-stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

-stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Diego Calleja]

Hi,

There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
of 5.11.1

This regression consists in graphics artifacts that will *only* start appearing after resuming
from suspend. They don't happen immediately after resuming from suspend either, but
after some minutes.

My system has integrated intel graphics
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4th Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])                                            
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4170T CPU @ 3.20GHz

For reference, this is the list of i915 commits that went into 5.10.9.


commit ecca0c675bdecebdeb2f2eb76fb33520c441dacf
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 22:52:19 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Restore clear-residual mitigations for Ivybridge, Baytrail
    
    commit 09aa9e45863e9e25dfbf350bae89fc3c2964482c upstream.


commit de3f572607c29f7fdd1bfd754646d08e32db0249
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 9 17:39:52 2020 +0200

    drm/i915/icl: Fix initing the DSI DSC power refcount during HW readout
    
    commit 2af5268180410b874fc06be91a1b2fbb22b1be0c upstream.


commit 54c9246a47fa8559c3ec6da2048e976a4b8750f6
Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Nov 18 13:40:58 2020 +0100

    drm/i915/dsi: Use unconditional msleep for the panel_on_delay when there is no reset-deassert MIPI-sequence
    
    commit 00cb645fd7e29bdd20967cd20fa8f77bcdf422f9 upstream.


commit 0a34addcdbd9e03e3f3d09bcd5a1719d90b2d637
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Jan 8 17:28:41 2021 +0200

    drm/i915/backlight: fix CPU mode backlight takeover on LPT
    
    commit bb83d5fb550bb7db75b29e6342417fda2bbb691c upstream.


commit 48b8c6689efa7cd65a72f620940a4f234b944b73
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 22:52:18 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Limit VFE threads based on GT
    
    commit ffaf97899c4a58b9fefb11534f730785443611a8 upstream.


commit 481e27f050732b8c680f26287dd44967fddf9a79
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 22:52:20 2021 +0000

    drm/i915: Allow the sysadmin to override security mitigations
    
    commit 984cadea032b103c5824a5f29d0a36b3e9df6333 upstream.


Regards

[Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Diego Calleja]

Hi,

There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
of 5.11.1

This regression consists in graphics artifacts that will *only* start appearing after resuming
from suspend. They don't happen immediately after resuming from suspend either, but
after some minutes.

My system has integrated intel graphics
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4th Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])                                            
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4170T CPU @ 3.20GHz

For reference, this is the list of i915 commits that went into 5.10.9.


commit ecca0c675bdecebdeb2f2eb76fb33520c441dacf
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 22:52:19 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Restore clear-residual mitigations for Ivybridge, Baytrail
    
    commit 09aa9e45863e9e25dfbf350bae89fc3c2964482c upstream.


commit de3f572607c29f7fdd1bfd754646d08e32db0249
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 9 17:39:52 2020 +0200

    drm/i915/icl: Fix initing the DSI DSC power refcount during HW readout
    
    commit 2af5268180410b874fc06be91a1b2fbb22b1be0c upstream.


commit 54c9246a47fa8559c3ec6da2048e976a4b8750f6
Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Nov 18 13:40:58 2020 +0100

    drm/i915/dsi: Use unconditional msleep for the panel_on_delay when there is no reset-deassert MIPI-sequence
    
    commit 00cb645fd7e29bdd20967cd20fa8f77bcdf422f9 upstream.


commit 0a34addcdbd9e03e3f3d09bcd5a1719d90b2d637
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Jan 8 17:28:41 2021 +0200

    drm/i915/backlight: fix CPU mode backlight takeover on LPT
    
    commit bb83d5fb550bb7db75b29e6342417fda2bbb691c upstream.


commit 48b8c6689efa7cd65a72f620940a4f234b944b73
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 22:52:18 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Limit VFE threads based on GT
    
    commit ffaf97899c4a58b9fefb11534f730785443611a8 upstream.


commit 481e27f050732b8c680f26287dd44967fddf9a79
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 22:52:20 2021 +0000

    drm/i915: Allow the sysadmin to override security mitigations
    
    commit 984cadea032b103c5824a5f29d0a36b3e9df6333 upstream.


Regards


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
> of 5.11.1

Is this the same issue reported here:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
?

If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
> of 5.11.1

Is this the same issue reported here:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
?

If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
>> of 5.11.1
> 
> Is this the same issue reported here:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> ?
> 
> If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?

I see in the original email:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/

That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost
certainly the same issue.

Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the
arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree
as downstream patches for now:

e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals")
d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state")
1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear")

We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have
multiple reports that these resolve the problem.

Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on
their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series?

ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed
with different hashes?)

Regards,

Hans

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
>> of 5.11.1
> 
> Is this the same issue reported here:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> ?
> 
> If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?

I see in the original email:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/

That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost
certainly the same issue.

Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the
arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree
as downstream patches for now:

e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals")
d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state")
1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear")

We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have
multiple reports that these resolve the problem.

Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on
their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series?

ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed
with different hashes?)

Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:28:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
> >> of 5.11.1
> > 
> > Is this the same issue reported here:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> > ?
> > 
> > If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?
> 
> I see in the original email:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/
> 
> That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost
> certainly the same issue.
> 
> Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the
> arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree
> as downstream patches for now:
> 
> e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals")
> d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state")
> 1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear")
> 
> We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have
> multiple reports that these resolve the problem.
> 
> Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on
> their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series?
> 
> ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed
> with different hashes?)

I have queued the first one up now, thanks.

greg k-h

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:28:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
> >> of 5.11.1
> > 
> > Is this the same issue reported here:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> > ?
> > 
> > If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?
> 
> I see in the original email:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/
> 
> That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost
> certainly the same issue.
> 
> Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the
> arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree
> as downstream patches for now:
> 
> e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals")
> d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state")
> 1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear")
> 
> We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have
> multiple reports that these resolve the problem.
> 
> Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on
> their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series?
> 
> ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed
> with different hashes?)

I have queued the first one up now, thanks.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Diego Calleja]

El domingo, 28 de febrero de 2021 16:14:54 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> Is this the same issue reported here:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> ?

I just tested current mainline (which already contains the three commits mentioned in the bugzilla),
and the problems have disappeared.

Regards.

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Diego Calleja]

El domingo, 28 de febrero de 2021 16:14:54 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> Is this the same issue reported here:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> ?

I just tested current mainline (which already contains the three commits mentioned in the bugzilla),
and the problems have disappeared.

Regards.


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 09:05:45PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El domingo, 28 de febrero de 2021 16:14:54 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> > Is this the same issue reported here:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> > ?
> 
> I just tested current mainline (which already contains the three commits mentioned in the bugzilla),
> and the problems have disappeared.

I do not see all 3 commits in Linus's tree already, am I missing
something?

What are the git ids that you are looking at?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 09:05:45PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El domingo, 28 de febrero de 2021 16:14:54 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> > Is this the same issue reported here:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> > ?
> 
> I just tested current mainline (which already contains the three commits mentioned in the bugzilla),
> and the problems have disappeared.

I do not see all 3 commits in Linus's tree already, am I missing
something?

What are the git ids that you are looking at?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Diego Calleja]

El lunes, 1 de marzo de 2021 10:09:10 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> I do not see all 3 commits in Linus's tree already, am I missing
> something?
> 
> What are the git ids that you are looking at?

I used grep on the git log, the commits are there but seem to have different commit ids (except for the first one)

commit e627d5923cae93fa4188f4c4afba6486169a1337
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Tue Jan 19 11:07:57 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals


commit d5109f739c9f14a3bda249cb48b16de1065932f0
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 25 22:02:47 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state


commit 81ce8f04aa96f7f6cae05770f68b5d15be91f5a2
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed Feb 10 12:27:28 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Diego Calleja]

El lunes, 1 de marzo de 2021 10:09:10 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> I do not see all 3 commits in Linus's tree already, am I missing
> something?
> 
> What are the git ids that you are looking at?

I used grep on the git log, the commits are there but seem to have different commit ids (except for the first one)

commit e627d5923cae93fa4188f4c4afba6486169a1337
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Tue Jan 19 11:07:57 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals


commit d5109f739c9f14a3bda249cb48b16de1065932f0
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Jan 25 22:02:47 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state


commit 81ce8f04aa96f7f6cae05770f68b5d15be91f5a2
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed Feb 10 12:27:28 2021 +0000

    drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:11:13AM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El lunes, 1 de marzo de 2021 10:09:10 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> > I do not see all 3 commits in Linus's tree already, am I missing
> > something?
> > 
> > What are the git ids that you are looking at?
> 
> I used grep on the git log, the commits are there but seem to have different commit ids (except for the first one)
> 
> commit e627d5923cae93fa4188f4c4afba6486169a1337
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Tue Jan 19 11:07:57 2021 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals
> 
> 
> commit d5109f739c9f14a3bda249cb48b16de1065932f0
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Mon Jan 25 22:02:47 2021 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state
> 
> 
> commit 81ce8f04aa96f7f6cae05770f68b5d15be91f5a2
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Wed Feb 10 12:27:28 2021 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear
> 
> 

Ugh, have I mentioned recently just how badly I think the drm developers
handle their git trees?  It's a constant mess to unwind that stuff...

{sigh}

Now queued up.

greg k-h

Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:11:13AM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El lunes, 1 de marzo de 2021 10:09:10 (CET) Greg KH escribió:
> > I do not see all 3 commits in Linus's tree already, am I missing
> > something?
> > 
> > What are the git ids that you are looking at?
> 
> I used grep on the git log, the commits are there but seem to have different commit ids (except for the first one)
> 
> commit e627d5923cae93fa4188f4c4afba6486169a1337
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Tue Jan 19 11:07:57 2021 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals
> 
> 
> commit d5109f739c9f14a3bda249cb48b16de1065932f0
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Mon Jan 25 22:02:47 2021 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state
> 
> 
> commit 81ce8f04aa96f7f6cae05770f68b5d15be91f5a2
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Wed Feb 10 12:27:28 2021 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear
> 
> 

Ugh, have I mentioned recently just how badly I think the drm developers
handle their git trees?  It's a constant mess to unwind that stuff...

{sigh}

Now queued up.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx