All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	Chet Douglas <chet.r.douglas@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/28] cxl/core: Store global list of root ports
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:32:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jqkEVTjqKd1wy468ht3_e8wawiR0sNQKcP9CHnPcgHMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211022183709.1199701-11-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 11:37 AM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
>
> CXL root ports (the downstream port to a host bridge) are to be
> enumerated by a platform specific driver. In the case of ACPI compliant
> systems, this is like the cxl_acpi driver. Root ports are the first
> CXL spec defined component that can be "found" by that platform specific
> driver.
>
> By storing a list of these root ports components in lower levels of the
> topology (switches and endpoints), have a mechanism to walk up their
> device hierarchy to find an enumerated root port. This will be necessary
> for region programming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/acpi.c            |  4 ++--
>  drivers/cxl/core/bus.c        | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h             |  5 ++++-
>  tools/testing/cxl/mock_acpi.c |  4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index 8cca0814dfb8..625c5d95b83f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ __mock int match_add_root_ports(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
>                 creg = cxl_reg_block(pdev, &map);
>
>         port_num = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_PN, lnkcap);
> -       rc = cxl_add_dport(port, &pdev->dev, port_num, creg);
> +       rc = cxl_add_dport(port, &pdev->dev, port_num, creg, true);
>         if (rc) {
>                 ctx->error = rc;
>                 return rc;
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
>                 dev_dbg(host, "No CHBS found for Host Bridge: %s\n",
>                         dev_name(match));
>
> -       rc = cxl_add_dport(root_port, match, uid, get_chbcr(chbs));
> +       rc = cxl_add_dport(root_port, match, uid, get_chbcr(chbs), false);
>         if (rc) {
>                 dev_err(host, "failed to add downstream port: %s\n",
>                         dev_name(match));
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/bus.c b/drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> index dffbd0ac64af..03394a3ae75f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>   */
>
>  static DEFINE_IDA(cxl_port_ida);
> +static LIST_HEAD(cxl_root_ports);
> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(root_port_sem);

I don't see a need for this new list and lock...

>
>  static ssize_t devtype_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>                             char *buf)
> @@ -268,12 +270,31 @@ struct cxl_port *to_cxl_port(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(to_cxl_port);
>
> +struct cxl_dport *cxl_get_root_dport(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct cxl_dport *ret = NULL;
> +       struct cxl_dport *dport;
> +
> +       down_read(&root_port_sem);
> +       list_for_each_entry(dport, &cxl_root_ports, root_port_link) {
> +               if (dport->dport == dev) {
> +                       ret = dport;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       up_read(&root_port_sem);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_get_root_dport);

This can be done by walking the existing topology:

struct cxl_dport *cxl_get_root_dport(struct device *dev)
{
        struct device *host = get_cxl_topology_host();
        struct cxl_dport *dport, *found = NULL;
        struct cxl_port *port;
        struct device *root;

        if (!host)
                return NULL;

        root = device_find_child(host, &root, match_cxl_root_port);
        if (!root)
                goto out;
        device_lock(root);
        port = to_cxl_port(root);
        list_for_each_entry (dport, &port->dports, list)
                if (dport->dport == dev) {
                        found = dport;
                        break;
                }
        device_unlock(root);
        put_device(root);

out:
        put_cxl_topology_host(host);
        return found;
}


It occurs to me after writing this that device_lock() for iterating
dports can be offloaded to the topology rwsem.

> +
>  static void unregister_port(void *_port)
>  {
>         struct cxl_port *port = _port;
>         struct cxl_dport *dport;
>
>         device_lock(&port->dev);
> +       down_read(&root_port_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry(dport, &port->dports, list) {
>                 char link_name[CXL_TARGET_STRLEN];
>
> @@ -281,7 +302,10 @@ static void unregister_port(void *_port)
>                              dport->port_id) >= CXL_TARGET_STRLEN)
>                         continue;
>                 sysfs_remove_link(&port->dev.kobj, link_name);
> +
> +               list_del_init(&dport->root_port_link);
>         }
> +       up_read(&root_port_sem);
>         device_unlock(&port->dev);
>         device_unregister(&port->dev);
>  }
> @@ -431,12 +455,13 @@ static int add_dport(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_dport *new)
>   * @dport_dev: firmware or PCI device representing the dport
>   * @port_id: identifier for this dport in a decoder's target list
>   * @component_reg_phys: optional location of CXL component registers
> + * @root_port: is this a root port (hostbridge downstream)
>   *
>   * Note that all allocations and links are undone by cxl_port deletion
>   * and release.
>   */
>  int cxl_add_dport(struct cxl_port *port, struct device *dport_dev, int port_id,
> -                 resource_size_t component_reg_phys)
> +                 resource_size_t component_reg_phys, bool root_port)

With the above implementation there's no need to add this last parameter.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-31 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 18:36 [RFC PATCH v2 00/28] CXL Region Creation / HDM decoder programming Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/28] cxl: Rename CXL_MEM to CXL_PCI Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 20:15   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 21:20     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 21:39       ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/28] cxl: Move register block enumeration to core Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 20:23   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 21:23     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/28] cxl/acpi: Map component registers for Root Ports Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 20:28   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/28] cxl: Add helper for new drivers Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 20:30   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/28] cxl/core: Convert decoder range to resource Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 20:50   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 21:26     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 22:22       ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 22:37         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-01 14:33           ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/28] cxl: Introduce endpoint decoders Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 21:00   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-29 22:02     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 22:25       ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/28] cxl/core: Move target population locking to caller Ben Widawsky
2021-10-29 23:03   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/28] cxl/port: Introduce a port driver Ben Widawsky
2021-10-30  1:37   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-31 17:53     ` Dan Williams
2021-10-31 18:10       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 17:36         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-01 17:53     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-01 17:54       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02  3:31       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 16:27         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02 17:21           ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 16:58         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-04 19:10           ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 19:49             ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-04 20:04               ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 21:25                 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-04 16:37     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-04 19:17       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 19:46         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-04 20:00           ` Dan Williams
2021-11-04 21:26             ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-03 15:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/28] cxl/acpi: Map single port host bridge component registers Ben Widawsky
2021-10-31 18:03   ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 17:07     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02  2:15       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 16:31         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02 17:46           ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 17:57             ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02 18:10               ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 18:27                 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02 18:49                   ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 21:15                     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02 21:34                       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 21:47                         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/28] cxl/core: Store global list of root ports Ben Widawsky
2021-10-31 18:32   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2021-11-01 18:43     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02  2:04       ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/28] cxl/acpi: Rescan bus at probe completion Ben Widawsky
2021-10-31 19:25   ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 18:56     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-01 21:45       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02  1:56         ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/28] cxl/core: Store component register base for memdevs Ben Widawsky
2021-10-31 20:13   ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 21:50     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/28] cxl: Flesh out register names Ben Widawsky
2021-10-31 20:18   ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 22:00     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02  1:53       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-03 15:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-03 16:03     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-03 16:42       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-03 17:05         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/28] cxl: Hide devm host for ports Ben Widawsky
2021-10-31 21:14   ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/28] cxl/core: Introduce API to scan switch ports Ben Widawsky
2021-11-01  5:39   ` Dan Williams
2021-11-01 22:56     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02  1:45       ` Dan Williams
2021-11-02 16:39         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-02 20:00           ` Dan Williams
2021-11-16 16:50         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-16 17:51           ` Dan Williams
2021-11-16 18:02             ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-03 16:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-10 17:49     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-10 18:10       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-10 21:03         ` Dan Williams
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/28] cxl: Introduce cxl_mem driver Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/28] cxl: Disable switch hierarchies for now Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/28] cxl/region: Add region creation ABI Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/28] cxl/region: Introduce concept of region configuration Ben Widawsky
2021-12-15 17:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/28] cxl/region: Introduce a cxl_region driver Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/28] cxl/acpi: Handle address space allocation Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/28] cxl/region: Address " Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/28] cxl/region: Implement XHB verification Ben Widawsky
2022-01-06 16:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-06 16:58     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-06 17:33       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-06 18:10         ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-06 18:34           ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/28] cxl/region: HB port config verification Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/28] cxl/region: Record host bridge target list Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/28] cxl/mem: Store the endpoint's uport Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/28] cxl/region: Gather HDM decoder resources Ben Widawsky
2021-10-22 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/28] cxl: Program decoders for regions Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4jqkEVTjqKd1wy468ht3_e8wawiR0sNQKcP9CHnPcgHMA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=chet.r.douglas@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.