All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
To: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Future of Qt4 recipes
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:27:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9ODKq5Gg5-fv=ibhmeh_peXyL_z81q3RQd29Uh8iKrtOiw2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LaKEvtznsdfz8gLWFSLyb6Rx2XsgbYG_cfOrAm+W2UfEg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1188 bytes --]

I vote for 2 as well.
Em 22/06/2015 07:44, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com> escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> So, Qt 4.8.7 was released last month[1].  Support for Qt4 stops at the end
> of 2015, and 4.8.7 is planned to be the last ever release of Qt4. It's
> still mandated by the long-awaited LSB 5 but I think it's fair to say that
> the majority of developers have moved to Qt5. So, what should we do with
> Qt4 moving forward?[2]  I see several options:
>
> 1) There's still lots of people using Qt4 in production, please keep it in
> oe-core!  (and revisit in six months time)
> 2) Move Qt4 recipes and classes to a meta-qt4 layer now so that oe-core
> 1.9 ships without Qt4, and anyone wanting full LSB compliance or Qt4 will
> need to add that layer to their distro.
>
> Personally, I vote for (2).  Any other comments?
>
> Ross
>
> [1] https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/26/qt-4-8-7-released/
> [2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7812
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1900 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
To: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Future of Qt4 recipes
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:27:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9ODKq5Gg5-fv=ibhmeh_peXyL_z81q3RQd29Uh8iKrtOiw2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LaKEvtznsdfz8gLWFSLyb6Rx2XsgbYG_cfOrAm+W2UfEg@mail.gmail.com>

I vote for 2 as well.
Em 22/06/2015 07:44, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com> escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> So, Qt 4.8.7 was released last month[1].  Support for Qt4 stops at the end
> of 2015, and 4.8.7 is planned to be the last ever release of Qt4. It's
> still mandated by the long-awaited LSB 5 but I think it's fair to say that
> the majority of developers have moved to Qt5. So, what should we do with
> Qt4 moving forward?[2]  I see several options:
>
> 1) There's still lots of people using Qt4 in production, please keep it in
> oe-core!  (and revisit in six months time)
> 2) Move Qt4 recipes and classes to a meta-qt4 layer now so that oe-core
> 1.9 ships without Qt4, and anyone wanting full LSB compliance or Qt4 will
> need to add that layer to their distro.
>
> Personally, I vote for (2).  Any other comments?
>
> Ross
>
> [1] https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/26/qt-4-8-7-released/
> [2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7812
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-22 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-22 10:43 Future of Qt4 recipes Burton, Ross
2015-06-22 10:43 ` Burton, Ross
2015-06-22 14:27 ` Otavio Salvador [this message]
2015-06-22 14:27   ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2015-06-22 21:48 ` Florian Boor
2015-06-22 21:58   ` Philip Balister
2015-06-22 22:14     ` Burton, Ross
2015-06-22 22:50       ` Philip Balister
2015-06-23 23:13 ` akuster808
2015-06-23 23:13   ` [OE-core] " akuster808
2015-06-24  0:26   ` Martin Jansa
2015-06-24  0:26     ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAP9ODKq5Gg5-fv=ibhmeh_peXyL_z81q3RQd29Uh8iKrtOiw2Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.