[PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Yuanzheng Song]

The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
sp : ffff800014c1b870
x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
Call trace:
 __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
 page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
 copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
 copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
 dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
 dup_mm+0x78/0x140
 copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
 kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
 __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
 __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
 do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
 el0_svc+0x24/0x38
 el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
 el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
Memory Limit: none
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---

This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.

This patch is not applicable to this version because
of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().

Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index cc50fa0f4590..45973fd97be8 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -823,6 +823,17 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
 	if (likely(!page_maybe_dma_pinned(page)))
 		return 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL
+	 * because the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages.
+	 * A BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
+	 * a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
+	 * page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
+	 * Return 1 if the page is not an anonymous page.
+	*/
+	if (!PageAnon(page))
+		return 1;
+
 	new_page = *prealloc;
 	if (!new_page)
 		return -EAGAIN;
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[kernel test robot]

Hi,

Thanks for your patch.

FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.

Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.'
Subject: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20221024094911.3054769-1-songyuanzheng%40huawei.com

The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 09:49:11AM +0000, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
> The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
> the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
> case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
> a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
> page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> sp : ffff800014c1b870
> x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
> x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
> x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
> x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
> x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
> x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
> x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
> x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
> x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
> Call trace:
>  __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>  page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
>  copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
>  copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
>  dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
>  dup_mm+0x78/0x140
>  copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
>  kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
>  __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
>  __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
>  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
>  do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
>  el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>  el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
>  el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
> Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
> ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
> PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
> CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
> Memory Limit: none
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
> 
> This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
> ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
> but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
> 
> This patch is not applicable to this version because
> of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
> adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
> 
> Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
> Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

We also need this in 5.15.y, right?  Can you provide a working version
for there so that no one upgrades from 5.10.y to 5.15.y and has a
regression?

I'll wait for that before taking this one.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[songyuanzheng]

Hi, Greg KH,

Currently, this patch is under review and no correct solution
is available to solve this problem. After a perfect patch is
available, I will send the corresponding patch to 5.15y.

On 2022/10/27 0:52, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 09:49:11AM +0000, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
>> The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
>> the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
>> case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
>> a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
>> page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
>> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
>> pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>> lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>> sp : ffff800014c1b870
>> x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
>> x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
>> x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
>> x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
>> x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
>> x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
>> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>> x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
>> x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
>> x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
>> x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
>> x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>> x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>> x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
>> x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
>> Call trace:
>>   __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>>   page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
>>   copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
>>   copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
>>   dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
>>   dup_mm+0x78/0x140
>>   copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
>>   kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
>>   __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
>>   __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
>>   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
>>   do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
>>   el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>>   el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
>>   el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
>> Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
>> ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
>> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>> Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
>> PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
>> CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
>> Memory Limit: none
>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
>>
>> This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
>> ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
>> but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
>>
>> This patch is not applicable to this version because
>> of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
>> adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
>>
>> Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
>> Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/memory.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> We also need this in 5.15.y, right?  Can you provide a working version
> for there so that no one upgrades from 5.10.y to 5.15.y and has a
> regression?
> 
> I'll wait for that before taking this one.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> .
> 
Thanks,

Yuanzheng
.

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Hugh Dickins]

On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:

> The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
> the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
> case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
> a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
> page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> sp : ffff800014c1b870
> x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
> x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
> x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
> x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
> x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
> x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
> x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
> x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
> x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
> Call trace:
>  __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>  page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
>  copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
>  copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
>  dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
>  dup_mm+0x78/0x140
>  copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
>  kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
>  __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
>  __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
>  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
>  do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
>  el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>  el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
>  el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
> Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
> ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
> PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
> CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
> Memory Limit: none
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
> 
> This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
> ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
> but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
> 
> This patch is not applicable to this version because
> of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
> adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
> 
> Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
> Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>

It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.

To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
less lenient).

But my eye on COW is very poor nowadays, and I may be plain wrong.

Hugh

> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index cc50fa0f4590..45973fd97be8 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -823,6 +823,17 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
>  	if (likely(!page_maybe_dma_pinned(page)))
>  		return 1;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL
> +	 * because the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages.
> +	 * A BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
> +	 * a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
> +	 * page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
> +	 * Return 1 if the page is not an anonymous page.
> +	*/
> +	if (!PageAnon(page))
> +		return 1;
> +
>  	new_page = *prealloc;
>  	if (!new_page)
>  		return -EAGAIN;
> -- 
> 2.25.1

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Peter Xu]

Hi, Yuanzheng,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:51:16PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
> 
> > The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
> > the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
> > case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
> > a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
> > page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
> > 
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
> > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
> > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> > pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > sp : ffff800014c1b870
> > x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
> > x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
> > x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
> > x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
> > x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
> > x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> > x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> > x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> > x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> > x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
> > x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
> > x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> > x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> > x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
> > x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > Call trace:
> >  __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> >  page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
> >  copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
> >  copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
> >  dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
> >  dup_mm+0x78/0x140
> >  copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
> >  kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
> >  __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
> >  __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
> >  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
> >  do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
> >  el0_svc+0x24/0x38
> >  el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
> >  el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
> > Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
> > ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
> > SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> > Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
> > PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
> > CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
> > Memory Limit: none
> > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
> > 
> > This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
> > ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
> > but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
> > 
> > This patch is not applicable to this version because
> > of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
> > adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
> > 
> > Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
> 
> It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
> without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.
> 
> To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
> it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
> too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
> is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
> dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
> less lenient).

Sorry to have missed this patch. I agree with Hugh that this patch may not
really fix the issue.

IIUC it's the case where the vma is privately mapping a file.  Some shared
pages got pinned, and here we're trying to trigger the CoW assuming it's
anonymous page but it's not.

The pin should be RO - if it was a write pin, CoW should have happened on
the page cache and there should be an anonymous page, and anon_vma should
be there, no issue should happen.  Only if with RO pin, we won't trigger
CoW, we won't have any anonymous page, we won't have anon_vma, hence the
panic.

The thing is if the page is RO pinned, skip copying it (as what was done in
this patch) is not correct either, because e.g. a follow up write after
fork() from the parent will trigger CoW and the dma RO page that was pinned
will be inconsistent to the page in pgtable anymore, I think.

IIUC the correct fix is what David worked on with unshare - when RO pin the
page cache we should have triggered CoR already before fork().  But as you
mentioned, that's too much change for stable.

So besides this workaround which seems feasible to at least not panic the
system (Hugh: I can't quickly tell what'll be the difference here to check
dst anon_vma or PageAnon, they all seem to work?  I could have missed
something for sure..), the other workaround is teach the user app to switch
to use RW pin for any DMA pages even if RO, so that it'll always guarantee
page coherence even with the old kernel, and afaict that's what RDMA relied
on for years.  I don't know an easy way to make old kernel work with RO pin
solidly if without the unsharing logic.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Hugh Dickins]

On Wed, 26 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:

> Hi, Yuanzheng,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:51:16PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
> > 
> > > The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
> > > the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
> > > case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
> > > a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
> > > page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
> > > 
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
> > > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > > Modules linked in:
> > > CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
> > > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > > pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> > > pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > > lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > > sp : ffff800014c1b870
> > > x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
> > > x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
> > > x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
> > > x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
> > > x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
> > > x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> > > x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> > > x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> > > x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> > > x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
> > > x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
> > > x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> > > x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> > > x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
> > > x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > > Call trace:
> > >  __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > >  page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
> > >  copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
> > >  copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
> > >  dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
> > >  dup_mm+0x78/0x140
> > >  copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
> > >  kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
> > >  __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
> > >  __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
> > >  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
> > >  do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
> > >  el0_svc+0x24/0x38
> > >  el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
> > >  el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
> > > Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
> > > ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
> > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
> > > SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> > > Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
> > > PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
> > > CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
> > > Memory Limit: none
> > > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
> > > 
> > > This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
> > > ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
> > > but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
> > > 
> > > This patch is not applicable to this version because
> > > of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
> > > adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
> > 
> > It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
> > without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.
> > 
> > To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
> > it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
> > too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
> > is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
> > dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
> > less lenient).
> 
> Sorry to have missed this patch. I agree with Hugh that this patch may not
> really fix the issue.
> 
> IIUC it's the case where the vma is privately mapping a file.  Some shared
> pages got pinned, and here we're trying to trigger the CoW assuming it's
> anonymous page but it's not.
> 
> The pin should be RO - if it was a write pin, CoW should have happened on
> the page cache and there should be an anonymous page, and anon_vma should
> be there, no issue should happen.  Only if with RO pin, we won't trigger
> CoW, we won't have any anonymous page, we won't have anon_vma, hence the
> panic.
> 
> The thing is if the page is RO pinned, skip copying it (as what was done in
> this patch) is not correct either, because e.g. a follow up write after
> fork() from the parent will trigger CoW and the dma RO page that was pinned
> will be inconsistent to the page in pgtable anymore, I think.
> 
> IIUC the correct fix is what David worked on with unshare - when RO pin the
> page cache we should have triggered CoR already before fork().  But as you
> mentioned, that's too much change for stable.
> 
> So besides this workaround which seems feasible to at least not panic the
> system (Hugh: I can't quickly tell what'll be the difference here to check
> dst anon_vma or PageAnon, they all seem to work?  I could have missed

Thanks for all the helpful elucidation above.

My thought here, in favour of checking dst anon_vma rather than PageAnon,
was that a common case would be that the private file vma does already
have an anon_vma attached (from earlier CoW on some other page), and
in that case there is no justification for taking this short cut to
avoid the BUG in __page_set_anon_rmap() on every !PageAnon in the vma.

And I imagined that the correct fix (short of going forward with David's
full changes) would be to back out to a context where one could add an
anon_vma_prepare(), then retry after that - involves dropping pt lock,
maybe gets nasty (tedious, anyway).

> something for sure..), the other workaround is teach the user app to switch
> to use RW pin for any DMA pages even if RO, so that it'll always guarantee
> page coherence even with the old kernel, and afaict that's what RDMA relied
> on for years.  I don't know an easy way to make old kernel work with RO pin
> solidly if without the unsharing logic.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[songyuanzheng]

Hi, Peter Xu:

Thank you for reviewing this patch. This bug was reported by syzkaller.

You can reproduce it using the following test case.


As you said, my patch isn't really fixing the problem, just avoiding the 
bug.

In my opinion, simply abandoning the creation of new anonymous rmap

by judging that it is not an anonymous page is the minimal change to

circumvent the bug.


This bug can be reproduced from

70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")

to

b51ad4f8679e ("mm/memory: slightly simplify copy_present_pte()")

in the mainline.

(Greg KH: Therefore, this problem involves 5.10y and even 5.15y.)


I hope you can help to look at this problem and find a better solution.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 


#define _GNU_SOURCE

#include <dirent.h>
#include <endian.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>

#include <linux/futex.h>

#ifndef __NR_clone
#define __NR_clone 220
#endif
#ifndef __NR_exit
#define __NR_exit 93
#endif
#ifndef __NR_gettid
#define __NR_gettid 178
#endif
#ifndef __NR_mmap
#define __NR_mmap 222
#endif
#ifndef __NR_process_vm_readv
#define __NR_process_vm_readv 270
#endif
#ifndef __NR_setsockopt
#define __NR_setsockopt 208
#endif
#ifndef __NR_socket
#define __NR_socket 198
#endif

static unsigned long long procid;

static void sleep_ms(uint64_t ms)
{
     usleep(ms * 1000);
}

static uint64_t current_time_ms(void)
{
     struct timespec ts;
     if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts))
     exit(1);
     return (uint64_t)ts.tv_sec * 1000 + (uint64_t)ts.tv_nsec / 1000000;
}

static void thread_start(void* (*fn)(void*), void* arg)
{
     pthread_t th;
     pthread_attr_t attr;
     pthread_attr_init(&attr);
     pthread_attr_setstacksize(&attr, 128 << 10);
     int i = 0;
     for (; i < 100; i++) {
         if (pthread_create(&th, &attr, fn, arg) == 0) {
             pthread_attr_destroy(&attr);
             return;
         }
         if (errno == EAGAIN) {
             usleep(50);
             continue;
         }
         break;
     }
     exit(1);
}

typedef struct {
     int state;
} event_t;

static void event_init(event_t* ev)
{
     ev->state = 0;
}

static void event_reset(event_t* ev)
{
     ev->state = 0;
}

static void event_set(event_t* ev)
{
     if (ev->state)
     exit(1);
     __atomic_store_n(&ev->state, 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
     syscall(SYS_futex, &ev->state, FUTEX_WAKE | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, 
1000000);
}

static void event_wait(event_t* ev)
{
     while (!__atomic_load_n(&ev->state, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
         syscall(SYS_futex, &ev->state, FUTEX_WAIT | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, 
0, 0);
}

static int event_isset(event_t* ev)
{
     return __atomic_load_n(&ev->state, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
}

static int event_timedwait(event_t* ev, uint64_t timeout)
{
     uint64_t start = current_time_ms();
     uint64_t now = start;
     for (;;) {
         uint64_t remain = timeout - (now - start);
         struct timespec ts;
         ts.tv_sec = remain / 1000;
         ts.tv_nsec = (remain % 1000) * 1000 * 1000;
         syscall(SYS_futex, &ev->state, FUTEX_WAIT | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, 
0, &ts);
         if (__atomic_load_n(&ev->state, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
             return 1;
         now = current_time_ms();
         if (now - start > timeout)
             return 0;
     }
}

static bool write_file(const char* file, const char* what, ...)
{
     char buf[1024];
     va_list args;
     va_start(args, what);
     vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), what, args);
     va_end(args);
     buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = 0;
     int len = strlen(buf);
     int fd = open(file, O_WRONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
     if (fd == -1)
         return false;
     if (write(fd, buf, len) != len) {
         int err = errno;
         close(fd);
         errno = err;
         return false;
     }
     close(fd);
     return true;
}

static void kill_and_wait(int pid, int* status)
{
     kill(-pid, SIGKILL);
     kill(pid, SIGKILL);
     for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
         if (waitpid(-1, status, WNOHANG | __WALL) == pid)
             return;
         usleep(1000);
     }
     DIR* dir = opendir("/sys/fs/fuse/connections");
     if (dir) {
         for (;;) {
             struct dirent* ent = readdir(dir);
             if (!ent)
                 break;
             if (strcmp(ent->d_name, ".") == 0 || strcmp(ent->d_name, 
"..") == 0)
                 continue;
             char abort[300];
             snprintf(abort, sizeof(abort), 
"/sys/fs/fuse/connections/%s/abort", ent->d_name);
             int fd = open(abort, O_WRONLY);
             if (fd == -1) {
                 continue;
             }
             if (write(fd, abort, 1) < 0) {
             }
             close(fd);
         }
         closedir(dir);
     } else {
     }
     while (waitpid(-1, status, __WALL) != pid) {
     }
}

static void setup_test()
{
     prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL, 0, 0, 0);
     setpgrp();
     write_file("/proc/self/oom_score_adj", "1000");
}

#define USLEEP_FORKED_CHILD (3 * 50 *1000)

static long handle_clone_ret(long ret)
{
     if (ret != 0) {
         return ret;
     }
     usleep(USLEEP_FORKED_CHILD);
     syscall(__NR_exit, 0);
     while (1) {
     }
}

static long syz_clone(volatile long flags, volatile long stack, volatile 
long stack_len,
               volatile long ptid, volatile long ctid, volatile long tls)
{
     long sp = (stack + stack_len) & ~15;
     long ret = (long)syscall(__NR_clone, flags & ~CLONE_VM, sp, ptid, 
ctid, tls);
     return handle_clone_ret(ret);
}

struct thread_t {
     int created, call;
     event_t ready, done;
};

static struct thread_t threads[16];
static void execute_call(int call);
static int running;

static void* thr(void* arg)
{
     struct thread_t* th = (struct thread_t*)arg;
     for (;;) {
         event_wait(&th->ready);
         event_reset(&th->ready);
         execute_call(th->call);
         __atomic_fetch_sub(&running, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
         event_set(&th->done);
     }
     return 0;
}

static void execute_one(void)
{
     int i, call, thread;
     for (call = 0; call < 6; call++) {
         for (thread = 0; thread < (int)(sizeof(threads) / 
sizeof(threads[0])); thread++) {
             struct thread_t* th = &threads[thread];
             if (!th->created) {
                 th->created = 1;
                 event_init(&th->ready);
                 event_init(&th->done);
                 event_set(&th->done);
                 thread_start(thr, th);
             }
             if (!event_isset(&th->done))
                 continue;
             event_reset(&th->done);
             th->call = call;
             __atomic_fetch_add(&running, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
             event_set(&th->ready);
             if (call == 3 || call == 4)
                 break;
             event_timedwait(&th->done, 50);
             break;
         }
     }
     for (i = 0; i < 100 && __atomic_load_n(&running, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); 
i++)
         sleep_ms(1);
}

static void execute_one(void);

#define WAIT_FLAGS __WALL

static void loop(void)
{
     int iter = 0;
     for (;; iter++) {
         int pid = fork();
         if (pid < 0)
     exit(1);
         if (pid == 0) {
             setup_test();
             execute_one();
             exit(0);
         }
         int status = 0;
         uint64_t start = current_time_ms();
         for (;;) {
             if (waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG | WAIT_FLAGS) == pid)
                 break;
             sleep_ms(1);
             if (current_time_ms() - start < 5000)
                 continue;
             kill_and_wait(pid, &status);
             break;
         }
     }
}

uint64_t r[2] = {0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0};

void execute_call(int call)
{
         intptr_t res = 0;
     switch (call) {
     case 0:
         res = syscall(__NR_socket, 0x11ul, 3ul, 0x300);
         if (res != -1)
                 r[0] = res;
         break;
     case 1:
*(uint32_t*)0x20000100 = 0x10000;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000104 = 7;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000108 = 0x1f0;
*(uint32_t*)0x2000010c = 0x39c;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000110 = 0;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000114 = 0;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000118 = 0;
         syscall(__NR_setsockopt, r[0], 0x107, 0xd, 0x20000100ul, 0x1cul);
         break;
     case 2:
         res = syscall(__NR_gettid);
         if (res != -1)
                 r[1] = res;
         break;
     case 3:
         syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x70000ul, 0x13ul, 0x12ul, 
r[0], 0ul);
         break;
     case 4:
syz_clone(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
         break;
     case 5:
*(uint64_t*)0x20000440 = 0x20000000;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000448 = 0xf1;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000450 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000458 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000460 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000468 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000470 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000478 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000480 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000488 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000490 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000498 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004a0 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004a8 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004b0 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004b8 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004c0 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004c8 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001700 = 0x20000500;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001708 = 0x15;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001710 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001718 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001720 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001728 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001730 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001738 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001740 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001748 = 0;
         syscall(__NR_process_vm_readv, r[1], 0x20000440ul, 9ul, 
0x20001700ul, 5ul, 0ul);
         break;
     }

}
int main(void)
{
         syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x1ffff000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
     syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x1000000ul, 7ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
     syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x21000000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
     for (procid = 0; procid < 4; procid++) {
         if (fork() == 0) {
             loop();
         }
     }
     sleep(1000000);
     return 0;
}

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 


On 2022/10/27 9:48, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
>
>> Hi, Yuanzheng,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:51:16PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
>>>
>>>> The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
>>>> the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
>>>> case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
>>>> a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
>>>> page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
>>>>
>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
>>>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>> CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
>>>> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>>>> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
>>>> pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>>>> lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>>>> sp : ffff800014c1b870
>>>> x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
>>>> x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
>>>> x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
>>>> x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
>>>> x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
>>>> x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
>>>> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>>>> x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
>>>> x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
>>>> x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
>>>> x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
>>>> x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>>>> x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>>>> x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
>>>> x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
>>>> Call trace:
>>>>   __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>>>>   page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
>>>>   copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
>>>>   copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
>>>>   dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
>>>>   dup_mm+0x78/0x140
>>>>   copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
>>>>   kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
>>>>   __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
>>>>   __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
>>>>   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
>>>>   do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
>>>>   el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>>>>   el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
>>>>   el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
>>>> Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
>>>> ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
>>>> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>>> Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
>>>> PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
>>>> CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
>>>> Memory Limit: none
>>>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
>>>>
>>>> This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
>>>> ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
>>>> but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is not applicable to this version because
>>>> of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
>>>> adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
>>> It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
>>> without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.
>>>
>>> To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
>>> it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
>>> too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
>>> is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
>>> dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
>>> less lenient).
>> Sorry to have missed this patch. I agree with Hugh that this patch may not
>> really fix the issue.
>>
>> IIUC it's the case where the vma is privately mapping a file.  Some shared
>> pages got pinned, and here we're trying to trigger the CoW assuming it's
>> anonymous page but it's not.
>>
>> The pin should be RO - if it was a write pin, CoW should have happened on
>> the page cache and there should be an anonymous page, and anon_vma should
>> be there, no issue should happen.  Only if with RO pin, we won't trigger
>> CoW, we won't have any anonymous page, we won't have anon_vma, hence the
>> panic.
>>
>> The thing is if the page is RO pinned, skip copying it (as what was done in
>> this patch) is not correct either, because e.g. a follow up write after
>> fork() from the parent will trigger CoW and the dma RO page that was pinned
>> will be inconsistent to the page in pgtable anymore, I think.
>>
>> IIUC the correct fix is what David worked on with unshare - when RO pin the
>> page cache we should have triggered CoR already before fork().  But as you
>> mentioned, that's too much change for stable.
>>
>> So besides this workaround which seems feasible to at least not panic the
>> system (Hugh: I can't quickly tell what'll be the difference here to check
>> dst anon_vma or PageAnon, they all seem to work?  I could have missed
> Thanks for all the helpful elucidation above.
>
> My thought here, in favour of checking dst anon_vma rather than PageAnon,
> was that a common case would be that the private file vma does already
> have an anon_vma attached (from earlier CoW on some other page), and
> in that case there is no justification for taking this short cut to
> avoid the BUG in __page_set_anon_rmap() on every !PageAnon in the vma.
>
> And I imagined that the correct fix (short of going forward with David's
> full changes) would be to back out to a context where one could add an
> anon_vma_prepare(), then retry after that - involves dropping pt lock,
> maybe gets nasty (tedious, anyway).
>
>> something for sure..), the other workaround is teach the user app to switch
>> to use RW pin for any DMA pages even if RO, so that it'll always guarantee
>> page coherence even with the old kernel, and afaict that's what RDMA relied
>> on for years.  I don't know an easy way to make old kernel work with RO pin
>> solidly if without the unsharing logic.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- 
>> Peter Xu
> .
Thanks,


-- 

Yuanzheng

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Peter Xu]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:48:29PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
> 
> > Hi, Yuanzheng,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:51:16PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
> > > > the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
> > > > case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
> > > > a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
> > > > page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
> > > > 
> > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
> > > > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > > > Modules linked in:
> > > > CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
> > > > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > > > pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> > > > pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > > > lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > > > sp : ffff800014c1b870
> > > > x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
> > > > x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
> > > > x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
> > > > x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
> > > > x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
> > > > x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> > > > x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> > > > x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> > > > x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> > > > x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
> > > > x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
> > > > x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> > > > x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
> > > > x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
> > > > x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > > > Call trace:
> > > >  __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
> > > >  page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
> > > >  copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
> > > >  copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
> > > >  dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
> > > >  dup_mm+0x78/0x140
> > > >  copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
> > > >  kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
> > > >  __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
> > > >  __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
> > > >  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
> > > >  do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
> > > >  el0_svc+0x24/0x38
> > > >  el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
> > > >  el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
> > > > Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
> > > > ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
> > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
> > > > SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> > > > Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
> > > > PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
> > > > CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
> > > > Memory Limit: none
> > > > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
> > > > 
> > > > This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
> > > > ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
> > > > but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch is not applicable to this version because
> > > > of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
> > > > adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
> > > 
> > > It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
> > > without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.
> > > 
> > > To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
> > > it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
> > > too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
> > > is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
> > > dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
> > > less lenient).
> > 
> > Sorry to have missed this patch. I agree with Hugh that this patch may not
> > really fix the issue.
> > 
> > IIUC it's the case where the vma is privately mapping a file.  Some shared
> > pages got pinned, and here we're trying to trigger the CoW assuming it's
> > anonymous page but it's not.
> > 
> > The pin should be RO - if it was a write pin, CoW should have happened on
> > the page cache and there should be an anonymous page, and anon_vma should
> > be there, no issue should happen.  Only if with RO pin, we won't trigger
> > CoW, we won't have any anonymous page, we won't have anon_vma, hence the
> > panic.
> > 
> > The thing is if the page is RO pinned, skip copying it (as what was done in
> > this patch) is not correct either, because e.g. a follow up write after
> > fork() from the parent will trigger CoW and the dma RO page that was pinned
> > will be inconsistent to the page in pgtable anymore, I think.
> > 
> > IIUC the correct fix is what David worked on with unshare - when RO pin the
> > page cache we should have triggered CoR already before fork().  But as you
> > mentioned, that's too much change for stable.
> > 
> > So besides this workaround which seems feasible to at least not panic the
> > system (Hugh: I can't quickly tell what'll be the difference here to check
> > dst anon_vma or PageAnon, they all seem to work?  I could have missed
> 
> Thanks for all the helpful elucidation above.
> 
> My thought here, in favour of checking dst anon_vma rather than PageAnon,
> was that a common case would be that the private file vma does already
> have an anon_vma attached (from earlier CoW on some other page), and
> in that case there is no justification for taking this short cut to
> avoid the BUG in __page_set_anon_rmap() on every !PageAnon in the vma.

I see, thanks for explaining.  Definitely makes sense.

> 
> And I imagined that the correct fix (short of going forward with David's
> full changes) would be to back out to a context where one could add an
> anon_vma_prepare(), then retry after that - involves dropping pt lock,
> maybe gets nasty (tedious, anyway).

Right, that looks a larger changeset with minimum benefit - the page is
still inconsistent before fork(), and also for users don't fork() at all
after the RO pin.

It looks to me Hugh's suggestion would be the best suite here for stable.
Yuanzheng, what do you think?

For the long term I think we should wait for David's further unshare work
so gup_must_unshare() will work for page caches too while mapped private.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Hugh Dickins]

Let me delete stable from the Cc, this discussion is not for stable.

On Thu, 27 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:48:29PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > 
> > And I imagined that the correct fix (short of going forward with David's
> > full changes) would be to back out to a context where one could add an
> > anon_vma_prepare(), then retry after that - involves dropping pt lock,
> > maybe gets nasty (tedious, anyway).
> 
> Right, that looks a larger changeset with minimum benefit - the page is
> still inconsistent before fork(), and also for users don't fork() at all
> after the RO pin.

Sorry, I don't understand any of what you're saying there: but you appear
to be saying ("larger changeset with minimum benefit") that my suggestion
would not be worth the effort - fair enough, but...

> 
> It looks to me Hugh's suggestion would be the best suite here for stable.
> Yuanzheng, what do you think?

... now you appear to be saying it would be worth the effort.  Oh,
perhaps you're referring to just the change to check dst anon_vma:
perhaps, but I'm really having to guess at what you mean.

But none of that matters as much as below...

> 
> For the long term I think we should wait for David's further unshare work
> so gup_must_unshare() will work for page caches too while mapped private.

I do wonder if in the long term we shall have to port all David's work
back to 5.15 and 5.10 (but I think there's yet more to come from him).
But set aside that thought for now...

More urgently, in the short term:

Peter, you've made no reference to David's mail, where he concludes that
Yuanzheng's !PageAnon patch is the appropriate one; and
David, you've made no reference to Peter's mail, where he concludes that
my doubts were correct, and it needs a different patch.

You appear to disagree over whether a RO-pinned file page needs to
be copied at fork() time.  I don't know, but I hope you can agree
on that (in the 5.10 and 5.15 context: maybe David is thinking of
the 6.0 context and Peter of the 5.10 context) before going further.

(I'm hoping David is right, and I was plain wrong, since that's easiest.)

Hugh

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Peter Xu]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 02:58:02PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Let me delete stable from the Cc, this discussion is not for stable.
> 
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:48:29PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > 
> > > And I imagined that the correct fix (short of going forward with David's
> > > full changes) would be to back out to a context where one could add an
> > > anon_vma_prepare(), then retry after that - involves dropping pt lock,
> > > maybe gets nasty (tedious, anyway).
> > 
> > Right, that looks a larger changeset with minimum benefit - the page is
> > still inconsistent before fork(), and also for users don't fork() at all
> > after the RO pin.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand any of what you're saying there: but you appear
> to be saying ("larger changeset with minimum benefit") that my suggestion
> would not be worth the effort - fair enough, but...
> 
> > 
> > It looks to me Hugh's suggestion would be the best suite here for stable.
> > Yuanzheng, what do you think?
> 
> ... now you appear to be saying it would be worth the effort.  Oh,
> perhaps you're referring to just the change to check dst anon_vma:
> perhaps, but I'm really having to guess at what you mean.

Sorry for not being clear.  Yes I was referring to that original idea of
using dest->anon_vma.

> 
> But none of that matters as much as below...
> 
> > 
> > For the long term I think we should wait for David's further unshare work
> > so gup_must_unshare() will work for page caches too while mapped private.
> 
> I do wonder if in the long term we shall have to port all David's work
> back to 5.15 and 5.10 (but I think there's yet more to come from him).
> But set aside that thought for now...
> 
> More urgently, in the short term:
> 
> Peter, you've made no reference to David's mail, where he concludes that
> Yuanzheng's !PageAnon patch is the appropriate one; and
> David, you've made no reference to Peter's mail, where he concludes that
> my doubts were correct, and it needs a different patch.
> 
> You appear to disagree over whether a RO-pinned file page needs to
> be copied at fork() time.  I don't know, but I hope you can agree
> on that (in the 5.10 and 5.15 context: maybe David is thinking of
> the 6.0 context and Peter of the 5.10 context) before going further.
> 
> (I'm hoping David is right, and I was plain wrong, since that's easiest.)

For some reason I thought David was talking about the plan for the latest..

The major difference IIUC is whether we'll CoW for page caches during
fork() with the old kernels or not with the two approaches (PageAnon check,
or dst->anon_vma check).

After a re-read and 2nd thought, I think David has a valid point in that we
shouldn't have special handling of !anon pages on CoW during fork(),
because that seems to be against the fundamental concept of fork().

So now I think I agree the !Anon original check does look a bit cleaner,
and also make fork() behavior matching with the old/new kernels, irrelevant
of the pin mess.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Hugh Dickins]

Reinstating Cc stable, which I removed just before the discussion settled.

On Thu, 27 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
> ...
> 
> After a re-read and 2nd thought, I think David has a valid point in that we
> shouldn't have special handling of !anon pages on CoW during fork(),
> because that seems to be against the fundamental concept of fork().
> 
> So now I think I agree the !Anon original check does look a bit cleaner,
> and also make fork() behavior matching with the old/new kernels, irrelevant
> of the pin mess.

Thanks Peter.  So Yuanzheng's patch for 5.10 is exactly right.

Sorry for leading everyone astray: my mistake was to suppose that
its !PageAnon check was simply to avoid the later BUG_ON(!anon_vma):
whereas David and Peter now agree that it actually corrects the
semantics for fork() on file pages.

I lift my hold on Yuanzheng's patch: nobody actually said "Acked-by",
but I think the discussion and resolution have given better than that.
(No 3rd thoughts please!)

Hugh

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[David Hildenbrand]

On 28.10.22 03:32, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Reinstating Cc stable, which I removed just before the discussion settled.

Sorry for not reading the full thread before and considering Peters 
mail; I had to take short cuts :)

> 
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> After a re-read and 2nd thought, I think David has a valid point in that we
>> shouldn't have special handling of !anon pages on CoW during fork(),
>> because that seems to be against the fundamental concept of fork().
>>
>> So now I think I agree the !Anon original check does look a bit cleaner,
>> and also make fork() behavior matching with the old/new kernels, irrelevant
>> of the pin mess.
> 
> Thanks Peter.  So Yuanzheng's patch for 5.10 is exactly right.
> 
> Sorry for leading everyone astray: my mistake was to suppose that
> its !PageAnon check was simply to avoid the later BUG_ON(!anon_vma):
> whereas David and Peter now agree that it actually corrects the
> semantics for fork() on file pages.
> 
> I lift my hold on Yuanzheng's patch: nobody actually said "Acked-by",
> but I think the discussion and resolution have given better than that.
> (No 3rd thoughts please!)

Unless someone tells me why I am obviously wrong

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[Peter Xu]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:32:01PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Sorry for leading everyone astray: my mistake was to suppose that
> its !PageAnon check was simply to avoid the later BUG_ON(!anon_vma):
> whereas David and Peter now agree that it actually corrects the
> semantics for fork() on file pages.

Thanks for raising this from the start, Hugh.  It's definitely worthwhile
to discuss this topic which is not obvious at all at least to me, and merge
even the same patch would be different before/after such a discussion,
since we're clearer on the side effects.

> 
> I lift my hold on Yuanzheng's patch: nobody actually said "Acked-by",
> but I think the discussion and resolution have given better than that.
> (No 3rd thoughts please!)

I've acked directly on v2, note that after this discussion IMHO the comment
of !Anon check can be slightly improved (e.g. add some more information on
why we decided to not copy the page even if anon_vma existed), but I don't
want to be harsh on any stable backports that helps resolving problems
already in correct ways.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[David Hildenbrand]

On 26.10.22 23:51, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
> 
>> The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
>> the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
>> case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
>> a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
>> page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
>> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
>> pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>> lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>> sp : ffff800014c1b870
>> x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
>> x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
>> x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
>> x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
>> x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
>> x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
>> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>> x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
>> x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
>> x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
>> x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
>> x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>> x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>> x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
>> x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
>> Call trace:
>>   __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>>   page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
>>   copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
>>   copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
>>   dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
>>   dup_mm+0x78/0x140
>>   copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
>>   kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
>>   __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
>>   __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
>>   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
>>   do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
>>   el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>>   el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
>>   el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
>> Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
>> ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
>> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>> Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
>> PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
>> CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
>> Memory Limit: none
>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
>>
>> This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
>> ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
>> but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
>>
>> This patch is not applicable to this version because
>> of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
>> adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
>>
>> Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
>> Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
> 
> It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
> without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.
> 
> To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
> it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
> too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
> is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
> dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
> less lenient).
> 
> But my eye on COW is very poor nowadays, and I may be plain wrong.

I am not aware of any reason for copying a !anon page during fork(). COW 
regrading fork() is all about sharing private (anon) pages between the 
parent and the child. The semantics of other pages are untouched.


Yes, I am working on reliable longterm R/O pinning improvements, whereby 
we never pin such pages in a MAP_PRIVATE mapping but instead break COW 
before pinning; but this only applies to longterm pinning 
(FOLL_LONGTERM) and is independent of fork() here.


Let me elaborate: if you have a pagecache page (or the shared zeropage) 
in a MAP_PRIVATE mapping pinned R/O, the next write fault will replace 
the page by a copy, *independent* of fork() or not: the page is already 
mapped write-protected into the page table.


IIUC, the problem here is that we have a writable private mapping (COW 
mapping) of, say, a file, whereby we never had to COW -- so no anon 
pages were mapped.

Then, we had the process pin some page (&src_mm->has_pinned) once and 
detect a pagecache page / shared zeropage as "maybe pinned" during 
fork(), which can happen easily, for example, due to other process' 
action, false positives, ... we end up duplicating a !anon page.

Restricting copying during fork() to anon pages is IMHO the right thing 
to do.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10] mm/memory: add non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page()

[songyuanzheng]

Hi, Hugh,

On 2022/10/27 5:51, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Yuanzheng Song wrote:
> 
>> The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL because
>> the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages. In this
>> case, a BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
>> a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
>> page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1044!
>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 2 PID: 3617 Comm: test Not tainted 5.10.149 #1
>> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
>> pc : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>> lr : __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>> sp : ffff800014c1b870
>> x29: ffff800014c1b870 x28: 0000000000000001
>> x27: 0000000010100073 x26: ffff1d65c517baa8
>> x25: ffff1d65cab0f000 x24: ffff1d65c416d800
>> x23: ffff1d65cab5f248 x22: 0000000020000000
>> x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000000000000
>> x19: fffffe75970023c0 x18: 0000000000000000
>> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>> x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
>> x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
>> x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000
>> x9 : ffffc3096d5fb858 x8 : 0000000000000000
>> x7 : 0000000000000011 x6 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>> x5 : 0000000000020000 x4 : ffff5a5c9089c000
>> x3 : ffffc3096d200000 x2 : ffffc3096e8d0000
>> x1 : ffff1d65ca3da740 x0 : 0000000000000000
>> Call trace:
>>   __page_set_anon_rmap+0xbc/0xf8
>>   page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x1e0/0x390
>>   copy_pte_range+0xd00/0x1248
>>   copy_page_range+0x39c/0x620
>>   dup_mmap+0x2e0/0x5a8
>>   dup_mm+0x78/0x140
>>   copy_process+0x918/0x1a20
>>   kernel_clone+0xac/0x638
>>   __do_sys_clone+0x78/0xb0
>>   __arm64_sys_clone+0x30/0x40
>>   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x308
>>   do_el0_svc+0x48/0xb8
>>   el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>>   el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x168
>>   el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
>> Code: 97f8ff85 f9400294 17ffffeb 97f8ff82 (d4210000)
>> ---[ end trace a972347688dc9bd4 ]---
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception
>> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>> Kernel Offset: 0x43095d200000 from 0xffff800010000000
>> PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffe29a80000000
>> CPU features: 0x08200022,61806082
>> Memory Limit: none
>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]---
>>
>> This problem has been fixed by the fb3d824d1a46
>> ("mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap()"),
>> but still exists in the linux-5.10.y branch.
>>
>> This patch is not applicable to this version because
>> of the large version differences. Therefore, fix it by
>> adding non-anonymous page check in the copy_present_page().
>>
>> Fixes: 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes")
>> Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
> 
> It's a good point, but this patch should not go into any stable release
> without an explicit Ack from either Peter Xu or David Hildenbrand.
> 
> To my eye, it's simply avoiding the issue, rather than fixing
> it properly; and even if the issue is so rare, and fixing properly
> too difficult or inefficent (a cached anon_vma?), that a workaround
> is good enough, it still looks like the wrong workaround (checking
> dst_vma->anon_vma instead of PageAnon seems more to the point, and
> less lenient).
For an anonymous page that belongs to a vma, the vma->anon_vma is
definitely not NULL, which is why I use PageAnon() instead of directly
judging that dst_vma->anon_vma is not NULL.

You are right. Maybe I didn't really solve the problem. Instead, I
simply avoided the issue. You can use the following test case to
reproduce the problem and find a better solution to the problem.
If you find the right solution, please inform me. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------
#define _GNU_SOURCE

#include <dirent.h>
#include <endian.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>

#include <linux/futex.h>

#ifndef __NR_clone
#define __NR_clone 220
#endif
#ifndef __NR_exit
#define __NR_exit 93
#endif
#ifndef __NR_gettid
#define __NR_gettid 178
#endif
#ifndef __NR_mmap
#define __NR_mmap 222
#endif
#ifndef __NR_process_vm_readv
#define __NR_process_vm_readv 270
#endif
#ifndef __NR_setsockopt
#define __NR_setsockopt 208
#endif
#ifndef __NR_socket
#define __NR_socket 198
#endif

static unsigned long long procid;

static void sleep_ms(uint64_t ms)
{
	usleep(ms * 1000);
}

static uint64_t current_time_ms(void)
{
	struct timespec ts;
	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts))
	exit(1);
	return (uint64_t)ts.tv_sec * 1000 + (uint64_t)ts.tv_nsec / 1000000;
}

static void thread_start(void* (*fn)(void*), void* arg)
{
	pthread_t th;
	pthread_attr_t attr;
	pthread_attr_init(&attr);
	pthread_attr_setstacksize(&attr, 128 << 10);
	int i = 0;
	for (; i < 100; i++) {
		if (pthread_create(&th, &attr, fn, arg) == 0) {
			pthread_attr_destroy(&attr);
			return;
		}
		if (errno == EAGAIN) {
			usleep(50);
			continue;
		}
		break;
	}
	exit(1);
}

typedef struct {
	int state;
} event_t;

static void event_init(event_t* ev)
{
	ev->state = 0;
}

static void event_reset(event_t* ev)
{
	ev->state = 0;
}

static void event_set(event_t* ev)
{
	if (ev->state)
	exit(1);
	__atomic_store_n(&ev->state, 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
	syscall(SYS_futex, &ev->state, FUTEX_WAKE | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, 1000000);
}

static void event_wait(event_t* ev)
{
	while (!__atomic_load_n(&ev->state, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
		syscall(SYS_futex, &ev->state, FUTEX_WAIT | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, 0, 0);
}

static int event_isset(event_t* ev)
{
	return __atomic_load_n(&ev->state, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
}

static int event_timedwait(event_t* ev, uint64_t timeout)
{
	uint64_t start = current_time_ms();
	uint64_t now = start;
	for (;;) {
		uint64_t remain = timeout - (now - start);
		struct timespec ts;
		ts.tv_sec = remain / 1000;
		ts.tv_nsec = (remain % 1000) * 1000 * 1000;
		syscall(SYS_futex, &ev->state, FUTEX_WAIT | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, 0, &ts);
		if (__atomic_load_n(&ev->state, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
			return 1;
		now = current_time_ms();
		if (now - start > timeout)
			return 0;
	}
}

static bool write_file(const char* file, const char* what, ...)
{
	char buf[1024];
	va_list args;
	va_start(args, what);
	vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), what, args);
	va_end(args);
	buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = 0;
	int len = strlen(buf);
	int fd = open(file, O_WRONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
	if (fd == -1)
		return false;
	if (write(fd, buf, len) != len) {
		int err = errno;
		close(fd);
		errno = err;
		return false;
	}
	close(fd);
	return true;
}

static void kill_and_wait(int pid, int* status)
{
	kill(-pid, SIGKILL);
	kill(pid, SIGKILL);
	for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
		if (waitpid(-1, status, WNOHANG | __WALL) == pid)
			return;
		usleep(1000);
	}
	DIR* dir = opendir("/sys/fs/fuse/connections");
	if (dir) {
		for (;;) {
			struct dirent* ent = readdir(dir);
			if (!ent)
				break;
			if (strcmp(ent->d_name, ".") == 0 || strcmp(ent->d_name, "..") == 0)
				continue;
			char abort[300];
			snprintf(abort, sizeof(abort), "/sys/fs/fuse/connections/%s/abort", 
ent->d_name);
			int fd = open(abort, O_WRONLY);
			if (fd == -1) {
				continue;
			}
			if (write(fd, abort, 1) < 0) {
			}
			close(fd);
		}
		closedir(dir);
	} else {
	}
	while (waitpid(-1, status, __WALL) != pid) {
	}
}

static void setup_test()
{
	prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL, 0, 0, 0);
	setpgrp();
	write_file("/proc/self/oom_score_adj", "1000");
}

#define USLEEP_FORKED_CHILD (3 * 50 *1000)

static long handle_clone_ret(long ret)
{
	if (ret != 0) {
		return ret;
	}
	usleep(USLEEP_FORKED_CHILD);
	syscall(__NR_exit, 0);
	while (1) {
	}
}

static long syz_clone(volatile long flags, volatile long stack, volatile 
long stack_len,
		      volatile long ptid, volatile long ctid, volatile long tls)
{
	long sp = (stack + stack_len) & ~15;
	long ret = (long)syscall(__NR_clone, flags & ~CLONE_VM, sp, ptid, ctid, 
tls);
	return handle_clone_ret(ret);
}

struct thread_t {
	int created, call;
	event_t ready, done;
};

static struct thread_t threads[16];
static void execute_call(int call);
static int running;

static void* thr(void* arg)
{
	struct thread_t* th = (struct thread_t*)arg;
	for (;;) {
		event_wait(&th->ready);
		event_reset(&th->ready);
		execute_call(th->call);
		__atomic_fetch_sub(&running, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
		event_set(&th->done);
	}
	return 0;
}

static void execute_one(void)
{
	int i, call, thread;
	for (call = 0; call < 6; call++) {
		for (thread = 0; thread < (int)(sizeof(threads) / sizeof(threads[0])); 
thread++) {
			struct thread_t* th = &threads[thread];
			if (!th->created) {
				th->created = 1;
				event_init(&th->ready);
				event_init(&th->done);
				event_set(&th->done);
				thread_start(thr, th);
			}
			if (!event_isset(&th->done))
				continue;
			event_reset(&th->done);
			th->call = call;
			__atomic_fetch_add(&running, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
			event_set(&th->ready);
			if (call == 3 || call == 4)
				break;
			event_timedwait(&th->done, 50);
			break;
		}
	}
	for (i = 0; i < 100 && __atomic_load_n(&running, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); i++)
		sleep_ms(1);
}

static void execute_one(void);

#define WAIT_FLAGS __WALL

static void loop(void)
{
	int iter = 0;
	for (;; iter++) {
		int pid = fork();
		if (pid < 0)
	exit(1);
		if (pid == 0) {
			setup_test();
			execute_one();
			exit(0);
		}
		int status = 0;
		uint64_t start = current_time_ms();
		for (;;) {
			if (waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG | WAIT_FLAGS) == pid)
				break;
			sleep_ms(1);
			if (current_time_ms() - start < 5000)
				continue;
			kill_and_wait(pid, &status);
			break;
		}
	}
}

uint64_t r[2] = {0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0};

void execute_call(int call)
{
		intptr_t res = 0;
	switch (call) {
	case 0:
		res = syscall(__NR_socket, 0x11ul, 3ul, 0x300);
		if (res != -1)
				r[0] = res;
		break;
	case 1:
*(uint32_t*)0x20000100 = 0x10000;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000104 = 7;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000108 = 0x1f0;
*(uint32_t*)0x2000010c = 0x39c;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000110 = 0;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000114 = 0;
*(uint32_t*)0x20000118 = 0;
		syscall(__NR_setsockopt, r[0], 0x107, 0xd, 0x20000100ul, 0x1cul);
		break;
	case 2:
		res = syscall(__NR_gettid);
		if (res != -1)
				r[1] = res;
		break;
	case 3:
		syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x70000ul, 0x13ul, 0x12ul, r[0], 0ul);
		break;
	case 4:
syz_clone(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
		break;
	case 5:
*(uint64_t*)0x20000440 = 0x20000000;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000448 = 0xf1;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000450 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000458 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000460 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000468 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000470 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000478 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000480 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000488 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000490 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20000498 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004a0 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004a8 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004b0 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004b8 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004c0 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x200004c8 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001700 = 0x20000500;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001708 = 0x15;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001710 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001718 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001720 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001728 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001730 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001738 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001740 = 0;
*(uint64_t*)0x20001748 = 0;
		syscall(__NR_process_vm_readv, r[1], 0x20000440ul, 9ul, 0x20001700ul, 
5ul, 0ul);
		break;
	}

}
int main(void)
{
		syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x1ffff000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
	syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x1000000ul, 7ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
	syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x21000000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
	for (procid = 0; procid < 4; procid++) {
		if (fork() == 0) {
			loop();
		}
	}
	sleep(1000000);
	return 0;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------
> But my eye on COW is very poor nowadays, and I may be plain wrong.
> 
> Hugh
> 
>> ---
>>   mm/memory.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index cc50fa0f4590..45973fd97be8 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -823,6 +823,17 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
>>   	if (likely(!page_maybe_dma_pinned(page)))
>>   		return 1;
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The vma->anon_vma of the child process may be NULL
>> +	 * because the entire vma does not contain anonymous pages.
>> +	 * A BUG will occur when the copy_present_page() passes
>> +	 * a copy of a non-anonymous page of that vma to the
>> +	 * page_add_new_anon_rmap() to set up new anonymous rmap.
>> +	 * Return 1 if the page is not an anonymous page.
>> +	*/
>> +	if (!PageAnon(page))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>>   	new_page = *prealloc;
>>   	if (!new_page)
>>   		return -EAGAIN;
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
> .
> 
Thanks,

Yuanzheng
.