All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:12:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDDD0B0B.29BC3%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B74971.4020104@citrix.com>

On 11/06/2013 16:59, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:

>> Hmm I can't find any confirmation that my patch actually *did* work. :( I'm
>> sure I remember testing it though!
>> 
>> My suggestion is we do indeed remove the inner if() in latch_shinfo_size().
>> Ie. Call update_domain_wallclock_time() even if shinfo size has apparently
>> not changed. 
>> 
>> We only latch shinfo size on hypercall page initialisation and on setup of
>> the callback irq. They are start-of-day/resume operations, so removing the
>> if() should have no bad side effect that I can see. If nothing else it
>> should make this wallclock-field setup more robust.
> 
> So it would be better to call update_domain_wallclock_time
> unconditionally on latch_shinfo_size rather than doing it on
> XENMAPSPACE_shared_info?
> 
> Conceptially it makes more sense IMHO to do it in the call to
> XENMAPSPACE_shared_info.

I would still make the fix in latch_shinfo_size() and perhaps add an extra
call to latch_shinfo_size() from the call to XENMAPSPACE_shared_info. But
actually I am sure you will find it unnecessary and at this point for Xen
4.3 I think the smallest possible patch wins.

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-11 10:46 [PATCH] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration Roger Pau Monne
2013-06-11 11:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 12:01   ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 12:12     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 13:59       ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-11 14:04         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:36           ` Egger, Christoph
2013-06-11 12:17   ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 13:15     ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 14:02     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 13:38   ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 14:16     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 14:41       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-11 15:05       ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 15:45         ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 15:59           ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 16:12             ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-06-11 16:14               ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 15:59           ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:50           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 13:55             ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 15:50     ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CDDD0B0B.29BC3%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.