All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* O_DIRECT change
@ 2011-06-03 16:48 Sage Weil
  2011-06-04  2:29 ` Henry C Chang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2011-06-03 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: henry.cy.chang; +Cc: ceph-devel

Hi Henry,

I made a small change to the O_DIRECT path to zero holes properly in 
commit 85defe7 (below).  Do you mind reviewing the change, and/or testing, 
since you are the main O_DIRECT user?  The test case that was failing is 
here:

	http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/1096#note-19

The problem was that the read coming down from the VFS isn't trimmed to 
i_size, so the old zero tail check wasn't true, and we would set 
*checkeof.  Then ceph_aio_read would getattr and loop, since we 
didn't actually read eof (due to a hole).

Actually, I suspect the *checkeof part is still incorrect... does the 
zeroing part at least look right to you?

Thanks!
sage


From 85defe76f7e2a0b3d285a3be72fcffce96629b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:08:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ceph: fix short sync reads from the OSD

If we get a short read from the OSD because the object is small, we need to
zero the remainder of the buffer.  For O_DIRECT reads, the attempted range
is not trimmed to i_size by the VFS, so we were actually looping
indefinitely.

Fix by trimming by i_size, and the unconditionally zeroing the trailing
range.

Reported-by: Jeff Wu <cpwu@tnsoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
---
 fs/ceph/file.c |   28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
index 8c5ac4e..b654f40 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/file.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int ceph_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 static int striped_read(struct inode *inode,
 			u64 off, u64 len,
 			struct page **pages, int num_pages,
-			int *checkeof, bool align_to_pages,
+			int *checkeof, bool o_direct,
 			unsigned long buf_align)
 {
 	struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_inode_to_client(inode);
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int striped_read(struct inode *inode,
 	io_align = off & ~PAGE_MASK;
 
 more:
-	if (align_to_pages)
+	if (o_direct)
 		page_align = (pos - io_align + buf_align) & ~PAGE_MASK;
 	else
 		page_align = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
@@ -346,20 +346,22 @@ more:
 	}
 
 	if (was_short) {
-		/* was original extent fully inside i_size? */
-		if (pos + left <= inode->i_size) {
-			dout("zero tail\n");
-			ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read, len - read,
+		/* did we bounce off eof? */
+		if (pos + left > inode->i_size)
+			*checkeof = 1;
+
+		/* zero trailing bytes (inside i_size) */
+		if (left > 0 && pos < inode->i_size) {
+			if (pos + left > inode->i_size)
+				left = inode->i_size - pos;
+
+			dout("zero tail %d\n", left);
+			ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read, left,
 						    pages);
-			read = len;
-			goto out;
+			read += left;
 		}
-
-		/* check i_size */
-		*checkeof = 1;
 	}
 
-out:
 	if (ret >= 0)
 		ret = read;
 	dout("striped_read returns %d\n", ret);
@@ -659,7 +661,7 @@ out:
 
 		/* hit EOF or hole? */
 		if (statret == 0 && *ppos < inode->i_size) {
-			dout("aio_read sync_read hit hole, reading more\n");
+			dout("aio_read sync_read hit hole, ppos %lld < size %lld, reading more\n", *ppos, inode->i_size);
 			read += ret;
 			base += ret;
 			len -= ret;
-- 
1.7.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: O_DIRECT change
  2011-06-03 16:48 O_DIRECT change Sage Weil
@ 2011-06-04  2:29 ` Henry C Chang
  2011-06-07  9:39   ` Henry C Chang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Henry C Chang @ 2011-06-04  2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sage Weil; +Cc: ceph-devel

Hi Sage,

We are on Dragon Boat Festival holidays. :) I will take a close look
and test it next week.
--
Henry

2011/6/4 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>:
> Hi Henry,
>
> I made a small change to the O_DIRECT path to zero holes properly in
> commit 85defe7 (below).  Do you mind reviewing the change, and/or testing,
> since you are the main O_DIRECT user?  The test case that was failing is
> here:
>
>        http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/1096#note-19
>
> The problem was that the read coming down from the VFS isn't trimmed to
> i_size, so the old zero tail check wasn't true, and we would set
> *checkeof.  Then ceph_aio_read would getattr and loop, since we
> didn't actually read eof (due to a hole).
>
> Actually, I suspect the *checkeof part is still incorrect... does the
> zeroing part at least look right to you?
>
> Thanks!
> sage
>
>
> From 85defe76f7e2a0b3d285a3be72fcffce96629b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:08:44 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ceph: fix short sync reads from the OSD
>
> If we get a short read from the OSD because the object is small, we need to
> zero the remainder of the buffer.  For O_DIRECT reads, the attempted range
> is not trimmed to i_size by the VFS, so we were actually looping
> indefinitely.
>
> Fix by trimming by i_size, and the unconditionally zeroing the trailing
> range.
>
> Reported-by: Jeff Wu <cpwu@tnsoft.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/file.c |   28 +++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> index 8c5ac4e..b654f40 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int ceph_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  static int striped_read(struct inode *inode,
>                        u64 off, u64 len,
>                        struct page **pages, int num_pages,
> -                       int *checkeof, bool align_to_pages,
> +                       int *checkeof, bool o_direct,
>                        unsigned long buf_align)
>  {
>        struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_inode_to_client(inode);
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int striped_read(struct inode *inode,
>        io_align = off & ~PAGE_MASK;
>
>  more:
> -       if (align_to_pages)
> +       if (o_direct)
>                page_align = (pos - io_align + buf_align) & ~PAGE_MASK;
>        else
>                page_align = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
> @@ -346,20 +346,22 @@ more:
>        }
>
>        if (was_short) {
> -               /* was original extent fully inside i_size? */
> -               if (pos + left <= inode->i_size) {
> -                       dout("zero tail\n");
> -                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read, len - read,
> +               /* did we bounce off eof? */
> +               if (pos + left > inode->i_size)
> +                       *checkeof = 1;
> +
> +               /* zero trailing bytes (inside i_size) */
> +               if (left > 0 && pos < inode->i_size) {
> +                       if (pos + left > inode->i_size)
> +                               left = inode->i_size - pos;
> +
> +                       dout("zero tail %d\n", left);
> +                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read, left,
>                                                    pages);
> -                       read = len;
> -                       goto out;
> +                       read += left;
>                }
> -
> -               /* check i_size */
> -               *checkeof = 1;
>        }
>
> -out:
>        if (ret >= 0)
>                ret = read;
>        dout("striped_read returns %d\n", ret);
> @@ -659,7 +661,7 @@ out:
>
>                /* hit EOF or hole? */
>                if (statret == 0 && *ppos < inode->i_size) {
> -                       dout("aio_read sync_read hit hole, reading more\n");
> +                       dout("aio_read sync_read hit hole, ppos %lld < size %lld, reading more\n", *ppos, inode->i_size);
>                        read += ret;
>                        base += ret;
>                        len -= ret;
> --
> 1.7.0
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: O_DIRECT change
  2011-06-04  2:29 ` Henry C Chang
@ 2011-06-07  9:39   ` Henry C Chang
  2011-06-08  5:07     ` Sage Weil
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Henry C Chang @ 2011-06-07  9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sage Weil; +Cc: ceph-devel

Hi Sage,

I checked the stripe_read function and think the following two patches
are needed:

1. Move hit_stripe/was_short checking after the adjustment of
ceph_osdc_readpages return code

    Fix the following case:
    (i) Create a sparse file
        dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/fs_depot/dd3 bs=1 seek=1048576 count=0

    (ii) Read the file
        dd if=/mnt/fs_depot/dd3 of=/root/ddout1 skip=8 bs=500 count=2
iflag=direct

diff --git a/ceph/file.c b/ceph/file.c
index 1f36e2c..6e6297a 100644
--- a/ceph/file.c
+++ b/ceph/file.c
@@ -313,16 +313,18 @@ more:
                page_align = (pos - io_align + buf_align) & ~PAGE_MASK;
        else
                page_align = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
+
        this_len = left;
        ret = ceph_osdc_readpages(&fsc->client->osdc, ceph_vino(inode),
                                  &ci->i_layout, pos, &this_len,
                                  ci->i_truncate_seq,
                                  ci->i_truncate_size,
                                  page_pos, pages_left, page_align);
-       hit_stripe = this_len < left;
-       was_short = ret >= 0 && ret < this_len;
        if (ret == -ENOENT)
                ret = 0;
+
+       hit_stripe = this_len < left;
+       was_short = ret >= 0 && ret < this_len;
        dout("striped_read %llu~%u (read %u) got %d%s%s\n", pos, left, read,
             ret, hit_stripe ? " HITSTRIPE" : "", was_short ? " SHORT" : "");


2. Fix didpages and the starting position of ceph_zero_page_vector_range

    This fixes segfault caused by the following scenario:
    (i) generate a sparse file by
        dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/fs_depot/dd10 bs=500 seek=8388 count=1
    (ii) read the file from offset 4194300~500
        dd if=/mnt/fs_depot/dd10 of=/root/dd10out bs=500 skip=8388 count=1

diff --git a/ceph/file.c b/ceph/file.c
index 6e6297a..d7932bc 100644
--- a/ceph/file.c
+++ b/ceph/file.c
@@ -291,7 +291,6 @@ static int striped_read(struct inode *inode,
        struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
        u64 pos, this_len;
        int io_align, page_align;
-       int page_off = off & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; /* first byte's offset in page */
        int left, pages_left;
        int read;
        struct page **page_pos;
@@ -329,12 +328,11 @@ more:
             ret, hit_stripe ? " HITSTRIPE" : "", was_short ? " SHORT" : "");

        if (ret > 0) {
-               int didpages =
-                       ((pos & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK) + ret) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+               int didpages = (page_align + ret) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;

                if (read < pos - off) {
                        dout(" zero gap %llu to %llu\n", off + read, pos);
-                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read,
+                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_align + read,
                                                    pos - off - read, pages);
                }
                pos += ret;
@@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ more:
                                left = inode->i_size - pos;

                        dout("zero tail %d\n", left);
-                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read, left,
+                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_align + read, left,
                                                    pages);
                        read += left;
                }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: O_DIRECT change
  2011-06-07  9:39   ` Henry C Chang
@ 2011-06-08  5:07     ` Sage Weil
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2011-06-08  5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henry C Chang; +Cc: ceph-devel

On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Henry C Chang wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> I checked the stripe_read function and think the following two patches
> are needed:
> 
> 1. Move hit_stripe/was_short checking after the adjustment of
> ceph_osdc_readpages return code
> 
>     Fix the following case:
>     (i) Create a sparse file
>         dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/fs_depot/dd3 bs=1 seek=1048576 count=0
> 
>     (ii) Read the file
>         dd if=/mnt/fs_depot/dd3 of=/root/ddout1 skip=8 bs=500 count=2
> iflag=direct
> 
> diff --git a/ceph/file.c b/ceph/file.c
> index 1f36e2c..6e6297a 100644
> --- a/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/ceph/file.c
> @@ -313,16 +313,18 @@ more:
>                 page_align = (pos - io_align + buf_align) & ~PAGE_MASK;
>         else
>                 page_align = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +
>         this_len = left;
>         ret = ceph_osdc_readpages(&fsc->client->osdc, ceph_vino(inode),
>                                   &ci->i_layout, pos, &this_len,
>                                   ci->i_truncate_seq,
>                                   ci->i_truncate_size,
>                                   page_pos, pages_left, page_align);
> -       hit_stripe = this_len < left;
> -       was_short = ret >= 0 && ret < this_len;
>         if (ret == -ENOENT)
>                 ret = 0;
> +
> +       hit_stripe = this_len < left;
> +       was_short = ret >= 0 && ret < this_len;
>         dout("striped_read %llu~%u (read %u) got %d%s%s\n", pos, left, read,
>              ret, hit_stripe ? " HITSTRIPE" : "", was_short ? " SHORT" : "");

Good catch.  Applied.
 
> 2. Fix didpages and the starting position of ceph_zero_page_vector_range
> 
>     This fixes segfault caused by the following scenario:
>     (i) generate a sparse file by
>         dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/fs_depot/dd10 bs=500 seek=8388 count=1
>     (ii) read the file from offset 4194300~500
>         dd if=/mnt/fs_depot/dd10 of=/root/dd10out bs=500 skip=8388 count=1
> 
> diff --git a/ceph/file.c b/ceph/file.c
> index 6e6297a..d7932bc 100644
> --- a/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/ceph/file.c
> @@ -291,7 +291,6 @@ static int striped_read(struct inode *inode,
>         struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
>         u64 pos, this_len;
>         int io_align, page_align;
> -       int page_off = off & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK; /* first byte's offset in page */
>         int left, pages_left;
>         int read;
>         struct page **page_pos;
> @@ -329,12 +328,11 @@ more:
>              ret, hit_stripe ? " HITSTRIPE" : "", was_short ? " SHORT" : "");
> 
>         if (ret > 0) {
> -               int didpages =
> -                       ((pos & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK) + ret) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +               int didpages = (page_align + ret) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> 
>                 if (read < pos - off) {
>                         dout(" zero gap %llu to %llu\n", off + read, pos);
> -                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read,
> +                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_align + read,
>                                                     pos - off - read, pages);
>                 }
>                 pos += ret;
> @@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ more:
>                                 left = inode->i_size - pos;
> 
>                         dout("zero tail %d\n", left);
> -                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_off + read, left,
> +                       ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_align + read, left,
>                                                     pages);
>                         read += left;
>                 }

Sigh, the alignment adjustments still make my head hurt... Did you test 
this with O_DIRECT as well?  IIRC, the last time I worked on this code the 
problem was with O_DIRECT when the memory alignment didn't match the file 
offset.  Something like
  - allocate buffer with page + 512 alignment
  - read from offset 1024

I think what we really need is a series of tests that verify we get 
correct data with all combinations of file alignment, buffer alignment, 
O_DIRECT and sync (multiclient) io.  Probably that means writing with 
O_DIRECT, reading with buffered IO, and then writing with buffered IO and 
reading with O_DIRECT. We should also test the same thing across object 
boundaries.  I wonder if xfstests has something?

Unfortunately it's somewhat annoying to force the client into normal sync 
mode with a single client (you have to mount -o sync).  I wonder if it's 
worth adding an ioctl to set a flag on the fd to do this.

I can't find the test program I was using before, although I also remember 
not being happy with it... :/

Anyway, opening up an item in the tracker for this, #1147.

sage



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-08  5:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-03 16:48 O_DIRECT change Sage Weil
2011-06-04  2:29 ` Henry C Chang
2011-06-07  9:39   ` Henry C Chang
2011-06-08  5:07     ` Sage Weil

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.