From: Delio Brignoli <dbrignoli@audioscience.com> To: Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: Minimal support for dm814x Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:26:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <D5E377BD-5AAE-4302-B2C3-2B17A00892B5@audioscience.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAALWOA-PjKW9M3qqxum4OqJ3V3AwKaaEDzA17jdZmgUNNE79Wg@mail.gmail.com> On 18 Nov 2015, at 06:22, Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> wrote: > The PLL code looks pretty mediocre to me. In particular, they make no > effort whatsoever to configure an exact ratio. It seems their > algorithm uses whatever pre divider was already programmed, I believe the implementors assumed the bootloader was setting up the PLL, its adjustment may have been an afterthought added in order to support PTP. > This works in principle, but both minimizing the DCO and (often > needlessly) using the fractional multiplier seem like recipes to > maximize the clock jitter. Mind you, I don't know how much jitter > we’re talking about here, I don't recall having seen specs about this. We haven’t seen any specs either but testing shows that changing DCO mode causes the PLL to lose lock at least temporarily. — Delio
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dbrignoli@audioscience.com (Delio Brignoli) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Minimal support for dm814x Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:26:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <D5E377BD-5AAE-4302-B2C3-2B17A00892B5@audioscience.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAALWOA-PjKW9M3qqxum4OqJ3V3AwKaaEDzA17jdZmgUNNE79Wg@mail.gmail.com> On 18 Nov 2015, at 06:22, Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> wrote: > The PLL code looks pretty mediocre to me. In particular, they make no > effort whatsoever to configure an exact ratio. It seems their > algorithm uses whatever pre divider was already programmed, I believe the implementors assumed the bootloader was setting up the PLL, its adjustment may have been an afterthought added in order to support PTP. > This works in principle, but both minimizing the DCO and (often > needlessly) using the fractional multiplier seem like recipes to > maximize the clock jitter. Mind you, I don't know how much jitter > we?re talking about here, I don't recall having seen specs about this. We haven?t seen any specs either but testing shows that changing DCO mode causes the PLL to lose lock at least temporarily. ? Delio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 8:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-11-05 13:08 Minimal support for dm814x Delio Brignoli 2015-11-09 15:06 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-09 15:06 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-10 8:50 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-10 8:50 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-10 10:23 ` Delio Brignoli 2015-11-10 10:23 ` Delio Brignoli 2015-11-10 10:44 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-10 10:44 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-11 17:40 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-11 17:40 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-12 9:20 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-12 9:20 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-12 17:41 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-12 17:41 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-13 7:14 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-13 7:14 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-13 10:59 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-13 10:59 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-13 14:52 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-13 14:52 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-13 14:57 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-13 14:57 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-11-18 5:22 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-18 5:22 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-18 8:26 ` Delio Brignoli [this message] 2015-11-18 8:26 ` Delio Brignoli 2015-11-18 10:01 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-18 10:01 ` Matthijs van Duin 2015-11-18 11:09 ` Delio Brignoli 2015-11-18 11:09 ` Delio Brignoli 2015-11-10 10:05 ` Delio Brignoli 2015-11-10 10:05 ` Delio Brignoli
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=D5E377BD-5AAE-4302-B2C3-2B17A00892B5@audioscience.com \ --to=dbrignoli@audioscience.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=matthijsvanduin@gmail.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.