* 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13847
Subject : X stopped accepting keystrokes
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-07-14 9:24 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756352426737&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
Subject : inotify regression, missing events
Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
Subject : i915 errors
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13843
Subject : Linux-2.6.31-rc4 fails to open a USB serial port
Submitter : e9hack <e9hack@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:16 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851343512022&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13842
Subject : Oops when writing to /sys/block/ram0/queue/max_sectors_kb
Submitter : Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>
Date : 2009-07-23 15:30 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124836574403032&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-07-23 14:12 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124835839019906&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13835
Subject : e1000e massive packet loss
Submitter : Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-16 09:49 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124773057917887&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13815
Subject : emacs -nw compilation doesn't show the error message
Submitter : Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 06:22 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d945cb9cce20ac7143c2de8d88b187f62db99bdc
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13813
Subject : Hangups in n_tty_read()
Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date : 2009-07-16 18:48 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124777019920579&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13812
Subject : Ooops on uplug
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-07-20 17:51 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124811234302786&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781
Subject : System freeze at resume after suspend to RAM
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:42 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject : System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 10:31 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13762
Subject : AHCI on HP Compaq 6715s broken, did not detect slots/ports -> unable to boot
Submitter : Matthias Tingelhoff <mindo83@t-online.de>
Date : 2009-07-11 20:48 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732
Subject : tty layer instabilities
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-07-06 13:43 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124688781732419&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13731
Subject : Inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 4:22 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124685417325348&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13729
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/notify/notification.c:93!
Submitter : Mikko C. <mikko.cal@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-04 10:16 (53 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/4/12
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13726
Subject : fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-01 11:25 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=51daa88ebd8e0d437289f589af29d4b39379ea76
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/679
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13713
Subject : [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
Submitter : <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 10:49 (22 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b962442e46a9340bdbc6711982c59ff0cc2b5afb
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13709
Subject : b2c2-flexcop: no frontend driver found for this B2C2/FlexCop adapter w/ kernel-2.6.31-rc2
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date : 2009-07-05 01:36 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13700
Subject : usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
Submitter : jouni susiluoto <jouni.susiluoto@helsinki.fi>
Date : 2009-07-03 21:13 (24 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13667
Subject : drm: display arifacts when X.Org is stopped
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-27 18:52 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/8/30
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13657
Subject : Linux-2.6.31-rc1 Fails To Recognize Some USB Disks
Submitter : Tarkan Erimer <tarkan.erimer@turknet.net.tr>
Date : 2009-06-26 10:03 (31 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3821d768912a47ddbd6cab52943a8284df88003c
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/34
Handled-By : Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13656
Subject : 2.6.31-rc1 crashes randomly on my Machine.
Submitter : Zeno Davatz <zdavatz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-26 08:56 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/27
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (40 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13840
Subject : KMS oops on 945G system
Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-21 20:50 (6 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7662c8bd6545c12ac7b2b39e4554c3ba34789c50
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124820945815030&w=4
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/anholt/drm-intel.git;a=commit;h=dff33cfcefa31c30b72c57f44586754ea9e8f3e2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13834
Subject : device mapper fails on some logical volumes
Submitter : Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:52 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=754c5fc7ebb417b23601a6222a6005cc2e7f2913
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124767677206470&w=4
Handled-By : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13827
Subject : PM/hibernate swapfile regression
Submitter : Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 15:54 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124757972118196&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/36510/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13825
Subject : eeepc-laptop: fix hot-unplug on resume
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2009-06-29 13:12 (28 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/150
Handled-By : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32926/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13742
Subject : iwlagn (4965): regression when hardware rf switch is used
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-29 11:28 (28 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/88
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/224
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
Submitter : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-26 13:36 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/127
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/35
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13847
Subject : X stopped accepting keystrokes
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-07-14 9:24 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756352426737&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
Subject : inotify regression, missing events
Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
Subject : i915 errors
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13843
Subject : Linux-2.6.31-rc4 fails to open a USB serial port
Submitter : e9hack <e9hack@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:16 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851343512022&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13842
Subject : Oops when writing to /sys/block/ram0/queue/max_sectors_kb
Submitter : Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>
Date : 2009-07-23 15:30 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124836574403032&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-07-23 14:12 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124835839019906&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13835
Subject : e1000e massive packet loss
Submitter : Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-16 09:49 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124773057917887&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13815
Subject : emacs -nw compilation doesn't show the error message
Submitter : Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 06:22 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d945cb9cce20ac7143c2de8d88b187f62db99bdc
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13813
Subject : Hangups in n_tty_read()
Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date : 2009-07-16 18:48 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124777019920579&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13812
Subject : Ooops on uplug
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-07-20 17:51 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124811234302786&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781
Subject : System freeze at resume after suspend to RAM
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:42 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject : System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 10:31 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13762
Subject : AHCI on HP Compaq 6715s broken, did not detect slots/ports -> unable to boot
Submitter : Matthias Tingelhoff <mindo83@t-online.de>
Date : 2009-07-11 20:48 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732
Subject : tty layer instabilities
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-07-06 13:43 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124688781732419&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13731
Subject : Inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 4:22 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124685417325348&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13729
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/notify/notification.c:93!
Submitter : Mikko C. <mikko.cal@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-04 10:16 (53 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/4/12
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13726
Subject : fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-01 11:25 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=51daa88ebd8e0d437289f589af29d4b39379ea76
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/679
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13713
Subject : [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
Submitter : <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 10:49 (22 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b962442e46a9340bdbc6711982c59ff0cc2b5afb
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13709
Subject : b2c2-flexcop: no frontend driver found for this B2C2/FlexCop adapter w/ kernel-2.6.31-rc2
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date : 2009-07-05 01:36 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13700
Subject : usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
Submitter : jouni susiluoto <jouni.susiluoto@helsinki.fi>
Date : 2009-07-03 21:13 (24 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13667
Subject : drm: display arifacts when X.Org is stopped
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-27 18:52 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/8/30
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13657
Subject : Linux-2.6.31-rc1 Fails To Recognize Some USB Disks
Submitter : Tarkan Erimer <tarkan.erimer@turknet.net.tr>
Date : 2009-06-26 10:03 (31 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3821d768912a47ddbd6cab52943a8284df88003c
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/34
Handled-By : Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13656
Subject : 2.6.31-rc1 crashes randomly on my Machine.
Submitter : Zeno Davatz <zdavatz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-26 08:56 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/27
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (40 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13840
Subject : KMS oops on 945G system
Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-21 20:50 (6 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7662c8bd6545c12ac7b2b39e4554c3ba34789c50
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124820945815030&w=4
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/anholt/drm-intel.git;a=commit;h=dff33cfcefa31c30b72c57f44586754ea9e8f3e2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13834
Subject : device mapper fails on some logical volumes
Submitter : Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:52 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=754c5fc7ebb417b23601a6222a6005cc2e7f2913
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124767677206470&w=4
Handled-By : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13827
Subject : PM/hibernate swapfile regression
Submitter : Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 15:54 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124757972118196&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/36510/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13825
Subject : eeepc-laptop: fix hot-unplug on resume
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2009-06-29 13:12 (28 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/150
Handled-By : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32926/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13742
Subject : iwlagn (4965): regression when hardware rf switch is used
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-29 11:28 (28 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/88
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/224
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
Submitter : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-26 13:36 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/127
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/35
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 23:33 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov,
Maciej Rutecki, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
2009-07-26 20:23 ` [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 23:33 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-07-27 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2009-07-26 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins,
Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 952 bytes --]
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
> Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
>
>
I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
didn't we?
Thanks,
Cascardo.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
@ 2009-07-27 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins,
Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 27 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> > Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> > Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
> > Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> > 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> > Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
> >
> >
>
> I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
> didn't we?
Yes, we did. It's waiting in the Dmirty's tree for Linus to take it AFAICS.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
@ 2009-07-27 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins,
Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 27 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> > Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> > Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> > 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> > Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo-DmMZpsCg3uxeGPcbtGPokg@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
> >
> >
>
> I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
> didn't we?
Yes, we did. It's waiting in the Dmirty's tree for Linus to take it AFAICS.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
2009-07-27 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 22:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-07-28 0:09 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2009-07-27 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov,
Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> > > Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> > > Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
> > > Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> > > 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> > > Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
> > didn't we?
>
> Yes, we did. It's waiting in the Dmirty's tree for Linus to take it AFAICS.
>
I believe it is in -rc4 actually.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
2009-07-27 22:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2009-07-28 0:09 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-07-28 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2009-07-28 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov,
Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1659 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 27 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> > > > Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> > > > Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
> > > > Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> > > > 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> > > > Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
> > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
> > > didn't we?
> >
> > Yes, we did. It's waiting in the Dmirty's tree for Linus to take it AFAICS.
> >
>
> I believe it is in -rc4 actually.
>
> --
> Dmitry
It entered in v2.6.31-rc3. Thanks, Dimitry.
cascardo@vespa:~/linux$ git log1 --author=cascardo v2.6.31-rc2..v2.6.31-rc3
ddaa43433dd77535e4e132787f199f58ce224f44 Input: mark serio and i8042 as suspende
cascardo@vespa:~/linux$
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
@ 2009-07-28 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-28 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Alan Jenkins, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov, Maciej Rutecki
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday 27 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> > > > > Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> > > > > Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
> > > > > Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> > > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> > > > > 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> > > > > Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
> > > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
> > > > didn't we?
> > >
> > > Yes, we did. It's waiting in the Dmirty's tree for Linus to take it AFAICS.
> > >
> >
> > I believe it is in -rc4 actually.
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry
>
> It entered in v2.6.31-rc3. Thanks, Dimitry.
>
> cascardo@vespa:~/linux$ git log1 --author=cascardo v2.6.31-rc2..v2.6.31-rc3
> ddaa43433dd77535e4e132787f199f58ce224f44 Input: mark serio and i8042 as suspende
> cascardo@vespa:~/linux$
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13643] Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
@ 2009-07-28 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-28 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Alan Jenkins, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov, Maciej Rutecki
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday 27 July 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13643
> > > > > Subject : Touchpad lost synchronization after resume from suspend to RAM
> > > > > Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > Date : 2009-06-28 10:42 (29 days old)
> > > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/23/365
> > > > > 2.6.30-rc1: touchpad disabled
> > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/256
> > > > > Handled-By : Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo-DmMZpsCg3uxeGPcbtGPokg@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34075/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess my patch did fix it and we had other confirmations as well,
> > > > didn't we?
> > >
> > > Yes, we did. It's waiting in the Dmirty's tree for Linus to take it AFAICS.
> > >
> >
> > I believe it is in -rc4 actually.
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry
>
> It entered in v2.6.31-rc3. Thanks, Dimitry.
>
> cascardo@vespa:~/linux$ git log1 --author=cascardo v2.6.31-rc2..v2.6.31-rc3
> ddaa43433dd77535e4e132787f199f58ce224f44 Input: mark serio and i8042 as suspende
> cascardo@vespa:~/linux$
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13656] 2.6.31-rc1 crashes randomly on my Machine.
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Zeno Davatz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13656
Subject : 2.6.31-rc1 crashes randomly on my Machine.
Submitter : Zeno Davatz <zdavatz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-26 08:56 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/27
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13659] iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop, Johannes Berg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-26 13:36 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/127
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/35
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13659] iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop, Johannes Berg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-26 13:36 (31 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/127
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/35
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13659] iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 23:23 ` Frans Pop
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-26 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
> Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
Fixed in mainline by: 76d8b64e536362e16e38ee1c279c965ebfe094cc
Cheers,
FJP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13659] iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
@ 2009-07-26 23:23 ` Frans Pop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-26 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
> Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
Fixed in mainline by: 76d8b64e536362e16e38ee1c279c965ebfe094cc
Cheers,
FJP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13659] iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
2009-07-26 23:23 ` Frans Pop
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frans Pop; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Monday 27 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
> > Subject : iwlagn (4965): no wireless due to RFKILL problem
>
> Fixed in mainline by: 76d8b64e536362e16e38ee1c279c965ebfe094cc
Thanks, closed.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13657] Linux-2.6.31-rc1 Fails To Recognize Some USB Disks
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Tarkan Erimer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13657
Subject : Linux-2.6.31-rc1 Fails To Recognize Some USB Disks
Submitter : Tarkan Erimer <tarkan.erimer@turknet.net.tr>
Date : 2009-06-26 10:03 (31 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3821d768912a47ddbd6cab52943a8284df88003c
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/34
Handled-By : Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13645] NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, poornima nayak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (40 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 23:30 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-26 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
> Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
> Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
> Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
>
This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
push to Linus:
page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-27 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Monday 27 July 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
> > Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
> > Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
> > Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
> >
>
> This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
> push to Linus:
>
> page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
> net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-27 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Monday 27 July 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666
> > Subject : WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
> > Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-06-27 16:15 (30 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/75
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/6
> >
>
> This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
> push to Linus:
>
> page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
> net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-30 7:21 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-30 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
> > push to Linus:
> >
> > page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
> > net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
>
> Thanks, updated.
>
These patches have made it to Linus' tree, so this issue is resolved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-30 7:21 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-30 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
> > push to Linus:
> >
> > page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
> > net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
>
> Thanks, updated.
>
These patches have made it to Linus' tree, so this issue is resolved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-30 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-30 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
> > > push to Linus:
> > >
> > > page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
> > > net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
> >
> > Thanks, updated.
> >
>
> These patches have made it to Linus' tree, so this issue is resolved.
Thanks, bug closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
@ 2009-07-30 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-30 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer,
Andrew Morton
On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > This is fixed in mmotm with the following patches, waiting for Andrew's
> > > push to Linus:
> > >
> > > page-allocator-allow-too-high-order-warning-messages-to-be-suppressed-with-__gfp_nowarn.patch
> > > net-dccp-suppress-warning-about-large-allocations-from-dccp.patch
> >
> > Thanks, updated.
> >
>
> These patches have made it to Linus' tree, so this issue is resolved.
Thanks, bug closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-07-30 7:21 ` David Rientjes
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-08-01 7:54 ` Christian Kujau
2009-08-01 19:56 ` David Rientjes
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2009-08-01 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 at 00:21, David Rientjes wrote:
> These patches have made it to Linus' tree, so this issue is resolved.
I've pulled Linus' tree yesterday, booted, all fine - just now it was the
first time I saw a similar WARNING on my box (running -rc kernels
for a few months now), see below.
Is this related to the WARNING in #13666?
I'm pretty sure the kernel already includes the patches you
mentioned, "git show" said "b592972493c38665efd7d429a01b23fcb21e331a".
Also, I just pulled again and mm/ was not touched any more.
Or maybe this is related to ext4 stuff? (I just mounted an ext4 partition
when this WARNING happened). Full dmesg & .config:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.31-rc4/
Thanks,
Christian.
[69973.604263] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[69973.604340] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1749 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0()
[69973.604422] Hardware name: Lenovo
[69973.604468] Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc lm75 hwmon b43 usb_storage usb_libusual mac80211 cfg80211 uhci_hcd tg3 ssb ehci_hcd usbcore libphy nls_base
[69973.604727] Pid: 15026, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4 #1
[69973.604781] Call Trace:
[69973.604831] [<c1036dda>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xc0
[69973.604891] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
[69973.604952] [<c1036e40>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x40
[69973.605072] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
[69973.605152] [<c106dc72>] ? delayacct_end+0xa2/0xd0
[69973.605212] [<c10c6617>] ? __find_get_block+0xa7/0x180
[69973.605271] [<c1076d41>] ? __get_free_pages+0x21/0x60
[69973.605330] [<c11f02bd>] ? match_number+0x3d/0xc0
[69973.605387] [<c1129512>] ? parse_options+0xe2/0x5d0
[69973.605444] [<c135116b>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xbb/0xf0
[69973.605506] [<c10c6ff8>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x28/0x50
[69973.605564] [<c112b5b7>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x457/0x2670
[69973.605622] [<c11ee136>] ? vsnprintf+0x516/0x820
[69973.605679] [<c11e7f1d>] ? kobject_get+0x1d/0x40
[69973.605738] [<c10ef5c7>] ? disk_name+0xd7/0xe0
[69973.605795] [<c10a37ca>] ? get_sb_bdev+0x15a/0x1a0
[69973.605851] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
[69973.605909] [<c112822d>] ? ext4_get_sb+0x2d/0x50
[69973.605963] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
[69973.606020] [<c10a24f8>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x58/0xd0
[69973.606078] [<c10a2606>] ? do_kern_mount+0x56/0x120
[69973.606135] [<c10bb2da>] ? do_mount+0x23a/0x750
[69973.606191] [<c10b91c1>] ? copy_mount_options+0x61/0x160
[69973.606249] [<c10bb88f>] ? sys_mount+0x9f/0x100
[69973.606306] [<c1003304>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[69973.606360] ---[ end trace 28ff7a9c4fbb8a1a ]---
--
BOFH excuse #376:
Budget cuts forced us to sell all the power cords for the servers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-01 7:54 ` Christian Kujau
@ 2009-08-01 19:56 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-01 21:30 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-08-01 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 at 00:21, David Rientjes wrote:
> > These patches have made it to Linus' tree, so this issue is resolved.
>
> I've pulled Linus' tree yesterday, booted, all fine - just now it was the
> first time I saw a similar WARNING on my box (running -rc kernels
> for a few months now), see below.
>
> Is this related to the WARNING in #13666?
> I'm pretty sure the kernel already includes the patches you
> mentioned, "git show" said "b592972493c38665efd7d429a01b23fcb21e331a".
> Also, I just pulled again and mm/ was not touched any more.
>
Your kernel includes the fixes for the __alloc_pages_nodemask() warning
that was reported in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666.
> [69973.604263] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [69973.604340] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1749 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0()
> [69973.604422] Hardware name: Lenovo
> [69973.604468] Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc lm75 hwmon b43 usb_storage usb_libusual mac80211 cfg80211 uhci_hcd tg3 ssb ehci_hcd usbcore libphy nls_base
> [69973.604727] Pid: 15026, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4 #1
> [69973.604781] Call Trace:
> [69973.604831] [<c1036dda>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xc0
> [69973.604891] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
> [69973.604952] [<c1036e40>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x40
> [69973.605072] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
> [69973.605152] [<c106dc72>] ? delayacct_end+0xa2/0xd0
> [69973.605212] [<c10c6617>] ? __find_get_block+0xa7/0x180
> [69973.605271] [<c1076d41>] ? __get_free_pages+0x21/0x60
> [69973.605330] [<c11f02bd>] ? match_number+0x3d/0xc0
> [69973.605387] [<c1129512>] ? parse_options+0xe2/0x5d0
> [69973.605444] [<c135116b>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xbb/0xf0
> [69973.605506] [<c10c6ff8>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x28/0x50
> [69973.605564] [<c112b5b7>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x457/0x2670
This is a different issue than bug 13666, this is in the ext4 mount code
(which can also probably happen with other filesystems as well).
What are your mount options? It appears that they are causing the parser
to allocate far more memory than it should ever need.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-01 19:56 ` David Rientjes
@ 2009-08-01 21:30 ` Christian Kujau
2009-08-02 20:18 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2009-08-01 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 at 12:56, David Rientjes wrote:
> This is a different issue than bug 13666, this is in the ext4 mount code
> (which can also probably happen with other filesystems as well).
OK, thanks for clarifying this.
> What are your mount options? It appears that they are causing the parser
> to allocate far more memory than it should ever need.
This was the first time I mounted this ext4 fileystem since the reboot
with the new kernel:
/dev/mapper/wdc0 /mnt/disk0 ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
Christian.
/proc/meminfo now looks like this, I don't have the output what it loooked
like right after the WARNING though:
bkp:~$ cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1024968 kB
MemFree: 14164 kB
Buffers: 24800 kB
Cached: 864356 kB
SwapCached: 852 kB
Active: 472728 kB
Inactive: 506644 kB
Active(anon): 42780 kB
Inactive(anon): 48164 kB
Active(file): 429948 kB
Inactive(file): 458480 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
HighTotal: 129864 kB
HighFree: 252 kB
LowTotal: 895104 kB
LowFree: 13912 kB
SwapTotal: 1048568 kB
SwapFree: 1046780 kB
Dirty: 89408 kB
Writeback: 100 kB
AnonPages: 89592 kB
Mapped: 7664 kB
Slab: 20476 kB
SReclaimable: 12368 kB
SUnreclaim: 8108 kB
PageTables: 1496 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 1561052 kB
Committed_AS: 1043668 kB
VmallocTotal: 122880 kB
VmallocUsed: 3436 kB
VmallocChunk: 108664 kB
DirectMap4k: 12280 kB
DirectMap4M: 897024 kB
--
BOFH excuse #159:
Stubborn processes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-01 21:30 ` Christian Kujau
@ 2009-08-02 20:18 ` Christian Kujau
2009-08-02 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2009-08-02 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
Hm,
looks like this *is* reproducible. After a reboot, mounting the very
same ext4 filesystem triggers this WARNING again:
[ 165.000603] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 165.000726] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1749 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0()
[ 165.000853] Hardware name: Lenovo
[ 165.000944] Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc lm75 hwmon b43 usb_storage usb_libusual mac80211 cfg80211 uhci_hcd ehci_hcd tg3 ssb usbcore libphy nls_base
[ 165.002297] Pid: 2789, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4 #1
[ 165.002397] Call Trace:
[ 165.002494] [<c1036dda>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xc0
[ 165.002601] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
[ 165.002708] [<c1036e40>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x40
[ 165.002812] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
[ 165.002921] [<c106dc72>] ? delayacct_end+0xa2/0xd0
[ 165.003027] [<c1076d41>] ? __get_free_pages+0x21/0x60
[ 165.003132] [<c11f02bd>] ? match_number+0x3d/0xc0
[ 165.003235] [<c1129512>] ? parse_options+0xe2/0x5d0
[ 165.003340] [<c135116b>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xbb/0xf0
[ 165.003449] [<c10c6ff8>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x28/0x50
[ 165.003552] [<c112b5b7>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x457/0x2670
[ 165.003657] [<c11ee136>] ? vsnprintf+0x516/0x820
[ 165.003759] [<c11e7f1d>] ? kobject_get+0x1d/0x40
[ 165.003865] [<c10ef5c7>] ? disk_name+0xd7/0xe0
[ 165.003967] [<c10a37ca>] ? get_sb_bdev+0x15a/0x1a0
[ 165.004107] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
[ 165.004216] [<c112822d>] ? ext4_get_sb+0x2d/0x50
[ 165.004315] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
[ 165.004419] [<c10a24f8>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x58/0xd0
[ 165.004522] [<c10a2606>] ? do_kern_mount+0x56/0x120
[ 165.004625] [<c10bb2da>] ? do_mount+0x23a/0x750
[ 165.004727] [<c10b91c1>] ? copy_mount_options+0x61/0x160
[ 165.004831] [<c10bb88f>] ? sys_mount+0x9f/0x100
[ 165.004934] [<c1003304>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[ 165.005044] ---[ end trace d2227ca6268a916a ]---
[ 165.287930] EXT4-fs (dm-7): barriers enabled
The whole dmesg and proc/meminfo is at:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.31-rc4/
Note: "dm-7" is a dm-crypt device, backed by an external disk which is
connected via USB. The filesystem itself seems fine however, nothing
unusual except this warning so far...
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #174:
Backbone adjustment
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-02 20:18 ` Christian Kujau
@ 2009-08-02 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-02 20:35 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-02 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: David Rientjes, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
On Sunday 02 August 2009, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Hm,
>
> looks like this *is* reproducible. After a reboot, mounting the very
> same ext4 filesystem triggers this WARNING again:
>
> [ 165.000603] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 165.000726] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1749 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0()
> [ 165.000853] Hardware name: Lenovo
> [ 165.000944] Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc lm75 hwmon b43 usb_storage usb_libusual mac80211 cfg80211 uhci_hcd ehci_hcd tg3 ssb usbcore libphy nls_base
> [ 165.002297] Pid: 2789, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4 #1
> [ 165.002397] Call Trace:
> [ 165.002494] [<c1036dda>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xc0
> [ 165.002601] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
> [ 165.002708] [<c1036e40>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x40
> [ 165.002812] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
> [ 165.002921] [<c106dc72>] ? delayacct_end+0xa2/0xd0
> [ 165.003027] [<c1076d41>] ? __get_free_pages+0x21/0x60
> [ 165.003132] [<c11f02bd>] ? match_number+0x3d/0xc0
> [ 165.003235] [<c1129512>] ? parse_options+0xe2/0x5d0
> [ 165.003340] [<c135116b>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xbb/0xf0
> [ 165.003449] [<c10c6ff8>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x28/0x50
> [ 165.003552] [<c112b5b7>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x457/0x2670
> [ 165.003657] [<c11ee136>] ? vsnprintf+0x516/0x820
> [ 165.003759] [<c11e7f1d>] ? kobject_get+0x1d/0x40
> [ 165.003865] [<c10ef5c7>] ? disk_name+0xd7/0xe0
> [ 165.003967] [<c10a37ca>] ? get_sb_bdev+0x15a/0x1a0
> [ 165.004107] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
> [ 165.004216] [<c112822d>] ? ext4_get_sb+0x2d/0x50
> [ 165.004315] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
> [ 165.004419] [<c10a24f8>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x58/0xd0
> [ 165.004522] [<c10a2606>] ? do_kern_mount+0x56/0x120
> [ 165.004625] [<c10bb2da>] ? do_mount+0x23a/0x750
> [ 165.004727] [<c10b91c1>] ? copy_mount_options+0x61/0x160
> [ 165.004831] [<c10bb88f>] ? sys_mount+0x9f/0x100
> [ 165.004934] [<c1003304>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [ 165.005044] ---[ end trace d2227ca6268a916a ]---
> [ 165.287930] EXT4-fs (dm-7): barriers enabled
>
> The whole dmesg and proc/meminfo is at:
> http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.31-rc4/
>
> Note: "dm-7" is a dm-crypt device, backed by an external disk which is
> connected via USB. The filesystem itself seems fine however, nothing
> unusual except this warning so far...
The patches supposed to fix this issue went in right before -rc5 AFAIC.
Can you try to reproduce with -rc5?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-02 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-02 20:35 ` Christian Kujau
2009-08-02 20:53 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2009-08-02 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: David Rientjes, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
Hi Rafael,
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 at 22:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The patches supposed to fix this issue went in right before -rc5 AFAIC.
Sorry, you fell off my Cc list, thanks for catching this. I've seen these
patches too, but David confirmed:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is this related to the WARNING in #13666?
> I'm pretty sure the kernel already includes the patches you
> mentioned, "git show" said "b592972493c38665efd7d429a01b23fcb21e331a".
> Also, I just pulled again and mm/ was not touched any more.
Your kernel includes the fixes for the __alloc_pages_nodemask() warning
that was reported in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13666.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
So, it looks like it's not related to #13666.
> Can you try to reproduce with -rc5?
Yes, I'm building it right now (actually, I'm using current -git tree),
will report back.
Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #6:
global warming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-02 20:35 ` Christian Kujau
@ 2009-08-02 20:53 ` Christian Kujau
2009-08-04 19:44 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2009-08-02 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: David Rientjes, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 at 13:35, Christian Kujau wrote:
>> Can you try to reproduce with -rc5?
>
> Yes, I'm building it right now (actually, I'm using current -git tree),
> will report back.
Here it is, unfortunately:
[ 124.683454] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 124.683577] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1749 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0()
[ 124.683704] Hardware name: Lenovo
[ 124.683795] Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc lm75 hwmon usb_storage usb_libusual b43 mac80211 uhci_hcd cfg80211 ehci_hcd tg3 usbcore libphy ssb nls_base
[ 124.685187] Pid: 2743, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc5 #1
[ 124.685286] Call Trace:
[ 124.685383] [<c1036dda>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xc0
[ 124.685489] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
[ 124.685596] [<c1036e40>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x40
[ 124.685700] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
[ 124.685808] [<c106dc72>] ? delayacct_end+0xa2/0xd0
[ 124.685913] [<c1076d41>] ? __get_free_pages+0x21/0x60
[ 124.686018] [<c11f02cd>] ? match_number+0x3d/0xc0
[ 124.686122] [<c1129512>] ? parse_options+0xe2/0x5d0
[ 124.686225] [<c135118b>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xbb/0xf0
[ 124.686334] [<c10c6ff8>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x28/0x50
[ 124.686438] [<c112b5b7>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x457/0x2670
[ 124.686542] [<c11ee146>] ? vsnprintf+0x516/0x820
[ 124.686646] [<c11e7f2d>] ? kobject_get+0x1d/0x40
[ 124.686752] [<c10ef5c7>] ? disk_name+0xd7/0xe0
[ 124.686855] [<c10a37ca>] ? get_sb_bdev+0x15a/0x1a0
[ 124.686958] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
[ 124.687062] [<c112822d>] ? ext4_get_sb+0x2d/0x50
[ 124.687162] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
[ 124.687265] [<c10a24f8>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x58/0xd0
[ 124.687369] [<c10a2606>] ? do_kern_mount+0x56/0x120
[ 124.687474] [<c10bb2da>] ? do_mount+0x23a/0x750
[ 124.687575] [<c10b91c1>] ? copy_mount_options+0x61/0x160
[ 124.687679] [<c10bb88f>] ? sys_mount+0x9f/0x100
[ 124.687783] [<c1003304>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[ 124.687883] ---[ end trace e312a7d04db27a01 ]---
[ 124.981799] EXT4-fs (dm-8): barriers enabled
[ 125.002226] kjournald2 starting: pid 2744, dev dm-8:8, commit interval 5 seconds
[ 125.003346] EXT4-fs (dm-8): internal journal on dm-8:8
[ 125.003555] EXT4-fs (dm-8): delayed allocation enabled
[ 125.003751] EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
[ 125.343718] EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
[ 125.343884] EXT4-fs (dm-8): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
Full dmesg and config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.31-rc5/
No mount options were passed on the commandline but read from fstab:
$ grep ext4 /etc/fstab
/dev/mapper/wdc0 /mnt/disk0 ext4 nosuid,nodev,noexec,noauto,barrier 0 0
I'm in the process of creating an e2image of this partition, would this
help anyone?
Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #6:
global warming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13666] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1743 __alloc_pages_nodemask
2009-08-02 20:53 ` Christian Kujau
@ 2009-08-04 19:44 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2009-08-04 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: David Rientjes, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, linux-ext4
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 at 13:53, Christian Kujau wrote:
> [ 124.683454] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 124.683577] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1749 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0()
Hm, I just wonder: is this something to worry about? The filesystem itself
seems fine so far, but I don't want it to get (silently) corrupted with
each mount because of this warning...
> [ 124.683704] Hardware name: Lenovo
> [ 124.683795] Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc lm75 hwmon usb_storage usb_libusual b43 mac80211 uhci_hcd cfg80211 ehci_hcd tg3 usbcore libphy ssb nls_base
> [ 124.685187] Pid: 2743, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.31-rc5 #1
> [ 124.685286] Call Trace:
> [ 124.685383] [<c1036dda>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xc0
> [ 124.685489] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
> [ 124.685596] [<c1036e40>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x40
> [ 124.685700] [<c1076be4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x5a0
> [ 124.685808] [<c106dc72>] ? delayacct_end+0xa2/0xd0
> [ 124.685913] [<c1076d41>] ? __get_free_pages+0x21/0x60
> [ 124.686018] [<c11f02cd>] ? match_number+0x3d/0xc0
> [ 124.686122] [<c1129512>] ? parse_options+0xe2/0x5d0
> [ 124.686225] [<c135118b>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xbb/0xf0
> [ 124.686334] [<c10c6ff8>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x28/0x50
> [ 124.686438] [<c112b5b7>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x457/0x2670
> [ 124.686542] [<c11ee146>] ? vsnprintf+0x516/0x820
> [ 124.686646] [<c11e7f2d>] ? kobject_get+0x1d/0x40
> [ 124.686752] [<c10ef5c7>] ? disk_name+0xd7/0xe0
> [ 124.686855] [<c10a37ca>] ? get_sb_bdev+0x15a/0x1a0
> [ 124.686958] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
> [ 124.687062] [<c112822d>] ? ext4_get_sb+0x2d/0x50
> [ 124.687162] [<c112b160>] ? ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x2670
> [ 124.687265] [<c10a24f8>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x58/0xd0
> [ 124.687369] [<c10a2606>] ? do_kern_mount+0x56/0x120
> [ 124.687474] [<c10bb2da>] ? do_mount+0x23a/0x750
> [ 124.687575] [<c10b91c1>] ? copy_mount_options+0x61/0x160
> [ 124.687679] [<c10bb88f>] ? sys_mount+0x9f/0x100
> [ 124.687783] [<c1003304>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [ 124.687883] ---[ end trace e312a7d04db27a01 ]---
> [ 124.981799] EXT4-fs (dm-8): barriers enabled
> [ 125.002226] kjournald2 starting: pid 2744, dev dm-8:8, commit interval 5 seconds
> [ 125.003346] EXT4-fs (dm-8): internal journal on dm-8:8
> [ 125.003555] EXT4-fs (dm-8): delayed allocation enabled
> [ 125.003751] EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
> [ 125.343718] EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
> [ 125.343884] EXT4-fs (dm-8): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
>
>
> Full dmesg and config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.31-rc5/
>
> No mount options were passed on the commandline but read from fstab:
>
> $ grep ext4 /etc/fstab
> /dev/mapper/wdc0 /mnt/disk0 ext4 nosuid,nodev,noexec,noauto,barrier 0 0
>
>
> I'm in the process of creating an e2image of this partition, would this
> help anyone?
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #166:
/pub/lunch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13667] drm: display arifacts when X.Org is stopped
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Frans Pop
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13667
Subject : drm: display arifacts when X.Org is stopped
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-27 18:52 (30 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/8/30
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13700] usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 5:33 ` Ozan Çağlayan
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
jouni susiluoto, Takashi Iwai
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13700
Subject : usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
Submitter : jouni susiluoto <jouni.susiluoto@helsinki.fi>
Date : 2009-07-03 21:13 (24 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13700] usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13700] usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 5:33 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-07-27 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2009-07-27 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, jouni susiluoto, Takashi Iwai
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote On 26-07-2009 23:28:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13700
> Subject : usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
> Submitter : jouni susiluoto <jouni.susiluoto@helsinki.fi>
> Date : 2009-07-03 21:13 (24 days old)
>
This is also an issue for 2.6.30 so it should have been listed in the
other 2.6.29->2.6.30 list I think.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13700] usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
@ 2009-07-27 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ozan Çağlayan
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, jouni susiluoto, Takashi Iwai
On Monday 27 July 2009, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote On 26-07-2009 23:28:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13700
> > Subject : usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
> > Submitter : jouni susiluoto <jouni.susiluoto@helsinki.fi>
> > Date : 2009-07-03 21:13 (24 days old)
> >
> This is also an issue for 2.6.30 so it should have been listed in the
> other 2.6.29->2.6.30 list I think.
Thanks, updated.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13700] usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
@ 2009-07-27 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ozan Çağlayan
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, jouni susiluoto, Takashi Iwai
On Monday 27 July 2009, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote On 26-07-2009 23:28:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13700
> > Subject : usb error flood in dmesg, makes kde use plenty of cpu - bisected
> > Submitter : jouni susiluoto <jouni.susiluoto-pxSi+dnQzZMxHbG02/KK1g@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-03 21:13 (24 days old)
> >
> This is also an issue for 2.6.30 so it should have been listed in the
> other 2.6.29->2.6.30 list I think.
Thanks, updated.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13665] commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Howells, MinChan Kim, Wu Fengguang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
Submitter : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13665] commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Howells, MinChan Kim, Wu Fengguang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
Submitter : David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13665] commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 0:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-27 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Wu Fengguang @ 2009-07-27 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Howells,
MinChan Kim, kosaki.motohiro, Rik van Riel
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:28:20AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
> Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
> Submitter : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
Both patches from KOSAKI and Rik can fix the OOM in my tests:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/104
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34740/
The latter one has been included in -mm
> Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
This patch is also in -mm.
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13665] commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
2009-07-27 0:48 ` Wu Fengguang
@ 2009-07-27 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Howells,
MinChan Kim, kosaki.motohiro, Rik van Riel
On Monday 27 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:28:20AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
> > Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
> > Submitter : David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
>
> Both patches from KOSAKI and Rik can fix the OOM in my tests:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/104
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34740/
>
> The latter one has been included in -mm
>
> > Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
>
> This patch is also in -mm.
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13665] commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
@ 2009-07-27 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Howells,
MinChan Kim, kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A,
Rik van Riel
On Monday 27 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:28:20AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
> > Subject : commit 69c854817566 causes OOMs
> > Submitter : David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-06-27 08:12 (30 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=69c854817566db82c362797b4a6521d0b00fe1d8
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/28
>
> Both patches from KOSAKI and Rik can fix the OOM in my tests:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/104
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34740/
>
> The latter one has been included in -mm
>
> > Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32740/
>
> This patch is also in -mm.
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13716] The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrej Podzimek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13726] fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Wu Fengguang, Zhang, Yanmin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13726
Subject : fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-01 11:25 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=51daa88ebd8e0d437289f589af29d4b39379ea76
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/679
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13713] [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes, kazikcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13713
Subject : [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
Submitter : <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 10:49 (22 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b962442e46a9340bdbc6711982c59ff0cc2b5afb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13728] 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Paul Collins, Trond Myklebust
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13728] 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Paul Collins, Trond Myklebust
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13728] 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 6:44 ` Paul Collins
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Paul Collins @ 2009-07-27 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Trond Myklebust
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
> Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
> Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
> Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
So far it's looking like this problem is no longer present in
2.6.31-rc4.
--
Paul Collins
Wellington, New Zealand
Dag vijandelijk luchtschip de huismeester is dood
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13728] 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
@ 2009-07-27 6:44 ` Paul Collins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Paul Collins @ 2009-07-27 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Trond Myklebust
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
> Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
> Submitter : Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
So far it's looking like this problem is no longer present in
2.6.31-rc4.
--
Paul Collins
Wellington, New Zealand
Dag vijandelijk luchtschip de huismeester is dood
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13728] 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
@ 2009-07-27 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Collins
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Trond Myklebust
On Monday 27 July 2009, Paul Collins wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13728
> > Subject : 2.6.31-rc2 soft lockups, RPC-related
> > Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-05 7:17 (22 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=4
>
> So far it's looking like this problem is no longer present in
> 2.6.31-rc4.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13709] b2c2-flexcop: no frontend driver found for this B2C2/FlexCop adapter w/ kernel-2.6.31-rc2
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, boris64
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13709
Subject : b2c2-flexcop: no frontend driver found for this B2C2/FlexCop adapter w/ kernel-2.6.31-rc2
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date : 2009-07-05 01:36 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13709] b2c2-flexcop: no frontend driver found for this B2C2/FlexCop adapter w/ kernel-2.6.31-rc2
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, boris64
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13709
Subject : b2c2-flexcop: no frontend driver found for this B2C2/FlexCop adapter w/ kernel-2.6.31-rc2
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org-ro/BP3KN3ujR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 01:36 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13730] hitting lockdep limits...
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel J Blueman, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13730] hitting lockdep limits...
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel J Blueman, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13730] hitting lockdep limits...
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 9:07 ` Daniel J Blueman
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-07-27 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel J Blueman
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
> Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
>
Is this still a problem after?
commit b0a5b83ee0fce9dbf8ff5fe1f8c9ae7dfafe458c
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Tue Jun 16 16:11:14 2009 +0200
dma-debug: Put all hash-chain locks into the same lock class
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13730] hitting lockdep limits...
2009-07-27 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2009-07-27 9:07 ` Daniel J Blueman
2009-07-27 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Blueman @ 2009-07-27 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
>> Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
>> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
>> Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
>>
>
>
> Is this still a problem after?
>
> commit b0a5b83ee0fce9dbf8ff5fe1f8c9ae7dfafe458c
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Tue Jun 16 16:11:14 2009 +0200
>
> dma-debug: Put all hash-chain locks into the same lock class
Using the same .config and use profile, I haven't seen this in
2.6.31-rc4, thus this can be closed. I've updated the kernel bugzilla
entry also.
--
Daniel J Blueman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13730] hitting lockdep limits...
@ 2009-07-27 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel J Blueman
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of recent regressions.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >> (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
> >> Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
> >> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> >> Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
> >>
> >
> >
> > Is this still a problem after?
> >
> > commit b0a5b83ee0fce9dbf8ff5fe1f8c9ae7dfafe458c
> > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date: Tue Jun 16 16:11:14 2009 +0200
> >
> > dma-debug: Put all hash-chain locks into the same lock class
>
> Using the same .config and use profile, I haven't seen this in
> 2.6.31-rc4, thus this can be closed. I've updated the kernel bugzilla
> entry also.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13730] hitting lockdep limits...
@ 2009-07-27 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel J Blueman
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of recent regressions.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >> (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13730
> >> Subject : hitting lockdep limits...
> >> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date : 2009-07-05 18:19 (22 days old)
> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124681799023782&w=4
> >>
> >
> >
> > Is this still a problem after?
> >
> > commit b0a5b83ee0fce9dbf8ff5fe1f8c9ae7dfafe458c
> > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Tue Jun 16 16:11:14 2009 +0200
> >
> > dma-debug: Put all hash-chain locks into the same lock class
>
> Using the same .config and use profile, I haven't seen this in
> 2.6.31-rc4, thus this can be closed. I've updated the kernel bugzilla
> entry also.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13731] Inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13731
Subject : Inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 4:22 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124685417325348&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13729] kernel BUG at fs/notify/notification.c:93!
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris, Mikko C.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13729
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/notify/notification.c:93!
Submitter : Mikko C. <mikko.cal@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-04 10:16 (53 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/4/12
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Niel Lambrechts
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Niel Lambrechts
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 17:54 ` Niel Lambrechts
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Niel Lambrechts @ 2009-07-27 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On 07/26/2009 10:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
> Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
> Submitter : Niel Lambrechts<niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
>
Hi,
Bug is still evident on kernels up to 2.6.31-rc4.
Regards,
Niel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
@ 2009-07-27 17:54 ` Niel Lambrechts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Niel Lambrechts @ 2009-07-27 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On 07/26/2009 10:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
> Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
> Submitter : Niel Lambrechts<niel.lambrechts-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
>
Hi,
Bug is still evident on kernels up to 2.6.31-rc4.
Regards,
Niel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
@ 2009-07-27 22:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Niel Lambrechts; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Niel Lambrechts wrote:
> On 07/26/2009 10:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
> > Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
> > Submitter : Niel Lambrechts<niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
> >
> Hi,
>
> Bug is still evident on kernels up to 2.6.31-rc4.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
@ 2009-07-27 22:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Niel Lambrechts; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Niel Lambrechts wrote:
> On 07/26/2009 10:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
> > Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
> > Submitter : Niel Lambrechts<niel.lambrechts-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (21 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
> >
> Hi,
>
> Bug is still evident on kernels up to 2.6.31-rc4.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13742] iwlagn (4965): regression when hardware rf switch is used
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 2:31 ` Frans Pop
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13742
Subject : iwlagn (4965): regression when hardware rf switch is used
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-06-29 11:28 (28 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/88
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/224
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Duncan, Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-07-27 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Duncan, Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
>
>
commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
@ 2009-07-27 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-07-27 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Duncan, Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan-j9pdmedNgrk@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
>
>
commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
2009-07-27 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2009-07-27 9:21 ` Duncan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2009-07-27 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Thomas Gleixner
On Sunday 26 July 2009 23:21:06 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> > Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> > Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> > Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
>
> commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
>
> sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
>
>
> commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
>
> sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
[replied to all]
That's presumably correct, as rc4 (on-tag at last git pull) resolved it.
Just updated the bug.
(I didn't know whether CODE_FIX or PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE was correct, and
the status link is to the generic bugzilla resolutions, so not much help. I
picked CODE_FIX. I guess that's the next bug I file, on bugzilla.kernel.org
itself.)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
@ 2009-07-27 9:21 ` Duncan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2009-07-27 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Thomas Gleixner
On Sunday 26 July 2009 23:21:06 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> > Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> > Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan-j9pdmedNgrk@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
>
> commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
>
> sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
>
>
> commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
>
> sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
[replied to all]
That's presumably correct, as rc4 (on-tag at last git pull) resolved it.
Just updated the bug.
(I didn't know whether CODE_FIX or PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE was correct, and
the status link is to the generic bugzilla resolutions, so not much help. I
picked CODE_FIX. I guess that's the next bug I file, on bugzilla.kernel.org
itself.)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
@ 2009-07-27 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Duncan
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Thomas Gleixner
On Monday 27 July 2009, Duncan wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 23:21:06 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> > > Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> > > Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> > > Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
> >
> > commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
> >
> > sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
> >
> >
> > commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
> >
> > sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
>
> [replied to all]
>
> That's presumably correct, as rc4 (on-tag at last git pull) resolved it.
>
> Just updated the bug.
Thanks.
> (I didn't know whether CODE_FIX or PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE was correct, and
> the status link is to the generic bugzilla resolutions, so not much help. I
> picked CODE_FIX. I guess that's the next bug I file, on bugzilla.kernel.org
> itself.)
For the bugs on the regression lists CODE_FIX is correct if the fix has been
merged by Linus or the problem has been confirmed not to be present in the
Linus' tree any more. In wich case the bug should be marked as CLOSED.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
@ 2009-07-27 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Duncan
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Thomas Gleixner
On Monday 27 July 2009, Duncan wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 23:21:06 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> > > Subject : Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> > > Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan-j9pdmedNgrk@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
> >
> > commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
> >
> > sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
> >
> >
> > commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
> >
> > sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
>
> [replied to all]
>
> That's presumably correct, as rc4 (on-tag at last git pull) resolved it.
>
> Just updated the bug.
Thanks.
> (I didn't know whether CODE_FIX or PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE was correct, and
> the status link is to the generic bugzilla resolutions, so not much help. I
> picked CODE_FIX. I guess that's the next bug I file, on bugzilla.kernel.org
> itself.)
For the bugs on the regression lists CODE_FIX is correct if the fix has been
merged by Linus or the problem has been confirmed not to be present in the
Linus' tree any more. In wich case the bug should be marked as CLOSED.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13732] tty layer instabilities
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732
Subject : tty layer instabilities
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-07-06 13:43 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124688781732419&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13740] X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (20 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13770] System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject : System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 10:31 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13770] System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject : System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-14 10:31 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13762] AHCI on HP Compaq 6715s broken, did not detect slots/ports -> unable to boot
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthias Tingelhoff
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13762
Subject : AHCI on HP Compaq 6715s broken, did not detect slots/ports -> unable to boot
Submitter : Matthias Tingelhoff <mindo83@t-online.de>
Date : 2009-07-11 20:48 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13806] system does not boot due to device-mapper error
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 1:58 ` Américo Wang
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Roman Shtylman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13806] system does not boot due to device-mapper error
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13806] system does not boot due to device-mapper error Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 1:58 ` Américo Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Américo Wang @ 2009-07-27 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Roman Shtylman
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
> Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
> Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
Proposed patch:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13806] system does not boot due to device-mapper error
@ 2009-07-27 1:58 ` Américo Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Américo Wang @ 2009-07-27 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Roman Shtylman
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
> Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
> Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
Proposed patch:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13806] system does not boot due to device-mapper error
@ 2009-07-27 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Américo Wang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Roman Shtylman
On Monday 27 July 2009, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
> > Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
> > Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
>
> Proposed patch:
>
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13806] system does not boot due to device-mapper error
@ 2009-07-27 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Américo Wang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Roman Shtylman
On Monday 27 July 2009, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
> > Subject : system does not boot due to device-mapper error
> > Submitter : Roman Shtylman <shtylman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-21 00:03 (6 days old)
>
> Proposed patch:
>
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-03 9:19 ` Robert Richter
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-03 9:19 ` Robert Richter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Robert Richter @ 2009-08-03 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
I also tested v2.6.31-rc4 with prove-locking enabled and could not
trigger the warning. My regression runs fine. Please provide more
information (workloads, oprofile setup, cpu info, kernel config) to be
able to reproduce this.
Thanks,
-Robert
On 26.07.09 22:28:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
> Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-08-03 9:19 ` Robert Richter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Robert Richter @ 2009-08-03 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
I also tested v2.6.31-rc4 with prove-locking enabled and could not
trigger the warning. My regression runs fine. Please provide more
information (workloads, oprofile setup, cpu info, kernel config) to be
able to reproduce this.
Thanks,
-Robert
On 26.07.09 22:28:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
> Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-08-05 14:45 ` Jerome Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Marchand @ 2009-08-05 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Richter
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Robert Richter wrote:
> I also tested v2.6.31-rc4 with prove-locking enabled and could not
> trigger the warning. My regression runs fine. Please provide more
> information (workloads, oprofile setup, cpu info, kernel config) to be
> able to reproduce this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Robert
>
Hi Robert,
I hit the warning on a dual i686 box, with both v2.6.31-rc2 and v2.6.31-rc4.
I can actually trigger it by just running opcontrol --start and then opreport.
It happens with both --separate=none and --separate=all options (the oprofile
deamon using otherwise default options).
About the kernel config, prove_locking is on, oprofile is a module and
oprofile_ibs is not set. For maor detail, I've attached the config file to
the bugzilla.
I've tried to reproduce it on 2.6.31-rc5 without success.
Regards,
Jerome
> On 26.07.09 22:28:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
>> Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
>> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-08-05 14:45 ` Jerome Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Marchand @ 2009-08-05 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Richter
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Robert Richter wrote:
> I also tested v2.6.31-rc4 with prove-locking enabled and could not
> trigger the warning. My regression runs fine. Please provide more
> information (workloads, oprofile setup, cpu info, kernel config) to be
> able to reproduce this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Robert
>
Hi Robert,
I hit the warning on a dual i686 box, with both v2.6.31-rc2 and v2.6.31-rc4.
I can actually trigger it by just running opcontrol --start and then opreport.
It happens with both --separate=none and --separate=all options (the oprofile
deamon using otherwise default options).
About the kernel config, prove_locking is on, oprofile is a module and
oprofile_ibs is not set. For maor detail, I've attached the config file to
the bugzilla.
I've tried to reproduce it on 2.6.31-rc5 without success.
Regards,
Jerome
> On 26.07.09 22:28:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
>> Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (5 days old)
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13781] System freeze at resume after suspend to RAM
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Casteyde
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13781
Subject : System freeze at resume after suspend to RAM
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:42 (12 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13815] emacs -nw compilation doesn't show the error message
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Aneesh Kumar K.V
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13815
Subject : emacs -nw compilation doesn't show the error message
Submitter : Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 06:22 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d945cb9cce20ac7143c2de8d88b187f62db99bdc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13813] Hangups in n_tty_read()
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Johannes Weiner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13813
Subject : Hangups in n_tty_read()
Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date : 2009-07-16 18:48 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124777019920579&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13812] Ooops on uplug
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Alan Stern, Daniel Mack
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13812
Subject : Ooops on uplug
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-07-20 17:51 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124811234302786&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, ling.ma, Linus Torvalds,
Ma Ling, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, ling.ma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
Linus Torvalds, Ma Ling, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13825] eeepc-laptop: fix hot-unplug on resume
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13825
Subject : eeepc-laptop: fix hot-unplug on resume
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2009-06-29 13:12 (28 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/150
Handled-By : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32926/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek,
Tobias Diedrich
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek,
Tobias Diedrich
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh-N3TV7GIv+o9fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 11:06 ` Tobias Diedrich
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Diedrich @ 2009-07-27 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, this still applies to 2.6.31-rc4.
If I don't add brightness_mode=2 the backlight controls don't work
properly.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
> Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
> Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
>
--
Tobias PGP: http://9ac7e0bc.uguu.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
@ 2009-07-27 11:06 ` Tobias Diedrich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Diedrich @ 2009-07-27 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, this still applies to 2.6.31-rc4.
If I don't add brightness_mode=2 the backlight controls don't work
properly.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
> Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
> Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh-N3TV7GIv+o9fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
>
--
Tobias PGP: http://9ac7e0bc.uguu.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
@ 2009-07-27 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Diedrich
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek
On Monday 27 July 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, this still applies to 2.6.31-rc4.
> If I don't add brightness_mode=2 the backlight controls don't work
> properly.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
> > Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
> > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
> > Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
@ 2009-07-27 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Diedrich
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek
On Monday 27 July 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, this still applies to 2.6.31-rc4.
> If I don't add brightness_mode=2 the backlight controls don't work
> properly.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13826
> > Subject : thinkpad boots with backlight low
> > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-15 15:13 (12 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756359126830&w=4
> > Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh-N3TV7GIv+o9fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
@ 2009-07-27 22:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh @ 2009-07-27 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Diedrich, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, this still applies to 2.6.31-rc4.
> If I don't add brightness_mode=2 the backlight controls don't work
> properly.
Patch ready. Will send to linux-acpi soon.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13826] thinkpad boots with backlight low
@ 2009-07-27 22:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh @ 2009-07-27 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Diedrich, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, this still applies to 2.6.31-rc4.
> If I don't add brightness_mode=2 the backlight controls don't work
> properly.
Patch ready. Will send to linux-acpi soon.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi-eEbw3PyuezQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 2:26 ` Carlos R. Mafra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sun 26.Jul'09 at 22:28:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
> Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
> Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
> Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
I was scanning the regressions list and noticed that I could reproduce
this bug.
So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
Cox.
I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
is the driver I used to test this problem.
If there is anything else I can do (give more info, test patches etc),
please let me know.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 2:26 ` Carlos R. Mafra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sun 26.Jul'09 at 22:28:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
> Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
> Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi-eEbw3PyuezQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
I was scanning the regressions list and noticed that I could reproduce
this bug.
So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
Cox.
I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
is the driver I used to test this problem.
If there is anything else I can do (give more info, test patches etc),
please let me know.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 12:01 ` Carlos R. Mafra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon 27.Jul'09 at 4:26:23 +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
> ("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
> Cox.
>
> I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
> but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
> is the driver I used to test this problem.
It doesn't revert cleanly from -rc4, but I solved the conflicts in
option.c and usb-serial.c (I wanted to learn how to do it)
and the problem gets fixed indeed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 12:01 ` Carlos R. Mafra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon 27.Jul'09 at 4:26:23 +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
> ("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
> Cox.
>
> I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
> but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
> is the driver I used to test this problem.
It doesn't revert cleanly from -rc4, but I solved the conflicts in
option.c and usb-serial.c (I wanted to learn how to do it)
and the problem gets fixed indeed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 15:34 ` Alan Stern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers,
Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun 26.Jul'09 at 22:28:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
> > Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
> > Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
> > Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
>
> I was scanning the regressions list and noticed that I could reproduce
> this bug.
>
> So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
> ("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
> Cox.
>
> I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
> but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
> is the driver I used to test this problem.
>
> If there is anything else I can do (give more info, test patches etc),
> please let me know.
Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
in use.
Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
with the device? If there is, what happens if you kill all the
processes using the serial device before you unplug it?
In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
way usb-serial has worked all along.
Alan Stern
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 15:34 ` Alan Stern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Ferenc Wagner, Kay Sievers,
Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun 26.Jul'09 at 22:28:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
> > Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
> > Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi-eEbw3PyuezQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
>
> I was scanning the regressions list and noticed that I could reproduce
> this bug.
>
> So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
> ("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
> Cox.
>
> I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
> but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
> is the driver I used to test this problem.
>
> If there is anything else I can do (give more info, test patches etc),
> please let me know.
Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
in use.
Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
with the device? If there is, what happens if you kill all the
processes using the serial device before you unplug it?
In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
way usb-serial has worked all along.
Alan Stern
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 15:53 ` Ferenc Wagner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Ferenc Wagner @ 2009-07-27 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Stern
Cc: Carlos R. Mafra, Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> writes:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
>> On Sun 26.Jul'09 at 22:28:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
>>> Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
>>> Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
>>> Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
>>
>> I was scanning the regressions list and noticed that I could reproduce
>> this bug.
>>
>> So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
>> ("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
>> Cox.
>>
>> I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
>> but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
>> is the driver I used to test this problem.
>>
>> If there is anything else I can do (give more info, test patches etc),
>> please let me know.
>
> Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
> the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
> in use.
My original report is about unplugging the USB servial device *after*
using it.
> Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
> it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
> with the device?
I checked and rechecked that the pppd process is already dead by the
time I unplug the device. However, the minor number did not increase
if I unplugged the device without using it beforehand, as expected.
> In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
> way usb-serial has worked all along.
I didn't experience this problem with 2.6.30: my ppp script was
hardwired to use ttyUSB0 and it always worked. Now with 2.6.31-rc3 it
does not, as the device node keeps changing.
I'll test this with opening ttyUSB directly from the shell, instead of
via pppd, and report back whether it makes a difference.
--
Regards,
Feri.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 15:53 ` Ferenc Wagner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Ferenc Wagner @ 2009-07-27 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Stern
Cc: Carlos R. Mafra, Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
>> On Sun 26.Jul'09 at 22:28:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13821
>>> Subject : Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
>>> Submitter : Ferenc Wagner <wferi-eEbw3PyuezQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date : 2009-07-18 20:04 (9 days old)
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124794754015776&w=4
>>
>> I was scanning the regressions list and noticed that I could reproduce
>> this bug.
>>
>> So I bisected it to commit 335f8514f200e63d689113d29cb7253a5c282967
>> ("tty: Bring the usb tty port structure into more use"), from Alan
>> Cox.
>>
>> I did not double check if reverting it from -rc4 fixes the issue,
>> but I noticed that this patch touches drivers/usb/serial/option.c, which
>> is the driver I used to test this problem.
>>
>> If there is anything else I can do (give more info, test patches etc),
>> please let me know.
>
> Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
> the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
> in use.
My original report is about unplugging the USB servial device *after*
using it.
> Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
> it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
> with the device?
I checked and rechecked that the pppd process is already dead by the
time I unplug the device. However, the minor number did not increase
if I unplugged the device without using it beforehand, as expected.
> In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
> way usb-serial has worked all along.
I didn't experience this problem with 2.6.30: my ppp script was
hardwired to use ttyUSB0 and it always worked. Now with 2.6.31-rc3 it
does not, as the device node keeps changing.
I'll test this with opening ttyUSB directly from the shell, instead of
via pppd, and report back whether it makes a difference.
--
Regards,
Feri.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
2009-07-27 15:53 ` Ferenc Wagner
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 16:18 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 16:48 ` Carlos R. Mafra
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferenc Wagner
Cc: Carlos R. Mafra, Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
> > the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
> > in use.
>
> My original report is about unplugging the USB servial device *after*
> using it.
>
> > Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
> > it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
> > with the device?
>
> I checked and rechecked that the pppd process is already dead by the
> time I unplug the device. However, the minor number did not increase
> if I unplugged the device without using it beforehand, as expected.
>
> > In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
> > way usb-serial has worked all along.
>
> I didn't experience this problem with 2.6.30: my ppp script was
> hardwired to use ttyUSB0 and it always worked. Now with 2.6.31-rc3 it
> does not, as the device node keeps changing.
>
> I'll test this with opening ttyUSB directly from the shell, instead of
> via pppd, and report back whether it makes a difference.
Another thing to check is whether this patch (not yet merged) fixes it:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=124825571403844&w=2
Alan Stern
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 16:48 ` Carlos R. Mafra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Stern
Cc: Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon 27.Jul'09 at 12:18:36 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
> > > Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
> > > the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
> > > in use.
> >
> > My original report is about unplugging the USB servial device *after*
> > using it.
> >
> > > Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
> > > it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
> > > with the device?
> >
> > I checked and rechecked that the pppd process is already dead by the
> > time I unplug the device. However, the minor number did not increase
> > if I unplugged the device without using it beforehand, as expected.
> >
> > > In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
> > > way usb-serial has worked all along.
> >
> > I didn't experience this problem with 2.6.30: my ppp script was
> > hardwired to use ttyUSB0 and it always worked. Now with 2.6.31-rc3 it
> > does not, as the device node keeps changing.
> >
> > I'll test this with opening ttyUSB directly from the shell, instead of
> > via pppd, and report back whether it makes a difference.
>
> Another thing to check is whether this patch (not yet merged) fixes it:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=124825571403844&w=2
No, unfortunately it does not fix it. I've just tested it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 16:48 ` Carlos R. Mafra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Stern
Cc: Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon 27.Jul'09 at 12:18:36 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
> > > Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
> > > the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
> > > in use.
> >
> > My original report is about unplugging the USB servial device *after*
> > using it.
> >
> > > Can you check whether the device is still being used when you unplug
> > > it? For instance, is there still a pppd process trying to communicate
> > > with the device?
> >
> > I checked and rechecked that the pppd process is already dead by the
> > time I unplug the device. However, the minor number did not increase
> > if I unplugged the device without using it beforehand, as expected.
> >
> > > In short, it seems likely that this is not new behavior but rather the
> > > way usb-serial has worked all along.
> >
> > I didn't experience this problem with 2.6.30: my ppp script was
> > hardwired to use ttyUSB0 and it always worked. Now with 2.6.31-rc3 it
> > does not, as the device node keeps changing.
> >
> > I'll test this with opening ttyUSB directly from the shell, instead of
> > via pppd, and report back whether it makes a difference.
>
> Another thing to check is whether this patch (not yet merged) fixes it:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=124825571403844&w=2
No, unfortunately it does not fix it. I've just tested it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 16:55 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2009-07-27 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Another thing to check is whether this patch (not yet merged) fixes it:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=124825571403844&w=2
>
> No, unfortunately it does not fix it. I've just tested it.
I wouldn't expect it to.
In the ppp case you have this occuring on an unplug
USB layer
unplug
hangup tty
PPPD
SIGHUP
ouch
log stuff
close down
However at the same time that PPPD is logging stuff and closing down th
USB layer is going to see the replug if you just unplug/replug quickly
and in that case you will get ttyUSB1. That aspect is timing dependant.
If everything has closed down and given the port back before you replug
it you should get ttyUSB0 again.
#
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 16:55 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2009-07-27 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Another thing to check is whether this patch (not yet merged) fixes it:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=124825571403844&w=2
>
> No, unfortunately it does not fix it. I've just tested it.
I wouldn't expect it to.
In the ppp case you have this occuring on an unplug
USB layer
unplug
hangup tty
PPPD
SIGHUP
ouch
log stuff
close down
However at the same time that PPPD is logging stuff and closing down th
USB layer is going to see the replug if you just unplug/replug quickly
and in that case you will get ttyUSB1. That aspect is timing dependant.
If everything has closed down and given the port back before you replug
it you should get ttyUSB0 again.
#
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
2009-07-27 16:55 ` Alan Cox
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 17:22 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2009-07-27 23:17 ` Alan Cox
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon 27.Jul'09 at 17:55:25 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Another thing to check is whether this patch (not yet merged) fixes it:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=124825571403844&w=2
> >
> > No, unfortunately it does not fix it. I've just tested it.
>
> I wouldn't expect it to.
>
> In the ppp case you have this occuring on an unplug
>
> USB layer
> unplug
> hangup tty
> PPPD
> SIGHUP
> ouch
> log stuff
> close down
>
> However at the same time that PPPD is logging stuff and closing down th
> USB layer is going to see the replug if you just unplug/replug quickly
> and in that case you will get ttyUSB1. That aspect is timing dependant.
Ok, so how long is "quickly" here? During bisection I typically waited ~30 secs
and there was no pppd listed on 'ps aux' when I reconnected it.
> If everything has closed down and given the port back before you replug
> it you should get ttyUSB0 again.
> #
I don't know what to say. I believe in you, of course, but I am not
seeing what you expect. For example, after sending the last email
I unplugged it and went back to work until I read this reply of
yours. So I did this,
[mafra@Pilar:5-pts-tree-level]$ ls /dev/ttyU*
ls: cannot access /dev/ttyU*: No such file or directory
which is OK, because the stick was not plugged in all this time. So
then I plugged it and got this,
[mafra@Pilar:5-pts-tree-level]$ ls /dev/ttyU*
/dev/ttyUSB1 /dev/ttyUSB2
And it took a lot longer than 30 secs this time, more than 5 minutes
for sure (and I don't see anything suspect in the output of 'ps aux').
And the fact that is, reverting your commit made things work under
the same testing conditions.
Do you have any suggestions as to what I should do between unplugging
and plugging it back?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 23:17 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2009-07-27 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
> And the fact that is, reverting your commit made things work under
> the same testing conditions.
>
> Do you have any suggestions as to what I should do between unplugging
> and plugging it back?
Got it - if the port is opened twice (eg by two apps) it does this.
Reproduced and testing a fix.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
@ 2009-07-27 23:17 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2009-07-27 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Alan Stern, Ferenc Wagner, Greg KH, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
> And the fact that is, reverting your commit made things work under
> the same testing conditions.
>
> Do you have any suggestions as to what I should do between unplugging
> and plugging it back?
Got it - if the port is opened twice (eg by two apps) it does this.
Reproduced and testing a fix.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090728003120.500c5cf0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>]
* Re: [Bisected] [Bug #13821] Replugging USB serial converter uses new device node
2009-07-27 15:53 ` Ferenc Wagner
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 16:20 ` Carlos R. Mafra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2009-07-27 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferenc Wagner
Cc: Alan Stern, Greg KH, Alan Cox, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, USB list, Kay Sievers, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon 27.Jul'09 at 17:53:18 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> writes:
> >
> > Are you certain this really is a regression? Under 2.6.30 and 2.6.27
> > the same thing happened if I unplugged a USB serial device while it was
> > in use.
>
> My original report is about unplugging the USB servial device *after*
> using it.
Yes, I did this:
1) plug the surfstick
2) connect to the internert (with draknetcenter)
3) disconnect (and wait a bit)
4) unplug the surfstick (and wait a bit)
Then when I plug it again, the devices created are /dev/ttyUSB{1,2} instead
of /dev/ttyUSB{0,1}.
That breaks 'draknetcenter', because if I try to connect again it
says that /dev/ttyUSB0 can not be found.
And during the bisection, for the commits which were marked "good", there
was no problem to reconnect and 'draknetcenter' was happy (although perhaps
it should not be so dependent on /dev/tttyUSB0 only, but that is another
story).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13835] e1000e massive packet loss
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Caleb Cushing, Eric Dumazet, Linux Netdev List
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13835
Subject : e1000e massive packet loss
Submitter : Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-16 09:49 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124773057917887&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Brownell, David Woodhouse, Eric Miao,
Pavel Machek, Tobias Diedrich
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Brownell, David Woodhouse, Eric Miao,
Pavel Machek, Tobias Diedrich
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 9:16 ` Tobias Diedrich
2009-07-27 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Diedrich @ 2009-07-27 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Brownell,
David Woodhouse, Eric Miao, Pavel Machek
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Well, the patch reverting the commit still applies to 2.6.31-rc4, so
I assume the issue persists,but I have not tried an unpatched
2.6.31-rc4.
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
> Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
> Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
> Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (12 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
>
--
Tobias PGP: http://9ac7e0bc.uguu.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
2009-07-27 9:16 ` Tobias Diedrich
@ 2009-07-27 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-28 11:33 ` saeed bishara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Diedrich
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Brownell,
David Woodhouse, Eric Miao, Pavel Machek
On Monday 27 July 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
>
> Well, the patch reverting the commit still applies to 2.6.31-rc4, so
> I assume the issue persists,but I have not tried an unpatched
> 2.6.31-rc4.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
@ 2009-07-28 11:33 ` saeed bishara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: saeed bishara @ 2009-07-28 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, David Woodhouse
Cc: Tobias Diedrich, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
David Brownell, Eric Miao, Pavel Machek
Hi
This patch crashes my system, when issue suspend to ram, the kernel
crashes mtd_cls_suspend when the mtd device is mtdXro, the problem is
the the mtdXro devices are of mtd_class, and the suspend function of
this class assumes that the "dev" is contained in mtd_into structure
(dev_to_mtd(dev)), but, the mtdXro device created using
device_create() so the dev is not contained in valid mtd_info
structure.
saeed
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of recent regressions.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> > (either way).
>>
>>
>> Well, the patch reverting the commit still applies to 2.6.31-rc4, so
>> I assume the issue persists,but I have not tried an unpatched
>> 2.6.31-rc4.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
@ 2009-07-28 11:33 ` saeed bishara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: saeed bishara @ 2009-07-28 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, David Woodhouse
Cc: Tobias Diedrich, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
David Brownell, Eric Miao, Pavel Machek
Hi
This patch crashes my system, when issue suspend to ram, the kernel
crashes mtd_cls_suspend when the mtd device is mtdXro, the problem is
the the mtdXro devices are of mtd_class, and the suspend function of
this class assumes that the "dev" is contained in mtd_into structure
(dev_to_mtd(dev)), but, the mtdXro device created using
device_create() so the dev is not contained in valid mtd_info
structure.
saeed
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of recent regressions.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> > (either way).
>>
>>
>> Well, the patch reverting the commit still applies to 2.6.31-rc4, so
>> I assume the issue persists,but I have not tried an unpatched
>> 2.6.31-rc4.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-30 9:08 ` Pavel Machek
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-07-30 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Brownell,
David Woodhouse, Eric Miao, Tobias Diedrich, rpurdie, lenz, Dirk,
arminlitzel, Cyril Hrubis, thommycheck, linux-arm-kernel,
dbaryshkov, omegamoon, eric.miao
Hi!
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
I believe I'm experiencing duplicate of this on zaurus.
I'm using (attached patch) to work around.
Legally speaking:
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Pavel
diff -ur mtd.ofic/mtdcore.c mtd/mtdcore.c
--- mtd.ofic/mtdcore.c 2009-07-15 01:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ mtd/mtdcore.c 2009-07-21 17:55:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
static struct class mtd_class = {
.name = "mtd",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .suspend = mtd_cls_suspend,
- .resume = mtd_cls_resume,
+ // .suspend = mtd_cls_suspend,
+ //.resume = mtd_cls_resume,
};
/* These are exported solely for the purpose of mtd_blkdevs.c. You
Only in mtd: mtdcore.c~
Binary files mtd.ofic/mtdcore.o and mtd/mtdcore.o differ
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
@ 2009-07-30 9:08 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-07-30 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Brownell,
David Woodhouse, Eric Miao, Tobias Diedrich,
rpurdie-Fm38FmjxZ/leoWH0uzbU5w, lenz-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw,
Dirk-RZHw+W3AUBHbFfAX06+HdQ, arminlitzel-S0/GAf8tV78,
Cyril Hrubis, thommycheck-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-arm-kernel, dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
omegamoon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
eric.miao-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ
Hi!
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
I believe I'm experiencing duplicate of this on zaurus.
I'm using (attached patch) to work around.
Legally speaking:
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Pavel
diff -ur mtd.ofic/mtdcore.c mtd/mtdcore.c
--- mtd.ofic/mtdcore.c 2009-07-15 01:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ mtd/mtdcore.c 2009-07-21 17:55:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
static struct class mtd_class = {
.name = "mtd",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .suspend = mtd_cls_suspend,
- .resume = mtd_cls_resume,
+ // .suspend = mtd_cls_suspend,
+ //.resume = mtd_cls_resume,
};
/* These are exported solely for the purpose of mtd_blkdevs.c. You
Only in mtd: mtdcore.c~
Binary files mtd.ofic/mtdcore.o and mtd/mtdcore.o differ
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13834] device mapper fails on some logical volumes
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alasdair Kergon, Christian Bornträger,
Mike Snitzer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13834
Subject : device mapper fails on some logical volumes
Submitter : Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:52 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=754c5fc7ebb417b23601a6222a6005cc2e7f2913
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124767677206470&w=4
Handled-By : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33534/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13827] PM/hibernate swapfile regression
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (38 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Heiko Carstens
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13827
Subject : PM/hibernate swapfile regression
Submitter : Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 15:54 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124757972118196&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/36510/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13838] kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Luca Tettamanti
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13838] kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Luca Tettamanti
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13838] kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 5:29 ` Américo Wang
2009-07-28 8:30 ` Luca Tettamanti
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Américo Wang @ 2009-07-27 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luca Tettamanti,
netdev, herbert
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
> Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
> Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
Hmm, it looks like that 'pfkey_net_id' is still zero after ipsec_pfkey_init()...
Add Herbert and net-dev into Cc.
Luca, would you mind to provide your .config and the steps to reproduce this?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13838] kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
@ 2009-07-28 8:30 ` Luca Tettamanti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Luca Tettamanti @ 2009-07-28 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Américo Wang
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, netdev, herbert, Alexey Dobriyan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Américo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
>> Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
>> Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
>> Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
>
> Hmm, it looks like that 'pfkey_net_id' is still zero after ipsec_pfkey_init()...
>
> Add Herbert and net-dev into Cc.
>
> Luca, would you mind to provide your .config and the steps to reproduce this?
I cannot reproduce it anymore with the current git kernel. The BUG was
triggered by racoon at startup.
Should I go back to an older kernel to investigate or can we consider
it "fixed"?
Luca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13838] kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
@ 2009-07-28 8:30 ` Luca Tettamanti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Luca Tettamanti @ 2009-07-28 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Américo Wang
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
herbert-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q, Alexey Dobriyan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Américo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
>> Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
>> Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it-Re5JQEeQqe8@public.gmane.orgm>
>> Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
>
> Hmm, it looks like that 'pfkey_net_id' is still zero after ipsec_pfkey_init()...
>
> Add Herbert and net-dev into Cc.
>
> Luca, would you mind to provide your .config and the steps to reproduce this?
I cannot reproduce it anymore with the current git kernel. The BUG was
triggered by racoon at startup.
Should I go back to an older kernel to investigate or can we consider
it "fixed"?
Luca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13838] kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
2009-07-28 8:30 ` Luca Tettamanti
(?)
@ 2009-07-28 12:46 ` Eric Dumazet
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2009-07-28 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luca Tettamanti
Cc: Américo Wang, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, netdev, herbert, Alexey Dobriyan
Luca Tettamanti a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Américo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>> of recent regressions.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>>> (either way).
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13838
>>> Subject : kernel BUG at include/net/netns/generic.h:41!
>>> Submitter : Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
>>> Date : 2009-07-20 15:27 (7 days old)
>>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/20/105
>> Hmm, it looks like that 'pfkey_net_id' is still zero after ipsec_pfkey_init()...
>>
>> Add Herbert and net-dev into Cc.
>>
>> Luca, would you mind to provide your .config and the steps to reproduce this?
>
> I cannot reproduce it anymore with the current git kernel. The BUG was
> triggered by racoon at startup.
> Should I go back to an older kernel to investigate or can we consider
> it "fixed"?
>
This should be fixed by following patch (submitted for bug 13760, but should apply)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index b7292a2..1972830 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ int net_assign_generic(struct net *net, int id, void *data)
*/
ng->len = id;
- memcpy(&ng->ptr, &old_ng->ptr, old_ng->len);
+ memcpy(&ng->ptr, &old_ng->ptr, old_ng->len * sizeof(void *));
rcu_assign_pointer(net->gen, ng);
call_rcu(&old_ng->rcu, net_generic_release);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13839] xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (40 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 2:13 ` Mark Lord
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Devin Heitmueller, Mark Lord
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13839] xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13839] xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 2:13 ` Mark Lord
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2009-07-27 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Devin Heitmueller
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
> Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
> Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
> Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
..
There is definitely a regression, in that it doesn't work without
config changes to Myth. This is due to the new way that firmware uploads
are implemented in xc5000: slower, and more often than before.
But the MythTV workaround required is simple:
> 3. In mythtv-setup -> CaptureCards -> DVB:1 -> RecordingOptions
> there is a tickbox for "Open DVB Card on Demand". It was ticked,
> so I un-ticked that box. Everything now works!
>
> When that tickbox was selected, the xc5000 took five (5) seconds to "open",
> as it did the firmware upload every time. This appeared to exceed some
> timeout inside myth.
>
> With the tickbox NOT ticked, myth just opens the tuner once at startup,
> and keeps it open, so no more delay when it wants to use it.
Dunno what to say about this one.
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13839] xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
@ 2009-07-27 2:13 ` Mark Lord
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2009-07-27 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Devin Heitmueller
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
> Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
> Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml-gsilrlXbHYg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
> Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller-eb9eJ82Ua7k9XoPSrs7Ehg@public.gmane.org>
..
There is definitely a regression, in that it doesn't work without
config changes to Myth. This is due to the new way that firmware uploads
are implemented in xc5000: slower, and more often than before.
But the MythTV workaround required is simple:
> 3. In mythtv-setup -> CaptureCards -> DVB:1 -> RecordingOptions
> there is a tickbox for "Open DVB Card on Demand". It was ticked,
> so I un-ticked that box. Everything now works!
>
> When that tickbox was selected, the xc5000 took five (5) seconds to "open",
> as it did the firmware upload every time. This appeared to exceed some
> timeout inside myth.
>
> With the tickbox NOT ticked, myth just opens the tuner once at startup,
> and keeps it open, so no more delay when it wants to use it.
Dunno what to say about this one.
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13839] xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
@ 2009-07-27 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Lord
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Devin Heitmueller
On Monday 27 July 2009, Mark Lord wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
> > Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
> > Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> > Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
> > Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
> ..
>
> There is definitely a regression, in that it doesn't work without
> config changes to Myth. This is due to the new way that firmware uploads
> are implemented in xc5000: slower, and more often than before.
>
> But the MythTV workaround required is simple:
>
> > 3. In mythtv-setup -> CaptureCards -> DVB:1 -> RecordingOptions
> > there is a tickbox for "Open DVB Card on Demand". It was ticked,
> > so I un-ticked that box. Everything now works!
> >
> > When that tickbox was selected, the xc5000 took five (5) seconds to "open",
> > as it did the firmware upload every time. This appeared to exceed some
> > timeout inside myth.
> >
> > With the tickbox NOT ticked, myth just opens the tuner once at startup,
> > and keeps it open, so no more delay when it wants to use it.
>
>
> Dunno what to say about this one.
Well, let's close it as 'documented'.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13839] xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
@ 2009-07-27 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Lord
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Devin Heitmueller
On Monday 27 July 2009, Mark Lord wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13839
> > Subject : xc5000 no longer works with Myth-0.21-fixes branch
> > Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml-gsilrlXbHYg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-19 15:15 (8 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124814394016848&w=4
> > Handled-By : Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller-eb9eJ82Ua7k9XoPSrs7Ehg@public.gmane.org>
> ..
>
> There is definitely a regression, in that it doesn't work without
> config changes to Myth. This is due to the new way that firmware uploads
> are implemented in xc5000: slower, and more often than before.
>
> But the MythTV workaround required is simple:
>
> > 3. In mythtv-setup -> CaptureCards -> DVB:1 -> RecordingOptions
> > there is a tickbox for "Open DVB Card on Demand". It was ticked,
> > so I un-ticked that box. Everything now works!
> >
> > When that tickbox was selected, the xc5000 took five (5) seconds to "open",
> > as it did the firmware upload every time. This appeared to exceed some
> > timeout inside myth.
> >
> > With the tickbox NOT ticked, myth just opens the tuner once at startup,
> > and keeps it open, so no more delay when it wants to use it.
>
>
> Dunno what to say about this one.
Well, let's close it as 'documented'.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13840] KMS oops on 945G system
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (41 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 17:10 ` Jesse Barnes
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Diego Calleja, Jesse Barnes, Shaohua Li
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13840
Subject : KMS oops on 945G system
Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-21 20:50 (6 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7662c8bd6545c12ac7b2b39e4554c3ba34789c50
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124820945815030&w=4
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/anholt/drm-intel.git;a=commit;h=dff33cfcefa31c30b72c57f44586754ea9e8f3e2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13836] suspend script fails, related to stdout?
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (42 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas M.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (43 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 8:45 ` Dave Young
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Young, Jiri Kosina
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 8:45 ` Dave Young
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2009-07-27 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jiri Kosina
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Now I'm not sure if it's a regression, because it happens not every
boot. Maybe I just noticed it after 2.6.30
jiri, I found the place via extra printk messages added to the i8042.c
in function i8042_check_aux(), when touchpad detecting fail, it fall
into following error path:
if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&i8042_aux_irq_delivered,
msecs_to_jiffies(250)) == 0) { [snip] }
so maybe the timeout value need to be increased? I try redo the
i8042_setup_aux after it fails, it fixes the problem indeed, which one
is the proper fix do you think? If it's the right fix I can post the
patch.
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
> Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
> Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (10 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
>
>
>
--
Regards
dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
@ 2009-07-27 8:45 ` Dave Young
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2009-07-27 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jiri Kosina
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Now I'm not sure if it's a regression, because it happens not every
boot. Maybe I just noticed it after 2.6.30
jiri, I found the place via extra printk messages added to the i8042.c
in function i8042_check_aux(), when touchpad detecting fail, it fall
into following error path:
if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&i8042_aux_irq_delivered,
msecs_to_jiffies(250)) == 0) { [snip] }
so maybe the timeout value need to be increased? I try redo the
i8042_setup_aux after it fails, it fixes the problem indeed, which one
is the proper fix do you think? If it's the right fix I can post the
patch.
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
> Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
> Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8@public.gmane.orgm>
> Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (10 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
>
>
>
--
Regards
dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
2009-07-27 8:45 ` Dave Young
(?)
@ 2009-08-08 0:41 ` Jiri Kosina
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2009-08-08 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1521 bytes --]
[ adding Dmitry and linux-input to CC ]
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Dave Young wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Now I'm not sure if it's a regression, because it happens not every
> boot. Maybe I just noticed it after 2.6.30
>
> jiri, I found the place via extra printk messages added to the i8042.c
>
> in function i8042_check_aux(), when touchpad detecting fail, it fall
> into following error path:
>
> if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&i8042_aux_irq_delivered,
> msecs_to_jiffies(250)) == 0) { [snip] }
>
> so maybe the timeout value need to be increased? I try redo the
> i8042_setup_aux after it fails, it fixes the problem indeed, which one
> is the proper fix do you think? If it's the right fix I can post the
> patch.
>
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
> > Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
> > Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (10 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> dave
>
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13844] i915 errors
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
Subject : i915 errors
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13844] i915 errors
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
Subject : i915 errors
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13844] i915 errors
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-07-27 17:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-27 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Barnes @ 2009-07-27 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:28:30 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
> Subject : i915 errors
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
> References :
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
I probably wasn't clear enough in my last mail about this one. The
errors have always been present, we just report them now. I think this
particular one is harmless, but we should still try to fix it (now that
we have more data about it).
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13844] i915 errors
2009-07-27 17:11 ` Jesse Barnes
@ 2009-07-27 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesse Barnes
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli
On Monday 27 July 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:28:30 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
> > Subject : i915 errors
> > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
> > References :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
>
> I probably wasn't clear enough in my last mail about this one. The
> errors have always been present, we just report them now. I think this
> particular one is harmless, but we should still try to fix it (now that
> we have more data about it).
OK, thanks, I've dropped it from the list of recent regressions, but the bug
is still open.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13844] i915 errors
@ 2009-07-27 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesse Barnes
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli
On Monday 27 July 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:28:30 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
> > Subject : i915 errors
> > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-25 9:30 (2 days old)
> > References :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851427612720&w=4
>
> I probably wasn't clear enough in my last mail about this one. The
> errors have always been present, we just report them now. I think this
> particular one is harmless, but we should still try to fix it (now that
> we have more data about it).
OK, thanks, I've dropped it from the list of recent regressions, but the bug
is still open.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13843] Linux-2.6.31-rc4 fails to open a USB serial port
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, e9hack
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13843
Subject : Linux-2.6.31-rc4 fails to open a USB serial port
Submitter : e9hack <e9hack@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-25 9:16 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124851343512022&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13842] Oops when writing to /sys/block/ram0/queue/max_sectors_kb
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (46 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Rosenboom
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13842
Subject : Oops when writing to /sys/block/ram0/queue/max_sectors_kb
Submitter : Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>
Date : 2009-07-23 15:30 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124836574403032&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gene Heskett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-07-23 14:12 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124835839019906&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gene Heskett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-23 14:12 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124835839019906&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 4:20 ` Gene Heskett
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-07-27 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>(either way).
>
Yes. I have nuked the odd stuff in my rc.local file, and rebuilt this kernel
with several mods that I thought might be related, but it is still failing in
the same manner. The error messages (apparently from lp:, but long after cups
has been started) do NOT make it to the messages log file either, so its
totally blown up at that point.
Note, that this is a regression from 2.6 31-rc3, which works fine. So the
thing shouldn't be that hard to find. But in looking over the changelog,
nothing obviously reaches out and grabs me.
I'm not really equipt to do a bisect here either, my git from F10 is at least
2 versions old now. And I'm crippled by a way too small /boot partition which
can't hold more than 12-14 kernels. The disk partitioning tool in F10 is
nothing short of fscking broken IMO. But fedora isn't interested in that
either, cuz its existed since at least Fedora 2. Here, fedora is on its way
out, 64 bit mandriva sure looks nice. And DiskDrake Just Works(TM).
Thanks Rafael, I thought it was being ignored.
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
>Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
>Date : 2009-07-23 14:12 (4 days old)
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124835839019906&w=4
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
All laws are simulations of reality.
-- John C. Lilly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
@ 2009-07-27 4:20 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-07-27 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>(either way).
>
Yes. I have nuked the odd stuff in my rc.local file, and rebuilt this kernel
with several mods that I thought might be related, but it is still failing in
the same manner. The error messages (apparently from lp:, but long after cups
has been started) do NOT make it to the messages log file either, so its
totally blown up at that point.
Note, that this is a regression from 2.6 31-rc3, which works fine. So the
thing shouldn't be that hard to find. But in looking over the changelog,
nothing obviously reaches out and grabs me.
I'm not really equipt to do a bisect here either, my git from F10 is at least
2 versions old now. And I'm crippled by a way too small /boot partition which
can't hold more than 12-14 kernels. The disk partitioning tool in F10 is
nothing short of fscking broken IMO. But fedora isn't interested in that
either, cuz its existed since at least Fedora 2. Here, fedora is on its way
out, 64 bit mandriva sure looks nice. And DiskDrake Just Works(TM).
Thanks Rafael, I thought it was being ignored.
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13841
>Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
>Date : 2009-07-23 14:12 (4 days old)
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124835839019906&w=4
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
All laws are simulations of reality.
-- John C. Lilly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
@ 2009-07-27 22:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >of recent regressions.
> >
> >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >(either way).
> >
> Yes. I have nuked the odd stuff in my rc.local file, and rebuilt this kernel
> with several mods that I thought might be related, but it is still failing in
> the same manner. The error messages (apparently from lp:, but long after cups
> has been started) do NOT make it to the messages log file either, so its
> totally blown up at that point.
>
> Note, that this is a regression from 2.6 31-rc3, which works fine. So the
> thing shouldn't be that hard to find. But in looking over the changelog,
> nothing obviously reaches out and grabs me.
>
> I'm not really equipt to do a bisect here either, my git from F10 is at least
> 2 versions old now. And I'm crippled by a way too small /boot partition which
> can't hold more than 12-14 kernels. The disk partitioning tool in F10 is
> nothing short of fscking broken IMO. But fedora isn't interested in that
> either, cuz its existed since at least Fedora 2. Here, fedora is on its way
> out, 64 bit mandriva sure looks nice. And DiskDrake Just Works(TM).
>
> Thanks Rafael, I thought it was being ignored.
You're welcome, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure
@ 2009-07-27 22:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >of recent regressions.
> >
> >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >(either way).
> >
> Yes. I have nuked the odd stuff in my rc.local file, and rebuilt this kernel
> with several mods that I thought might be related, but it is still failing in
> the same manner. The error messages (apparently from lp:, but long after cups
> has been started) do NOT make it to the messages log file either, so its
> totally blown up at that point.
>
> Note, that this is a regression from 2.6 31-rc3, which works fine. So the
> thing shouldn't be that hard to find. But in looking over the changelog,
> nothing obviously reaches out and grabs me.
>
> I'm not really equipt to do a bisect here either, my git from F10 is at least
> 2 versions old now. And I'm crippled by a way too small /boot partition which
> can't hold more than 12-14 kernels. The disk partitioning tool in F10 is
> nothing short of fscking broken IMO. But fedora isn't interested in that
> either, cuz its existed since at least Fedora 2. Here, fedora is on its way
> out, 64 bit mandriva sure looks nice. And DiskDrake Just Works(TM).
>
> Thanks Rafael, I thought it was being ignored.
You're welcome, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (48 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 8:35 ` Scott James Remnant
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris, Scott James Remnant
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
Subject : inotify regression, missing events
Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
2009-07-26 20:28 ` [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 8:35 ` Scott James Remnant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Scott James Remnant @ 2009-07-27 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 832 bytes --]
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
> Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
>
This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
still an issue and should be listed.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@ubuntu.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
@ 2009-07-27 8:35 ` Scott James Remnant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Scott James Remnant @ 2009-07-27 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
still an issue and should be listed.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
2009-07-27 8:35 ` Scott James Remnant
@ 2009-07-27 22:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott James Remnant
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris
On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> >
> This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> still an issue and should be listed.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
@ 2009-07-27 22:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott James Remnant
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris
On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >
> This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> still an issue and should be listed.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
@ 2009-07-28 20:15 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-07-28 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Scott James Remnant, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
> > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> > >
> > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> > still an issue and should be listed.
>
> Thanks for the update
Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like
to test and verify.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
@ 2009-07-28 20:15 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-07-28 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Scott James Remnant, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > >
> > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> > still an issue and should be listed.
>
> Thanks for the update
Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like
to test and verify.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
2009-07-28 20:15 ` Eric Paris
@ 2009-07-29 12:04 ` Scott James Remnant
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Scott James Remnant @ 2009-07-29 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1304 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:15 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
> > > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > > > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> > > still an issue and should be listed.
> >
> > Thanks for the update
>
> Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like
> to test and verify.
>
Tested and verified, good work!
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@ubuntu.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
@ 2009-07-29 12:04 ` Scott James Remnant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Scott James Remnant @ 2009-07-29 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:15 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > > > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > >
> > > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> > > still an issue and should be listed.
> >
> > Thanks for the update
>
> Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like
> to test and verify.
>
Tested and verified, good work!
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
2009-07-29 12:04 ` Scott James Remnant
@ 2009-07-29 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-29 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott James Remnant
Cc: Eric Paris, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:15 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > > > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > > > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
> > > > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > > > > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> > > > >
> > > > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> > > > still an issue and should be listed.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update
> >
> > Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like
> > to test and verify.
> >
> Tested and verified, good work!
Thanks, bug closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events
@ 2009-07-29 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-29 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott James Remnant
Cc: Eric Paris, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:15 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845
> > > > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events
> > > > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant <scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4
> > > > > Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > > >
> > > > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely
> > > > still an issue and should be listed.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update
> >
> > Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like
> > to test and verify.
> >
> Tested and verified, good work!
Thanks, bug closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13848] iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (49 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread* [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Clayton
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Clayton
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 9:27 ` Chris Clayton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Chris Clayton @ 2009-07-27 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
2009/7/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
This bug should remain open, although we are, I think, getting closer
to the cause, which seems to be related to some interaction between
the rt61 driver and mac80211 power saving.
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
> Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
>
>
>
--
No, Sir; there is nothing which has yet been contrived by man, by which
so much happiness is produced as by a good tavern or inn - Doctor Samuel
Johnson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
@ 2009-07-27 9:27 ` Chris Clayton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Chris Clayton @ 2009-07-27 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
2009/7/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
This bug should remain open, although we are, I think, getting closer
to the cause, which seems to be related to some interaction between
the rt61 driver and mac80211 power saving.
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
> Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
>
>
>
--
No, Sir; there is nothing which has yet been contrived by man, by which
so much happiness is produced as by a good tavern or inn - Doctor Samuel
Johnson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
@ 2009-07-27 22:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Clayton; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Chris Clayton wrote:
> 2009/7/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
>
> This bug should remain open, although we are, I think, getting closer
> to the cause, which seems to be related to some interaction between
> the rt61 driver and mac80211 power saving.
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> > Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
> > Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
@ 2009-07-27 22:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Clayton; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 27 July 2009, Chris Clayton wrote:
> 2009/7/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
>
> This bug should remain open, although we are, I think, getting closer
> to the cause, which seems to be related to some interaction between
> the rt61 driver and mac80211 power saving.
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> > Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
> > Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (14 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13847] X stopped accepting keystrokes
2009-07-26 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 208+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andreas Mohr, Jiri Kosina, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13847
Subject : X stopped accepting keystrokes
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-07-14 9:24 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124756352426737&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 208+ messages in thread