All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shi, Guohuai" <Guohuai.Shi@windriver.com>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>,
	Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "Meng, Bin" <Bin.Meng@windriver.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 04/16] hw/9pfs: Implement Windows specific xxxdir() APIs
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 17:28:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4173F6A077C963E1C5149CF8EFBC9@MN2PR11MB4173.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2201939.iVmW86lLxn@silver>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 19:05
> To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Meng, Bin <Bin.Meng@windriver.com>; Shi, Guohuai
> <Guohuai.Shi@windriver.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] hw/9pfs: Implement Windows specific xxxdir()
> APIs
> 
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
> 
> On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:05:34 PM CET Shi, Guohuai wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 00:06
> > > To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > > Cc: Shi, Guohuai <Guohuai.Shi@windriver.com>; Meng, Bin
> > > <Bin.Meng@windriver.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] hw/9pfs: Implement Windows specific
> > > xxxdir() APIs
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> > > sender and know the content is safe.
> > >
> > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 11:08:03 AM CET Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > From: Guohuai Shi <guohuai.shi@windriver.com>
> > > >
> > > > This commit implements Windows specific xxxdir() APIs for safety
> > > > directory access.
> > >
> > > That comment is seriously too short for this patch.
> > >
> > > 1. You should describe the behaviour implementation that you have
> > > chosen and why you have chosen it.
> > >
> > > 2. Like already said in the previous version of the patch, you
> > > should place a link to the discussion we had on this issue.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guohuai Shi <guohuai.shi@windriver.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >  hw/9pfs/9p-util.h       |   6 +
> > > >  hw/9pfs/9p-util-win32.c | 443
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 449 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h index
> > > > 0f159fb4ce..c1c251fbd1 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> > > > +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> > > > @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ int unlinkat_win32(int dirfd, const char
> > > > *pathname, int flags);  int statfs_win32(const char *root_path,
> > > > struct statfs *stbuf);  int openat_dir(int dirfd, const char
> > > > *name);  int openat_file(int dirfd, const char *name, int flags,
> > > > mode_t mode);
> > > > +DIR *opendir_win32(const char *full_file_name); int
> > > > +closedir_win32(DIR *pDir); struct dirent *readdir_win32(DIR
> > > > +*pDir); void rewinddir_win32(DIR *pDir); void seekdir_win32(DIR
> > > > +*pDir, long pos); long telldir_win32(DIR *pDir);
> > > >  #endif
> > > >
> > > >  static inline void close_preserve_errno(int fd) diff --git
> > > > a/hw/9pfs/9p-util-win32.c b/hw/9pfs/9p-util-win32.c index
> > > > a99d579a06..e9408f3c45 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/9pfs/9p-util-win32.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p-util-win32.c
> > > > @@ -37,6 +37,16 @@
> > > >   *    Windows does not support opendir, the directory fd is created by
> > > >   *    CreateFile and convert to fd by _open_osfhandle(). Keep the fd
> open
> > > will
> > > >   *    lock and protect the directory (can not be modified or replaced)
> > > > + *
> > > > + * 5. Neither Windows native APIs, nor MinGW provide a POSIX
> > > > + compatible
> > > API for
> > > > + *    acquiring directory entries in a safe way. Calling those APIs
> > > (native
> > > > + *    _findfirst() and _findnext() or MinGW's readdir(), seekdir() and
> > > > + *    telldir()) directly can lead to an inconsistent state if
> directory
> > > is
> > > > + *    modified in between, e.g. the same directory appearing more than
> > > once
> > > > + *    in output, or directories not appearing at all in output even
> though
> > > they
> > > > + *    were neither newly created nor deleted. POSIX does not define
> what
> > > happens
> > > > + *    with deleted or newly created directories in between, but it
> > > guarantees a
> > > > + *    consistent state.
> > > >   */
> > > >
> > > >  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > > > @@ -51,6 +61,25 @@
> > > >
> > > >  #define V9FS_MAGIC  0x53465039  /* string "9PFS" */
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * MinGW and Windows does not provide a safe way to seek
> > > > +directory while other
> > > > + * thread is modifying the same directory.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This structure is used to store sorted file id and ensure
> > > > +directory seek
> > > > + * consistency.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct dir_win32 {
> > > > +    struct dirent dd_dir;
> > > > +    uint32_t offset;
> > > > +    uint32_t total_entries;
> > > > +    HANDLE hDir;
> > > > +    uint32_t dir_name_len;
> > > > +    uint64_t dot_id;
> > > > +    uint64_t dot_dot_id;
> > > > +    uint64_t *file_id_list;
> > > > +    char dd_name[1];
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * win32_error_to_posix - convert Win32 error to POSIX error number
> > > >   *
> > > > @@ -977,3 +1006,417 @@ int qemu_mknodat(int dirfd, const char
> > > > *filename,
> > > mode_t mode, dev_t dev)
> > > >      errno = ENOTSUP;
> > > >      return -1;
> > > >  }
> > > > +
> > > > +static int file_id_compare(const void *id_ptr1, const void
> > > > +*id_ptr2) {
> > > > +    uint64_t id[2];
> > > > +
> > > > +    id[0] = *(uint64_t *)id_ptr1;
> > > > +    id[1] = *(uint64_t *)id_ptr2;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (id[0] > id[1]) {
> > > > +        return 1;
> > > > +    } else if (id[0] < id[1]) {
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    } else {
> > > > +        return 0;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int get_next_entry(struct dir_win32 *stream) {
> > > > +    HANDLE hDirEntry = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > > > +    char *entry_name;
> > > > +    char *entry_start;
> > > > +    FILE_ID_DESCRIPTOR fid;
> > > > +    DWORD attribute;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream->file_id_list[stream->offset] == stream->dot_id) {
> > > > +        strcpy(stream->dd_dir.d_name, ".");
> > > > +        return 0;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream->file_id_list[stream->offset] == stream->dot_dot_id) {
> > > > +        strcpy(stream->dd_dir.d_name, "..");
> > > > +        return 0;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    fid.dwSize = sizeof(fid);
> > > > +    fid.Type = FileIdType;
> > > > +
> > > > +    fid.FileId.QuadPart = stream->file_id_list[stream->offset];
> > > > +
> > > > +    hDirEntry = OpenFileById(stream->hDir, &fid, GENERIC_READ,
> > > > +                             FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE
> > > > +                             | FILE_SHARE_DELETE,
> > > > +                             NULL,
> > > > +                             FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS
> > > > +                             | FILE_FLAG_OPEN_REPARSE_POINT);
> > >
> > > What's the purpose of FILE_FLAG_OPEN_REPARSE_POINT here? As it's
> > > apparently not obvious, please add a comment.
> > >
> >
> > If do not use this flag, and if file id is a symbolic link, then Windows
> will not symbolic link itself, but open the target file.
> > This flag is similar as O_NOFOLLOW flag.
> 
> OK, got it, thanks! But please add a comment in code that describes this.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (hDirEntry == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
> > > > +        /*
> > > > +         * Not open it successfully, it may be deleted.
> > >
> > > Wrong English. "Open failed, it may have been deleted in the meantime.".
> > >
> > > > +         * Try next id.
> > > > +         */
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    entry_name = get_full_path_win32(hDirEntry, NULL);
> > > > +
> > > > +    CloseHandle(hDirEntry);
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (entry_name == NULL) {
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    attribute = GetFileAttributes(entry_name);
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* symlink is not allowed */
> > > > +    if (attribute == INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES
> > > > +        || (attribute & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT) != 0) {
> > > > +        return -1;
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it make sense to call warn_report_once() here to let the
> > > user know that he has some symlinks that are never delivered to guest?
> >
> > OK, Got it.
> >
> > >
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (memcmp(entry_name, stream->dd_name, stream->dir_name_len)
> > > > + !=
> > > > + 0) {
> > >
> > > No, that's unsafe. You want to use something like strncmp() instead.
> > >
> > > > +        /*
> > > > +         * The full entry file name should be a part of parent
> > > > + directory
> > > name,
> > > > +         * except dot and dot_dot (is already handled).
> > > > +         * If not, this entry should not be returned.
> > > > +         */
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    entry_start = entry_name + stream->dir_name_len;
> > >
> > > s/entry_start/entry_basename/ ?
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* skip slash */
> > > > +    while (*entry_start == '\\') {
> > > > +        entry_start++;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (strchr(entry_start, '\\') != NULL) {
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (strlen(entry_start) == 0
> > > > +        || strlen(entry_start) + 1 > sizeof(stream->dd_dir.d_name)) {
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +    strcpy(stream->dd_dir.d_name, entry_start);
> > >
> > > g_path_get_basename() ? :)
> >
> > For above three comments:
> > This code is not good, should be fixed.
> > The code want to filter the following cases:
> > The parent directory path is not a part of entry's full path:
> > Parent: C:\123\456, entry: C:\123, C:\ Entry contains more than one
> > name components:
> > Parent: C:\123\456, entry: C:\123\456\789\abc Entry is zero length or
> > name buffer is too long
> >
> > I will refactor this part.
> 
> In general: writing parsing code yourself is extremely error prone. That's
> why it makes sense to use existing functions from glib, etc.
> 
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +    return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * opendir_win32 - open a directory
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function opens a directory and caches all directory entries.
> > >
> > > It just caches all file IDs, doesn't it?
> > >
> >
> > Will fix it
> >
> > > > + */
> > > > +DIR *opendir_win32(const char *full_file_name) {
> > > > +    HANDLE hDir = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > > > +    HANDLE hDirEntry = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > > > +    char *full_dir_entry = NULL;
> > > > +    DWORD attribute;
> > > > +    intptr_t dd_handle = -1;
> > > > +    struct _finddata_t dd_data;
> > > > +    uint64_t file_id;
> > > > +    uint64_t *file_id_list = NULL;
> > > > +    BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION FileInfo;
> > >
> > > FileInfo is the variable name, not a struct name, so no upper case
> > > for it please.
> >
> > Will fix it.
> > >
> > > > +    struct dir_win32 *stream = NULL;
> > > > +    int err = 0;
> > > > +    int find_status;
> > > > +    int sort_first_two_entry = 0;
> > > > +    uint32_t list_count = 16;
> > >
> > > Magic number 16?
> >
> > Will change it to a macro.
> > >
> > > > +    uint32_t index = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* open directory to prevent it being removed */
> > > > +
> > > > +    hDir = CreateFile(full_file_name, GENERIC_READ,
> > > > +                      FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE |
> > > FILE_SHARE_DELETE,
> > > > +                      NULL,
> > > > +                      OPEN_EXISTING,
> > > > +                      FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS |
> > > FILE_FLAG_OPEN_REPARSE_POINT,
> > > > +                      NULL);
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (hDir == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
> > > > +        err = win32_error_to_posix(GetLastError());
> > > > +        goto out;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    attribute = GetFileAttributes(full_file_name);
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* symlink is not allow */
> > > > +    if (attribute == INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES
> > > > +        || (attribute & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT) != 0) {
> > > > +        err = EACCES;
> > > > +        goto out;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* check if it is a directory */
> > > > +    if ((attribute & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY) == 0) {
> > > > +        err = ENOTDIR;
> > > > +        goto out;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    file_id_list = g_malloc0(sizeof(uint64_t) * list_count);
> > > > +
> > > > +    /*
> > > > +     * findfirst() needs suffix format name like "\dir1\dir2\*",
> > > > +     * allocate more buffer to store suffix.
> > > > +     */
> > > > +    stream = g_malloc0(sizeof(struct dir_win32) +
> > > > + strlen(full_file_name) + 3);
> > >
> > > Not that I would care much, but +2 would be correct here, as you
> > > declared the struct with one character already, so it is not a
> > > classic (zero size) flex
> > > array:
> > >
> > >   struct dir_win32 {
> > >     ...
> > >     char dd_name[1];
> > >   };
> > >
> > Will fix it.
> >
> > > > +
> > > > +    strcpy(stream->dd_name, full_file_name);
> > > > +    strcat(stream->dd_name, "\\*");
> > > > +
> > > > +    stream->hDir = hDir;
> > > > +    stream->dir_name_len = strlen(full_file_name);
> > > > +
> > > > +    dd_handle = _findfirst(stream->dd_name, &dd_data);
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (dd_handle == -1) {
> > > > +        err = errno;
> > > > +        goto out;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* read all entries to link list */
> > >
> > > "read all entries as a linked list"
> > >
> > > However there is no linked list here. It seems to be an array.
> >
> > Will fix it.
> > >
> > > > +    do {
> > > > +        full_dir_entry = get_full_path_win32(hDir, dd_data.name);
> > > > +
> > > > +        if (full_dir_entry == NULL) {
> > > > +            err = ENOMEM;
> > > > +            break;
> > > > +        }
> > > > +
> > > > +        /*
> > > > +         * Open every entry and get the file informations.
> > > > +         *
> > > > +         * Skip symbolic links during reading directory.
> > > > +         */
> > > > +        hDirEntry = CreateFile(full_dir_entry,
> > > > +                               GENERIC_READ,
> > > > +                               FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE
> > > > +                               | FILE_SHARE_DELETE,
> > > > +                               NULL,
> > > > +                               OPEN_EXISTING,
> > > > +                               FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS
> > > > +                               | FILE_FLAG_OPEN_REPARSE_POINT,
> > > > + NULL);
> > > > +
> > > > +        if (hDirEntry != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
> > > > +            if (GetFileInformationByHandle(hDirEntry,
> > > > +                                           &FileInfo) == TRUE) {
> > > > +                attribute = FileInfo.dwFileAttributes;
> > > > +
> > > > +                /* only save validate entries */
> > > > +                if ((attribute & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT) == 0) {
> > > > +                    if (index >= list_count) {
> > > > +                        list_count = list_count + 16;
> > >
> > > Magic number 16 again.
> > >
> > > > +                        file_id_list = g_realloc(file_id_list,
> > > > +                                                 sizeof(uint64_t)
> > > > +                                                 * list_count);
> > >
> > > OK, so here we are finally at the point where you chose the overall
> > > behaviour for this that we discussed before.
> > >
> > > So you are constantly appending 16 entry chunks to the end of the
> > > array, periodically reallocate the entire array, and potentially end
> > > up with one giant dense array with *all* file IDs of the directory.
> > >
> > > That's not really what I had in mind, as it still has the potential
> > > to easily crash QEMU if there are large directories on host.
> > > Theoretically a Windows directory might then consume up to 16 GB of
> > > RAM for looking up only one single directory.
> > >
> > > So is this the implementation that you said was very slow, or did
> > > you test a different one? Remember, my orgiginal idea (as starting
> > > point for Windows) was to only cache *one* file ID (the last being
> > > looked up). That's it. Not a list of file IDs.
> >
> > If only cache one file ID, that means for every read directory operation.
> > we need to look up whole directory to find out the next ID larger than last
> cached one.
> >
> > I provided some performance test in last patch:
> > Run test for read directory with 100, 1000, 10000 entries #1, For file
> > name cache solution, the time cost is: 2, 9, 44 (in ms).
> > #2, For file id cache solution, the time cost: 3, 438, 4338 (in ms). This
> is current solution.
> > #3, for cache one id solution, I just tested it: 4, 4788, more than
> > one minutes (in ms)
> >
> > I think it is not a good idea to cache one file id, it would be very
> > bad performance
> 
> Yes, the performce would be lousy, but at least we would have a basis that
> just works^TM. Correct behaviour always comes before performance. And from
> there you could add additional patches on top to address performance
> improvements. Because the point is: your implementation is also suboptimal,
> and more importantly: prone to crashes like we discussed before.
> 
> Regarding performance: for instance you are re-allocating an entire dense
> buffer on every 16 new entries. That will slow down things extremely. Please
> use a container from glib, because these are handling resize operations more
> smoothly for you out of the box, i.e. typically by doubling the container
> capacity instead of re-allocating frequently with small chunks like you did.
> 
> However I am still not convinced that allocating a huge dense buffer with
> *all* file IDs of a directory makes sense.
> 
> On the long-term it would make sense to do it like other implementations:
> store a snapshot of the directory temporarily on disk. That way it would not
> matter how huge the directory is. But that's a complex implementation, so not
> something that I would do in this series already.
> 
> On the short/mid term I think we could simply make a mix of your solution and
> the one-ID solution that I suggested: keeping a maximum of e.g. 1k file IDs
> in RAM. And once guest seeks past that boundary, loading the subsequent 1k
> entries, free-ing the previous 1k entries, and so on.
> 

Please note that the performance data is tested in native OS, but not in QEMU.
It is even worse in QEMU.

I run Linux guest OS on Windows host, use "ls -l" command to list a directory with about 100 entries.
"ls -l" command need about 0.5 second to display one directory entry.

Caching only one node (file id, or file name, or others) will make 9pfs not usable: listing 100 directory entries need 50 seconds in guest OS.

> > >
> > > > +                    }
> > > > +                    file_id = (uint64_t)FileInfo.nFileIndexLow
> > > > +                              +
> > > > + (((uint64_t)FileInfo.nFileIndexHigh)
> > > > + << 32);
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +                    file_id_list[index] = file_id;
> > > > +
> > > > +                    if (strcmp(dd_data.name, ".") == 0) {
> > > > +                        stream->dot_id = file_id_list[index];
> > > > +                        if (index != 0) {
> > > > +                            sort_first_two_entry = 1;
> > > > +                        }
> > > > +                    } else if (strcmp(dd_data.name, "..") == 0) {
> > > > +                        stream->dot_dot_id = file_id_list[index];
> > > > +                        if (index != 1) {
> > > > +                            sort_first_two_entry = 1;
> > > > +                        }
> > > > +                    }
> > > > +                    index++;
> > > > +                }
> > > > +            }
> > > > +            CloseHandle(hDirEntry);
> > > > +        }
> > > > +        g_free(full_dir_entry);
> > > > +        find_status = _findnext(dd_handle, &dd_data);
> > > > +    } while (find_status == 0);
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (errno == ENOENT) {
> > > > +        /* No more matching files could be found, clean errno */
> > > > +        errno = 0;
> > > > +    } else {
> > > > +        err = errno;
> > > > +        goto out;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    stream->total_entries = index;
> > > > +    stream->file_id_list = file_id_list;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (sort_first_two_entry == 0) {
> > > > +        /*
> > > > +         * If the first two entry is "." and "..", then do not sort
> them.
> > > > +         *
> > > > +         * If the guest OS always considers first two entries are
> > > > + "." and
> > > "..",
> > > > +         * sort the two entries may cause confused display in guest
> OS.
> > > > +         */
> > > > +        qsort(&file_id_list[2], index - 2, sizeof(file_id),
> > > file_id_compare);
> > > > +    } else {
> > > > +        qsort(&file_id_list[0], index, sizeof(file_id),
> file_id_compare);
> > > > +    }
> > >
> > > Were there cases where you did not get "." and ".." ?
> >
> > NTFS always provides "." and "..".
> > I could add more checks here to fix this risk
> 
> That's what I assumed. So you can probably just drop this code for
> simplicity.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +out:
> > > > +    if (err != 0) {
> > > > +        errno = err;
> > > > +        if (stream != NULL) {
> > > > +            if (file_id_list != NULL) {
> > > > +                g_free(file_id_list);
> > > > +            }
> > > > +            CloseHandle(hDir);
> > > > +            g_free(stream);
> > > > +            stream = NULL;
> > > > +        }
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (dd_handle != -1) {
> > > > +        _findclose(dd_handle);
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    return (DIR *)stream;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * closedir_win32 - close a directory
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function closes directory and free all cached resources.
> > > > + */
> > > > +int closedir_win32(DIR *pDir)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    struct dir_win32 *stream = (struct dir_win32 *)pDir;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream == NULL) {
> > > > +        errno = EBADF;
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* free all resources */
> > > > +    CloseHandle(stream->hDir);
> > > > +
> > > > +    g_free(stream->file_id_list);
> > > > +
> > > > +    g_free(stream);
> > > > +
> > > > +    return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * readdir_win32 - read a directory
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function reads a directory entry from cached entry list.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct dirent *readdir_win32(DIR *pDir) {
> > > > +    struct dir_win32 *stream = (struct dir_win32 *)pDir;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream == NULL) {
> > > > +        errno = EBADF;
> > > > +        return NULL;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +retry:
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream->offset >= stream->total_entries) {
> > > > +        /* reach to the end, return NULL without set errno */
> > > > +        return NULL;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (get_next_entry(stream) != 0) {
> > > > +        stream->offset++;
> > > > +        goto retry;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* Windows does not provide inode number */
> > > > +    stream->dd_dir.d_ino = 0;
> > > > +    stream->dd_dir.d_reclen = 0;
> > > > +    stream->dd_dir.d_namlen = strlen(stream->dd_dir.d_name);
> > > > +
> > > > +    stream->offset++;
> > > > +
> > > > +    return &stream->dd_dir;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * rewinddir_win32 - reset directory stream
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function resets the position of the directory stream to
> > > > +the
> > > > + * beginning of the directory.
> > > > + */
> > > > +void rewinddir_win32(DIR *pDir)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    struct dir_win32 *stream = (struct dir_win32 *)pDir;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream == NULL) {
> > > > +        errno = EBADF;
> > > > +        return;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    stream->offset = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +    return;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * seekdir_win32 - set the position of the next readdir() call in
> > > > +the directory
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function sets the position of the next readdir() call in
> > > > +the directory
> > > > + * from which the next readdir() call will start.
> > > > + */
> > > > +void seekdir_win32(DIR *pDir, long pos) {
> > > > +    struct dir_win32 *stream = (struct dir_win32 *)pDir;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream == NULL) {
> > > > +        errno = EBADF;
> > > > +        return;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (pos < -1) {
> > > > +        errno = EINVAL;
> > > > +        return;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (pos == -1 || pos >= (long)stream->total_entries) {
> > > > +        /* seek to the end */
> > > > +        stream->offset = stream->total_entries;
> > > > +        return;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (pos - (long)stream->offset == 0) {
> > > > +        /* no need to seek */
> > > > +        return;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    stream->offset = pos;
> > > > +
> > > > +    return;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * telldir_win32 - return current location in directory
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function returns current location in directory.
> > > > + */
> > > > +long telldir_win32(DIR *pDir)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    struct dir_win32 *stream = (struct dir_win32 *)pDir;
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream == NULL) {
> > > > +        errno = EBADF;
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    if (stream->offset > stream->total_entries) {
> > > > +        return -1;
> > > > +    }
> > > > +
> > > > +    return (long)stream->offset;
> > > > +}
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-16 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-20 10:07 [PATCH v5 00/16] hw/9pfs: Add 9pfs support for Windows Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] hw/9pfs: Add missing definitions " Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] hw/9pfs: Implement Windows specific utilities functions for 9pfs Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] hw/9pfs: Replace the direct call to xxxdir() APIs with a wrapper Bin Meng
2023-03-06  9:31   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06  9:35     ` Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] hw/9pfs: Implement Windows specific xxxdir() APIs Bin Meng
2023-03-14 16:05   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-03-15 19:05     ` Shi, Guohuai
2023-03-16 11:05       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-03-16 17:28         ` Shi, Guohuai [this message]
2023-03-17  4:36           ` Shi, Guohuai
2023-03-17 12:16             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] hw/9pfs: Update the local fs driver to support Windows Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] hw/9pfs: Support getting current directory offset for Windows Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] hw/9pfs: Update helper qemu_stat_rdev() Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] hw/9pfs: Add a helper qemu_stat_blksize() Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] hw/9pfs: Disable unsupported flags and features for Windows Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] hw/9pfs: Update v9fs_set_fd_limit() " Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] hw/9pfs: Add Linux error number definition Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] hw/9pfs: Translate Windows errno to Linux value Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] fsdev: Disable proxy fs driver on Windows Bin Meng
2023-03-06  9:28   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] hw/9pfs: Update synth fs driver for Windows Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] tests/qtest: virtio-9p-test: Adapt the case for win32 Bin Meng
2023-02-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] meson.build: Turn on virtfs for Windows Bin Meng
2023-03-13 12:53   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-03-06  6:04 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] hw/9pfs: Add 9pfs support " Bin Meng
2023-03-06 14:15 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-03-06 14:30   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06 14:56   ` Bin Meng
2023-03-07 12:44     ` Christian Schoenebeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB4173F6A077C963E1C5149CF8EFBC9@MN2PR11MB4173.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=guohuai.shi@windriver.com \
    --cc=Bin.Meng@windriver.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.