All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Loke, Chetan" <Chetan.Loke@netscout.com>
To: "Tom Coughlan" <coughlan@redhat.com>,
	"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>, <tasleson@redhat.com>
Cc: <Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com>, <vgoyal@redhat.com>, <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:17:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3F292ADF945FB49B35E96C94C2061B9159134BD@nsmail.netscout.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326113987.2580.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tom Coughlan
> 


> Yes, Red Hat does. Tony Asleson. libStorageMgmt:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/libstoragemgmt
> 
> The current focus is on managing external storage (SMI-S, etc.). This
> focus can be expanded over time. Contributions welcome.
> 

Device management(scalability/feature mgmt) - 

1) scalability:
I may be wrong but storage boxes like symmetrix(and others) support
large number of LUNs.
So device management 'scalability' will make linux shine. By scalability
I mean efficiently managing let's say 32K(?) LUNs.

2) feature management:
As Shyam mentioned in earlier emails - provide an ecosystem similar to
smart-phones. Let me provide an example(and then
you guys can correct me by saying this already exists or bits and pieces
exist):

a) As a kernel developer - export all the features(to the upper layers)
we can by querying the target.

b) As an app developer - GetLUNFeatures(), could return - {Thin
Provision, RAID-level, ... ).

c) As a sys-admin - If I right click(for a volume/LUN) on my management
GUI, I should be able to tell if my volume supports thin-prov, backed by
DRBD[proxy?] etc.

So once we provide b) from above, tens(if not hundreds) of apps will be
developed in a short period of time.
I feel libstoragemgmt is an excellent place to get all of this
organized.


Chetan Loke

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Loke, Chetan" <Chetan.Loke@netscout.com>
To: Tom Coughlan <coughlan@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	tasleson@redhat.com
Cc: Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, rwheeler@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:17:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3F292ADF945FB49B35E96C94C2061B9159134BD@nsmail.netscout.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326113987.2580.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tom Coughlan
> 


> Yes, Red Hat does. Tony Asleson. libStorageMgmt:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/libstoragemgmt
> 
> The current focus is on managing external storage (SMI-S, etc.). This
> focus can be expanded over time. Contributions welcome.
> 

Device management(scalability/feature mgmt) - 

1) scalability:
I may be wrong but storage boxes like symmetrix(and others) support
large number of LUNs.
So device management 'scalability' will make linux shine. By scalability
I mean efficiently managing let's say 32K(?) LUNs.

2) feature management:
As Shyam mentioned in earlier emails - provide an ecosystem similar to
smart-phones. Let me provide an example(and then
you guys can correct me by saying this already exists or bits and pieces
exist):

a) As a kernel developer - export all the features(to the upper layers)
we can by querying the target.

b) As an app developer - GetLUNFeatures(), could return - {Thin
Provision, RAID-level, ... ).

c) As a sys-admin - If I right click(for a volume/LUN) on my management
GUI, I should be able to tell if my volume supports thin-prov, backed by
DRBD[proxy?] etc.

So once we provide b) from above, tens(if not hundreds) of apps will be
developed in a short period of time.
I feel libstoragemgmt is an excellent place to get all of this
organized.


Chetan Loke

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-19 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-21 15:59 [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what's missing? Ric Wheeler
2011-12-22  8:14 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-22  8:14   ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-22 15:58   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-22 20:54     ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-22 20:54       ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-23  3:06       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23  4:35         ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-23  4:35           ` Shyam_Iyer
2012-01-09 12:18       ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-09 12:59         ` Tom Coughlan
2012-01-10  6:53           ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-20  8:55             ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-19 16:17           ` Loke, Chetan [this message]
2012-01-19 16:17             ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing? Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 16:19             ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-19 16:26               ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 16:26                 ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 16:29                 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-19 17:32                   ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 17:32                     ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 17:44                     ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-19 21:30                       ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 21:30                         ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 21:39                         ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-24 17:05                           ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-24 17:05                             ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-24 18:13                             ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-26 22:24                             ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-26 22:29                               ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-03 19:26 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC][ATTEND] linux servers as a storage server - what's missing? Jeff Layton
2012-01-03 19:32   ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-17 21:16     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 21:25       ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-24 21:36   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-24 23:13     ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-25 19:05       ` Christopher R. Hertel
2012-01-25 20:25       ` Christopher R. Hertel
2012-01-25 21:56         ` Roland Dreier
2012-01-25 22:09           ` Christopher R. Hertel
2012-01-26 21:52             ` Andy Grover
2012-01-26 11:15         ` Bart Van Assche
2012-01-18 17:00 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] " Roland Dreier
2012-01-18 17:51   ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-18 18:46     ` Roland Dreier
2012-01-18 18:51       ` Bart Van Assche
2012-01-18 19:00         ` Roland Dreier
2012-01-19  8:16         ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-19 17:50       ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 17:50         ` Loke, Chetan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D3F292ADF945FB49B35E96C94C2061B9159134BD@nsmail.netscout.com \
    --to=chetan.loke@netscout.com \
    --cc=Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com \
    --cc=coughlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=tasleson@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.