All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix uninitialized return in intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:48:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YA6F3oF8mRaNQWjb@mwanda> (raw)

Smatch found an uninitialized variable bug in this code:

    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c:3191 intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
    error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.

The first thing that Smatch complains about is that "ret" isn't set if
we don't enter the "for_each_engine(engine, &dev_priv->gt, id) {" loop.
Presumably we always have at least one engine so that's a false
positive.

But it's definitely a bug to not set "ret" if i915_gem_object_pin_map()
fails.

Let's fix the bug and silence the false positive.

Fixes: 493f30cd086e ("drm/i915/gvt: parse init context to update cmd accessible reg whitelist")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 7fb91de06557..d54ea0e4681d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -3103,7 +3103,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	struct intel_vgpu_submission *s = &vgpu->submission;
 	struct i915_request *requests[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
 	bool is_ctx_pinned[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (gvt->is_reg_whitelist_updated)
 		return;
@@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 		if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
 			gvt_err("failed to pin init ctx obj, ring=%d, err=%lx\n",
 				id, PTR_ERR(vaddr));
+			ret = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-- 
2.29.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix uninitialized return in intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:48:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YA6F3oF8mRaNQWjb@mwanda> (raw)

Smatch found an uninitialized variable bug in this code:

    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c:3191 intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
    error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.

The first thing that Smatch complains about is that "ret" isn't set if
we don't enter the "for_each_engine(engine, &dev_priv->gt, id) {" loop.
Presumably we always have at least one engine so that's a false
positive.

But it's definitely a bug to not set "ret" if i915_gem_object_pin_map()
fails.

Let's fix the bug and silence the false positive.

Fixes: 493f30cd086e ("drm/i915/gvt: parse init context to update cmd accessible reg whitelist")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 7fb91de06557..d54ea0e4681d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -3103,7 +3103,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	struct intel_vgpu_submission *s = &vgpu->submission;
 	struct i915_request *requests[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
 	bool is_ctx_pinned[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (gvt->is_reg_whitelist_updated)
 		return;
@@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 		if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
 			gvt_err("failed to pin init ctx obj, ring=%d, err=%lx\n",
 				id, PTR_ERR(vaddr));
+			ret = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-- 
2.29.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix uninitialized return in intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:48:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YA6F3oF8mRaNQWjb@mwanda> (raw)

Smatch found an uninitialized variable bug in this code:

    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c:3191 intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
    error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.

The first thing that Smatch complains about is that "ret" isn't set if
we don't enter the "for_each_engine(engine, &dev_priv->gt, id) {" loop.
Presumably we always have at least one engine so that's a false
positive.

But it's definitely a bug to not set "ret" if i915_gem_object_pin_map()
fails.

Let's fix the bug and silence the false positive.

Fixes: 493f30cd086e ("drm/i915/gvt: parse init context to update cmd accessible reg whitelist")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 7fb91de06557..d54ea0e4681d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -3103,7 +3103,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	struct intel_vgpu_submission *s = &vgpu->submission;
 	struct i915_request *requests[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
 	bool is_ctx_pinned[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (gvt->is_reg_whitelist_updated)
 		return;
@@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 		if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
 			gvt_err("failed to pin init ctx obj, ring=%d, err=%lx\n",
 				id, PTR_ERR(vaddr));
+			ret = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix uninitialized return in intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:48:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YA6F3oF8mRaNQWjb@mwanda> (raw)

Smatch found an uninitialized variable bug in this code:

    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c:3191 intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist()
    error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.

The first thing that Smatch complains about is that "ret" isn't set if
we don't enter the "for_each_engine(engine, &dev_priv->gt, id) {" loop.
Presumably we always have at least one engine so that's a false
positive.

But it's definitely a bug to not set "ret" if i915_gem_object_pin_map()
fails.

Let's fix the bug and silence the false positive.

Fixes: 493f30cd086e ("drm/i915/gvt: parse init context to update cmd accessible reg whitelist")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 7fb91de06557..d54ea0e4681d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -3103,7 +3103,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	struct intel_vgpu_submission *s = &vgpu->submission;
 	struct i915_request *requests[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
 	bool is_ctx_pinned[I915_NUM_ENGINES] = {};
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (gvt->is_reg_whitelist_updated)
 		return;
@@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ void intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 		if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
 			gvt_err("failed to pin init ctx obj, ring=%d, err=%lx\n",
 				id, PTR_ERR(vaddr));
+			ret = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-26  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25  8:48 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2021-01-25  8:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix uninitialized return in intel_gvt_update_reg_whitelist() Dan Carpenter
2021-01-25  8:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-01-25  8:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-01-25  9:44 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-25  9:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-25  9:44   ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-26  5:09   ` Zhenyu Wang
2021-01-26  5:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Zhenyu Wang
2021-01-26  5:09     ` Zhenyu Wang
2021-01-26  5:09     ` Zhenyu Wang
2021-01-25 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YA6F3oF8mRaNQWjb@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.