From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jerry Hoemann <Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@hpe.com>,
jmoyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com>,
Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:18:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h-8bm4nxO=5K6vRb3720rtaW8A-VHWRaZAhyw0_tjrvg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211180950.GA57513@tevye.fc.hp.com>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 04:48:55PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Yes, updating the acpi_evaluate_dsm() definition seems the best choice.
>>
>
> I have a patch for this. While not big (6 files), these files are
> outside of nvdimm and will have a two line of over a dozen reviewers/lists
> not previously reviewing this series.
For an acpi change no need to cc all those folks and lists. Just cc
the following for that change:
Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Why 6 files and not 2 for a prototype update? I wouldn't go touch
existing callers of acpi_evaluate_dsm() if they have been living with
the potential truncation all this time there's no need to change.
> Do you want me to send this patch as one of this series (w/ the
> extra reviewers?)
Yes, send that patch with the series so the acpi developers have the
context for what motivated the change.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jerry Hoemann <Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@hpe.com>,
jmoyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com>,
Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:18:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h-8bm4nxO=5K6vRb3720rtaW8A-VHWRaZAhyw0_tjrvg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211180950.GA57513@tevye.fc.hp.com>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 04:48:55PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Yes, updating the acpi_evaluate_dsm() definition seems the best choice.
>>
>
> I have a patch for this. While not big (6 files), these files are
> outside of nvdimm and will have a two line of over a dozen reviewers/lists
> not previously reviewing this series.
For an acpi change no need to cc all those folks and lists. Just cc
the following for that change:
Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Why 6 files and not 2 for a prototype update? I wouldn't go touch
existing callers of acpi_evaluate_dsm() if they have been living with
the potential truncation all this time there's no need to change.
> Do you want me to send this patch as one of this series (w/ the
> extra reviewers?)
Yes, send that patch with the series so the acpi developers have the
context for what motivated the change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-11 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 21:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] nvdimm: Add an IOCTL pass thru for DSM calls Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvdimm: Clean-up access mode check Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvdimm: Add wrapper for IOCTL pass thru Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-02 21:05 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-09 2:10 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-09 2:10 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-10 0:24 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-10 0:24 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-10 0:48 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-10 0:48 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-11 18:09 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-11 18:09 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-11 18:18 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2015-12-11 18:18 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-11 19:00 ` Jerry Hoemann
2015-12-11 19:00 ` Jerry Hoemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4h-8bm4nxO=5K6vRb3720rtaW8A-VHWRaZAhyw0_tjrvg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linda.knippers@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.