RE: [PATCH v4 0/8] Add hardware prefetch control driver for A64FX and x86

["tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com" <tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com>]

Thanks for the comment.

> If this is something to be tuned for specific applications, shouldn't it be a prctl or
> similar and part of process context, so different applications can use different
> settings (or even a single application depending on what it's doing)? Especially if
> writing those sysregs/MSRs is cheap.

> In particular, configuring things separately for different cores feels strange. You'd
> then have to pin applications to specific cores to get the benefits, and wouldn't be
> able to optimize for multiple applications running simultaneously that need
> different prefetch behavior if they share cores.

As you say, this is used for tuning specific applications.

I assume that users using this feature bind an application to a specific
core and use it exclusively. This is not only for pfctl, but also to
prevent performance from being affected by context switches, etc.

I agree that it is also useful to be able to control in the process
context. However, in this case, I think that it is sufficient if it can
be provided as a userspace interface which expresses the hardware
prefetch register directly, assuming the above usage.