Re: [PATCH 0/3] add dt configuration for dp83867 led modes

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add dt configuration for dp83867 led modes
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:11:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3eEiyUn6DDeUZmg@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU3P-t3Q1XZrNG=czvFBU7UsCOA_Ap47k9Ein_3VQy_tGw@mail.gmail.com>

> Andrew,
> 
> I completely agree with you but I haven't seen how that can be done
> yet. What support exists for a PHY driver to expose their LED
> configuration to be used that way? Can you point me to an example?

Nobody has actually worked on this long enough to get code merged. e.g.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201004095852.GB1104@bug/T/
https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/3396223

This is probably the last attempt, which was not too far away from getting merged:
https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-leds/cover/20220503151633.18760-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com/

I seem to NACK a patch like yours every couple of months. If all that
wasted time was actually spent on a common framework, this would of
been solved years ago.

How important is it to you to control these LEDs? Enough to finish
this code and get it merged?

     Andrew