[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 0/2] armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32 execution state

* [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 0/2] armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32 execution state
@ 2016-10-08  6:47 Alison Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alison Wang @ 2016-10-08  6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

> -----????-----
> ???: york sun [mailto:york.sun at nxp.com]
> ????: Thursday, October 06, 2016 3:00 AM
> ???: Alison Wang <b18965@freescale.com>; agraf at suse.de; Scott Wood
> <scott.wood@nxp.com>; Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; fenghua at phytium.com.cn; linus.walleij at linaro.org;
> ryan.harkin at linaro.org; monstr at monstr.eu; thomas.ab at samsung.com;
> mk7.kang at samsung.com; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> ??: Jason Jin <jason.jin@nxp.com>
> ??: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32
> execution state
> 
> On 09/09/2016 01:56 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > This series is to support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state
> > will change from
> > AArch64 to AArch32 when jumping to kernel. The architecture
> > information will be got through checking FIT image, then U-Boot will
> load 32-bit OS or 64-bit OS automatically.
> >
> > Spin-table method is used for secondary cores to load 32-bit OS. The
> > architecture information will be got through checking FIT image and
> > saved in the os_arch element of spin-table, then the secondary cores
> > will check os_arch and jump to 32-bit OS or 64-bit OS automatically.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Modified armv8_switch_to_el1(). It will always jump to ep when
> switching to AArch64 or AArch32 modes.
> > - Make other platforms compatible with the new armv8_switch_to_el2()
> and armv8_switch_to_el1().
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Modified armv8_switch_to_el2(). It will always jump to ep when
> switching to AArch64 or AArch32 modes.
> > - Make secondary_switch_to_el2() always jump to ep when switching to
> AArch64 or AArch32 modes.
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Correct config ARM64_SUPPORT_AARCH32.
> > - Omit arch and ftaddr arguments.
> > - Rename "xreg5" to "tmp".
> > - Use xxx_RES1 to combine all RES1 fields in xxx register.
> > - Use an immediate cmp directly.
> > - Use #ifdef for CONFIG_ARM64_SUPPORT_AARCH32.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Comments the functions and the arguments.
> > - Rename the real parameters.
> > - Use the macros instead of the magic values.
> > - Remove the redundant codes.
> > - Clean up all of the mess in boot_jump_linux().
> > - Add CONFIG_ARM64_SUPPORT_AARCH32 to detect for some ARM64 system
> doesn't support AArch32 state.
> > - Adjust the arguments for armv8_switch_to_el2_m and
> armv8_switch_to_el1_m.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - armv8_switch_to_el2_aarch32() is removed. armv8_switch_to_el2_m is
> used
> >   to switch to AArch64 EL2 or AArch32 Hyp.
> > - armv8_switch_to_el1_aarch32() is removed. armv8_switch_to_el1_m is
> used
> >   to switch to AArch64 EL1 or AArch32 SVC.
> > - Support to call armv8_switch_to_el2_m and armv8_switch_to_el1_m.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Alison Wang (2):
> >       armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32 execution state
> >       armv8: fsl-layerscape: SMP support for loading 32-bit OS
> 
> Alison,
> 
> The change overall is OK, but the way you split the patches is not. If
> you apply the first patch and then compile, you will see all our armv8
> platforms are broken. You changed the definition of macro
> armv8_switch_to_el2_m in the first patch, but you change the call in
> the second patch.
[Alison Wang] Sorry for the mistake. I will split the patches correctly
in v7.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Alison Wang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread