[PATCH] 9p: add myself as reviewer to MAINTAINERS

[PATCH] 9p: add myself as reviewer to MAINTAINERS

[Christian Schoenebeck]

Volunteering as reviewer for 9p patches. As I am quite familiar with the
9p code base in the Linux kernel already, plus being current maintainer
of 9p in QEMU this move probably makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index fb18ce7168aa..c8db00be639b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ F:	drivers/net/ethernet/8390/
 M:	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
 M:	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
 M:	Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
+R:	Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
 L:	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
 S:	Maintained
 W:	http://swik.net/v9fs
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH] 9p: add myself as reviewer to MAINTAINERS

[Dominique Martinet]

Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:53:59PM +0100:
> Volunteering as reviewer for 9p patches. As I am quite familiar with the
> 9p code base in the Linux kernel already, plus being current maintainer
> of 9p in QEMU this move probably makes sense.

There honestly isn't much coming in, but it'll be a pleasure to have you
help when you can, I'll push this to Linus with other 5.17 changes in a
couple of weeks :)

I didn't reply to your series for bigger msize, I doubt I'll have time
to do any useful tests for it this round but I'm thinking of taking the
first patch first now as it makes sense independantly.
I feel that the rest needs more attention and will be for next cycle,
sorry for the delay
-- 
Dominique

Re: [PATCH] 9p: add myself as reviewer to MAINTAINERS

[Christian Schoenebeck]

On Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 14:49:14 CET Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:53:59PM +0100:
> > Volunteering as reviewer for 9p patches. As I am quite familiar with the
> > 9p code base in the Linux kernel already, plus being current maintainer
> > of 9p in QEMU this move probably makes sense.
> 
> There honestly isn't much coming in, but it'll be a pleasure to have you
> help when you can, I'll push this to Linus with other 5.17 changes in a
> couple of weeks :)

I know, it is the same with 9p on QEMU side. But I felt you were currently the 
only person providing service at this end, so I thought a bit of help might 
not hurt.

> I didn't reply to your series for bigger msize, I doubt I'll have time
> to do any useful tests for it this round but I'm thinking of taking the
> first patch first now as it makes sense independantly.

Sure!

> I feel that the rest needs more attention and will be for next cycle,
> sorry for the delay

Yeah, that code definitely still needs some decantation time. No rush. Maybe 
some other people find some time for review or testing in the meantime.

Thanks Dominique!

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck