From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: dougg@torque.net, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
<jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:54:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0704020951180.1743-100000@netrider.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704020828.l328SICc009264@burner.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a repost as I like to know the current state of the problem...
>
> The USB DMA size problem is known to exist on Linux since February 2004.
> I am still in hope that there will be a fix soon.
Me too. I submitted the most recent version of the patch (labelled as857)
over a month ago and have received essentially no feedback on it.
Douglas, James... What's the story?
Alan Stern
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: dougg@torque.net, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
jens.axboe@oracle.com,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:54:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0704020951180.1743-100000@netrider.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704020828.l328SICc009264@burner.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a repost as I like to know the current state of the problem...
>
> The USB DMA size problem is known to exist on Linux since February 2004.
> I am still in hope that there will be a fix soon.
Me too. I submitted the most recent version of the patch (labelled as857)
over a month ago and have received essentially no feedback on it.
Douglas, James... What's the story?
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-02 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-02 8:28 [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Joerg Schilling
2007-04-02 13:54 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2007-04-02 13:54 ` Alan Stern
2007-04-02 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-02 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-02 14:34 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0704020951180.1743-100000@netrider.rowland.org \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.