All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srinivas, Vidya" <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
To: "Kumar, Mahesh1" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Upscale scaler max scale for NV12
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:26:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F653A0A18852B74D88578FA2EB7094EAB6758024@BGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39085383-c222-3c80-e2ec-ac644076dada@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar, Mahesh1
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 7:35 PM
> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>; intel-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; Konduru, Chandra
> <chandra.konduru@intel.com>; Kamath, Sunil <sunil.kamath@intel.com>;
> Maiti, Nabendu Bikash <nabendu.bikash.maiti@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Upscale scaler max scale for NV12
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 10 October 2017 05:47 PM, Vidya Srinivas wrote:
> > From: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch updates scaler max limit support for NV12
> >
> > v2: Rebased (me)
> >
> > v3: Rebased (me)
> >
> > v4: Missed the Tested-by/Reviewed-by in the previous series
> > 	Adding the same to commit message in this version.
> >
> > v5: Addressed review comments from Ville and rebased
> > 	- calculation of max_scale to be made
> > 	less convoluted by splitting it up a bit
> > 	- Indentation errors to be fixed in the series
> >
> > v6: Rebased (me)
> > 	Fixed review comments from Paauwe, Bob J
> > 	Previous version, where a split of calculation
> > 	was done, was wrong. Fixed that issue here.
> >
> > v7: Rebased (me)
> >
> > v8: Rebased (me)
> >
> > Tested-by: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> -------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  3 ++-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  |  3 ++-
> >   3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index a10bbe8..f71a704 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -3472,6 +3472,8 @@ static u32 skl_plane_ctl_format(uint32_t
> pixel_format)
> >   		return PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_YUV422 |
> PLANE_CTL_YUV422_UYVY;
> >   	case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY:
> >   		return PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_YUV422 |
> PLANE_CTL_YUV422_VYUY;
> > +	case DRM_FORMAT_NV12:
> > +		return PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_NV12;
> >   	default:
> >   		MISSING_CASE(pixel_format);
> >   	}
> > @@ -4727,7 +4729,8 @@ static void cpt_verify_modeset(struct
> drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> >   static int
> >   skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach,
> >   		  unsigned int scaler_user, int *scaler_id,
> > -		  int src_w, int src_h, int dst_w, int dst_h)
> > +		  int src_w, int src_h, int dst_w, int dst_h,
> > +		  uint32_t pixel_format)
> >   {
> >   	struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state =
> >   		&crtc_state->scaler_state;
> > @@ -4743,7 +4746,8 @@ static void cpt_verify_modeset(struct
> drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> >   	 * the 90/270 degree plane rotation cases (to match the
> >   	 * GTT mapping), hence no need to account for rotation here.
> >   	 */
> > -	need_scaling = src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h;
> > +	need_scaling = src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h ||
> > +		(pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12);
> IMHO keep nv12 check separate from rest of src/dst_w/h checks.
> >
> >   	if (crtc_state->ycbcr420 && scaler_user == SKL_CRTC_INDEX)
> >   		need_scaling = true;
> > @@ -4822,7 +4826,7 @@ int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct
> intel_crtc_state *state)
> >   	return skl_update_scaler(state, !state->base.active,
> SKL_CRTC_INDEX,
> >   		&state->scaler_state.scaler_id,
> >   		state->pipe_src_w, state->pipe_src_h,
> > -		adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay, adjusted_mode-
> >crtc_vdisplay);
> > +		adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay, adjusted_mode-
> >crtc_vdisplay, 0);
> >   }
> >
> >   /**
> > @@ -4852,7 +4856,8 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >   				drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.src) >>
> 16,
> >   				drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >>
> 16,
> >   				drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.dst),
> > -				drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.dst));
> > +				drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.dst),
> > +				fb ? fb->format->format : 0);
> >
> >   	if (ret || plane_state->scaler_id < 0)
> >   		return ret;
> > @@ -4878,6 +4883,7 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >   	case DRM_FORMAT_YVYU:
> >   	case DRM_FORMAT_UYVY:
> >   	case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY:
> > +	case DRM_FORMAT_NV12:
> >   		break;
> >   	default:
> >   		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] FB:%d unsupported
> scaling format
> > 0x%x\n", @@ -12799,11 +12805,12 @@ static void
> add_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >   }
> >
> >   int
> > -skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > +skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > +	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, uint32_t pixel_format)
> >   {
> >   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
> > -	int max_scale;
> > -	int crtc_clock, max_dotclk;
> > +	int max_scale, mult;
> > +	int crtc_clock, max_dotclk, tmpclk1, tmpclk2;
> >
> >   	if (!intel_crtc || !crtc_state->base.enable)
> >   		return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; @@ -12825,8
> +12832,10 @@
> > static void add_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >   	 *            or
> >   	 *    cdclk/crtc_clock
> >   	 */
> > -	max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1,
> > -			(1 << 8) * ((max_dotclk << 8) / crtc_clock));
> > +	mult = pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12 ? 2 : 3;
> > +	tmpclk1 = (1 << 16) * mult - 1;
> > +	tmpclk2 = (1 << 8) * ((max_dotclk << 8) / crtc_clock);
> > +	max_scale = min(tmpclk1, tmpclk2);
> you can optimize use of max_scale by directly returning min(tmpclk1,
> tmpclk2) :)

Thank you. Will add the change for next version.
> 
> -Mahesh
> >
> >   	return max_scale;
> >   }
> > @@ -12847,7 +12856,11 @@ static void
> add_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >   		/* use scaler when colorkey is not required */
> >   		if (state->ckey.flags == I915_SET_COLORKEY_NONE) {
> >   			min_scale = 1;
> > -			max_scale = skl_max_scale(to_intel_crtc(crtc),
> crtc_state);
> > +			max_scale = skl_max_scale(to_intel_crtc(crtc),
> > +						crtc_state,
> > +						state->base.fb ?
> > +						state->base.fb->format-
> >format :
> > +						0);
> >   		}
> >   		can_position = true;
> >   	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 51ae058..fd60635 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1490,7 +1490,8 @@ void intel_mode_from_pipe_config(struct
> drm_display_mode *mode,
> >   				 struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> >
> >   int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > -int skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *crtc, struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state);
> > +int skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *crtc, struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state,
> > +	uint32_t pixel_format);
> >
> >   static inline u32 intel_plane_ggtt_offset(const struct intel_plane_state
> *state)
> >   {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > index 091bb42..6f98bc5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > @@ -817,7 +817,8 @@ static u32 g4x_sprite_ctl(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >   		if (state->ckey.flags == I915_SET_COLORKEY_NONE) {
> >   			can_scale = 1;
> >   			min_scale = 1;
> > -			max_scale = skl_max_scale(crtc, crtc_state);
> > +			max_scale = skl_max_scale(crtc, crtc_state,
> > +						fb->format->format);
> >   		} else {
> >   			can_scale = 0;
> >   			min_scale = DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10 12:17 [PATCH 00/14] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/skl+: rename skl_wm_values struct to skl_ddb_values Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/skl+: refactore WM calculation for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/skl+: add NV12 in skl_format_to_fourcc Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/skl+: support varification of DDB HW state for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/skl+: NV12 related changes for WM Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/skl+: pass skl_wm_level struct to wm compute func Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/skl+: make sure higher latency level has higher wm value Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/skl+: nv12 workaround disable WM level 1-7 Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Set scaler mode for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 13:53   ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-10-10 20:24     ` Srinivas, Vidya
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Update format_is_yuv() to include NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Upscale scaler max scale for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 14:05   ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-10-10 20:26     ` Srinivas, Vidya [this message]
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported format for primary plane Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 14:09   ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-10-10 14:29     ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-10-10 20:25     ` Srinivas, Vidya
2017-10-16 22:33   ` Kristian Kristensen
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported format for sprite plane Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-16 22:35   ` Kristian Kristensen
2017-10-17  3:58     ` Srinivas, Vidya
2017-10-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Add NV12 support to intel_framebuffer_init Vidya Srinivas
2017-10-10 12:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Adding NV12 support (rev3) Patchwork
2017-10-10 16:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F653A0A18852B74D88578FA2EB7094EAB6758024@BGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.