RE: [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to reprogram PEBS event for guest counters

["Xu, Like" <like.xu@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2020 12:28 AM
> To: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org; x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; peterz@infradead.org; mingo@redhat.com;
> acme@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com; jolsa@redhat.com;
> namhyung@kernel.org; tglx@linutronix.de; bp@alien8.de; hpa@zytor.com;
> pbonzini@redhat.com; sean.j.christopherson@intel.com;
> vkuznets@redhat.com; wanpengli@tencent.com; jmattson@google.com;
> joro@8bytes.org; pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com; ak@linux.intel.com;
> thomas.lendacky@amd.com; fenghua.yu@intel.com;
> kan.liang@linux.intel.com; like.xu@linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to reprogram PEBS
> event for guest counters
> 
> Hi Luwei,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on
> tip/perf/core tip/auto-latest v5.6-rc4 next-20200306] [if your patch is applied to
> the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we
> also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the base tree in git format-patch,
> please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Luwei-Kang/PEBS-virtualization-ena
> bling-via-DS/20200306-013049
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git linux-next
> config: x86_64-randconfig-h003-20200305 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.5.0-5) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=x86_64
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    ld: arch/x86/kvm/pmu.o: in function `pmc_reprogram_counter':
> >> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c:199: undefined reference to
> `perf_x86_pmu_unset_auto_reload'

Since we may not lose PEBS functionality for other x86 vendors on KVM
and we already have defined PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD in the general
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h,

one of the ways to fix this issue is to
move the definition of perf_x86_pmu_unset_auto_reload()
to the end of arch/x86/events/core.c
instead of making it Intel specific
in previous patch "perf/x86: Expose a function to disable auto-reload."

Thanks,
Like Xu

> 
> vim +199 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> 
>    101
>    102	static void pmc_reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u32 type,
>    103					  unsigned config, bool exclude_user,
>    104					  bool exclude_kernel, bool intr,
>    105					  bool in_tx, bool in_tx_cp)
>    106	{
>    107		struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(pmc->vcpu);
>    108		struct perf_event *event;
>    109		struct perf_event_attr attr = {
>    110			.type = type,
>    111			.size = sizeof(attr),
>    112			.pinned = true,
>    113			.exclude_idle = true,
>    114			.exclude_host = 1,
>    115			.exclude_user = exclude_user,
>    116			.exclude_kernel = exclude_kernel,
>    117			.config = config,
>    118			.disabled = 1,
>    119		};
>    120		bool pebs = test_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long
> *)&pmu->pebs_enable);
>    121
>    122		attr.sample_period = (-pmc->counter) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
>    123
>    124		if (in_tx)
>    125			attr.config |= HSW_IN_TX;
>    126		if (in_tx_cp) {
>    127			/*
>    128			 * HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED is not supported with
> nonzero
>    129			 * period. Just clear the sample period so at least
>    130			 * allocating the counter doesn't fail.
>    131			 */
>    132			attr.sample_period = 0;
>    133			attr.config |= HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED;
>    134		}
>    135
>    136		if (pebs) {
>    137			/*
>    138			 * Host never knows the precision level set by guest.
>    139			 * Force Host's PEBS event to precision level 1, which will
>    140			 * not impact the accuracy of the results for guest PEBS
> events.
>    141			 * Because,
>    142			 * - For most cases, there is no difference among precision
>    143			 *   level 1 to 3 for PEBS events.
>    144			 * - The functions as below checks the precision level in
> host.
>    145			 *   But the results from these functions in host are
> replaced
>    146			 *   by guest when sampling the guest.
>    147			 *   The accuracy for guest PEBS events will not be
> impacted.
>    148			 *    -- event_constraints() impacts the index of counter.
>    149			 *	The index for host event is exactly the same as guest.
>    150			 *	It's decided by guest.
>    151			 *    -- pebs_update_adaptive_cfg() impacts the value of
>    152			 *	MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG. When guest is switched in,
>    153			 *	the MSR value will be replaced by the value from
> guest.
>    154			 *    -- setup_sample () impacts the output of a PEBS
> record.
>    155			 *	Guest handles the PEBS records.
>    156			 */
>    157			attr.precise_ip = 1;
>    158			/*
>    159			 * When the host's PMI handler completes, it's going to
>    160			 * enter the guest and trigger the guest's PMI handler.
>    161			 *
>    162			 * At this moment, this function may be called by
>    163			 * kvm_pmu_handle_event(). However the next
> sample_period
>    164			 * hasn't been determined by guest yet and the left period,
>    165			 * which probably be 0, is used for current sample_period.
>    166			 *
>    167			 * In this case, perf will mistakenly treat it as non
>    168			 * sampling events. The PEBS event will error out.
>    169			 *
>    170			 * Fill it with maximum period to prevent the error out.
>    171			 * The guest PMI handler will soon reprogram the counter.
>    172			 */
>    173			if (!attr.sample_period)
>    174				attr.sample_period = (-1ULL) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
>    175		}
>    176
>    177		event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
>    178							 (intr || pebs) ?
>    179							 kvm_perf_overflow_intr :
>    180							 kvm_perf_overflow, pmc);
>    181		if (IS_ERR(event)) {
>    182			pr_debug_ratelimited("kvm_pmu: event creation failed %ld
> for pmc->idx = %d\n",
>    183				    PTR_ERR(event), pmc->idx);
>    184			return;
>    185		}
>    186
>    187		if (pebs) {
>    188			event->guest_dedicated_idx = pmc->idx;
>    189			/*
>    190			 * For guest PEBS events, guest takes the responsibility to
>    191			 * drain PEBS buffers, and load proper values to reset
> counters.
>    192			 *
>    193			 * Host will unconditionally set auto-reload flag for PEBS
>    194			 * events with fixed period which is not necessary. Host
> should
>    195			 * do nothing in drain_pebs() but inject the PMI into the
> guest.
>    196			 *
>    197			 * Unset the auto-reload flag for guest PEBS events.
>    198			 */
>  > 199			perf_x86_pmu_unset_auto_reload(event);
>    200		}
>    201		pmc->perf_event = event;
>    202		pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->event_count++;
>    203		perf_event_enable(event);
>    204		clear_bit(pmc->idx, pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->reprogram_pmi);
>    205	}
>    206
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org