All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6
@ 2020-12-03  9:08 Dan Carpenter
  2021-06-02 21:12 ` Brian Norris
  2021-06-08 13:04 ` Coelho, Luciano
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-12-03  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: luciano.coelho; +Cc: linux-wireless

Hello Luca Coelho,

The patch fbb7957d28ac: "iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version
6" from Sep 28, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:462 iwl_sar_fill_table()
	error: buffer overflow 'prof->table' 10 <= 15

drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
   422  static int iwl_sar_fill_table(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
   423                                __le16 *per_chain, u32 n_subbands,
   424                                int prof_a, int prof_b)

Original n_subbands was ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS (5) but now it can be
IWL_NUM_SUB_BANDS_V2 (11) as well.

   425  {
   426          int profs[ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS] = { prof_a, prof_b };
   427          int i, j, idx;
   428  
   429          for (i = 0; i < ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS; i++) {
   430                  struct iwl_sar_profile *prof;
   431  
   432                  /* don't allow SAR to be disabled (profile 0 means disable) */
   433                  if (profs[i] == 0)
   434                          return -EPERM;
   435  
   436                  /* we are off by one, so allow up to ACPI_SAR_PROFILE_NUM */
   437                  if (profs[i] > ACPI_SAR_PROFILE_NUM)
   438                          return -EINVAL;
   439  
   440                  /* profiles go from 1 to 4, so decrement to access the array */
   441                  prof = &fwrt->sar_profiles[profs[i] - 1];
   442  
   443                  /* if the profile is disabled, do nothing */
   444                  if (!prof->enabled) {
   445                          IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "SAR profile %d is disabled.\n",
   446                                          profs[i]);
   447                          /*
   448                           * if one of the profiles is disabled, we
   449                           * ignore all of them and return 1 to
   450                           * differentiate disabled from other failures.
   451                           */
   452                          return 1;
   453                  }
   454  
   455                  IWL_DEBUG_INFO(fwrt,
   456                                 "SAR EWRD: chain %d profile index %d\n",
   457                                 i, profs[i]);
   458                  IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "  Chain[%d]:\n", i);
   459                  for (j = 0; j < n_subbands; j++) {
   460                          idx = i * ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS + j;
   461                          per_chain[i * n_subbands + j] =
   462                                  cpu_to_le16(prof->table[idx]);
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
But this table size wasn't increased so potentially we're reading beyond
the end of the array?

   463                          IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "    Band[%d] = %d * .125dBm\n",
   464                                          j, prof->table[idx]);
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   465                  }
   466          }
   468          return 0;
   469  }

regards,
dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6
  2020-12-03  9:08 [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6 Dan Carpenter
@ 2021-06-02 21:12 ` Brian Norris
  2021-06-08 13:05   ` Coelho, Luciano
  2021-06-08 13:04 ` Coelho, Luciano
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2021-06-02 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Coelho, Luciano; +Cc: linux-wireless, Johannes Berg

Signal boost:
I've seen issues in this code in the past, as this is a custom format,
the docs are non-public, it interacts with ACPI tables that Intel
doesn't always get to review, and the parsing is all written in C...
...I also think Dan's static checker warning below is correct.

Luca, has this been addressed yet?

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:10 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Luca Coelho,
>
> The patch fbb7957d28ac: "iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version
> 6" from Sep 28, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning:
>
>         drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:462 iwl_sar_fill_table()
>         error: buffer overflow 'prof->table' 10 <= 15
>
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
>    422  static int iwl_sar_fill_table(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
>    423                                __le16 *per_chain, u32 n_subbands,
>    424                                int prof_a, int prof_b)
>
> Original n_subbands was ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS (5) but now it can be
> IWL_NUM_SUB_BANDS_V2 (11) as well.
>
>    425  {
>    426          int profs[ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS] = { prof_a, prof_b };
>    427          int i, j, idx;
>    428
>    429          for (i = 0; i < ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS; i++) {
>    430                  struct iwl_sar_profile *prof;
>    431
>    432                  /* don't allow SAR to be disabled (profile 0 means disable) */
>    433                  if (profs[i] == 0)
>    434                          return -EPERM;
>    435
>    436                  /* we are off by one, so allow up to ACPI_SAR_PROFILE_NUM */
>    437                  if (profs[i] > ACPI_SAR_PROFILE_NUM)

Side note: stuff like this would be more readable and hopefully less
error prone if we used ARRAY_SIZE() instead of memorizing the array's
size here. Similar up at line 429, but at least that array is defined
~3 lines away.

>    438                          return -EINVAL;
>    439
>    440                  /* profiles go from 1 to 4, so decrement to access the array */
>    441                  prof = &fwrt->sar_profiles[profs[i] - 1];
>    442
>    443                  /* if the profile is disabled, do nothing */
>    444                  if (!prof->enabled) {
>    445                          IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "SAR profile %d is disabled.\n",
>    446                                          profs[i]);
>    447                          /*
>    448                           * if one of the profiles is disabled, we
>    449                           * ignore all of them and return 1 to
>    450                           * differentiate disabled from other failures.
>    451                           */
>    452                          return 1;
>    453                  }
>    454
>    455                  IWL_DEBUG_INFO(fwrt,
>    456                                 "SAR EWRD: chain %d profile index %d\n",
>    457                                 i, profs[i]);
>    458                  IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "  Chain[%d]:\n", i);
>    459                  for (j = 0; j < n_subbands; j++) {
>    460                          idx = i * ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS + j;
>    461                          per_chain[i * n_subbands + j] =
>    462                                  cpu_to_le16(prof->table[idx]);
>                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> But this table size wasn't increased so potentially we're reading beyond
> the end of the array?

I believe your warning is pointing out a real issue, and I think (?)
it's safe to just bump the table size, but given all the
not-quite-explicit relationships between various bits of the ACPI
table, the IWL command definition, and the various macros, it's not
obvious that this is the only necessary change.

Brian

>    463                          IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "    Band[%d] = %d * .125dBm\n",
>    464                                          j, prof->table[idx]);
>                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    465                  }
>    466          }
>    468          return 0;
>    469  }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6
  2020-12-03  9:08 [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6 Dan Carpenter
  2021-06-02 21:12 ` Brian Norris
@ 2021-06-08 13:04 ` Coelho, Luciano
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Coelho, Luciano @ 2021-06-08 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dan.carpenter; +Cc: linux-wireless

On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 12:08 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Luca Coelho,
> 
> The patch fbb7957d28ac: "iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version
> 6" from Sep 28, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning:
> 
> 	drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:462 iwl_sar_fill_table()
> 	error: buffer overflow 'prof->table' 10 <= 15
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
>    422  static int iwl_sar_fill_table(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
>    423                                __le16 *per_chain, u32 n_subbands,
>    424                                int prof_a, int prof_b)
> 
> Original n_subbands was ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS (5) but now it can be
> IWL_NUM_SUB_BANDS_V2 (11) as well.
> 
>    425  {
>    426          int profs[ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS] = { prof_a, prof_b };
>    427          int i, j, idx;
>    428  
>    429          for (i = 0; i < ACPI_SAR_NUM_CHAIN_LIMITS; i++) {
>    430                  struct iwl_sar_profile *prof;
>    431  
>    432                  /* don't allow SAR to be disabled (profile 0 means disable) */
>    433                  if (profs[i] == 0)
>    434                          return -EPERM;
>    435  
>    436                  /* we are off by one, so allow up to ACPI_SAR_PROFILE_NUM */
>    437                  if (profs[i] > ACPI_SAR_PROFILE_NUM)
>    438                          return -EINVAL;
>    439  
>    440                  /* profiles go from 1 to 4, so decrement to access the array */
>    441                  prof = &fwrt->sar_profiles[profs[i] - 1];
>    442  
>    443                  /* if the profile is disabled, do nothing */
>    444                  if (!prof->enabled) {
>    445                          IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "SAR profile %d is disabled.\n",
>    446                                          profs[i]);
>    447                          /*
>    448                           * if one of the profiles is disabled, we
>    449                           * ignore all of them and return 1 to
>    450                           * differentiate disabled from other failures.
>    451                           */
>    452                          return 1;
>    453                  }
>    454  
>    455                  IWL_DEBUG_INFO(fwrt,
>    456                                 "SAR EWRD: chain %d profile index %d\n",
>    457                                 i, profs[i]);
>    458                  IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(fwrt, "  Chain[%d]:\n", i);
>    459                  for (j = 0; j < n_subbands; j++) {
>    460                          idx = i * ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS + j;
>    461                          per_chain[i * n_subbands + j] =
>    462                                  cpu_to_le16(prof->table[idx]);
>                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> But this table size wasn't increased so potentially we're reading beyond
> the end of the array?

This is a good catch! The intention of this patch is to support the
larger structures in the FW, but not from ACPI.  So the solution for
this here, would be to check if j is larger than ACPI_SAR_NUM_SUB_BANDS
(which is the max ACPI table we support) and just fill in with zeros in
that case.

This code has already been refactored in our internal tree (and will go
upstream soon) to support the full size table from ACPI as well.  But
since the changes are not only fixing this bug, I'll send a separate
bugfix for the mainline for now.

Thanks, Dan!

--
Cheers,
Luca.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6
  2021-06-02 21:12 ` Brian Norris
@ 2021-06-08 13:05   ` Coelho, Luciano
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Coelho, Luciano @ 2021-06-08 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dan.carpenter, briannorris; +Cc: linux-wireless, johannes

On Wed, 2021-06-02 at 14:12 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Signal boost:
> I've seen issues in this code in the past, as this is a custom format,
> the docs are non-public, it interacts with ACPI tables that Intel
> doesn't always get to review, and the parsing is all written in C...
> ...I also think Dan's static checker warning below is correct.
> 
> Luca, has this been addressed yet?

You're right, the issue that Dan pointed out is indeed an issue.  I'll
send a fix as explained in my previous email.

--
Cheers,
Luca.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-08 13:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-03  9:08 [bug report] iwlwifi: support REDUCE_TX_POWER_CMD version 6 Dan Carpenter
2021-06-02 21:12 ` Brian Norris
2021-06-08 13:05   ` Coelho, Luciano
2021-06-08 13:04 ` Coelho, Luciano

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.