FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatch between misplaced vma check and vma" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatch between misplaced vma check and vma" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 0e53656ad8abc99e0a80c3de611e593ebbf55829 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:29:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatch between misplaced vma check and vma
 insert

When inserting a VMA, we restrict the placement to the low 4G unless the
caller opts into using the full range. This was done to allow usersapce
the opportunity to transition slowly from a 32b address space, and to
avoid breaking inherent 32b assumptions of some commands.

However, for insert we limited ourselves to 4G-4K, but on verification
we allowed the full 4G. This causes some attempts to bind a new buffer
to sporadically fail with -ENOSPC, but at other times be bound
successfully.

commit 48ea1e32c39d ("drm/i915/gen9: Set PIN_ZONE_4G end to 4GB - 1
page") suggests that there is a genuine problem with stateless addressing
that cannot utilize the last page in 4G and so we purposefully excluded
it. This means that the quick pin pass may cause us to utilize a buggy
placement.

Reported-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_params/larger-than-life-batch
Fixes: 48ea1e32c39d ("drm/i915/gen9: Set PIN_ZONE_4G end to 4GB - 1 page")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.5+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201216092951.7124-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 5f22cc0b134ab702d7f64b714e26018f7288ffee)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index b07dc1156a0e..bcc80f428172 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ eb_vma_misplaced(const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
 		return true;
 
 	if (!(flags & EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS) &&
-	    (vma->node.start + vma->node.size - 1) >> 32)
+	    (vma->node.start + vma->node.size + 4095) >> 32)
 		return true;
 
 	if (flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP &&

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatch between misplaced vma check and vma" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

[Sudip Mukherjee]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 400 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:47:24AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Here is the backport, will also apply to 4.14-stable.

--
Regards
Sudip

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-drm-i915-Fix-mismatch-between-misplaced-vma-check-an.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2460 bytes --]

From 40f27238b7f9df7141f13443289995cc064a2328 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:29:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatch between misplaced vma check and vma
 insert

commit 0e53656ad8abc99e0a80c3de611e593ebbf55829 upstream

When inserting a VMA, we restrict the placement to the low 4G unless the
caller opts into using the full range. This was done to allow usersapce
the opportunity to transition slowly from a 32b address space, and to
avoid breaking inherent 32b assumptions of some commands.

However, for insert we limited ourselves to 4G-4K, but on verification
we allowed the full 4G. This causes some attempts to bind a new buffer
to sporadically fail with -ENOSPC, but at other times be bound
successfully.

commit 48ea1e32c39d ("drm/i915/gen9: Set PIN_ZONE_4G end to 4GB - 1
page") suggests that there is a genuine problem with stateless addressing
that cannot utilize the last page in 4G and so we purposefully excluded
it. This means that the quick pin pass may cause us to utilize a buggy
placement.

Reported-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_params/larger-than-life-batch
Fixes: 48ea1e32c39d ("drm/i915/gen9: Set PIN_ZONE_4G end to 4GB - 1 page")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.5+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201216092951.7124-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 5f22cc0b134ab702d7f64b714e26018f7288ffee)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
[sudip: use file from old path]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 52894816167c..8b5b147cdfd1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ eb_vma_misplaced(const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
 		return true;
 
 	if (!(flags & EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS) &&
-	    (vma->node.start + vma->node.size - 1) >> 32)
+	    (vma->node.start + vma->node.size + 4095) >> 32)
 		return true;
 
 	if (flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP &&
-- 
2.11.0

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatch between misplaced vma check and vma" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:51:56PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:47:24AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > 
> > The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> 
> Here is the backport, will also apply to 4.14-stable.

All now applied, thanks.

greg k-h