From: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:32:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPj87rP_qPk0dKhLQDpFAsAqL2LxG=_5n+0KMRW=qEih4mBTJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80
> characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply
> to your very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting
> them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that
> kind of additional work? Thanks.
His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters.
You should probably look into fixing your MUA.
Cheers,
Daniel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:32:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPj87rP_qPk0dKhLQDpFAsAqL2LxG=_5n+0KMRW=qEih4mBTJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80
> characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply
> to your very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting
> them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that
> kind of additional work? Thanks.
His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters.
You should probably look into fixing your MUA.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel@fooishbar.org (Daniel Stone)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:32:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPj87rP_qPk0dKhLQDpFAsAqL2LxG=_5n+0KMRW=qEih4mBTJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80
> characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply
> to your very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting
> them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that
> kind of additional work? Thanks.
His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters.
You should probably look into fixing your MUA.
Cheers,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 14:44 [PATCH 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 16:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 16:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 16:49 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:49 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:32 ` Daniel Stone [this message]
2015-11-16 17:32 ` Daniel Stone
2015-11-16 17:32 ` Daniel Stone
2015-11-16 17:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:48 ` Daniel Stone
2015-11-16 17:48 ` Daniel Stone
2015-11-16 17:48 ` Daniel Stone
2015-11-16 17:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 17:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 21:17 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 21:17 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 21:17 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/rockchip: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 14:44 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 16:52 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:52 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:52 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 17:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 17:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 17:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 16:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 16:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 16:50 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:50 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-16 16:50 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPj87rP_qPk0dKhLQDpFAsAqL2LxG=_5n+0KMRW=qEih4mBTJA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=daniel@fooishbar.org \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.