[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix David Scott's email

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix David Scott's email

[Doug Goldstein]

The existing email bounces with an address rejected failure message.
This is the email that other maintainers are using for David.
---
 MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 73a96c9..ce194d3 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ F:	config/MiniOS.mk
 F:	extras/mini-os/
 
 OCAML TOOLS
-M:	David Scott <dave.scott@eu.citrix.com>
+M:	David Scott <dave.scott@citrix.com>
 S:	Supported
 F:	tools/ocaml/
 
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix David Scott's email

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com> 09/01/15 9:05 PM >>>
>The existing email bounces with an address rejected failure message.
>This is the email that other maintainers are using for David.
>---
>MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>index 73a96c9..ce194d3 100644
>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ F:	config/MiniOS.mk
>F:	extras/mini-os/
 >
>OCAML TOOLS
>-M:	David Scott <dave.scott@eu.citrix.com>
>+M:	David Scott <dave.scott@citrix.com>
>S:	Supported
>F:	tools/ocaml/
 >

I think such an adjustment should normally come from the person involved; at
the very least we'll need David's consent (or someone at Citrix to confirm only
that new address is expected to work - iirc there are various other people with
working @eu.citrix.com addresses).

I'm also not certain whether - trivial and non-technical or not - we can accept a
patch without Signed-off-by tag.

Jan

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix David Scott's email

[David Scott (Sales UK)]

Hi All,

I think you are looking for dave.scott@citrix.com - cc'd

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@suse.com] 
Sent: 02 September 2015 09:26
To: cardoe@cardoe.com; David Scott (Sales UK) <david.scott@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix David Scott's email

>>> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com> 09/01/15 9:05 PM >>>
>The existing email bounces with an address rejected failure message.
>This is the email that other maintainers are using for David.
>---
>MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>index 73a96c9..ce194d3 100644
>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ F:	config/MiniOS.mk
>F:	extras/mini-os/
 >
>OCAML TOOLS
>-M:	David Scott <dave.scott@eu.citrix.com>
>+M:	David Scott <dave.scott@citrix.com>
>S:	Supported
>F:	tools/ocaml/
 >

I think such an adjustment should normally come from the person involved; at the very least we'll need David's consent (or someone at Citrix to confirm only that new address is expected to work - iirc there are various other people with working @eu.citrix.com addresses).

I'm also not certain whether - trivial and non-technical or not - we can accept a patch without Signed-off-by tag.

Jan

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix David Scott's email

[Doug Goldstein]

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com> 09/01/15 9:05 PM >>>
>>The existing email bounces with an address rejected failure message.
>>This is the email that other maintainers are using for David.
>>---
>>MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>index 73a96c9..ce194d3 100644
>>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ F: config/MiniOS.mk
>>F:     extras/mini-os/
>  >
>>OCAML TOOLS
>>-M:    David Scott <dave.scott@eu.citrix.com>
>>+M:    David Scott <dave.scott@citrix.com>
>>S:     Supported
>>F:     tools/ocaml/
>  >
>
> I think such an adjustment should normally come from the person involved; at
> the very least we'll need David's consent (or someone at Citrix to confirm only
> that new address is expected to work - iirc there are various other people with
> working @eu.citrix.com addresses).
>
> I'm also not certain whether - trivial and non-technical or not - we can accept a
> patch without Signed-off-by tag.
>
> Jan
>

Agreed. I had been trying to email him regarding some OCaml bits and
was getting a bounce and around the same time Wei forwarded my OCaml
patch to the email address I referenced in the patch. Just trying to
help others out when they're confused why an email bounces that they
got from get_maintainers.pl

-- 
Doug Goldstein