MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[David Thompson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]

Hello folks,

Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer,
or is there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd be
very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.

Thanks in advance,
Dave

David Thompson
Sr. Staff Engineer, System SW
Mellanox Technologies
1900 West Park Drive, Suite 290
Westborough MA USA 01581
Direct: 508-983-6439


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2635 bytes --]

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Rick Altherr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 950 bytes --]

I know the Aspeed parts have hardware to support MCTP. Neither mainline
Linux or OpenBMC have drivers for that hardware yet. I'm interested in what
can be done with MCTP but I'm not aware of any plans from IBM or Google to
implement support. That said, if you'd like to work on a device driver,
I'll gladly review patches and assist with upstreaming.

Rick

On Mar 30, 2017 3:09 PM, "David Thompson" <dthompson@mellanox.com> wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
>
>
> Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer,
>
> or is there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I’d be
>
> very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> David Thompson
>
> Sr. Staff Engineer, System SW
>
> Mellanox Technologies
>
> 1900 West Park Drive, Suite 290
>
> Westborough MA USA 01581
>
> Direct: 508-983-6439 <(508)%20983-6439>
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2026 bytes --]

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Jeremy Kerr]

Hi David and Rick,

> Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer,
> or is there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I’d be
> very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.

Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of doing 
a little prototyping with our host firmware stack.

I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or others) 
made progress on this since this initial email? I know there was a 
presentation on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm not sure if any 
solid plans came from that.

If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...

Cheers,


Jeremy

RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Supreeth Venkatesh]

David/Jeremy,

We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
We are in the process of getting CLA signed.
We have the same concern regarding duplicating work.
We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).

Thanks,
Supreeth

-----Original Message-----
From: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+supreeth.venkatesh=arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org> On Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:00 AM
To: David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Hi David and Rick,

> Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer, or is
> there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd be
> very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.

Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of doing a little prototyping with our host firmware stack.

I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or others) made progress on this since this initial email? I know there was a presentation on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm not sure if any solid plans came from that.

If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...

Cheers,


Jeremy
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Emily Shaffer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1860 bytes --]

Google is interested in investigating MCTP as well. I'd love to join the wg.

Emily

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:14 AM Supreeth Venkatesh <
Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com> wrote:

> David/Jeremy,
>
> We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
> We are in the process of getting CLA signed.
> We have the same concern regarding duplicating work.
> We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in
> this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).
>
> Thanks,
> Supreeth
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+supreeth.venkatesh=arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>
> On Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:00 AM
> To: David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?
>
> Hi David and Rick,
>
> > Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer, or is
> > there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd be
> > very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.
>
> Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of doing a
> little prototyping with our host firmware stack.
>
> I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or others) made
> progress on this since this initial email? I know there was a presentation
> on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm not sure if any solid plans came
> from that.
>
> If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jeremy
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2450 bytes --]

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Jeremy Kerr]

Hi all,

> We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.

OK, super!

> We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).

Personally, I'd prefer *not* to form a workgroup at the moment; we can 
discuss things here on the list, rather than separating those 
conversations from the rest of the OpenBMC community. I also don't think 
we need any of the formality of a workgroup at this stage.

Essentially, forming a WG just means we'd have meetings and a separate 
mailing list. The former means that some attendees of the WG have to 
have late nights to attend, and the latter separates the MCTP 
discussions from the rest of OpenBMC.

However, we can certainly revisit this if conditions warrant it.

Let me know if you have any strong opinions one way or the other.

With that in mind, and since a few folks have expressed interest, I'll 
share some of my initial sketches to this list soon. I'll be sure to 
include MCTP in the subject to make things findable.

Cheers,


Jeremy

RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Khetan, Sharad]

Hi Jeremy,
We are very interested. Nilan presented MCTP in the Hackathon and has been working on the MCTP architecture for Intel platforms. It will be good to work together.

Thanks,
-Sharad


-----Original Message-----
From: openbmc [mailto:openbmc-bounces+sharad.khetan=intel.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 9:44 AM
To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Cc: Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Hi all,

> We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.

OK, super!

> We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).

Personally, I'd prefer *not* to form a workgroup at the moment; we can 
discuss things here on the list, rather than separating those 
conversations from the rest of the OpenBMC community. I also don't think 
we need any of the formality of a workgroup at this stage.

Essentially, forming a WG just means we'd have meetings and a separate 
mailing list. The former means that some attendees of the WG have to 
have late nights to attend, and the latter separates the MCTP 
discussions from the rest of OpenBMC.

However, we can certainly revisit this if conditions warrant it.

Let me know if you have any strong opinions one way or the other.

With that in mind, and since a few folks have expressed interest, I'll 
share some of my initial sketches to this list soon. I'll be sure to 
include MCTP in the subject to make things findable.

Cheers,


Jeremy

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Andrew Geissler]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:44 PM Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> wrote:

>
> With that in mind, and since a few folks have expressed interest, I'll
> share some of my initial sketches to this list soon. I'll be sure to
> include MCTP in the subject to make things findable.

Please also remember that with new functions, we'd like to have
https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/designs/design-template.md
filled out at some point fairly early in the process. The gerrit review of that
is where some discussion can also occur. The mailing list for early design
points is great too.

Thanks Jeremy!

>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jeremy

RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Supreeth Venkatesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2735 bytes --]

Thanks Emily. Based on feedback from others, we can decide whether we should form a WG or should use alternate mechanism.

Supreeth

From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:02 PM
To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Google is interested in investigating MCTP as well. I'd love to join the wg.

Emily

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:14 AM Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com<mailto:Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>> wrote:
David/Jeremy,

We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
We are in the process of getting CLA signed.
We have the same concern regarding duplicating work.
We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).

Thanks,
Supreeth

-----Original Message-----
From: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+supreeth.venkatesh=arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>> On Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:00 AM
To: David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com<mailto:dthompson@mellanox.com>>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Hi David and Rick,

> Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer, or is
> there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd be
> very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.

Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of doing a little prototyping with our host firmware stack.

I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or others) made progress on this since this initial email? I know there was a presentation on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm not sure if any solid plans came from that.

If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...

Cheers,


Jeremy
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5722 bytes --]

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Supreeth Venkatesh]

On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 09:44 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> > We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
> 
> OK, super!
> 
> > We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested
> > in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).
> 
> Personally, I'd prefer *not* to form a workgroup at the moment; we
> can 
> discuss things here on the list, rather than separating those 
> conversations from the rest of the OpenBMC community. I also don't
> think 
> we need any of the formality of a workgroup at this stage.
No Strong opinion. Lets start with the list and if the discussion gets
unmanageable using list and we can always have this option. 
> 
> Essentially, forming a WG just means we'd have meetings and a
> separate 
> mailing list. The former means that some attendees of the WG have to 
> have late nights to attend, and the latter separates the MCTP 
> discussions from the rest of OpenBMC.
:)
> 
> However, we can certainly revisit this if conditions warrant it.
> 
> Let me know if you have any strong opinions one way or the other.
> 
> With that in mind, and since a few folks have expressed interest,
> I'll 
> share some of my initial sketches to this list soon. I'll be sure to 
> include MCTP in the subject to make things findable.
Thanks. Appreciate it. I will look for it and can provide feedback.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Jeremy

RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Rapkiewicz, Pawel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4246 bytes --]

Hi,

We’re interested in MCTP involvement, so please count us in for any further discussions, and WG participation.

Regards,
Pawel

From: openbmc [mailto:openbmc-bounces+pawel.rapkiewicz=intel.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Supreeth Venkatesh
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:47 PM
To: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>
Subject: RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Thanks Emily. Based on feedback from others, we can decide whether we should form a WG or should use alternate mechanism.

Supreeth

From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com<mailto:emilyshaffer@google.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:02 PM
To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com<mailto:Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org<mailto:jk@ozlabs.org>>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com<mailto:dthompson@mellanox.com>>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com<mailto:Dong.Wei@arm.com>>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Google is interested in investigating MCTP as well. I'd love to join the wg.

Emily

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:14 AM Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com<mailto:Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>> wrote:
David/Jeremy,

We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
We are in the process of getting CLA signed.
We have the same concern regarding duplicating work.
We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).

Thanks,
Supreeth

-----Original Message-----
From: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+supreeth.venkatesh=arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>> On Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:00 AM
To: David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com<mailto:dthompson@mellanox.com>>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Hi David and Rick,

> Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer, or is
> there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd be
> very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.

Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of doing a little prototyping with our host firmware stack.

I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or others) made progress on this since this initial email? I know there was a presentation on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm not sure if any solid plans came from that.

If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...

Cheers,


Jeremy
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o.
ul. Slowackiego 173 | 80-298 Gdansk | Sad Rejonowy Gdansk Polnoc | VII Wydzial Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sadowego - KRS 101882 | NIP 957-07-52-316 | Kapital zakladowy 200.000 PLN.

Ta wiadomosc wraz z zalacznikami jest przeznaczona dla okreslonego adresata i moze zawierac informacje poufne. W razie przypadkowego otrzymania tej wiadomosci, prosimy o powiadomienie nadawcy oraz trwale jej usuniecie; jakiekolwiek
przegladanie lub rozpowszechnianie jest zabronione.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies; any review or distribution by
others is strictly prohibited.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8920 bytes --]

RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[David Thompson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5000 bytes --]

Hello all,

Personally I have not worked on any MCTP protocol support for OpenBMC,
nor am I aware of any efforts to bring this support into OpenBMC.  I am
curious about the status of this support, but have nothing to offer at this time.


  *   Dave

From: Rapkiewicz, Pawel <pawel.rapkiewicz@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 11:25 AM
To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>; Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>
Subject: RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Hi,

We’re interested in MCTP involvement, so please count us in for any further discussions, and WG participation.

Regards,
Pawel

From: openbmc [mailto:openbmc-bounces+pawel.rapkiewicz=intel.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Supreeth Venkatesh
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:47 PM
To: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com<mailto:emilyshaffer@google.com>>
Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com<mailto:Dong.Wei@arm.com>>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com<mailto:dthompson@mellanox.com>>
Subject: RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Thanks Emily. Based on feedback from others, we can decide whether we should form a WG or should use alternate mechanism.

Supreeth

From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com<mailto:emilyshaffer@google.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:02 PM
To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com<mailto:Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org<mailto:jk@ozlabs.org>>; David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com<mailto:dthompson@mellanox.com>>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com<mailto:Dong.Wei@arm.com>>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Google is interested in investigating MCTP as well. I'd love to join the wg.

Emily

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:14 AM Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com<mailto:Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>> wrote:
David/Jeremy,

We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
We are in the process of getting CLA signed.
We have the same concern regarding duplicating work.
We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).

Thanks,
Supreeth

-----Original Message-----
From: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+supreeth.venkatesh=arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>> On Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:00 AM
To: David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com<mailto:dthompson@mellanox.com>>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org<mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

Hi David and Rick,

> Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer, or is
> there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd be
> very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP stack.

Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of doing a little prototyping with our host firmware stack.

I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or others) made progress on this since this initial email? I know there was a presentation on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm not sure if any solid plans came from that.

If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...

Cheers,


Jeremy
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o.
ul. Słowackiego 173 | 80-298 Gdańsk | Sąd Rejonowy Gdańsk Północ | VII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego - KRS 101882 | NIP 957-07-52-316 | Kapitał zakładowy 200.000 PLN.

Ta wiadomość wraz z załącznikami jest przeznaczona dla określonego adresata i może zawierać informacje poufne. W razie przypadkowego otrzymania tej wiadomości, prosimy o powiadomienie nadawcy oraz trwałe jej usunięcie; jakiekolwiek przeglądanie lub rozpowszechnianie jest zabronione.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies; any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12718 bytes --]

Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?

[Supreeth Venkatesh]

On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 16:24 +0000, Rapkiewicz, Pawel wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> We’re interested in MCTP involvement, so please count us in for any
> further discussions, and WG participation.
Thanks Pawel/Sharad/Nilan for your involvement. Anyone else interested
please chime in as well.
I guess the first step is to review initial proposal (Sketches) from
Jeremy and see if we should form a WG or discuss it over the mailing
list.
>  
> Regards,
> Pawel
>  
> From: openbmc [mailto:
> openbmc-bounces+pawel.rapkiewicz=intel.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of Supreeth Venkatesh
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:47 PM
> To: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
> Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>; David
> Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>
> Subject: RE: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?
>  
> Thanks Emily. Based on feedback from others, we can decide whether we
> should form a WG or should use alternate mechanism.
>  
> Supreeth
>  
> From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:02 PM
> To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>
> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>; David Thompson <
> dthompson@mellanox.com>; openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; Dong Wei <
> Dong.Wei@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?
>  
> Google is interested in investigating MCTP as well. I'd love to join
> the wg.
>  
> Emily
>  
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:14 AM Supreeth Venkatesh <
> Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com> wrote:
> > David/Jeremy,
> > 
> > We (@ arm) are also interested in contributing MCTP to OpenBMC.
> > We are in the process of getting CLA signed.
> > We have the same concern regarding duplicating work.
> > We would like to collaborate with OpenBMC folks  who are interested
> > in this topic. (maybe form a Workgroup to discuss this).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Supreeth
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openbmc <
> > openbmc-bounces+supreeth.venkatesh=arm.com@lists.ozlabs.org> On
> > Behalf Of Jeremy Kerr
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:00 AM
> > To: David Thompson <dthompson@mellanox.com>; 
> > openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: MCTP protocol support in OpenBMC?
> > 
> > Hi David and Rick,
> > 
> > > Does OpenBMC currently have any support for MCTP protocol layer,
> > or is
> > > there a plan to deliver something like this in the future?  I'd
> > be
> > > very interested to hear about any future plans related to MCTP
> > stack.
> > 
> > Us too! I'm interested in looking at MCTP, and am in the middle of
> > doing a little prototyping with our host firmware stack.
> > 
> > I'd also like to avoid duplicating work though, have you (or
> > others) made progress on this since this initial email? I know
> > there was a presentation on MCTP at the recent hackathon, but I'm
> > not sure if any solid plans came from that.
> > 
> > If not, I'd be happy to sketch out an architecture for this...
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremy
> > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments
> > are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not
> > disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose,
> > or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
> the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or
> copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o.
> ul. Słowackiego 173 | 80-298 Gdańsk | Sąd Rejonowy Gdańsk Północ |
> VII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego - KRS 101882 |
> NIP 957-07-52-316 | Kapitał zakładowy 200.000 PLN.
> Ta wiadomość wraz z załącznikami jest przeznaczona dla określonego
> adresata i może zawierać informacje poufne. W razie przypadkowego
> otrzymania tej wiadomości, prosimy o powiadomienie nadawcy oraz
> trwałe jej usunięcie; jakiekolwiek przeglądanie lub rozpowszechnianie
> jest zabronione.
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies;
> any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited.