All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@fb.com>, Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:36:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4657C1830DACC5EB4CD98B789BB49@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34093244-431b-98c8-ba88-82957c659808@novek.ru>

-----Original Message-----
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru> 
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 12:48 AM

>Hi Arkadiusz!
>
>On 23.06.2022 16:33, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
>> Hi Vadim,
>> 
>> Great work!
>> 
>> Although, I've been thinking that you already forget about it, so I have
>> started development of something similar.
>>
>
>Sorry for making you wait for so long. I'm happy to merge your work into these 
>series and to continue collaboration to further improve subsystem.

Not a problem, sounds great!

>
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +#
>>> +# Generic DPLL drivers configuration
>>> +#
>>> +
>>> +config DPLL
>>> +  bool
>> 
>> for RFC help and default were ommited?
>> 
>
>In private conversation with Jakub we decided to hide this subsystem from user
>facing menu and enable via in-kernel customer's dependency. If you think it's 
>better to let users enable or disable it, we can bring this discussion back to 
>wider audience.

Well, I won't insist on it. Seems fair.

>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/Makefile b/drivers/dpll/Makefile
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..0748c80097e4
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +#
>>> +# Makefile for DPLL drivers.
>>> +#
>>> +
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DPLL)          += dpll_sys.o
>>> +dpll_sys-y                  += dpll_core.o dpll_netlink.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..e34767e723cf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + *  dpll_core.c - Generic DPLL Management class support.
>>> + *
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/string.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "dpll_core.h"
>>> +
>>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +static DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(dpll_device_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>>> +#define DPLL_REGISTERED XA_MARK_1
>>> +
>>> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(d)                                           \
>>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(d)                                      \
>>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +int for_each_dpll_device(int id, int (*cb)(struct dpll_device *, void *), void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	unsigned long index;
>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	xa_for_each_start(&dpll_device_xa, index, dpll, id) {
>>> +		if (!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, index, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +			continue;
>>> +		ret = cb(dpll, data);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			break;
>>> +	}
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = NULL;
>>> +
>>> +	if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +		dpll = xa_load(&dpll_device_xa, id);
>>> +	return dpll;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void *dpll_priv(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>>> +{
>>> +	return dpll->priv;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_priv);
>>> +
>>> +static void dpll_device_release(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +
>>> +	dpll = to_dpll_device(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	dpll_device_unregister(dpll);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_destroy(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	kfree(dpll);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct class dpll_class = {
>>> +	.name = "dpll",
>>> +	.dev_release = dpll_device_release,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_alloc(struct dpll_device_ops *ops, int sources_count,
>>> +					 int outputs_count, void *priv)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	dpll = kzalloc(sizeof(*dpll), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!dpll)
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_init(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	dpll->ops = ops;
>>> +	dpll->dev.class = &dpll_class;
>>> +	dpll->sources_count = sources_count;
>>> +	dpll->outputs_count = outputs_count;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	ret = xa_alloc(&dpll_device_xa, &dpll->id, dpll, xa_limit_16b, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto error;
>>> +	dev_set_name(&dpll->dev, "dpll%d", dpll->id);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	dpll->priv = priv;
>>> +
>>> +	return dpll;
>>> +
>>> +error:
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	kfree(dpll);
>>> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_alloc);
>>> +
>>> +void dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>>> +{
>>> +	ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(dpll);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	xa_set_mark(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id, DPLL_REGISTERED);
>>> +	dpll_notify_device_create(dpll->id, dev_name(&dpll->dev));
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_register);
>>> +
>>> +void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>>> +{
>>> +	ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(dpll);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	xa_erase(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_unregister);
>>> +
>>> +static int __init dpll_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = dpll_netlink_init();
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto error;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = class_register(&dpll_class);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto unregister_netlink;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +unregister_netlink:
>>> +	dpll_netlink_finish();
>>> +error:
>>> +	mutex_destroy(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +subsys_initcall(dpll_init);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..5ad3224d5caf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __DPLL_CORE_H__
>>> +#define __DPLL_CORE_H__
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/dpll.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "dpll_netlink.h"
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct dpll_device - structure for a DPLL device
>>> + * @id:		unique id number for each edvice
>>> + * @dev:	&struct device for this dpll device
>>> + * @sources_count:	amount of input sources this dpll_device supports
>>> + * @outputs_count:	amount of outputs this dpll_device supports
>>> + * @ops:	operations this &dpll_device supports
>>> + * @lock:	mutex to serialize operations
>>> + * @priv:	pointer to private information of owner
>>> + */
>>> +struct dpll_device {
>>> +	int id;
>>> +	struct device dev;
>>> +	int sources_count;
>>> +	int outputs_count;
>>> +	struct dpll_device_ops *ops;
>>> +	struct mutex lock;
>>> +	void *priv;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define to_dpll_device(_dev) \
>>> +	container_of(_dev, struct dpll_device, dev)
>>> +
>>> +int for_each_dpll_device(int id, int (*cb)(struct dpll_device *, void *),
>>> +			  void *data);
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id);
>>> +void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..0bbdaa6dde8e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + * Generic netlink for DPLL management framework
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <net/genetlink.h>
>>> +#include "dpll_core.h"
>>> +
>>> +#include <uapi/linux/dpll.h>
>>> +
>>> +static const struct genl_multicast_group dpll_genl_mcgrps[] = {
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_CONFIG_DEVICE_GROUP_NAME, },
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_CONFIG_SOURCE_GROUP_NAME, },
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_CONFIG_OUTPUT_GROUP_NAME, },
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_MONITOR_GROUP_NAME,  },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct nla_policy dpll_genl_get_policy[] = {
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME]	= { .type = NLA_STRING,
>>> +				    .len = DPLL_NAME_LENGTH },
>>> +	[DPLLA_FLAGS]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct nla_policy dpll_genl_set_source_policy[] = {
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_SOURCE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct nla_policy dpll_genl_set_output_policy[] = {
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct param {
>>> +	struct netlink_callback *cb;
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	struct nlattr **attrs;
>>> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
>>> +	int dpll_id;
>>> +	int dpll_source_id;
>>> +	int dpll_source_type;
>>> +	int dpll_output_id;
>>> +	int dpll_output_type;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_dump_ctx {
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dev;
>>> +	int flags;
>>> +	int pos_idx;
>>> +	int pos_src_idx;
>>> +	int pos_out_idx;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +typedef int (*cb_t)(struct param *);
>>> +
>>> +static struct genl_family dpll_gnl_family;
>>> +
>>> +static struct dpll_dump_ctx *dpll_dump_context(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>> +{
>>> +	return (struct dpll_dump_ctx *)cb->ctx;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_device_dump_one(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, dpll->id))
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME, dev_name(&dpll->dev)))
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_dump_sources(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct nlattr *src_attr;
>>> +	int i, ret = 0, type;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < dpll->sources_count; i++) {
>>> +		src_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLLA_SOURCE);
>>> +		if (!src_attr) {
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		type = dpll->ops->get_source_type(dpll, i);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_SOURCE_ID, i) ||
>>> +		    nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE, type)) {
>>> +			nla_nest_cancel(msg, src_attr);
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		nla_nest_end(msg, src_attr);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_dump_outputs(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct nlattr *out_attr;
>>> +	int i, ret = 0, type;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < dpll->outputs_count; i++) {
>>> +		out_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT);
>>> +		if (!out_attr) {
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		type = dpll->ops->get_source_type(dpll, i);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID, i) ||
>>> +		    nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE, type)) {
>>> +			nla_nest_cancel(msg, out_attr);
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		nla_nest_end(msg, out_attr);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_dump_status(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dpll->ops->get_status && !dpll->ops->get_temp && !dpll->ops->get_lock_status)
>>> +		return 0;
>> 
>> what if dpll doesn't support one of those commands?
>> 
>
>then only supported attributes will be messaged back to user

Hmm, isn't that redundat if we need to check those again below?

>
>>> +
>>> +	if (dpll->ops->get_status) {
>>> +		ret = dpll->ops->get_status(dpll);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_STATUS, ret))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (dpll->ops->get_temp) {
>>> +		ret = dpll->ops->get_status(dpll);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_TEMP, ret))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>> 
>> shouldn't be get_temp(dpll)?
>
>good catch, copy-paste error
>
>>> +
>>> +	if (dpll->ops->get_lock_status) {
>>> +		ret = dpll->ops->get_lock_status(dpll);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_LOCK_STATUS, ret))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_device_dump_one(struct dpll_device *dev, struct sk_buff *msg, int flags)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct nlattr *hdr;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	hdr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLLA_DEVICE);
>>> +	if (!hdr)
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
>>> +	ret = __dpll_cmd_device_dump_one(dev, msg);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +
>>> +	if (flags & DPLL_FLAG_SOURCES && dev->ops->get_source_type) {
>>> +		ret = __dpll_cmd_dump_sources(dev, msg);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (flags & DPLL_FLAG_OUTPUTS && dev->ops->get_output_type) {
>>> +		ret = __dpll_cmd_dump_outputs(dev, msg);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (flags & DPLL_FLAG_STATUS) {
>>> +		ret = __dpll_cmd_dump_status(dev, msg);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
>>> +	nla_nest_end(msg, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +out_cancel_nest:
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
>>> +	nla_nest_cancel(msg, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_set_source(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(p->cb);
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = p->dpll;
>>> +	int ret = 0, src_id, type;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_ID] ||
>>> +	    !info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE])
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dpll->ops->set_source_type)
>>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> +	src_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_ID]);
>>> +	type = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE]);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	ret = dpll->ops->set_source_type(dpll, src_id, type);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll->lock);

I wonder if shouldn't the dpll ptr be validated here, and in similar cases.
I mean, between calling dpll_pre_doit and actually doing something on a 'dpll',
it is possible that device gets removed?

Or maybe pre_doit/post_doit shall lock and unlock some other mutex?
Altough, I am not an expert in the netlink stuff, thus just raising a concern.

>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_set_output(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(p->cb);
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = p->dpll;
>>> +	int ret = 0, out_id, type;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID] ||
>>> +	    !info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE])
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dpll->ops->set_output_type)
>>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> +	out_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID]);
>>> +	type = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE]);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	ret = dpll->ops->set_source_type(dpll, out_id, type);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll->lock);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_device_loop_cb(struct dpll_device *dpll, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_dump_ctx *ctx;
>>> +	struct param *p = (struct param *)data;
>>> +
>>> +	ctx = dpll_dump_context(p->cb);
>>> +
>>> +	ctx->pos_idx = dpll->id;
>>> +
>>> +	return dpll_device_dump_one(dpll, p->msg, ctx->flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_cmd_device_dump(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_dump_ctx *ctx = dpll_dump_context(p->cb);
>>> +
>>> +	return for_each_dpll_device(ctx->pos_idx, dpll_device_loop_cb, p);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_device_get_id(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = p->dpll;
>>> +	int flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	if (p->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS])
>>> +		flags = nla_get_u32(p->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS]);
>>> +
>>> +	return dpll_device_dump_one(dpll, p->msg, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static cb_t cmd_doit_cb[] = {
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET]		= dpll_genl_cmd_device_get_id,
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_SET_SOURCE_TYPE]	= dpll_genl_cmd_set_source,
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_SET_OUTPUT_TYPE]	= dpll_genl_cmd_set_output,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static cb_t cmd_dump_cb[] = {
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET]		= dpll_cmd_device_dump,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb);
>>> +	struct dpll_dump_ctx *ctx = dpll_dump_context(cb);
>>> +
>>> +	ctx->dev = NULL;
>>> +	if (info->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS])
>>> +		ctx->flags = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS]);
>>> +	else
>>> +		ctx->flags = 0;
>>> +	ctx->pos_idx = 0;
>>> +	ctx->pos_src_idx = 0;
>>> +	ctx->pos_out_idx = 0;
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> +				   struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct param p = { .cb = cb, .msg = skb };
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb);
>>> +	int cmd = info->op.cmd;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +	void *hdr;
>>> +
>>> +	hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, &dpll_gnl_family, 0, cmd);
>>> +	if (!hdr)
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = cmd_dump_cb[cmd](&p);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_cancel_msg;
>>> +
>>> +	genlmsg_end(skb, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +out_cancel_msg:
>>> +	genlmsg_cancel(skb, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> +				 struct genl_info *info)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct param p = { .attrs = info->attrs, .dpll = info->user_ptr[0] };
>>> +	int cmd = info->genlhdr->cmd;
>>> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
>>> +	void *hdr;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!msg)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +	p.msg = msg;
>>> +
>>> +	hdr = genlmsg_put_reply(msg, info, &dpll_gnl_family, 0, cmd);
>>> +	if (!hdr) {
>>> +		ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +		goto out_free_msg;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	ret = cmd_doit_cb[cmd](&p);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_cancel_msg;
>>> +
>>> +	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
>>> +
>>> +out_cancel_msg:
>>> +	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>>> +out_free_msg:
>>> +	nlmsg_free(msg);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_pre_doit(const struct genl_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> +						 struct genl_info *info)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	int id;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!info->attrs[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID])
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]);
>>> +
>>> +	dpll = dpll_device_get_by_id(id);
>>> +	if (!dpll)
>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>> +	info->user_ptr[0] = dpll;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct genl_ops dpll_genl_ops[] = {
>>> +	{
>>> +		.cmd	= DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,
>>> +		.start	= dpll_genl_cmd_start,
>>> +		.dumpit	= dpll_genl_cmd_dumpit,
>>> +		.doit	= dpll_genl_cmd_doit,
>>> +		.policy	= dpll_genl_get_policy,
>>> +		.maxattr = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_get_policy) - 1,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.cmd	= DPLL_CMD_SET_SOURCE_TYPE,
>>> +		.flags	= GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM,
>>> +		.doit	= dpll_genl_cmd_doit,
>>> +		.policy	= dpll_genl_set_source_policy,
>>> +		.maxattr = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_set_source_policy) - 1,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.cmd	= DPLL_CMD_SET_OUTPUT_TYPE,
>>> +		.flags	= GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM,
>>> +		.doit	= dpll_genl_cmd_doit,
>>> +		.policy	= dpll_genl_set_output_policy,
>>> +		.maxattr = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_set_output_policy) - 1,
>>> +	},
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct genl_family dpll_gnl_family __ro_after_init = {
>>> +	.hdrsize	= 0,
>>> +	.name		= DPLL_FAMILY_NAME,
>>> +	.version	= DPLL_VERSION,
>>> +	.ops		= dpll_genl_ops,
>>> +	.n_ops		= ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_ops),
>>> +	.mcgrps		= dpll_genl_mcgrps,
>>> +	.n_mcgrps	= ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_mcgrps),
>>> +	.pre_doit	= dpll_pre_doit,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +int __init dpll_netlink_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	return genl_register_family(&dpll_gnl_family);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void dpll_netlink_finish(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	genl_unregister_family(&dpll_gnl_family);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void __exit dpll_netlink_fini(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	dpll_netlink_finish();
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..e2d100f59dd6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +int __init dpll_netlink_init(void);
>>> +void dpll_netlink_finish(void);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..9051337bcf9e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __DPLL_H__
>>> +#define __DPLL_H__
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device;
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device_ops {
>>> +	int (*get_status)(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +	int (*get_temp)(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +	int (*get_lock_status)(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +	int (*get_source_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id);
>>> +	int (*get_output_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id);
>>> +	int (*set_source_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id, int val);
>>> +	int (*set_output_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id, int val);
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_alloc(struct dpll_device_ops *ops, int sources_count,
>>> +					 int outputs_count, void *priv);
>>> +void dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +void *dpll_priv(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..8c00f52736ee
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
>>> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H
>>> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H
>>> +
>>> +#define DPLL_NAME_LENGTH	20
>>> +
>>> +/* Adding event notification support elements */
>>> +#define DPLL_FAMILY_NAME		"dpll"
>>> +#define DPLL_VERSION			0x01
>>> +#define DPLL_CONFIG_DEVICE_GROUP_NAME  "config"
>>> +#define DPLL_CONFIG_SOURCE_GROUP_NAME  "source"
>>> +#define DPLL_CONFIG_OUTPUT_GROUP_NAME  "output"
>>> +#define DPLL_MONITOR_GROUP_NAME        "monitor"
>>> +
>>> +#define DPLL_FLAG_SOURCES	1
>>> +#define DPLL_FLAG_OUTPUTS	2
>>> +#define DPLL_FLAG_STATUS	4
>>> +
>>> +/* Attributes of dpll_genl_family */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_get_attr {
>>> +	DPLLA_UNSPEC,
>>> +	DPLLA_DEVICE,
>>> +	DPLLA_DEVICE_ID,
>>> +	DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME,
>>> +	DPLLA_SOURCE,
>>> +	DPLLA_SOURCE_ID,
>>> +	DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE,
>>> +	DPLLA_OUTPUT,
>>> +	DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID,
>>> +	DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE,
>>> +	DPLLA_STATUS,
>>> +	DPLLA_TEMP,
>>> +	DPLLA_LOCK_STATUS,
>>> +	DPLLA_FLAGS,
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLLA_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLLA_GET_MAX (__DPLLA_MAX - 1)
>> 
>> I think "_get_/_GET_" in above names is outdated?
>> 
>
>Yes, you are right. The earliest revision had these "GET/SET" in attributes but 
>later we decided to unite them into common attributes. I will remove these 
>artifacts in the next revision.
>
>>> +
>>> +/* DPLL signal types used as source or as output */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_signal_type {
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_EXT_1PPS,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_EXT_10MHZ,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_INT_OSCILLATOR,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_GNSS,
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLL_TYPE_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLL_TYPE_MAX (__DPLL_TYPE_MAX - 1)
>>> +
>>> +/* Events of dpll_genl_family */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_event {
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_UNSPEC,
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE,		/* DPLL device creation */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE,		/* DPLL device deletion */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_LOCKED,		/* DPLL device locked to source */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_UNLOCKED,	/* DPLL device freerun */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE,		/* DPLL device source changed */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_OUTPUT_CHANGE,		/* DPLL device output changed */
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLL_EVENT_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLL_EVENT_MAX (__DPLL_EVENT_MAX - 1)
>>> +
>>> +/* Commands supported by the dpll_genl_family */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_cmd {
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_UNSPEC,
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,	/* List of DPLL devices id */
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_SET_SOURCE_TYPE,	/* Set the DPLL device source type */
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_SET_OUTPUT_TYPE,	/* Get the DPLL device output type */
>> 
>> "Get" in comment description looks like a typo.
>> I am getting bit confused with the name and comments.
>> For me, first look says: it is selection of a type of a source.
>> But in the code I can see it selects a source id and a type.
>> Type of source originates in HW design, why would the one want to "set" it?
>> I can imagine a HW design where a single source or output would allow to choose
>> where the signal originates/goes, some kind of extra selector layer for a
>> source/output, but was that the intention?
>
>In general - yes, we have experimented with our time card providing different 
>types of source synchronisation signal on different input pins, i.e. 1PPS, 
>10MHz, IRIG-B, etc. Any of these signals could be connected to any of 4 external 
>pins, that's why I source id is treated as input pin identifier and source type 
>is the signal type it receives.
>
>> If so, shouldn't the user get some bitmap/list of modes available for each
>> source/output?
>
>Good idea. We have list of available modes exposed via sysfs file, and I agree 
>that it's worth to expose them via netlink interface. I will try to address this 
>in the next version.
>
>> 
>> The user shall get some extra information about the source/output. Right now
>> there can be multiple sources/outputs of the same type, but not really possible
>> to find out their purpose. I.e. a dpll equipped with four source of
>> DPLL_TYPE_EXT_1PPS type.
>>  > This implementation looks like designed for a "forced reference lock" mode
>> where the user must explicitly select one source. But a multi source/output
>> DPLL could be running in different modes. I believe most important is automatic
>> mode, where it tries to lock to a user-configured source priority list.
>> However, there is also freerun mode, where dpll isn't even trying to lock to
>> anything, or NCO - Numerically Controlled Oscillator mode.
>
>Yes, you are right, my focus was on "forced reference lock" mode as currently 
>this is the only mode supported by our hardware. But I'm happy to extend it to 
>other usecases.
>
>> It would be great to have ability to select DPLL modes, but also to be able to
>> configure priorities, read failure status, configure extra "features" (i.e.
>> Embedded Sync, EEC modes, Fast Lock)
>I absolutely agree on this way of improvement, and I already have some ongoing 
>work about failures/events/status change messages. I can see no stoppers for 
>creating priorities (if supported by HW) and other extra "features", but we have 
>to agree on the interface with flexibility in mind.

Great and makes perfect sense!

>
>> The sources and outputs can also have some extra features or capabilities, like:
>> - enable Embedded Sync
>
>Does it mean we want to enable or disable Embedded Sync within one protocol? Is 
>it like Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) for Ethernet?

Well, from what I know, Embedded PPS (ePPS), Embedded Pulse Per 2 Seconds
(ePP2S) and Embedded Sync (eSync) can be either 25/75 or 75/25, which describes
a ratio of how the 'embedded pulse' is divided into HIGH and LOW states on a
pulse of higher frequency signal in which EPPS/EPP2S/ESync is embedded.

EPPS and EPP2S are rather straightforward, once an EPPS enabled input is
selected as a source, then output configured as PPS(PP2S) shall tick in the
same periods as signal "embedded" in input.
Embedded Sync (eSync) is similar but it allows for configuration of frequency
of a 'sync' signal, i.e. source is 10MHz with eSync configured as 100 HZ, where
the output configured for 100HZ could use it.

I cannot say how exactly Embedded Sync/PPS will be used, as from my perspective
this is user specific, and I am not very familiar with any standard describing
its usage.
I am working on SyncE, where either Embedded Sync or PPS is not a part of SyncE
standard, but I strongly believe that users would need to run a DPLL with
Embedded Sync/PPS enabled for some other things. And probably would love to
have SW control over the dpll.

Lets assume following simplified example:
input1 +-------------+ output1 
-------|             |---------
       |  DPLL 1     |         
input2 |             | output2 
-------|             |---------
       +-------------+         
where:
- input1 is external 10MHz with 25/75 Embedded PPS enabled,
- input2 is a fallback PPS from GNSS
user expects:
- output1 as a 10MHz with embedded sync
- output2 as a PPS
As long as input1 is selected source, output1 is synchonized with it and
output2 ticks are synchronized with ePPS.
Now the user selects input2 as a source, where outputs are unchanged,
both output2 and output1-ePPS are synchronized with input2, and output1
10MHz must be generated by DPLL.

I am trying to show example of what DPLL user might want to configure, this
would be a separated configuration of ePPS/ePP2S/eSync per source as well as
per output.
Also a DPLL itself can have explicitly disabled embedded signal processing on
its sources.

>
>> - add phase delay
>> - configure frequency (user might need to use source/output with different
>>    frequency then 1 PPS or 10MHz)
>
>Providing these modes I was thinking about the most common and widely used 
>signals in measurement equipment. So my point here is that both 1PPS and 10MHz 
>should stay as is, but another type of signal should be added, let's say 
>CUSTOM_FREQ, which will also consider special attribute in netlink terms. is it ok?

Sure, makes sense.

>
>> Generally, for simple DPLL designs this interface could do the job (although,
>> I still think user needs more information about the sources/outputs), but for
>> more complex ones, there should be something different, which takes care of my
>> comments regarding extra configuration needed.
>> 
>
>As I already mentioned earlier, I'm open for improvements and happy to 
>collaborate to cover other use cases of this subsystem from the very beginning 
>of development. We can even create an open github repo to share implementation 
>details together with comments if it works better for you.
>

Sure, great! I am happy to help.
I could start working on a part for extra DPLL modes and source-priorities as
automatic mode doesn't make sense without them.

Thank you,
Arkadiusz  

>> Thanks,
>> Arkadiusz
>> 
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLL_CMD_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLL_CMD_MAX (__DPLL_CMD_MAX - 1)
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H */
>>> -- 
>>> 2.27.0
>>>
>>>
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@fb.com>, Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:36:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4657C1830DACC5EB4CD98B789BB49@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34093244-431b-98c8-ba88-82957c659808@novek.ru>

-----Original Message-----
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru> 
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 12:48 AM

>Hi Arkadiusz!
>
>On 23.06.2022 16:33, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
>> Hi Vadim,
>> 
>> Great work!
>> 
>> Although, I've been thinking that you already forget about it, so I have
>> started development of something similar.
>>
>
>Sorry for making you wait for so long. I'm happy to merge your work into these 
>series and to continue collaboration to further improve subsystem.

Not a problem, sounds great!

>
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +#
>>> +# Generic DPLL drivers configuration
>>> +#
>>> +
>>> +config DPLL
>>> +  bool
>> 
>> for RFC help and default were ommited?
>> 
>
>In private conversation with Jakub we decided to hide this subsystem from user
>facing menu and enable via in-kernel customer's dependency. If you think it's 
>better to let users enable or disable it, we can bring this discussion back to 
>wider audience.

Well, I won't insist on it. Seems fair.

>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/Makefile b/drivers/dpll/Makefile
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..0748c80097e4
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +#
>>> +# Makefile for DPLL drivers.
>>> +#
>>> +
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DPLL)          += dpll_sys.o
>>> +dpll_sys-y                  += dpll_core.o dpll_netlink.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..e34767e723cf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + *  dpll_core.c - Generic DPLL Management class support.
>>> + *
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/string.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "dpll_core.h"
>>> +
>>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +static DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(dpll_device_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>>> +#define DPLL_REGISTERED XA_MARK_1
>>> +
>>> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(d)                                           \
>>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(d)                                      \
>>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +int for_each_dpll_device(int id, int (*cb)(struct dpll_device *, void *), void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	unsigned long index;
>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	xa_for_each_start(&dpll_device_xa, index, dpll, id) {
>>> +		if (!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, index, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +			continue;
>>> +		ret = cb(dpll, data);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			break;
>>> +	}
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = NULL;
>>> +
>>> +	if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>>> +		dpll = xa_load(&dpll_device_xa, id);
>>> +	return dpll;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void *dpll_priv(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>>> +{
>>> +	return dpll->priv;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_priv);
>>> +
>>> +static void dpll_device_release(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +
>>> +	dpll = to_dpll_device(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	dpll_device_unregister(dpll);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_destroy(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	kfree(dpll);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct class dpll_class = {
>>> +	.name = "dpll",
>>> +	.dev_release = dpll_device_release,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_alloc(struct dpll_device_ops *ops, int sources_count,
>>> +					 int outputs_count, void *priv)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	dpll = kzalloc(sizeof(*dpll), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!dpll)
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_init(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	dpll->ops = ops;
>>> +	dpll->dev.class = &dpll_class;
>>> +	dpll->sources_count = sources_count;
>>> +	dpll->outputs_count = outputs_count;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	ret = xa_alloc(&dpll_device_xa, &dpll->id, dpll, xa_limit_16b, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto error;
>>> +	dev_set_name(&dpll->dev, "dpll%d", dpll->id);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	dpll->priv = priv;
>>> +
>>> +	return dpll;
>>> +
>>> +error:
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	kfree(dpll);
>>> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_alloc);
>>> +
>>> +void dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>>> +{
>>> +	ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(dpll);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	xa_set_mark(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id, DPLL_REGISTERED);
>>> +	dpll_notify_device_create(dpll->id, dev_name(&dpll->dev));
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_register);
>>> +
>>> +void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>>> +{
>>> +	ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(dpll);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	xa_erase(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_unregister);
>>> +
>>> +static int __init dpll_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = dpll_netlink_init();
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto error;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = class_register(&dpll_class);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto unregister_netlink;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +unregister_netlink:
>>> +	dpll_netlink_finish();
>>> +error:
>>> +	mutex_destroy(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +subsys_initcall(dpll_init);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..5ad3224d5caf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __DPLL_CORE_H__
>>> +#define __DPLL_CORE_H__
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/dpll.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "dpll_netlink.h"
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct dpll_device - structure for a DPLL device
>>> + * @id:		unique id number for each edvice
>>> + * @dev:	&struct device for this dpll device
>>> + * @sources_count:	amount of input sources this dpll_device supports
>>> + * @outputs_count:	amount of outputs this dpll_device supports
>>> + * @ops:	operations this &dpll_device supports
>>> + * @lock:	mutex to serialize operations
>>> + * @priv:	pointer to private information of owner
>>> + */
>>> +struct dpll_device {
>>> +	int id;
>>> +	struct device dev;
>>> +	int sources_count;
>>> +	int outputs_count;
>>> +	struct dpll_device_ops *ops;
>>> +	struct mutex lock;
>>> +	void *priv;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define to_dpll_device(_dev) \
>>> +	container_of(_dev, struct dpll_device, dev)
>>> +
>>> +int for_each_dpll_device(int id, int (*cb)(struct dpll_device *, void *),
>>> +			  void *data);
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id);
>>> +void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..0bbdaa6dde8e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + * Generic netlink for DPLL management framework
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <net/genetlink.h>
>>> +#include "dpll_core.h"
>>> +
>>> +#include <uapi/linux/dpll.h>
>>> +
>>> +static const struct genl_multicast_group dpll_genl_mcgrps[] = {
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_CONFIG_DEVICE_GROUP_NAME, },
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_CONFIG_SOURCE_GROUP_NAME, },
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_CONFIG_OUTPUT_GROUP_NAME, },
>>> +	{ .name = DPLL_MONITOR_GROUP_NAME,  },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct nla_policy dpll_genl_get_policy[] = {
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME]	= { .type = NLA_STRING,
>>> +				    .len = DPLL_NAME_LENGTH },
>>> +	[DPLLA_FLAGS]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct nla_policy dpll_genl_set_source_policy[] = {
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_SOURCE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct nla_policy dpll_genl_set_output_policy[] = {
>>> +	[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +	[DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct param {
>>> +	struct netlink_callback *cb;
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	struct nlattr **attrs;
>>> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
>>> +	int dpll_id;
>>> +	int dpll_source_id;
>>> +	int dpll_source_type;
>>> +	int dpll_output_id;
>>> +	int dpll_output_type;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_dump_ctx {
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dev;
>>> +	int flags;
>>> +	int pos_idx;
>>> +	int pos_src_idx;
>>> +	int pos_out_idx;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +typedef int (*cb_t)(struct param *);
>>> +
>>> +static struct genl_family dpll_gnl_family;
>>> +
>>> +static struct dpll_dump_ctx *dpll_dump_context(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>> +{
>>> +	return (struct dpll_dump_ctx *)cb->ctx;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_device_dump_one(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, dpll->id))
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME, dev_name(&dpll->dev)))
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_dump_sources(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct nlattr *src_attr;
>>> +	int i, ret = 0, type;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < dpll->sources_count; i++) {
>>> +		src_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLLA_SOURCE);
>>> +		if (!src_attr) {
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		type = dpll->ops->get_source_type(dpll, i);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_SOURCE_ID, i) ||
>>> +		    nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE, type)) {
>>> +			nla_nest_cancel(msg, src_attr);
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		nla_nest_end(msg, src_attr);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_dump_outputs(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct nlattr *out_attr;
>>> +	int i, ret = 0, type;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < dpll->outputs_count; i++) {
>>> +		out_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT);
>>> +		if (!out_attr) {
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		type = dpll->ops->get_source_type(dpll, i);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID, i) ||
>>> +		    nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE, type)) {
>>> +			nla_nest_cancel(msg, out_attr);
>>> +			ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +		nla_nest_end(msg, out_attr);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __dpll_cmd_dump_status(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +					   struct sk_buff *msg)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dpll->ops->get_status && !dpll->ops->get_temp && !dpll->ops->get_lock_status)
>>> +		return 0;
>> 
>> what if dpll doesn't support one of those commands?
>> 
>
>then only supported attributes will be messaged back to user

Hmm, isn't that redundat if we need to check those again below?

>
>>> +
>>> +	if (dpll->ops->get_status) {
>>> +		ret = dpll->ops->get_status(dpll);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_STATUS, ret))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (dpll->ops->get_temp) {
>>> +		ret = dpll->ops->get_status(dpll);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_TEMP, ret))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>> 
>> shouldn't be get_temp(dpll)?
>
>good catch, copy-paste error
>
>>> +
>>> +	if (dpll->ops->get_lock_status) {
>>> +		ret = dpll->ops->get_lock_status(dpll);
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLLA_LOCK_STATUS, ret))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_device_dump_one(struct dpll_device *dev, struct sk_buff *msg, int flags)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct nlattr *hdr;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	hdr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLLA_DEVICE);
>>> +	if (!hdr)
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
>>> +	ret = __dpll_cmd_device_dump_one(dev, msg);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +
>>> +	if (flags & DPLL_FLAG_SOURCES && dev->ops->get_source_type) {
>>> +		ret = __dpll_cmd_dump_sources(dev, msg);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (flags & DPLL_FLAG_OUTPUTS && dev->ops->get_output_type) {
>>> +		ret = __dpll_cmd_dump_outputs(dev, msg);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (flags & DPLL_FLAG_STATUS) {
>>> +		ret = __dpll_cmd_dump_status(dev, msg);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out_cancel_nest;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
>>> +	nla_nest_end(msg, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +out_cancel_nest:
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
>>> +	nla_nest_cancel(msg, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_set_source(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(p->cb);
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = p->dpll;
>>> +	int ret = 0, src_id, type;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_ID] ||
>>> +	    !info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE])
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dpll->ops->set_source_type)
>>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> +	src_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_ID]);
>>> +	type = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE]);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	ret = dpll->ops->set_source_type(dpll, src_id, type);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll->lock);

I wonder if shouldn't the dpll ptr be validated here, and in similar cases.
I mean, between calling dpll_pre_doit and actually doing something on a 'dpll',
it is possible that device gets removed?

Or maybe pre_doit/post_doit shall lock and unlock some other mutex?
Altough, I am not an expert in the netlink stuff, thus just raising a concern.

>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_set_output(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(p->cb);
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = p->dpll;
>>> +	int ret = 0, out_id, type;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID] ||
>>> +	    !info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE])
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dpll->ops->set_output_type)
>>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> +	out_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID]);
>>> +	type = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE]);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&dpll->lock);
>>> +	ret = dpll->ops->set_source_type(dpll, out_id, type);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&dpll->lock);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_device_loop_cb(struct dpll_device *dpll, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_dump_ctx *ctx;
>>> +	struct param *p = (struct param *)data;
>>> +
>>> +	ctx = dpll_dump_context(p->cb);
>>> +
>>> +	ctx->pos_idx = dpll->id;
>>> +
>>> +	return dpll_device_dump_one(dpll, p->msg, ctx->flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_cmd_device_dump(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_dump_ctx *ctx = dpll_dump_context(p->cb);
>>> +
>>> +	return for_each_dpll_device(ctx->pos_idx, dpll_device_loop_cb, p);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_device_get_id(struct param *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = p->dpll;
>>> +	int flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	if (p->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS])
>>> +		flags = nla_get_u32(p->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS]);
>>> +
>>> +	return dpll_device_dump_one(dpll, p->msg, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static cb_t cmd_doit_cb[] = {
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET]		= dpll_genl_cmd_device_get_id,
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_SET_SOURCE_TYPE]	= dpll_genl_cmd_set_source,
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_SET_OUTPUT_TYPE]	= dpll_genl_cmd_set_output,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static cb_t cmd_dump_cb[] = {
>>> +	[DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET]		= dpll_cmd_device_dump,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb);
>>> +	struct dpll_dump_ctx *ctx = dpll_dump_context(cb);
>>> +
>>> +	ctx->dev = NULL;
>>> +	if (info->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS])
>>> +		ctx->flags = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_FLAGS]);
>>> +	else
>>> +		ctx->flags = 0;
>>> +	ctx->pos_idx = 0;
>>> +	ctx->pos_src_idx = 0;
>>> +	ctx->pos_out_idx = 0;
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> +				   struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct param p = { .cb = cb, .msg = skb };
>>> +	const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb);
>>> +	int cmd = info->op.cmd;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +	void *hdr;
>>> +
>>> +	hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, &dpll_gnl_family, 0, cmd);
>>> +	if (!hdr)
>>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = cmd_dump_cb[cmd](&p);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_cancel_msg;
>>> +
>>> +	genlmsg_end(skb, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +out_cancel_msg:
>>> +	genlmsg_cancel(skb, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_genl_cmd_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> +				 struct genl_info *info)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct param p = { .attrs = info->attrs, .dpll = info->user_ptr[0] };
>>> +	int cmd = info->genlhdr->cmd;
>>> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
>>> +	void *hdr;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!msg)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +	p.msg = msg;
>>> +
>>> +	hdr = genlmsg_put_reply(msg, info, &dpll_gnl_family, 0, cmd);
>>> +	if (!hdr) {
>>> +		ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +		goto out_free_msg;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	ret = cmd_doit_cb[cmd](&p);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_cancel_msg;
>>> +
>>> +	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>>> +
>>> +	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
>>> +
>>> +out_cancel_msg:
>>> +	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>>> +out_free_msg:
>>> +	nlmsg_free(msg);
>>> +
>>> +	return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpll_pre_doit(const struct genl_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> +						 struct genl_info *info)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll;
>>> +	int id;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!info->attrs[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID])
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLLA_DEVICE_ID]);
>>> +
>>> +	dpll = dpll_device_get_by_id(id);
>>> +	if (!dpll)
>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>> +	info->user_ptr[0] = dpll;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct genl_ops dpll_genl_ops[] = {
>>> +	{
>>> +		.cmd	= DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,
>>> +		.start	= dpll_genl_cmd_start,
>>> +		.dumpit	= dpll_genl_cmd_dumpit,
>>> +		.doit	= dpll_genl_cmd_doit,
>>> +		.policy	= dpll_genl_get_policy,
>>> +		.maxattr = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_get_policy) - 1,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.cmd	= DPLL_CMD_SET_SOURCE_TYPE,
>>> +		.flags	= GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM,
>>> +		.doit	= dpll_genl_cmd_doit,
>>> +		.policy	= dpll_genl_set_source_policy,
>>> +		.maxattr = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_set_source_policy) - 1,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.cmd	= DPLL_CMD_SET_OUTPUT_TYPE,
>>> +		.flags	= GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM,
>>> +		.doit	= dpll_genl_cmd_doit,
>>> +		.policy	= dpll_genl_set_output_policy,
>>> +		.maxattr = ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_set_output_policy) - 1,
>>> +	},
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct genl_family dpll_gnl_family __ro_after_init = {
>>> +	.hdrsize	= 0,
>>> +	.name		= DPLL_FAMILY_NAME,
>>> +	.version	= DPLL_VERSION,
>>> +	.ops		= dpll_genl_ops,
>>> +	.n_ops		= ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_ops),
>>> +	.mcgrps		= dpll_genl_mcgrps,
>>> +	.n_mcgrps	= ARRAY_SIZE(dpll_genl_mcgrps),
>>> +	.pre_doit	= dpll_pre_doit,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +int __init dpll_netlink_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	return genl_register_family(&dpll_gnl_family);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void dpll_netlink_finish(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	genl_unregister_family(&dpll_gnl_family);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void __exit dpll_netlink_fini(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	dpll_netlink_finish();
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..e2d100f59dd6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +int __init dpll_netlink_init(void);
>>> +void dpll_netlink_finish(void);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..9051337bcf9e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __DPLL_H__
>>> +#define __DPLL_H__
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device;
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device_ops {
>>> +	int (*get_status)(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +	int (*get_temp)(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +	int (*get_lock_status)(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +	int (*get_source_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id);
>>> +	int (*get_output_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id);
>>> +	int (*set_source_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id, int val);
>>> +	int (*set_output_type)(struct dpll_device *dpll, int id, int val);
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_alloc(struct dpll_device_ops *ops, int sources_count,
>>> +					 int outputs_count, void *priv);
>>> +void dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +void *dpll_priv(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..8c00f52736ee
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
>>> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H
>>> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H
>>> +
>>> +#define DPLL_NAME_LENGTH	20
>>> +
>>> +/* Adding event notification support elements */
>>> +#define DPLL_FAMILY_NAME		"dpll"
>>> +#define DPLL_VERSION			0x01
>>> +#define DPLL_CONFIG_DEVICE_GROUP_NAME  "config"
>>> +#define DPLL_CONFIG_SOURCE_GROUP_NAME  "source"
>>> +#define DPLL_CONFIG_OUTPUT_GROUP_NAME  "output"
>>> +#define DPLL_MONITOR_GROUP_NAME        "monitor"
>>> +
>>> +#define DPLL_FLAG_SOURCES	1
>>> +#define DPLL_FLAG_OUTPUTS	2
>>> +#define DPLL_FLAG_STATUS	4
>>> +
>>> +/* Attributes of dpll_genl_family */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_get_attr {
>>> +	DPLLA_UNSPEC,
>>> +	DPLLA_DEVICE,
>>> +	DPLLA_DEVICE_ID,
>>> +	DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME,
>>> +	DPLLA_SOURCE,
>>> +	DPLLA_SOURCE_ID,
>>> +	DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE,
>>> +	DPLLA_OUTPUT,
>>> +	DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID,
>>> +	DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE,
>>> +	DPLLA_STATUS,
>>> +	DPLLA_TEMP,
>>> +	DPLLA_LOCK_STATUS,
>>> +	DPLLA_FLAGS,
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLLA_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLLA_GET_MAX (__DPLLA_MAX - 1)
>> 
>> I think "_get_/_GET_" in above names is outdated?
>> 
>
>Yes, you are right. The earliest revision had these "GET/SET" in attributes but 
>later we decided to unite them into common attributes. I will remove these 
>artifacts in the next revision.
>
>>> +
>>> +/* DPLL signal types used as source or as output */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_signal_type {
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_EXT_1PPS,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_EXT_10MHZ,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_INT_OSCILLATOR,
>>> +	DPLL_TYPE_GNSS,
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLL_TYPE_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLL_TYPE_MAX (__DPLL_TYPE_MAX - 1)
>>> +
>>> +/* Events of dpll_genl_family */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_event {
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_UNSPEC,
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE,		/* DPLL device creation */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE,		/* DPLL device deletion */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_LOCKED,		/* DPLL device locked to source */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_UNLOCKED,	/* DPLL device freerun */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE,		/* DPLL device source changed */
>>> +	DPLL_EVENT_OUTPUT_CHANGE,		/* DPLL device output changed */
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLL_EVENT_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLL_EVENT_MAX (__DPLL_EVENT_MAX - 1)
>>> +
>>> +/* Commands supported by the dpll_genl_family */
>>> +enum dpll_genl_cmd {
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_UNSPEC,
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,	/* List of DPLL devices id */
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_SET_SOURCE_TYPE,	/* Set the DPLL device source type */
>>> +	DPLL_CMD_SET_OUTPUT_TYPE,	/* Get the DPLL device output type */
>> 
>> "Get" in comment description looks like a typo.
>> I am getting bit confused with the name and comments.
>> For me, first look says: it is selection of a type of a source.
>> But in the code I can see it selects a source id and a type.
>> Type of source originates in HW design, why would the one want to "set" it?
>> I can imagine a HW design where a single source or output would allow to choose
>> where the signal originates/goes, some kind of extra selector layer for a
>> source/output, but was that the intention?
>
>In general - yes, we have experimented with our time card providing different 
>types of source synchronisation signal on different input pins, i.e. 1PPS, 
>10MHz, IRIG-B, etc. Any of these signals could be connected to any of 4 external 
>pins, that's why I source id is treated as input pin identifier and source type 
>is the signal type it receives.
>
>> If so, shouldn't the user get some bitmap/list of modes available for each
>> source/output?
>
>Good idea. We have list of available modes exposed via sysfs file, and I agree 
>that it's worth to expose them via netlink interface. I will try to address this 
>in the next version.
>
>> 
>> The user shall get some extra information about the source/output. Right now
>> there can be multiple sources/outputs of the same type, but not really possible
>> to find out their purpose. I.e. a dpll equipped with four source of
>> DPLL_TYPE_EXT_1PPS type.
>>  > This implementation looks like designed for a "forced reference lock" mode
>> where the user must explicitly select one source. But a multi source/output
>> DPLL could be running in different modes. I believe most important is automatic
>> mode, where it tries to lock to a user-configured source priority list.
>> However, there is also freerun mode, where dpll isn't even trying to lock to
>> anything, or NCO - Numerically Controlled Oscillator mode.
>
>Yes, you are right, my focus was on "forced reference lock" mode as currently 
>this is the only mode supported by our hardware. But I'm happy to extend it to 
>other usecases.
>
>> It would be great to have ability to select DPLL modes, but also to be able to
>> configure priorities, read failure status, configure extra "features" (i.e.
>> Embedded Sync, EEC modes, Fast Lock)
>I absolutely agree on this way of improvement, and I already have some ongoing 
>work about failures/events/status change messages. I can see no stoppers for 
>creating priorities (if supported by HW) and other extra "features", but we have 
>to agree on the interface with flexibility in mind.

Great and makes perfect sense!

>
>> The sources and outputs can also have some extra features or capabilities, like:
>> - enable Embedded Sync
>
>Does it mean we want to enable or disable Embedded Sync within one protocol? Is 
>it like Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) for Ethernet?

Well, from what I know, Embedded PPS (ePPS), Embedded Pulse Per 2 Seconds
(ePP2S) and Embedded Sync (eSync) can be either 25/75 or 75/25, which describes
a ratio of how the 'embedded pulse' is divided into HIGH and LOW states on a
pulse of higher frequency signal in which EPPS/EPP2S/ESync is embedded.

EPPS and EPP2S are rather straightforward, once an EPPS enabled input is
selected as a source, then output configured as PPS(PP2S) shall tick in the
same periods as signal "embedded" in input.
Embedded Sync (eSync) is similar but it allows for configuration of frequency
of a 'sync' signal, i.e. source is 10MHz with eSync configured as 100 HZ, where
the output configured for 100HZ could use it.

I cannot say how exactly Embedded Sync/PPS will be used, as from my perspective
this is user specific, and I am not very familiar with any standard describing
its usage.
I am working on SyncE, where either Embedded Sync or PPS is not a part of SyncE
standard, but I strongly believe that users would need to run a DPLL with
Embedded Sync/PPS enabled for some other things. And probably would love to
have SW control over the dpll.

Lets assume following simplified example:
input1 +-------------+ output1 
-------|             |---------
       |  DPLL 1     |         
input2 |             | output2 
-------|             |---------
       +-------------+         
where:
- input1 is external 10MHz with 25/75 Embedded PPS enabled,
- input2 is a fallback PPS from GNSS
user expects:
- output1 as a 10MHz with embedded sync
- output2 as a PPS
As long as input1 is selected source, output1 is synchonized with it and
output2 ticks are synchronized with ePPS.
Now the user selects input2 as a source, where outputs are unchanged,
both output2 and output1-ePPS are synchronized with input2, and output1
10MHz must be generated by DPLL.

I am trying to show example of what DPLL user might want to configure, this
would be a separated configuration of ePPS/ePP2S/eSync per source as well as
per output.
Also a DPLL itself can have explicitly disabled embedded signal processing on
its sources.

>
>> - add phase delay
>> - configure frequency (user might need to use source/output with different
>>    frequency then 1 PPS or 10MHz)
>
>Providing these modes I was thinking about the most common and widely used 
>signals in measurement equipment. So my point here is that both 1PPS and 10MHz 
>should stay as is, but another type of signal should be added, let's say 
>CUSTOM_FREQ, which will also consider special attribute in netlink terms. is it ok?

Sure, makes sense.

>
>> Generally, for simple DPLL designs this interface could do the job (although,
>> I still think user needs more information about the sources/outputs), but for
>> more complex ones, there should be something different, which takes care of my
>> comments regarding extra configuration needed.
>> 
>
>As I already mentioned earlier, I'm open for improvements and happy to 
>collaborate to cover other use cases of this subsystem from the very beginning 
>of development. We can even create an open github repo to share implementation 
>details together with comments if it works better for you.
>

Sure, great! I am happy to help.
I could start working on a part for extra DPLL modes and source-priorities as
automatic mode doesn't make sense without them.

Thank you,
Arkadiusz  

>> Thanks,
>> Arkadiusz
>> 
>>> +
>>> +	__DPLL_CMD_MAX,
>>> +};
>>> +#define DPLL_CMD_MAX (__DPLL_CMD_MAX - 1)
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_DPLL_H */
>>> -- 
>>> 2.27.0
>>>
>>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-24 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-23  0:57 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23  0:57 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23  0:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23  0:57   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23 15:33   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-06-23 15:33     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-06-23 22:48     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23 22:48       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-24 17:36       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz [this message]
2022-06-24 17:36         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-06-26 19:39         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-26 19:39           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-29  1:46           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-06-29  1:46             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-06-29 23:30             ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-29 23:30               ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-30 10:00               ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-06-30 10:00                 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
     [not found]               ` <20220629192312.45acd2fd@kernel.org>
2022-06-30 15:50                 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-30 15:50                   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-30 18:27                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-30 18:27                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23  0:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] dpll: add netlink events Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23  0:57   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23  0:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23  0:57   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23 18:28   ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-23 18:28     ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-23 23:11     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23 23:11       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-23 23:36       ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-23 23:36         ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-26 19:28         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-26 19:28           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-27 19:27           ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-27 19:27             ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-27 22:06             ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-27 22:06               ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-26 19:27     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-26 19:27       ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-27 19:23       ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-27 19:23         ` Jonathan Lemon
2022-06-27 22:04         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-27 22:04           ` Vadim Fedorenko
2022-06-24 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API Florian Fainelli
2022-06-24 17:20   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-24 17:55   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-24 17:55     ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB4657C1830DACC5EB4CD98B789BB49@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vadfed@fb.com \
    --cc=vfedorenko@novek.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.