From: Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> To: Roland Dreier <roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Cc: Christoph Raisch <raisch-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:39:33 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <OF31C67CA1.9901BC1C-ONC12578DC.0060E598-C12578DC.006101DD@de.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAL1RGDXJzW7e2LTyex1EZXSLBdB_xmcBvBiiS2XKL-5qUCOQ1w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Hi Roland, This patch looks fine to me. Thanks Nam roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org wrote on 29.07.2011 19:10:32: > [image removed] > > Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node > > Roland Dreier > > to: > > Eric Dumazet > > 29.07.2011 19:11 > > Sent by: > > roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org > > Cc: > > Hoang-Nam Nguyen, Christoph Raisch, Sean Hefty, linux-rdma, linux-kernel > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Since create_comp_task() creates percpu kthread, it makes > > sense to use kthread_create_on_node() to get proper NUMA affinity for > > kthread stack. > > Seems eminently sane to me. ehca guys, any concern about this? > > - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@de.ibm.com> To: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, roland@purestorage.com, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:39:33 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <OF31C67CA1.9901BC1C-ONC12578DC.0060E598-C12578DC.006101DD@de.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAL1RGDXJzW7e2LTyex1EZXSLBdB_xmcBvBiiS2XKL-5qUCOQ1w@mail.gmail.com> Hi Roland, This patch looks fine to me. Thanks Nam roland@purestorage.com wrote on 29.07.2011 19:10:32: > [image removed] > > Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node > > Roland Dreier > > to: > > Eric Dumazet > > 29.07.2011 19:11 > > Sent by: > > roland@purestorage.com > > Cc: > > Hoang-Nam Nguyen, Christoph Raisch, Sean Hefty, linux-rdma, linux-kernel > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since create_comp_task() creates percpu kthread, it makes > > sense to use kthread_create_on_node() to get proper NUMA affinity for > > kthread stack. > > Seems eminently sane to me. ehca guys, any concern about this? > > - R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 17:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-07-29 7:15 [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node Eric Dumazet 2011-07-29 7:15 ` Eric Dumazet 2011-07-29 17:10 ` Roland Dreier 2011-07-29 17:10 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <CAL1RGDXJzW7e2LTyex1EZXSLBdB_xmcBvBiiS2XKL-5qUCOQ1w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2011-07-29 17:39 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen [this message] 2011-07-29 17:39 ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen 2012-02-02 11:12 ` Eric Dumazet 2012-02-02 11:12 ` Eric Dumazet 2012-02-02 17:08 ` Roland Dreier 2012-02-08 21:26 ` Or Gerlitz [not found] ` <CAJZOPZJtXGq36Hx5BQAc2Q7znErJ-Uaiqs-DaJQ=jCSy49uTiQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2012-02-08 21:35 ` Roland Dreier 2012-02-08 21:35 ` Roland Dreier 2012-02-08 22:28 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=OF31C67CA1.9901BC1C-ONC12578DC.0060E598-C12578DC.006101DD@de.ibm.com \ --to=hnguyen-ta70fqpds9bqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \ --cc=eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=raisch-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org \ --cc=roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.