From: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com> To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@ite.com.tw>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/edid: Introduce is_detailed_timing_descritor() Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 19:49:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <E7C9878FBA1C6D42A1CA3F62AEB6945F823A9FB7@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_OJs1A7RMq354Dyo5udB2C9U8Ga-4fuU=v2AygR1OR5ZA@mail.gmail.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Alex > Deucher > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 4:06 AM > To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@ite.com.tw>; Intel Graphics Development <intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Maling list - DRI developers <dri- > devel@lists.freedesktop.org> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/edid: Introduce > is_detailed_timing_descritor() > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:02 PM Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > Let's introduce is_detailed_timing_descritor() as the opposite > > counterpart of is_display_descriptor(). > > > > Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@ite.com.tw> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 42 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > index 96ae1fde4ce2..d6bce58b27ac 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > @@ -2202,6 +2202,11 @@ static bool is_display_descriptor(const u8 d[18], u8 > tag) > > d[2] == 0x00 && d[3] == tag; } > > > > +static bool is_detailed_timing_descriptor(const u8 d[18]) { > > + return d[0] != 0x00 || d[1] != 0x00; } > > + > > typedef void detailed_cb(struct detailed_timing *timing, void > > *closure); > > > > static void > > @@ -3101,27 +3106,28 @@ do_detailed_mode(struct detailed_timing *timing, > void *c) > > struct detailed_mode_closure *closure = c; > > struct drm_display_mode *newmode; > > > > - if (timing->pixel_clock) { > > - newmode = drm_mode_detailed(closure->connector->dev, > > - closure->edid, timing, > > - closure->quirks); > > - if (!newmode) > > - return; > > + if (!is_detailed_timing_descriptor((const u8 *)timing)) > > + return; > > + > > + newmode = drm_mode_detailed(closure->connector->dev, > > + closure->edid, timing, > > + closure->quirks); > > + if (!newmode) > > + return; > > > > - if (closure->preferred) > > - newmode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED; > > + if (closure->preferred) > > + newmode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED; > > > > - /* > > - * Detailed modes are limited to 10kHz pixel clock resolution, > > - * so fix up anything that looks like CEA/HDMI mode, but the clock > > - * is just slightly off. > > - */ > > - fixup_detailed_cea_mode_clock(newmode); > > + /* > > + * Detailed modes are limited to 10kHz pixel clock resolution, > > + * so fix up anything that looks like CEA/HDMI mode, but the clock > > + * is just slightly off. > > + */ > > + fixup_detailed_cea_mode_clock(newmode); > > > > - drm_mode_probed_add(closure->connector, newmode); > > - closure->modes++; > > - closure->preferred = false; > > - } > > + drm_mode_probed_add(closure->connector, newmode); > > + closure->modes++; > > + closure->preferred = false; > > } > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.24.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dri-devel mailing list > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com> To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@ite.com.tw>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/edid: Introduce is_detailed_timing_descritor() Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 19:49:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <E7C9878FBA1C6D42A1CA3F62AEB6945F823A9FB7@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_OJs1A7RMq354Dyo5udB2C9U8Ga-4fuU=v2AygR1OR5ZA@mail.gmail.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Alex > Deucher > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 4:06 AM > To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@ite.com.tw>; Intel Graphics Development <intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Maling list - DRI developers <dri- > devel@lists.freedesktop.org> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/edid: Introduce > is_detailed_timing_descritor() > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:02 PM Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > Let's introduce is_detailed_timing_descritor() as the opposite > > counterpart of is_display_descriptor(). > > > > Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@ite.com.tw> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 42 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > index 96ae1fde4ce2..d6bce58b27ac 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > @@ -2202,6 +2202,11 @@ static bool is_display_descriptor(const u8 d[18], u8 > tag) > > d[2] == 0x00 && d[3] == tag; } > > > > +static bool is_detailed_timing_descriptor(const u8 d[18]) { > > + return d[0] != 0x00 || d[1] != 0x00; } > > + > > typedef void detailed_cb(struct detailed_timing *timing, void > > *closure); > > > > static void > > @@ -3101,27 +3106,28 @@ do_detailed_mode(struct detailed_timing *timing, > void *c) > > struct detailed_mode_closure *closure = c; > > struct drm_display_mode *newmode; > > > > - if (timing->pixel_clock) { > > - newmode = drm_mode_detailed(closure->connector->dev, > > - closure->edid, timing, > > - closure->quirks); > > - if (!newmode) > > - return; > > + if (!is_detailed_timing_descriptor((const u8 *)timing)) > > + return; > > + > > + newmode = drm_mode_detailed(closure->connector->dev, > > + closure->edid, timing, > > + closure->quirks); > > + if (!newmode) > > + return; > > > > - if (closure->preferred) > > - newmode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED; > > + if (closure->preferred) > > + newmode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED; > > > > - /* > > - * Detailed modes are limited to 10kHz pixel clock resolution, > > - * so fix up anything that looks like CEA/HDMI mode, but the clock > > - * is just slightly off. > > - */ > > - fixup_detailed_cea_mode_clock(newmode); > > + /* > > + * Detailed modes are limited to 10kHz pixel clock resolution, > > + * so fix up anything that looks like CEA/HDMI mode, but the clock > > + * is just slightly off. > > + */ > > + fixup_detailed_cea_mode_clock(newmode); > > > > - drm_mode_probed_add(closure->connector, newmode); > > - closure->modes++; > > - closure->preferred = false; > > - } > > + drm_mode_probed_add(closure->connector, newmode); > > + closure->modes++; > > + closure->preferred = false; > > } > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.24.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dri-devel mailing list > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-03 19:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-01-24 20:02 [PATCH 1/8] drm/edid: Check the number of detailed timing descriptors in the CEA ext block Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/edid: Don't accept any old garbage as a display descriptor Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:35 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-02-03 19:44 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 19:44 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/edid: Introduce is_detailed_timing_descritor() Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:36 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-02-03 19:49 ` Shankar, Uma [this message] 2020-02-03 19:49 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Clear out spurious whitespace Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:28 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-02-03 19:51 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 19:51 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/edid: Document why we don't bounds check the DispID CEA block start/end Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:30 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-01-28 11:44 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-01-28 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2020-02-03 19:58 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/edid: Add a FIXME about DispID CEA data block revision Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:32 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-02-03 20:15 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 20:15 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-04 13:32 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-02-04 13:32 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-02-04 14:57 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-04 14:57 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/edid: Constify lots of things Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:38 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-01-28 11:49 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-01-28 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2020-02-03 20:34 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 20:34 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/edid: Dump bogus 18 byte descriptors Ville Syrjala 2020-01-24 20:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2020-01-27 22:38 ` Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-02-03 20:38 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 20:38 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-01-24 22:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/8] drm/edid: Check the number of detailed timing descriptors in the CEA ext block Patchwork 2020-01-24 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2020-01-27 13:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2020-01-27 22:34 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Alex Deucher 2020-01-27 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher 2020-02-03 19:15 ` Shankar, Uma 2020-02-03 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Shankar, Uma 2020-01-28 15:17 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-01-28 15:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-01-28 16:15 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-01-28 16:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2020-01-28 16:18 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-01-28 16:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-01-28 16:28 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-01-28 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=E7C9878FBA1C6D42A1CA3F62AEB6945F823A9FB7@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com \ --to=uma.shankar@intel.com \ --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \ --cc=allen.chen@ite.com.tw \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.