From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Various Spectre-v1 fixes
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 06:50:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hEufFemihN8-pRC1sUqSzC9vbK8_s28Vyacd_e7-muow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423093321.GV4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 07:03:44PM -0600, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 20-04-18 15:14:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > These fix a number of perf, x86 and sched cases where we have user controlled
>> > array dereferences. All were found by Dan's recent Smatch update.
>>
>> Do we want to mark all of these for stable?
>
> If we all agree that any (speculative) user-controlled array index --
> irrespective of the existence of the second load/store that would
> complete the gadget -- needs fixing and thus all these patches are
> 'good', then yes, that makes sense.
>
> Given yours is the only response so far, I suspect we're good on all
> that :-)
+1 from me for -stable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-23 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 13:14 [PATCH 0/7] Various Spectre-v1 fixes Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for aux_pages Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf,x86: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf,x86: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for x86_pmu::event_map() Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf,x86/msr: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for msr Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf,x86/cstate: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for pkg_msr Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for sched_prio_to_weight[] Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-20 13:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched,autogroup: Fix possible Spectre-v1 for sched_prio_to_weight Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-23 1:03 ` [PATCH 0/7] Various Spectre-v1 fixes Michal Hocko
2018-04-23 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-23 13:50 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-04-23 16:47 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hEufFemihN8-pRC1sUqSzC9vbK8_s28Vyacd_e7-muow@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.