All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	 Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	 Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	 Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] cxl/acpi: Handle address space allocation
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:17:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jq470iFeqXPVftSwomcf=aC_eLZUMhMK1JZkOxekkGxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220128002707.391076-6-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:27 PM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Regions are carved out of an addresses space which is claimed by top
> level decoders, and subsequently their children decoders. Regions are

s/children/descendant/

> created with a size and therefore must fit, with proper alignment, in
> that address space. The support for doing this fitting is handled by the
> driver automatically.
>
> As an example, a platform might configure a top level decoder to claim
> 1TB of address space @ 0x800000000 -> 0x10800000000; it would be
> possible to create M regions with appropriate alignment to occupy that
> address space. Each of those regions would have a host physical address
> somewhere in the range between 32G and 1.3TB, and the location will be
> determined by the logic added here.
>
> The request_region() usage is not strictly mandatory at this point as
> the actual handling of the address space is done with genpools. It is
> highly likely however that the resource/region APIs will become useful
> in the not too distant future.

More on this below, but I think resource APIs are critical for the
pre-existing / BIOS created region case and I have a feeling gen_pool
is not a good fit.

> All decoders manage a host physical address space while active. Only the
> root decoder has constraints on location and size. As a result, it makes
> most sense for the root decoder to be responsible for managing the
> entire address space, and mid-level decoders and endpoints can ask the
> root decoder for suballocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h  |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index d6dcb2b6af48..74681bfbf53c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  /* Copyright(c) 2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. */
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -73,6 +74,27 @@ static int cxl_acpi_cfmws_verify(struct device *dev,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Every decoder while active has an address space that it is decoding. However,
> + * only the root level decoders have fixed host physical address space ranges.
> + */
> +static int cxl_create_cfmws_address_space(struct cxl_decoder *cxld,
> +                                         struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *cfmws)
> +{
> +       const int order = ilog2(SZ_256M * cxld->interleave_ways);
> +       struct device *dev = &cxld->dev;
> +       struct gen_pool *pool;
> +
> +       pool = devm_gen_pool_create(dev, order, NUMA_NO_NODE, dev_name(dev));

The cxld dev is not a suitable devm host.

Moreover, the address space is a generic property of root decoders, it
belongs in the core not in cxl_acpi.

As for the data structure / APIs to manage the address space I'm not
sure gen_pool is the right answer, because the capacity tracking will
be done in terms of __request_region() and resource trees. The
infrastructure to keep the gen_pool aligned with the resource tree
drops away if there was an interface for allocating free space out of
a resource tree to augment the base API of requesting space with known
addresses. In fact, there is already the request_free_mem_region()
helper. Did you consider that vs gen_pool? Otherwise, how to solve the
problem of pre-populating the busy areas of the gen_pool relative to
capacity that the BIOS may have consumed out of the decoder range?
That comes for free with just walking decoders at boot and doing
__request_region() against the root decoders. Then the allocation
helper can just walk that free space similar to
request_free_mem_region().

> +       if (IS_ERR(pool))
> +               return PTR_ERR(pool);
> +
> +       cxld->address_space = pool;
> +
> +       return gen_pool_add(cxld->address_space, cfmws->base_hpa,
> +                           cfmws->window_size, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +}
> +
>  struct cxl_cfmws_context {
>         struct device *dev;
>         struct cxl_port *root_port;
> @@ -113,6 +135,14 @@ static int cxl_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
>         cxld->interleave_ways = CFMWS_INTERLEAVE_WAYS(cfmws);
>         cxld->interleave_granularity = CFMWS_INTERLEAVE_GRANULARITY(cfmws);
>
> +       rc = cxl_create_cfmws_address_space(cxld, cfmws);
> +       if (rc) {
> +               dev_err(dev,
> +                       "Failed to create CFMWS address space for decoder\n");
> +               put_device(&cxld->dev);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
>         rc = cxl_decoder_add(cxld, target_map);
>         if (rc)
>                 put_device(&cxld->dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index d1a8ca19c9ea..b300673072f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ enum cxl_decoder_type {
>   * @flags: memory type capabilities and locking
>   * @target_lock: coordinate coherent reads of the target list
>   * @region_ida: allocator for region ids.
> + * @address_space: Used/free address space for regions.
>   * @nr_targets: number of elements in @target
>   * @target: active ordered target list in current decoder configuration
>   */
> @@ -267,6 +268,7 @@ struct cxl_decoder {
>         unsigned long flags;
>         seqlock_t target_lock;
>         struct ida region_ida;
> +       struct gen_pool *address_space;
>         int nr_targets;
>         struct cxl_dport *target[];
>  };
> --
> 2.35.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-18 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28  0:26 [PATCH v3 00/14] CXL Region driver Ben Widawsky
2022-01-28  0:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] cxl/region: Add region creation ABI Ben Widawsky
2022-01-28 18:14   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28 18:59     ` Dan Williams
2022-02-02 18:26       ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-02 18:28         ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-02 18:48           ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-02 19:00             ` Dan Williams
2022-02-02 19:02               ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-02 19:15                 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-01 22:42     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-01 15:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-17 17:10   ` [PATCH v4 " Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 17:19     ` [PATCH v5 01/15] " Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 17:33       ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 17:58       ` Dan Williams
2022-02-17 18:58         ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 20:26           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-17 22:22         ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 23:32           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-18 16:41             ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-28  0:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] cxl/region: Introduce concept of region configuration Ben Widawsky
2022-01-29  0:25   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-01 14:59     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-03  5:06       ` Dan Williams
2022-02-01 23:11     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-03 17:48       ` Dan Williams
2022-02-03 22:23         ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-03 23:27           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-04  0:19             ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-04  2:45               ` Dan Williams
2022-02-17 18:36     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 19:57       ` Dan Williams
2022-02-17 20:20         ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17 21:12           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-23 21:49         ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-23 22:24           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-23 22:31             ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-23 22:42               ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] cxl/mem: Cache port created by the mem dev Ben Widawsky
2022-02-17  1:20   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] cxl/region: Introduce a cxl_region driver Ben Widawsky
2022-02-01 16:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-17  6:04   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] cxl/acpi: Handle address space allocation Ben Widawsky
2022-02-18 19:17   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2022-01-28  0:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] cxl/region: Address " Ben Widawsky
2022-02-18 19:51   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] cxl/region: Implement XHB verification Ben Widawsky
2022-02-18 20:23   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] cxl/region: HB port config verification Ben Widawsky
2022-02-14 16:20   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-14 17:51     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-02-14 18:09       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-15 16:35   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-18 21:04   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] cxl/region: Add infrastructure for decoder programming Ben Widawsky
2022-02-01 18:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-18 21:53   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] cxl/region: Collect host bridge decoders Ben Widawsky
2022-02-01 18:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-18 23:42   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] cxl/region: Add support for single switch level Ben Widawsky
2022-02-01 18:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-15 16:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-18 18:23     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] cxl: Program decoders for regions Ben Widawsky
2022-02-24  0:08   ` Dan Williams
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] cxl/pmem: Convert nvdimm bridge API to use dev Ben Widawsky
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] cxl/region: Create an nd_region Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4jq470iFeqXPVftSwomcf=aC_eLZUMhMK1JZkOxekkGxQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.