All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1
@ 2009-06-04 17:26 Keir Fraser
  2009-06-04 17:44 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2009-06-04 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

Folks,

The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 is tagged as 3.4.1-rc1 at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg

Quite a few important fixes have been made since 3.4.0. Please test and
let's get this one out quickly!

 Thanks,
 Keir

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* VCPU time reporting!
  2009-06-04 17:26 First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Keir Fraser
@ 2009-06-04 17:44 ` Ata Bohra
  2009-06-04 19:10 ` First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Pasi Kärkkäinen
  2009-06-05 14:52 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ata Bohra @ 2009-06-04 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]


Dear All, 

 

I am trying to extract the CPU time used by each domain. As per the xentop code, it reports the VCPU time using 'xenstat_vcpu_ns()'. I have a strange observation, I started a ubuntu-8 domain and left it without running any application at the getty login prompt, when I observe the xentop data, it still gives me a constant increase in the VCPU time for both the domain0 and domain1(ubuntu-8). 

 

Just to further analyze the data, I ran a large matrix multiplication program on dom0 and expected that the increase in VCPU time for domain0 should increase substantially that domain1 (which is doing nothing), BUT it is observed that the increase in VCPU time is in ration os maximum 1:2 with respect to domain1: domain0. 

 

Is there any reason for a idle domain to consume so much of CPU time, I have not set any cap for scheduling thus I observe the domain0 maximum utilization not more than 50% whereas domain1 always shows the CPU utililzation of >= 50%. 

 

Is there a more cleaner way to get individual domain CPU utlization parameters.

 

Thanks for your support!

 

Regards,

Ata E Husain 

University at Buffalo
 

_________________________________________________________________
More than messages–check out the rest of the Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1680 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1
  2009-06-04 17:26 First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Keir Fraser
  2009-06-04 17:44 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra
@ 2009-06-04 19:10 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
  2009-06-04 21:14   ` Keir Fraser
  2009-06-05 14:52 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen @ 2009-06-04 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keir Fraser; +Cc: xen-devel

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:26:07PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 is tagged as 3.4.1-rc1 at
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg
> 
> Quite a few important fixes have been made since 3.4.0. Please test and
> let's get this one out quickly!
> 

docs/ChangeLog talks about "Xen 3.3".. 

-- Pasi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1
  2009-06-04 19:10 ` First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Pasi Kärkkäinen
@ 2009-06-04 21:14   ` Keir Fraser
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2009-06-04 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pasi Kärkkäinen; +Cc: xen-devel

On 04/06/2009 20:10, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:

>> The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 is tagged as 3.4.1-rc1 at
>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg
>> 
>> Quite a few important fixes have been made since 3.4.0. Please test and
>> let's get this one out quickly!
>> 
> 
> docs/ChangeLog talks about "Xen 3.3"..

The ChangeLog hasn't been kept up to date. I can add words to that effect.

 -- Keir

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: VCPU time reporting!
  2009-06-04 17:26 First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Keir Fraser
  2009-06-04 17:44 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra
  2009-06-04 19:10 ` First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Pasi Kärkkäinen
@ 2009-06-05 14:52 ` Ata Bohra
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ata Bohra @ 2009-06-05 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xen developer


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2105 bytes --]


Dear All, 

 

I was trying to understand the increased CPU utilization percentage reported by xentop on ay domain (no matter domains waits at getty login). I was able to find that 'nash-hotlplug' process uses almost 100 % of the CPU if system is idle, but being a nice process if you kickoff some job, it relinguishes most of the cpu.

 

By adding 'pkill -9 nash-hotplug' in /etc/rc.local helped me get the normal values of CPU utilization. Just sharing in case some one else also lands in same situation as mine. 

 

Thanks!

Ata
  


From: ata.husain@hotmail.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: VCPU time reporting!
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:14:29 +0530



Dear All, 
 
I am trying to extract the CPU time used by each domain. As per the xentop code, it reports the VCPU time using 'xenstat_vcpu_ns()'. I have a strange observation, I started a ubuntu-8 domain and left it without running any application at the getty login prompt, when I observe the xentop data, it still gives me a constant increase in the VCPU time for both the domain0 and domain1(ubuntu-8). 
 
Just to further analyze the data, I ran a large matrix multiplication program on dom0 and expected that the increase in VCPU time for domain0 should increase substantially that domain1 (which is doing nothing), BUT it is observed that the increase in VCPU time is in ration os maximum 1:2 with respect to domain1: domain0. 
 
Is there any reason for a idle domain to consume so much of CPU time, I have not set any cap for scheduling thus I observe the domain0 maximum utilization not more than 50% whereas domain1 always shows the CPU utililzation of >= 50%. 
 
Is there a more cleaner way to get individual domain CPU utlization parameters.
 
Thanks for your support!
 
Regards,
Ata E Husain 
University at Buffalo
 



Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live™ Photos. Drag n’ drop
_________________________________________________________________
Missed any of the IPL matches ? Catch a recap of all the action on MSN Videos
http://msnvideos.in/iplt20/msnvideoplayer.aspx

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2707 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-05 14:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-04 17:26 First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Keir Fraser
2009-06-04 17:44 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra
2009-06-04 19:10 ` First release candidate for Xen 3.4.1 Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-06-04 21:14   ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-05 14:52 ` VCPU time reporting! Ata Bohra

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.