From: Park, Aiden <aiden.park@intel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] x86: enable 64-bit kernel boot from 64-bit U-Boot
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 06:17:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB20481881B75D64258C6132058EAD0@MWHPR11MB2048.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ2E-UTrm8MXev8K5AyjCq_rbeZFEQndcgRXTYyJ0Oq6Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Simon,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:16 PM
> To: Park, Aiden <aiden.park@intel.com>
> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <u-
> boot at lists.denx.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86: enable 64-bit kernel boot from 64-bit U-Boot
>
> Hi Aiden,
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 18:45, <aiden.park@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Aiden Park <aiden.park@intel.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aiden Park <aiden.park@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/call64.S | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h | 10 +++++++++-
> > arch/x86/include/asm/zimage.h | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/lib/bootm.c | 10 +++++++---
> > arch/x86/lib/zimage.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> > 7 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) create mode
> > 100644 arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/call64.S
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/Makefile
> > b/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/Makefile index 400f0ffe39..951e503a1f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/Makefile
> > @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
> > # Written by Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> #
> >
> > -obj-y += cpu.o interrupts.o setjmp.o
> > +obj-y += cpu.o interrupts.o setjmp.o call64.o
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/call64.S
> > b/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/call64.S new file mode 100644 index
> > 0000000000..e2cfe15080
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/call64.S
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation <www.intel.com> */
> > +
> > +.code64
> > +.globl cpu_call64
> > +cpu_call64:
> > + /*
> > + * cpu_call64(ulong pgtable, ulong setup_base, ulong target)
> > + *
> > + * rdi - pgtable (unused - already in 64-bit with paging)
> > + * rsi - setup_base
> > + * rdx - target
> > + *
> > + */
> > + cli
> > + mov %rdx, %rcx
> > + mov %rsi, %rdx
> > + call *%rcx
> > + ret
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/cpu.c
> > index 90925e46ea..0730c43f1c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/x86_64/cpu.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #include <common.h>
> > #include <cpu_func.h>
> > #include <debug_uart.h>
> > +#include <asm/cpu.h>
> >
> > /*
> > * Global declaration of gd.
> > @@ -67,3 +68,12 @@ int x86_cpu_reinit_f(void) {
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +
> > +int cpu_jump_to_64bit(ulong setup_base, ulong load_address) {
> > + ulong target = load_address + 0x200;
> > +
> > + cpu_call64(0, setup_base, target);
> > +
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h
> > index d961dddc9e..73c94a33ec 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h
> > @@ -59,7 +59,15 @@ struct setup_header {
> > __u32 initrd_addr_max;
> > __u32 kernel_alignment;
> > __u8 relocatable_kernel;
> > - __u8 _pad2[3];
> > + __u8 min_alignment;
> > + __u16 xloadflags;
> > +#define XLF_KERNEL_64 BIT(0)
> > +#define XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G BIT(1)
> > +#define XLF_EFI_HANDOVER_32 BIT(2)
> > +#define XLF_EFI_HANDOVER_64 BIT(3)
> > +#define XLF_EFI_KEXEC BIT(4)
> > +#define XLF_5LEVEL BIT(5)
> > +#define XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED BIT(6)
> > __u32 cmdline_size;
> > __u32 hardware_subarch;
> > __u64 hardware_subarch_data;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/zimage.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/zimage.h index 80e128ccf3..cadeb04168 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/zimage.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/zimage.h
> > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
> > #define ZIMAGE_LOAD_ADDR 0x10000
> >
> > struct boot_params *load_zimage(char *image, unsigned long kernel_size,
> > - ulong *load_addressp);
> > + ulong *load_addressp, bool
> > + *image_64bit);
>
> Please put a 'p' on the end, so image_64bitp, since it a return value.
Thanks. I will do that.
>
> > int setup_zimage(struct boot_params *setup_base, char *cmd_line, int
> auto_boot,
> > unsigned long initrd_addr, unsigned long
> > initrd_size); void setup_video(struct screen_info *screen_info); diff
> > --git a/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c b/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c index
> > 07d8f1f279..ebed9e4605 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
> > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static int boot_prep_linux(bootm_headers_t *images)
> > void *data = NULL;
> > size_t len;
> > int ret;
> > + bool image_64bit;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
> > if (images->ft_len) {
> > @@ -116,7 +117,8 @@ static int boot_prep_linux(bootm_headers_t *images)
> > ulong load_address;
> > char *base_ptr;
> >
> > - base_ptr = (char *)load_zimage(data, len, &load_address);
> > + base_ptr = (char *)load_zimage(data, len, &load_address,
> > + &image_64bit);
> > if (!base_ptr) {
> > puts("## Kernel loading failed ...\n");
> > goto error;
> > @@ -124,6 +126,10 @@ static int boot_prep_linux(bootm_headers_t
> *images)
> > images->os.load = load_address;
> > cmd_line_dest = base_ptr + COMMAND_LINE_OFFSET;
> > images->ep = (ulong)base_ptr;
> > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(X86_64)
> > + if (image_64bit)
>
> if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(X86_64) && image_64bit)
>
> > + images->os.arch = IH_ARCH_X86_64; #endif
> > } else if (images->ep) {
> > cmd_line_dest = (void *)images->ep + COMMAND_LINE_OFFSET;
> > } else {
> > @@ -164,9 +170,7 @@ int boot_linux_kernel(ulong setup_base, ulong
> load_address, bool image_64bit)
> > * TODO(sjg at chromium.org): Support booting both 32-bit and
> > * 64-bit kernels from 64-bit U-Boot.
> > */
> > -#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(X86_64)
>
> if()
I will do that.
>
> > return cpu_jump_to_64bit(setup_base, load_address);
> > -#endif
> > } else {
> > /*
> > * Set %ebx, %ebp, and %edi to 0, %esi to point to the
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/zimage.c b/arch/x86/lib/zimage.c index
> > ffc09630b7..c84e2d39b2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/zimage.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/zimage.c
> > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int setup_device_tree(struct setup_header
> > *hdr, const void *fdt_blob) }
> >
> > struct boot_params *load_zimage(char *image, unsigned long kernel_size,
> > - ulong *load_addressp)
> > + ulong *load_addressp, bool
> > + *image_64bit)
>
> image_64bitp
I will do that.
>
> > {
> > struct boot_params *setup_base;
> > int setup_size;
> > @@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ struct boot_params *load_zimage(char *image,
> unsigned long kernel_size,
> > big_image = (bootproto >= 0x0200) &&
> > (hdr->loadflags & BIG_KERNEL_FLAG);
> >
> > + /* Determine 64-bit kernel */
> > + *image_64bit = (hdr->xloadflags & XLF_KERNEL_64) ? true :
> > + false;
> > +
>
> Drop ()
>
> In fact I suspect you can do:
>
> *image_64bit = hdr->xloadflags & XLF_KERNEL_64)
I will do that.
>
> > /* Determine load address */
> > if (big_image)
> > *load_addressp = BZIMAGE_LOAD_ADDR; @@ -313,12 +316,13
> > @@ void __setup_pcat_compatibility(void) int do_zboot(cmd_tbl_t
> > *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const argv[]) {
> > struct boot_params *base_ptr;
> > - void *bzImage_addr = NULL;
> > + void *bzimage_addr = NULL;
>
> Good change, but really should be in a separate patch.
Let me make a separate patch for this.
>
> > ulong load_address;
> > char *s;
> > - ulong bzImage_size = 0;
> > + ulong bzimage_size = 0;
> > ulong initrd_addr = 0;
> > ulong initrd_size = 0;
> > + bool image_64bit;
> >
> > disable_interrupts();
> >
> > @@ -333,11 +337,11 @@ int do_zboot(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> char *const argv[])
> > }
> >
> > if (s)
> > - bzImage_addr = (void *)simple_strtoul(s, NULL, 16);
> > + bzimage_addr = (void *)simple_strtoul(s, NULL, 16);
> >
> > if (argc >= 3) {
> > /* argv[2] holds the size of the bzImage */
> > - bzImage_size = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> > + bzimage_size = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> > }
> >
> > if (argc >= 4)
> > @@ -346,8 +350,13 @@ int do_zboot(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> char *const argv[])
> > initrd_size = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 16);
> >
> > /* Lets look for */
> > - base_ptr = load_zimage(bzImage_addr, bzImage_size, &load_address);
> > + base_ptr = load_zimage(bzimage_addr, bzimage_size, &load_address,
> > + &image_64bit); #if
> > +!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(X86_64)
>
> if()
>
> But why not just set it always?
This was just to keep original boot flow in zboot to boot 32-bit kernel entry from 32-bit U-Boot.
I also agree with you. 32-bit U-Boot is able to boot 64-bit kernel entry with 64-bit paging.
Let me remove this.
>
> > + image_64bit = false;
> > +#endif
> >
> > + /* we assume that the kernel is in place */
> > if (!base_ptr) {
> > puts("## Kernel loading failed ...\n");
> > return -1;
> > @@ -358,8 +367,7 @@ int do_zboot(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> char *const argv[])
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > - /* we assume that the kernel is in place */
> > - return boot_linux_kernel((ulong)base_ptr, load_address, false);
> > + return boot_linux_kernel((ulong)base_ptr, load_address,
> > + image_64bit);
> > }
> >
> > U_BOOT_CMD(
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
>
> Regards,
> Simon
Best Regards,
Aiden
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 0:44 [PATCH 0/8] Support 64-bit U-Boot for Slim Bootloader aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86: Add a new X86_RUN_64BIT_ONLY to Kconfig aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 20:15 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 5:44 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-30 9:13 ` Bin Meng
2020-05-01 18:36 ` Park, Aiden
2020-05-03 2:26 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86: start64: Add a hook at 64-bit entry aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 20:15 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 5:48 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86: start64: Support HOB in 64-bit U-Boot aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 20:15 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 5:57 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86: slimbootloader: Support 64-bit operation aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 20:15 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 6:01 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-29 18:03 ` Simon Glass
2020-05-01 18:34 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 5/8] configs: slimbootloader: Add x86_64 slimbootloader config aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 20:32 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 6:02 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-30 9:13 ` Bin Meng
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86: Fix 64-bit compile warning aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 19:45 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 6:08 ` Park, Aiden
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86: enable 64-bit kernel boot from 64-bit U-Boot aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-26 20:15 ` Simon Glass
2020-04-29 6:17 ` Park, Aiden [this message]
2020-04-22 0:45 ` [PATCH 8/8] doc: slimbootloader: Update 64-bit build instruction aiden.park at intel.com
2020-04-30 9:13 ` Bin Meng
2020-04-26 20:15 ` [PATCH 0/8] Support 64-bit U-Boot for Slim Bootloader Simon Glass
2020-04-29 5:41 ` Park, Aiden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB20481881B75D64258C6132058EAD0@MWHPR11MB2048.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=aiden.park@intel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.