All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pmem: only set QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for fsdax mode
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:07:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h6HO6fs6k7QMD77jkz2djCeWCtWomCdNb0-1Q4VKanqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626185830.GA7171@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26 2018 at  2:52pm -0400,
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ross Zwisler
>> <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > QUEUE_FLAG_DAX is an indication that a given block device supports
>> > filesystem DAX and should not be set for PMEM namespaces which are in "raw"
>> > or "sector" modes.  These namespaces lack struct page and are prevented
>> > from participating in filesystem DAX.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
>> > Suggested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Why is this cc: stable? What is the user visible impact of this change
>> especially given the requirement to validate QUEUE_FLAG_DAX with
>> bdev_dax_supported()? Patch looks good, but it's just a cosmetic fixup
>> afaics.
>
> This isn't cosmetic when you consider that stacking up a DM device is
> looking at this flag to determine whether a table does or does _not_
> support DAX.
>
> So this patch, in conjunction with the other changes in the series, is
> certainly something I'd consider appropriate for stable.

I think this classifies as something that never worked correctly and
is not a regression. It does not identify which commit it is repairing
or the user visible failure mode.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pmem: only set QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for fsdax mode
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:07:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h6HO6fs6k7QMD77jkz2djCeWCtWomCdNb0-1Q4VKanqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626185830.GA7171@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26 2018 at  2:52pm -0400,
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ross Zwisler
>> <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > QUEUE_FLAG_DAX is an indication that a given block device supports
>> > filesystem DAX and should not be set for PMEM namespaces which are in "raw"
>> > or "sector" modes.  These namespaces lack struct page and are prevented
>> > from participating in filesystem DAX.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
>> > Suggested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Why is this cc: stable? What is the user visible impact of this change
>> especially given the requirement to validate QUEUE_FLAG_DAX with
>> bdev_dax_supported()? Patch looks good, but it's just a cosmetic fixup
>> afaics.
>
> This isn't cosmetic when you consider that stacking up a DM device is
> looking at this flag to determine whether a table does or does _not_
> support DAX.
>
> So this patch, in conjunction with the other changes in the series, is
> certainly something I'd consider appropriate for stable.

I think this classifies as something that never worked correctly and
is not a regression. It does not identify which commit it is repairing
or the user visible failure mode.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nvdimm
	<linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	stable <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	device-mapper development
	<dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-fsdevel
	<linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pmem: only set QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for fsdax mode
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:07:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h6HO6fs6k7QMD77jkz2djCeWCtWomCdNb0-1Q4VKanqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626185830.GA7171-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26 2018 at  2:52pm -0400,
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ross Zwisler
>> <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > QUEUE_FLAG_DAX is an indication that a given block device supports
>> > filesystem DAX and should not be set for PMEM namespaces which are in "raw"
>> > or "sector" modes.  These namespaces lack struct page and are prevented
>> > from participating in filesystem DAX.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>> > Suggested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> > Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>
>> Why is this cc: stable? What is the user visible impact of this change
>> especially given the requirement to validate QUEUE_FLAG_DAX with
>> bdev_dax_supported()? Patch looks good, but it's just a cosmetic fixup
>> afaics.
>
> This isn't cosmetic when you consider that stacking up a DM device is
> looking at this flag to determine whether a table does or does _not_
> support DAX.
>
> So this patch, in conjunction with the other changes in the series, is
> certainly something I'd consider appropriate for stable.

I think this classifies as something that never worked correctly and
is not a regression. It does not identify which commit it is repairing
or the user visible failure mode.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-26 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-26 17:59 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix DM DAX handling Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] pmem: only set QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for fsdax mode Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 18:52   ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 18:52     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 18:52     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 18:58     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 18:58       ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 19:07       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-06-26 19:07         ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 19:07         ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 19:12         ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:12           ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:12           ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:13         ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 19:13           ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 19:13           ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 19:19           ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 19:19             ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 19:19             ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 20:54           ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 20:54             ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 20:54             ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 21:02             ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:02               ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:02               ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:23               ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 21:23                 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 21:23                 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 21:28                 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:28                   ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:28                   ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:31                   ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 21:31                     ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 21:51                     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:51                       ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 21:51                       ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 22:04                       ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 22:04                         ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-28 17:42                         ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 17:42                           ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 17:42                           ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 17:48                           ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-28 17:48                             ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-28 17:59                             ` Dan Williams
2018-06-28 17:59                               ` Dan Williams
2018-06-28 17:59                               ` Dan Williams
2018-06-28 18:01                             ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 18:01                               ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 18:01                               ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 19:04                           ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-28 19:04                             ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-28 19:04                             ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-28 19:40                             ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 19:40                               ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-28 19:40                               ` Kani, Toshi
2018-06-26 19:11       ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:11         ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:11         ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: bdev_dax_supported() check for QUEUE_FLAG_DAX Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] dm: prevent DAX mounts if not supported Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 17:59   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 18:17   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 18:17     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 18:17     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 19:01   ` [PATCH v4 " Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:01     ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 19:01     ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-26 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix DM DAX handling Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 18:48   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-26 18:48   ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4h6HO6fs6k7QMD77jkz2djCeWCtWomCdNb0-1Q4VKanqw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.