All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kuohong.wang@mediatek.com" <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"peter.wang@mediatek.com" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"andy.teng@mediatek.com" <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
	"cc.chou@mediatek.com" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>,
	"chaotian.jing@mediatek.com" <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	"pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com" <pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix imprecise waiting time for ref-clk control
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 07:10:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB464015BDF84DF7A9779BEB41FC8D0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529092310.1106-2-stanley.chu@mediatek.com>

 
> 
> Currently ref-clk control timeout is implemented by Jiffies. However
> jiffies is not accurate enough thus "false timeout" may happen.
> 
> Use more accurate delay mechanism instead, for example, ktime.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Teng <andy.teng@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 7 ++++---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> index d56ce8d97d4e..523ee5573921 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>  {
>         struct ufs_mtk_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>         struct arm_smccc_res res;
> -       unsigned long timeout;
> +       ktime_t timeout, time_checked;
>         u32 value;
> 
>         if (host->ref_clk_enabled == on)
> @@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>         }
> 
>         /* Wait for ack */
> -       timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +       timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_US);
>         do {
> +               time_checked = ktime_get();
>                 value = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_REFCLK_CTRL);
> 
>                 /* Wait until ack bit equals to req bit */
> @@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>                         goto out;
> 
>                 usleep_range(100, 200);
> -       } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +       } while (ktime_before(time_checked, timeout));
Nit: you could get rid of time_checked if you would use ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0

Thanks,
Avri

> 
>         dev_err(hba->dev, "missing ack of refclk req, reg: 0x%x\n", value);
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> index 5bbd3e9cbae2..fc42dcbfd800 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  #define REFCLK_REQUEST              BIT(0)
>  #define REFCLK_ACK                  BIT(1)
> 
> -#define REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_MS       3
> +#define REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_US       3000
> 
>  /*
>   * Vendor specific pre-defined parameters
> --
> 2.18.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com" <pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"andy.teng@mediatek.com" <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
	"cc.chou@mediatek.com" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>,
	"chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"kuohong.wang@mediatek.com" <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"peter.wang@mediatek.com" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"chaotian.jing@mediatek.com" <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix imprecise waiting time for ref-clk control
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 07:10:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB464015BDF84DF7A9779BEB41FC8D0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529092310.1106-2-stanley.chu@mediatek.com>

 
> 
> Currently ref-clk control timeout is implemented by Jiffies. However
> jiffies is not accurate enough thus "false timeout" may happen.
> 
> Use more accurate delay mechanism instead, for example, ktime.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Teng <andy.teng@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 7 ++++---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> index d56ce8d97d4e..523ee5573921 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>  {
>         struct ufs_mtk_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>         struct arm_smccc_res res;
> -       unsigned long timeout;
> +       ktime_t timeout, time_checked;
>         u32 value;
> 
>         if (host->ref_clk_enabled == on)
> @@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>         }
> 
>         /* Wait for ack */
> -       timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +       timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_US);
>         do {
> +               time_checked = ktime_get();
>                 value = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_REFCLK_CTRL);
> 
>                 /* Wait until ack bit equals to req bit */
> @@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>                         goto out;
> 
>                 usleep_range(100, 200);
> -       } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +       } while (ktime_before(time_checked, timeout));
Nit: you could get rid of time_checked if you would use ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0

Thanks,
Avri

> 
>         dev_err(hba->dev, "missing ack of refclk req, reg: 0x%x\n", value);
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> index 5bbd3e9cbae2..fc42dcbfd800 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  #define REFCLK_REQUEST              BIT(0)
>  #define REFCLK_ACK                  BIT(1)
> 
> -#define REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_MS       3
> +#define REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_US       3000
> 
>  /*
>   * Vendor specific pre-defined parameters
> --
> 2.18.0

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com" <pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"andy.teng@mediatek.com" <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
	"cc.chou@mediatek.com" <cc.chou@mediatek.com>,
	"chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"kuohong.wang@mediatek.com" <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"peter.wang@mediatek.com" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"chaotian.jing@mediatek.com" <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix imprecise waiting time for ref-clk control
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 07:10:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB464015BDF84DF7A9779BEB41FC8D0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529092310.1106-2-stanley.chu@mediatek.com>

 
> 
> Currently ref-clk control timeout is implemented by Jiffies. However
> jiffies is not accurate enough thus "false timeout" may happen.
> 
> Use more accurate delay mechanism instead, for example, ktime.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Teng <andy.teng@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 7 ++++---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> index d56ce8d97d4e..523ee5573921 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>  {
>         struct ufs_mtk_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>         struct arm_smccc_res res;
> -       unsigned long timeout;
> +       ktime_t timeout, time_checked;
>         u32 value;
> 
>         if (host->ref_clk_enabled == on)
> @@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>         }
> 
>         /* Wait for ack */
> -       timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +       timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_US);
>         do {
> +               time_checked = ktime_get();
>                 value = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_REFCLK_CTRL);
> 
>                 /* Wait until ack bit equals to req bit */
> @@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ static int ufs_mtk_setup_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> bool on)
>                         goto out;
> 
>                 usleep_range(100, 200);
> -       } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +       } while (ktime_before(time_checked, timeout));
Nit: you could get rid of time_checked if you would use ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0

Thanks,
Avri

> 
>         dev_err(hba->dev, "missing ack of refclk req, reg: 0x%x\n", value);
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> index 5bbd3e9cbae2..fc42dcbfd800 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  #define REFCLK_REQUEST              BIT(0)
>  #define REFCLK_ACK                  BIT(1)
> 
> -#define REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_MS       3
> +#define REFCLK_REQ_TIMEOUT_US       3000
> 
>  /*
>   * Vendor specific pre-defined parameters
> --
> 2.18.0

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-31  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-29  9:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix clk-gating and introduce low-power mode for vccq2 Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix imprecise waiting time for ref-clk control Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-31  7:10   ` Avri Altman [this message]
2020-05-31  7:10     ` Avri Altman
2020-05-31  7:10     ` Avri Altman
2020-05-31 13:45     ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-31 13:45       ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-31 13:45       ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Do not gate clocks if auto-hibern8 is not entered yet Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Introduce low-power mode for device power supply Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix unbalanced clock on/off Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Allow unbound mphy Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu
2020-05-29  9:23   ` Stanley Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR04MB464015BDF84DF7A9779BEB41FC8D0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pengshun.zhao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.