All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
	<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List
	<linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/20] xprtrdma: Limit the number of rpcrdma_mws
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:09:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F1820E16-A2BF-4529-A5C9-59C9AD57369A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607204941.GA7991-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>


> On Jun 7, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:47:32PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> The fixed part of an R_key is 24 bits, but the variant part is only
>> 8 bits, allowing 256 unique R_keys concurrenly in flight on one QP.
>> 
>> Thus an rpcrdma_xprt cannot use more than 256 rpcrdma_mws at a time.
>> 
>> Capping the number of rpcrdma_mws should prevent ro_map from
>> re-using an R_key, which could change the MR co-ordinates or access
>> settings while an RPC is still in progress. It also reduces the
>> number of pre-allocated FRMRs per transport, allowing more
>> transports per device.
>> 
>> To get more R_keys in flight at once, additional QPs will be
>> necessary.
> 
> ??
> 
> The 24 bit / 8 bit thing doesn't create new MRs, it just disambiguates
> the life cycle of a single MR.

Right.


> Further, the MR is connected to a PD,
> not a QP, there is no such thing as '256 unique R_keys concurrenly in
> flight on one QP' ???

OK, fair enough, but...


> This is why no ULP has ever needed this constant before:
> 
>> +enum {
>> +	RPCRDMA_RKEYS_PER_QP	= 256
>> +};
> 
> Because you never need to care when working with FRMRs.
> 
> Either the number in queue is limited by the invalidation
> synchronization point to 2, or in the case of iwarp read, it doesn't
> matter since everything executes serially in order and the value can
> safely wrap.

I don't understand this. How does invalidation prevent
the ULP from registering more R_keys?

And, I'd like to limit the number of pre-allocated MRs
to no more than each transport endpoint can use. For
xprtrdma, a transport is one QP and PD. What is that
number?

--
Chuck Lever



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/20] xprtrdma: Limit the number of rpcrdma_mws
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:09:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F1820E16-A2BF-4529-A5C9-59C9AD57369A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607204941.GA7991@obsidianresearch.com>


> On Jun 7, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:47:32PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> The fixed part of an R_key is 24 bits, but the variant part is only
>> 8 bits, allowing 256 unique R_keys concurrenly in flight on one QP.
>> 
>> Thus an rpcrdma_xprt cannot use more than 256 rpcrdma_mws at a time.
>> 
>> Capping the number of rpcrdma_mws should prevent ro_map from
>> re-using an R_key, which could change the MR co-ordinates or access
>> settings while an RPC is still in progress. It also reduces the
>> number of pre-allocated FRMRs per transport, allowing more
>> transports per device.
>> 
>> To get more R_keys in flight at once, additional QPs will be
>> necessary.
> 
> ??
> 
> The 24 bit / 8 bit thing doesn't create new MRs, it just disambiguates
> the life cycle of a single MR.

Right.


> Further, the MR is connected to a PD,
> not a QP, there is no such thing as '256 unique R_keys concurrenly in
> flight on one QP' ???

OK, fair enough, but...


> This is why no ULP has ever needed this constant before:
> 
>> +enum {
>> +	RPCRDMA_RKEYS_PER_QP	= 256
>> +};
> 
> Because you never need to care when working with FRMRs.
> 
> Either the number in queue is limited by the invalidation
> synchronization point to 2, or in the case of iwarp read, it doesn't
> matter since everything executes serially in order and the value can
> safely wrap.

I don't understand this. How does invalidation prevent
the ULP from registering more R_keys?

And, I'd like to limit the number of pre-allocated MRs
to no more than each transport endpoint can use. For
xprtrdma, a transport is one QP and PD. What is that
number?

--
Chuck Lever




  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-07 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-07 19:46 [PATCH v1 00/20] NFS/RDMA client patches proposed for v4.8 Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46 ` Chuck Lever
     [not found] ` <20160607194001.18401.88592.stgit-FYjufvaPoItvLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 19:46   ` [PATCH v1 01/20] xprtrdma: Remove ALLPHYSICAL memory registration mode Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46   ` [PATCH v1 02/20] xprtrdma: Refactor ->ro_init Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46     ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20160607194635.18401.66399.stgit-FYjufvaPoItvLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 17:48       ` Anna Schumaker
2016-06-08 17:48         ` Anna Schumaker
2016-06-07 19:46   ` [PATCH v1 03/20] xprtrdma: Create common scatterlist fields in rpcrdma_mw Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46   ` [PATCH v1 04/20] xprtrdma: Use scatterlist for DMA mapping and unmapping under FMR Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46   ` [PATCH v1 05/20] xprtrdma: Remove rpcrdma_map_one() and friends Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:46     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 06/20] xprtrdma: Refactor MR recovery work queues Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 07/20] xprtrdma: Place registered MWs on a per-req list Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 08/20] xprtrdma: Reply buffer exhaustion can be catastrophic Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 09/20] xprtrdma: Limit the number of rpcrdma_mws Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20160607194732.18401.71941.stgit-FYjufvaPoItvLzlybtyyYzGyq/o6K9yX@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 20:49       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-07 20:49         ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]         ` <20160607204941.GA7991-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 21:09           ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2016-06-07 21:09             ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]             ` <F1820E16-A2BF-4529-A5C9-59C9AD57369A-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 21:28               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-07 21:28                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]                 ` <20160607212831.GA9192-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 21:51                   ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 21:51                     ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]                     ` <D90190F5-ACCB-45D8-B08D-B75023ED6240-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 22:01                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-07 22:01                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]                         ` <20160607220107.GA9982-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 14:54                           ` Tom Talpey
2016-06-08 14:54                             ` Tom Talpey
     [not found]                             ` <c43e37cd-71ea-8629-20f2-bcd674d50b83-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 15:06                               ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-08 15:06                                 ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]                                 ` <8FF9BF11-C5BF-4418-9A84-AAD7A6D6321D-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 17:40                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-08 17:40                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]                                     ` <20160608174014.GB30822-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 17:50                                       ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-08 17:50                                         ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-08 17:53                                       ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-08 17:53                                         ` Chuck Lever
     [not found]                                         ` <240BF8C6-AB80-4A27-8C38-1FE9BB02AD66-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 18:45                                           ` Tom Talpey
2016-06-08 18:45                                             ` Tom Talpey
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 10/20] xprtrdma: Chunk list encoders no longer share one rl_segments array Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 11/20] xprtrdma: rpcrdma_inline_fixup() overruns the receive page list Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47   ` [PATCH v1 12/20] xprtrdma: Do not update {head, tail}.iov_len in rpcrdma_inline_fixup() Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 13/20] xprtrdma: Update only specific fields in private receive buffer Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 14/20] xprtrdma: Clean up fixup_copy_count accounting Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 15/20] xprtrdma: No direct data placement with krb5i and krb5p Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 16/20] svc: Avoid garbage replies when pc_func() returns rpc_drop_reply Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 17/20] NFS: Don't drop CB requests with invalid principals Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 18/20] xprtrdma: Eliminate rpcrdma_receive_worker() Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48   ` [PATCH v1 19/20] xprtrdma: Eliminate INLINE_THRESHOLD macros Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:48     ` Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:49   ` [PATCH v1 20/20] xprtrdma: Relocate connection helper functions Chuck Lever
2016-06-07 19:49     ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F1820E16-A2BF-4529-A5C9-59C9AD57369A@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.