All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>,
	<parri.andrea@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	<npiggin@gmail.com>, <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
	Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>, <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:19:37 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1809141315580.1482-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180914163649.GA13942@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> 	bf36a3124d04 doc: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire()
> 
> 		Small change, needs an ack.  Looks to me like is is
> 		just aligning the documentation with the code, so
> 		should not be controversial (famous last words).
> 
> 		Please take a look and consider giving feedback
> 		and/or a review/ack.

What branch is this commit in?  It doesn't seem to be in the lkmm 
branch.

In any case, the change is trivial and obviously correct.

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

Alan


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	parri.andrea@gmail.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com, Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
	Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
	akiyks@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:19:37 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1809141315580.1482-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180914163649.GA13942@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> 	bf36a3124d04 doc: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire()
> 
> 		Small change, needs an ack.  Looks to me like is is
> 		just aligning the documentation with the code, so
> 		should not be controversial (famous last words).
> 
> 		Please take a look and consider giving feedback
> 		and/or a review/ack.

What branch is this commit in?  It doesn't seem to be in the lkmm 
branch.

In any case, the change is trivial and obviously correct.

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-14 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-29 21:10 [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add extra ordering for locks and remove it for ordinary release/acquire Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 12:50   ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-30 21:31     ` Alan Stern
2018-08-30 21:31       ` Alan Stern
2018-08-31  9:17       ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-31 14:52         ` Alan Stern
2018-08-31 14:52           ` Alan Stern
2018-08-31 16:06           ` Will Deacon
2018-08-31 18:28             ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-03  9:01               ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-03 17:04                 ` Will Deacon
2018-09-04  8:11                   ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-04 19:09                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-04 19:09                       ` Alan Stern
2018-09-05  7:21                       ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-05 14:33                         ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-09-05 14:53                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-05 15:00                           ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-05 15:04                             ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-09-05 15:24                               ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-03 17:52                 ` Alan Stern
2018-09-03 17:52                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-03 18:28                   ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-06  1:25                 ` Alan Stern
2018-09-06  1:25                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-06  9:36                   ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-07 16:00                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-07 16:00                       ` Alan Stern
2018-09-07 16:09                       ` Will Deacon
2018-09-07 16:39                         ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-07 16:39                           ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-07 17:38                           ` Alan Stern
2018-09-07 17:38                             ` Alan Stern
2018-09-08  0:04                             ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-08  0:04                               ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-08  9:58                             ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-11 19:31                               ` Alan Stern
2018-09-11 19:31                                 ` Alan Stern
2018-09-11 20:03                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-12 14:24                                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-12 14:24                                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-13 17:07                                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-13 17:07                                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 14:37                                     ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-14 16:29                                       ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 16:29                                         ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 19:44                                         ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-14 21:08                                       ` [PATCH v5] " Alan Stern
2018-09-14 21:08                                         ` Alan Stern
2018-09-15  3:56                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-03 17:05               ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] " Will Deacon
2018-08-31 17:55           ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 2/7] doc: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire() Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-14 16:59   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-14 18:20     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 3/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Add more LKMM limitations Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30  9:17   ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-30 22:18     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-31  9:43       ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-06 18:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 4/7] tools/memory-model: Fix a README typo Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Add scripts to check github litmus tests Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 6/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Make scripts take "-j" abbreviation for "--jobs" Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 7/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Add .cfg and .cat files for s390 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-31 16:06   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-01 17:08     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-14 16:36 ` [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-14 17:19   ` Alan Stern [this message]
2018-09-14 17:19     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 18:29     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1809141315580.1482-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.