at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite (
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the
infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
?

The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test (
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to
be fixed before the release ?

Thanks
Abhishek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1
  2016-02-11  6:17 rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1 Abhishek Varshney
@ 2016-02-17  6:41 ` Abhishek Varshney
  2016-02-17 15:52   ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abhishek Varshney @ 2016-02-17  6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yehuda; +Cc: Ceph Development, Loic Dachary

Hi Yehuda,

A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with
next infernalis release v9.2.1.

Thanks
Abhishek

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney
<abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> The next infernalis release as found at
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite (
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the
> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
> ?
>
> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test (
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to
> be fixed before the release ?
>
> Thanks
> Abhishek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1
  2016-02-17  6:41 ` Abhishek Varshney
@ 2016-02-17 15:52   ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
  2016-02-17 17:51     ` Yuri Weinstein
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub @ 2016-02-17 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abhishek Varshney; +Cc: Ceph Development, Loic Dachary

Yeah, it's fine. Note that the upgrade test failure seems like an
issue with the test itself (running radosgw-admin/radosgw while
upgrading the libraries).

Yehuda


On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Abhishek Varshney
<abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with
> next infernalis release v9.2.1.
>
> Thanks
> Abhishek
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney
> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next infernalis release as found at
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite (
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the
>> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
>> ?
>>
>> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test (
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to
>> be fixed before the release ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhishek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1
  2016-02-17 15:52   ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
@ 2016-02-17 17:51     ` Yuri Weinstein
  2016-02-18  2:54       ` Abhishek Varshney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-02-17 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub; +Cc: Abhishek Varshney, Ceph Development, Loic Dachary

Can you point me to the test in question?

Thx
YuriW

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
<yehuda@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yeah, it's fine. Note that the upgrade test failure seems like an
> issue with the test itself (running radosgw-admin/radosgw while
> upgrading the libraries).
>
> Yehuda
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Abhishek Varshney
> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with
>> next infernalis release v9.2.1.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhishek
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney
>> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> The next infernalis release as found at
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite (
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the
>>> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
>>> ?
>>>
>>> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test (
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to
>>> be fixed before the release ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Abhishek
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1
  2016-02-17 17:51     ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-02-18  2:54       ` Abhishek Varshney
  2016-02-18 21:39         ` Yuri Weinstein
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abhishek Varshney @ 2016-02-18  2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub, Ceph Development, Loic Dachary

Hi Yuri,

The RGW test that failed in the upgrade suite run (
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-15 ) can be found here :
http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-02-05_13:57:02-upgrade:infernalis-infernalis---basic-vps/

Thanks
Abhishek



On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Can you point me to the test in question?
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
> <yehuda@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, it's fine. Note that the upgrade test failure seems like an
>> issue with the test itself (running radosgw-admin/radosgw while
>> upgrading the libraries).
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Abhishek Varshney
>> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with
>>> next infernalis release v9.2.1.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Abhishek
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney
>>> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>>
>>>> The next infernalis release as found at
>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite (
>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the
>>>> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test (
>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to
>>>> be fixed before the release ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Abhishek
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1
  2016-02-18  2:54       ` Abhishek Varshney
@ 2016-02-18 21:39         ` Yuri Weinstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-02-18 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abhishek Varshney; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub, Ceph Development, Loic Dachary

The RGW test that failed in the upgrade suite run should be fixed by
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/826

tests passed on wip branch.

Thx
YuriW

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Abhishek Varshney
<abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> The RGW test that failed in the upgrade suite run (
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-15 ) can be found here :
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-02-05_13:57:02-upgrade:infernalis-infernalis---basic-vps/
>
> Thanks
> Abhishek
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Can you point me to the test in question?
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
>> <yehuda@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Yeah, it's fine. Note that the upgrade test failure seems like an
>>> issue with the test itself (running radosgw-admin/radosgw while
>>> upgrading the libraries).
>>>
>>> Yehuda
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Abhishek Varshney
>>> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>>
>>>> A gentle reminder. We are waiting for your response to move ahead with
>>>> next infernalis release v9.2.1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Abhishek
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Abhishek Varshney
>>>> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>>>
>>>>> The next infernalis release as found at
>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed the rgw suite (
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-21 ). Do you think the
>>>>> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> The upgrade suite has a RGW failed test (
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 ), is it something that needs to
>>>>> be fixed before the release ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Abhishek
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-18 21:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-11  6:17 rgw and the next infernalis release v9.2.1 Abhishek Varshney
2016-02-17  6:41 ` Abhishek Varshney
2016-02-17 15:52   ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
2016-02-17 17:51     ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-02-18  2:54       ` Abhishek Varshney
2016-02-18 21:39         ` Yuri Weinstein

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.