RE: [PREEMPT_RT][PATCH] printk: Enhance the condition check of msleep in pr_flush()

["Qin, Chao" <chao.qin@intel.com>]

Hi John Ogness,

Do you have plan to backport this fix into v5.10.y-rt kernel?

Thanks,
Qin Chao.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 10:03 PM
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>; Qin, Chao <chao.qin@intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org; bigeasy@linutronix.de; tglx@linutronix.de; rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mgross@linux.intel.com; Mei, Paul <paul.mei@intel.com>; Li, Lili <lili.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT_RT][PATCH] printk: Enhance the condition check of msleep in pr_flush()

On 2021-07-20, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> Logic continuations are typically at the end of the previous line.
> And there are few too many parentheses for my taste.
>
> Maybe exceed 80 columns in a single line
>
> 	may_sleep = preemptible() && !in_softirq() && system_state >= 
> SYSTEM_RUNNING;
>
> or align the continuation
>
> 	may_sleep = (preemptible() && !in_softirq() &&
> 		     system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING);
>
> or use individual lines
>
> 	may_sleep = (preemptible() &&
> 		     !in_softirq() &&
> 		     system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING);

The kernel now has a 100-column policy, but I decided to go with this third variant for easy reading.

Chao Qin, your patch will be part of the next PREEMPT_RT release. Thank you.

John Ogness