From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> To: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: RE: [ARM SMMU] Dynamic StreamID allocation Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:34:03 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB51344BE2FF0A8C09D123AAFBEC0F0@VI1PR04MB5134.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0401MB24969CE24E4FB91EC8551DEBF10C0@VI1PR0401MB2496.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> Hi Pankaj, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On > Behalf Of Pankaj Bansal > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 3:34 PM > > Hi Will/Robin/Joerg, > > I am s/w engineer from NXP India Pvt. Ltd. > We are using SMMU-V3 in one of NXP SOC. > I have a question about the SMMU Stream ID allocation in linux. > > Right now the Stream IDs allocated to a device are mapped via device tree > to the device. [snip] > > As the device tree is passed from bootloader to linux, we detect all the > stream IDs needed by a device in bootloader and add their IDs in > respective device nodes. > For each PCIE Endpoint (a unique BDF (Bus Device Function)) on PCIE bus, > we are assigning a unique Stream ID in bootloader. > > However, this poses an issue with PCIE hot plug. > If we plug in a pcie device while linux is running, a unique BDF is > assigned to the device, for which there is no stream ID in device tree. > > How can this problem be solved in linux? > > Is there a way to assign (and revoke) stream IDs at run time? I think that our main problem is that we enumerate the PCI EPs in the bootloader (u-boot) and allocate StreamIDs just for them, completely disregarding hotplug scenarios. One simple fix would be to not do this and simply allocate a decently sized, fixed range of StreamIDs per PCI controller. --- Best Regards, Laurentiu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> To: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com> Subject: RE: [ARM SMMU] Dynamic StreamID allocation Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:34:03 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB51344BE2FF0A8C09D123AAFBEC0F0@VI1PR04MB5134.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0401MB24969CE24E4FB91EC8551DEBF10C0@VI1PR0401MB2496.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> Hi Pankaj, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On > Behalf Of Pankaj Bansal > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 3:34 PM > > Hi Will/Robin/Joerg, > > I am s/w engineer from NXP India Pvt. Ltd. > We are using SMMU-V3 in one of NXP SOC. > I have a question about the SMMU Stream ID allocation in linux. > > Right now the Stream IDs allocated to a device are mapped via device tree > to the device. [snip] > > As the device tree is passed from bootloader to linux, we detect all the > stream IDs needed by a device in bootloader and add their IDs in > respective device nodes. > For each PCIE Endpoint (a unique BDF (Bus Device Function)) on PCIE bus, > we are assigning a unique Stream ID in bootloader. > > However, this poses an issue with PCIE hot plug. > If we plug in a pcie device while linux is running, a unique BDF is > assigned to the device, for which there is no stream ID in device tree. > > How can this problem be solved in linux? > > Is there a way to assign (and revoke) stream IDs at run time? I think that our main problem is that we enumerate the PCI EPs in the bootloader (u-boot) and allocate StreamIDs just for them, completely disregarding hotplug scenarios. One simple fix would be to not do this and simply allocate a decently sized, fixed range of StreamIDs per PCI controller. --- Best Regards, Laurentiu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 13:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-10 12:33 [ARM SMMU] Dynamic StreamID allocation Pankaj Bansal 2019-05-10 12:33 ` Pankaj Bansal 2019-05-10 13:19 ` Pankaj Bansal 2019-05-10 13:19 ` Pankaj Bansal 2019-05-10 13:36 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2019-05-10 13:36 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2019-05-13 7:09 ` Pankaj Bansal 2019-05-13 7:09 ` Pankaj Bansal 2019-05-13 12:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2019-05-13 12:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2019-05-13 13:36 ` Robin Murphy 2019-05-13 13:36 ` Robin Murphy 2019-05-13 13:34 ` Laurentiu Tudor [this message] 2019-05-13 13:34 ` Laurentiu Tudor
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB51344BE2FF0A8C09D123AAFBEC0F0@VI1PR04MB5134.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \ --to=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \ --cc=V.Sethi@nxp.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=pankaj.bansal@nxp.com \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.