Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Call for agenda items for September 5th Community Call @ 15:00 UTC

From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>
To: Rich Persaud <persaur@gmail.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>,
	Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	"anastassios.nanos@onapp.com" <anastassios.nanos@onapp.com>,
	Matt Spencer <Matt.Spencer@arm.com>,
	"edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com" <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>,
	John Ji <john.ji@intel.com>,
	"robin.randhawa@arm.com" <robin.randhawa@arm.com>,
	"daniel.kiper@oracle.com" <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	"mirela.simonovic@aggios.com" <mirela.simonovic@aggios.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Rian Quinn <rianquinn@gmail.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.k.lengyel@gmail.com>,
	Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@gmail.com>,
	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>,
	"vfachin@de.adit-jv.com" <vfachin@de.adit-jv.com>,
	"intel-xen@intel.com" <intel-xen@intel.com>,
	Jarvis Roach <Jarvis.Roach@dornerworks.com>,
	Artem Mygaiev <Artem_Mygaiev@epam.com>,
	Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>,
	Jeff Kubascik <Jeff.Kubascik@dornerworks.com>,
	Janakarajan Natarajan <jnataraj@amd.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Stewart Hildebrand <Stewart.Hildebrand@dornerworks.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Call for agenda items for September 5th Community Call @ 15:00 UTC
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:49:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FA118783-4079-460A-95F8-B628F3320637@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11D8BF8A-BF9E-4610-8A80-8698B705AFAB@gmail.com>

On 05/09/2019, 08:41, "Rich Persaud" <persaur@gmail.com> wrote:

    > On Sep 5, 2019, at 03:19, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Forgive me asking, but why is this put up as an agenda item here?
    > IMO this is the kind of thing where you would send a proposal and
    > request feedback by email first, and put it up as an agenda item
    > here only if it got stalled there. (Apologies if I've overlooked
    > such a stalled thread.)

    If Xen community call topics are limited to escalations of xen-devel threads, then a new thread can be created for this topic. Xen community calls have also provided real-time, interactive feedback on candidate proposals, along with guidance on areas which need documentation before a formal proposal is made to xen-devel.   Such agenda items are typically covered after all series and priority topics have been addressed.

I don't mind having items such these on the agenda and to be fair have added similar items onto the agenda in the past.
Clearly, they are forward looking [like an RFC], for which reason I tend to add them to the end of an agenda if there is a busy schedule

Personally, on this specific item, it is not really clear what the questions are.  In other words: is this about UUIDS/domain ids only, or is there something else. 

Lars

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel