All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" 
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Use IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for vfio_file_enforced_coherent()
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 09:26:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2EQb6mSTKOvASlp@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52766FB4EFCFB2197ACDC1F98C369@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:52:23AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY we know what the
> > iommu_domain will be
> > capable of without having to create it. Use this to compute
> 
> it's worth noting that the prerequisite is that vfio always enforces
> cache coherency on a domain according to the iommu capability
> of the devices attached to that domain. There is no mix of attaching
> a device supporting the cap to a domain which doesn't enforce
> coherency. With that we know what the domain will be w/o having
> to create it.

OK, I added this:

VFIO always tries to upgrade domains to enforce cache coherency, it never
attaches a device that supports enforce cache coherency to a less capable
domain, so the cap test is a sufficient proxy for the ultimate
outcome. iommufd also ensures that devices that set the cap will be
connected to enforcing domains.

> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the device does not have
> > IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
> > +	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it.
> > +	 */
> 
> also add the other part i.e. if the device does have the cap then any domain
> later attached to it will have the cap enabled. Only with both clarified
> we can safely use the device cap here.

And this:

	/*
	 * If the device does not have IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it. If the cap
	 * is set then the iommu_domain eventually attached to the device/group
	 * must must use a domain with enforce_cache_coherency().
	 */

Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Use IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for vfio_file_enforced_coherent()
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 09:26:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2EQb6mSTKOvASlp@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52766FB4EFCFB2197ACDC1F98C369@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:52:23AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY we know what the
> > iommu_domain will be
> > capable of without having to create it. Use this to compute
> 
> it's worth noting that the prerequisite is that vfio always enforces
> cache coherency on a domain according to the iommu capability
> of the devices attached to that domain. There is no mix of attaching
> a device supporting the cap to a domain which doesn't enforce
> coherency. With that we know what the domain will be w/o having
> to create it.

OK, I added this:

VFIO always tries to upgrade domains to enforce cache coherency, it never
attaches a device that supports enforce cache coherency to a less capable
domain, so the cap test is a sufficient proxy for the ultimate
outcome. iommufd also ensures that devices that set the cap will be
connected to enforcing domains.

> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the device does not have
> > IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
> > +	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it.
> > +	 */
> 
> also add the other part i.e. if the device does have the cap then any domain
> later attached to it will have the cap enabled. Only with both clarified
> we can safely use the device cap here.

And this:

	/*
	 * If the device does not have IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it. If the cap
	 * is set then the iommu_domain eventually attached to the device/group
	 * must must use a domain with enforce_cache_coherency().
	 */

Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Use IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for vfio_file_enforced_coherent()
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 09:26:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2EQb6mSTKOvASlp@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52766FB4EFCFB2197ACDC1F98C369@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:52:23AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY we know what the
> > iommu_domain will be
> > capable of without having to create it. Use this to compute
> 
> it's worth noting that the prerequisite is that vfio always enforces
> cache coherency on a domain according to the iommu capability
> of the devices attached to that domain. There is no mix of attaching
> a device supporting the cap to a domain which doesn't enforce
> coherency. With that we know what the domain will be w/o having
> to create it.

OK, I added this:

VFIO always tries to upgrade domains to enforce cache coherency, it never
attaches a device that supports enforce cache coherency to a less capable
domain, so the cap test is a sufficient proxy for the ultimate
outcome. iommufd also ensures that devices that set the cap will be
connected to enforcing domains.

> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the device does not have
> > IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
> > +	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it.
> > +	 */
> 
> also add the other part i.e. if the device does have the cap then any domain
> later attached to it will have the cap enabled. Only with both clarified
> we can safely use the device cap here.

And this:

	/*
	 * If the device does not have IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it. If the cap
	 * is set then the iommu_domain eventually attached to the device/group
	 * must must use a domain with enforce_cache_coherency().
	 */

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 206+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25 18:17 [PATCH 00/10] Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] vfio: Move vfio_device driver open/close code to a function Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  7:33   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:33     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:33     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:12     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:12       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:12       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 14:36   ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 14:36     ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-01 14:36     ` Yi Liu
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] vfio: Move vfio_device_assign_container() into vfio_device_first_open() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  7:38   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:38     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:14     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:14       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:14       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 14:37   ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 14:37     ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 14:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-01 17:37     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 17:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 17:37       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] vfio: Rename vfio_device_assign/unassign_container() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  7:39   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:39     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 14:39   ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 14:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-01 14:39     ` Yi Liu
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Move storage of allow_unsafe_interrupts to vfio_main.c Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-26 21:24   ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-26 21:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-26 21:24     ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-28 18:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-28 18:40       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-28 18:40       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 22:45       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-31 22:45         ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-31 22:45         ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 13:19         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 13:19           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 13:19           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 15:18           ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 15:18             ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 15:18             ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 15:32             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 15:32               ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 15:32               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 18:05               ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 18:05                 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 18:05                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 18:45                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 18:45                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 18:45                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-08 22:55                   ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-08 22:55                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-11-08 22:55                     ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-09  1:05                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-09  1:05                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-09  1:05                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-09  3:21                       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-09  3:21                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-09  3:21                         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-09 13:11                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-09 13:11                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-09 13:11                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-10  2:44                           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-10  2:44                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-10  2:44                             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-09 18:28                       ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-09 18:28                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-11-09 18:28                         ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-10 19:19                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-10 19:19                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-10 19:19                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Use IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for vfio_file_enforced_coherent() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  7:52   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  7:52     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:26     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-11-01 12:26       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:26       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-03  4:38       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-03  4:38         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-03  4:38         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-04 19:45         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-04 19:45           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-04 19:45           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] vfio-iommufd: Allow iommufd to be used in place of a container fd Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  8:09   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:09     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  9:19     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01  9:19       ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01  9:19       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01 11:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 11:51         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 11:51         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-03  4:39         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-03  4:39           ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-03  4:39           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:40       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:40       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-02  7:28   ` Yi Liu
2022-11-02  7:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-02  7:28     ` Yi Liu
2022-11-07 23:45     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 23:45       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 23:45       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [PATCH 07/10] vfio-iommufd: Support iommufd for physical VFIO devices Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  8:21   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:21     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-04 19:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-04 19:51       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-04 19:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [PATCH 08/10] vfio-iommufd: Support iommufd for emulated " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  8:37   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:37     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:49       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-03  4:52       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-03  4:52         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-03  4:52         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] vfio: Make vfio_container optionally compiled Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  8:41   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:41     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01  8:41     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:56       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [PATCH 10/10] iommufd: Allow iommufd to supply /dev/vfio/vfio Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-26 21:31   ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-26 21:31     ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-26 21:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-28 18:44     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-28 18:44       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-28 18:44       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 22:53       ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-31 22:53         ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-31 22:53         ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 13:57         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 13:57           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 13:57           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD Patchwork
2022-10-28 23:53 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Nicolin Chen
2022-10-28 23:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicolin Chen
2022-10-28 23:53   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-10-28 23:54   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-10-28 23:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicolin Chen
2022-10-28 23:54     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-10-31 10:38 ` Yi Liu
2022-10-31 10:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-10-31 10:38   ` Yi Liu
2022-10-31 12:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 12:18     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 12:18     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 12:25     ` Yi Liu
2022-10-31 12:25       ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-10-31 12:25       ` Yi Liu
2022-10-31 23:24       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 23:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 23:24         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01  3:04         ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01  3:04           ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01  3:04           ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-01  4:21           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01  4:21             ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01  4:21             ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01 12:54             ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 12:54               ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-01 12:54               ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 11:41           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 11:41             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 11:41             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:55             ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 12:55               ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 12:55               ` [Intel-gfx] " Yi Liu
2022-11-07 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2EQb6mSTKOvASlp@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.