* [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system
@ 2021-04-25 3:04 zhanglianjie
2021-04-26 19:25 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhanglianjie @ 2021-04-25 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
If the fuse file system is ignored and the kernel enable CONFIG_NTFS_FS,
then the mount.ntfs of fuse is used when mounting ntfs,
which is equivalent to not ignoring the fuse file system.
Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie@uniontech.com>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
index d9a8eec31..f9693089b 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
.all_filesystems = 1,
.skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){
"fuse",
+ "ntfs",
"tmpfs",
NULL
},
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system
2021-04-25 3:04 [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system zhanglianjie
@ 2021-04-26 19:25 ` Petr Vorel
2021-04-27 12:25 ` zhanglianjie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2021-04-26 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi,
> If the fuse file system is ignored and the kernel enable CONFIG_NTFS_FS,
> then the mount.ntfs of fuse is used when mounting ntfs,
> which is equivalent to not ignoring the fuse file system.
...
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .all_filesystems = 1,
> .skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){
> "fuse",
> + "ntfs",
Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"?
Testing on SLES kernel 5.3 (heavily patched) which is without CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
...
tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
...
Summary:
passed 21
failed 0
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
Testing Debian kernel 4.9.0-11-amd64 which is with CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
tst_supported_fs_types.c:148: TINFO: Skipping ntfs as requested by the test
...
Summary:
passed 15
failed 0
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
Kind regards,
Petr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system
2021-04-26 19:25 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2021-04-27 12:25 ` zhanglianjie
2021-04-27 13:27 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhanglianjie @ 2021-04-27 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi,
>
>> If the fuse file system is ignored and the kernel enable CONFIG_NTFS_FS,
>> then the mount.ntfs of fuse is used when mounting ntfs,
>> which is equivalent to not ignoring the fuse file system.
>
> ...
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
>> .all_filesystems = 1,
>> .skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){
>> "fuse",
>> + "ntfs",
>
> Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"?
Can't replace fuse.
>
> Testing on SLES kernel 5.3 (heavily patched) which is without CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
> ...
> tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
> ...
> Summary:
> passed 21
> failed 0
> broken 0
> skipped 0
> warnings 0
If there is no CONFIG_NTFS_FS, the test of the ntfs file system will be
ignored. Because there is fuse in skip_filesystems, the test can pass.
>
> Testing Debian kernel 4.9.0-11-amd64 which is with CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
> tst_supported_fs_types.c:148: TINFO: Skipping ntfs as requested by the test
> ...
> Summary:
> passed 15
> failed 0
> broken 0
> skipped 0
> warnings 0
>
CONFIG_NTFS_FS is configured, are you sure there is no ntfs
in skip_filesystems? Why does it output "Skipping ntfs as requested by
the test"?
There should be no mount.ntfs command provided by ntfs-3g in your
system.
Testing Ubuntu kernel 5.8.0-50-generic:
ub-PC$ cat /boot/config-5.8.0-50-generic | grep -E "EXFAT_FS|NTFS_FS"
CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m
CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m
tst_supported_fs_types.c:89: TINFO: Kernel supports ntfs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.ntfs does exist
...
tst_test.c:1379: TINFO: Testing on ntfs
tst_test.c:888: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop10 with ntfs opts='' extra
opts=''
tst_test.c:899: TINFO: Trying FUSE...
tst_test.c:1311: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
sync_file_range02.c:73: TFAIL: Sync equals write: Synced 0, expected
33554432
sync_file_range02.c:73: TFAIL: Sync inside of write: Synced 0, expected
16777216
sync_file_range02.c:73: TFAIL: Sync overlaps with write: Synced 0,
expected 8388608
Summary:
passed 15
failed 3
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system
2021-04-27 12:25 ` zhanglianjie
@ 2021-04-27 13:27 ` Petr Vorel
2021-04-27 14:36 ` zhanglianjie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2021-04-27 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi,
> > > If the fuse file system is ignored and the kernel enable CONFIG_NTFS_FS,
> > > then the mount.ntfs of fuse is used when mounting ntfs,
> > > which is equivalent to not ignoring the fuse file system.
> > ...
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
> > > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> > > .all_filesystems = 1,
> > > .skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){
> > > "fuse",
> > > + "ntfs",
> > Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"?
> Can't replace fuse.
Not sure if we understand each other: I mean add "ntfs" and *remove* "fuse",
as "fuse" is now redundant when we whitelist ntfs (see
tst_get_supported_fs_types()), unless there is problem with other fuse
filesystems. I tested with CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m.
But maybe removing "fuse" should be a separate step.
> > Testing on SLES kernel 5.3 (heavily patched) which is without CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
> > ...
> > tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
> > ...
> > Summary:
> > passed 21
> > failed 0
> > broken 0
> > skipped 0
> > warnings 0
> If there is no CONFIG_NTFS_FS, the test of the ntfs file system will be
> ignored. Because there is fuse in skip_filesystems, the test can pass.
See above.
> > Testing Debian kernel 4.9.0-11-amd64 which is with CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
> > tst_supported_fs_types.c:148: TINFO: Skipping ntfs as requested by the test
> > ...
> > Summary:
> > passed 15
> > failed 0
> > broken 0
> > skipped 0
> > warnings 0
> CONFIG_NTFS_FS is configured, are you sure there is no ntfs
> in skip_filesystems? Why does it output "Skipping ntfs as requested by
> the test"?
> There should be no mount.ntfs command provided by ntfs-3g in your
> system.
See above.
Kind regards,
Petr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system
2021-04-27 13:27 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2021-04-27 14:36 ` zhanglianjie
2021-04-27 19:14 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhanglianjie @ 2021-04-27 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi,
>
>>>> If the fuse file system is ignored and the kernel enable CONFIG_NTFS_FS,
>>>> then the mount.ntfs of fuse is used when mounting ntfs,
>>>> which is equivalent to not ignoring the fuse file system.
>
>>> ...
>>>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range02.c
>>>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
>>>> .all_filesystems = 1,
>>>> .skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){
>>>> "fuse",
>>>> + "ntfs",
>
>>> Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"?
>> Can't replace fuse.
> Not sure if we understand each other: I mean add "ntfs" and *remove* "fuse",
> as "fuse" is now redundant when we whitelist ntfs (see
> tst_get_supported_fs_types()), unless there is problem with other fuse
> filesystems. I tested with CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m.
>
> But maybe removing "fuse" should be a separate step.
>
I can understand what you mean, but I can't remove the fuse. If the fuse
is removed and the kernel is not configured with CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m, it
will cause the test exfat to fail.
>>> Testing on SLES kernel 5.3 (heavily patched) which is without CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
>>> ...
>>> tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
>>> ...
>>> Summary:
>>> passed 21
>>> failed 0
>>> broken 0
>>> skipped 0
>>> warnings 0
>> If there is no CONFIG_NTFS_FS, the test of the ntfs file system will be
>> ignored. Because there is fuse in skip_filesystems, the test can pass.
>
> See above.
>
>>> Testing Debian kernel 4.9.0-11-amd64 which is with CONFIG_NTFS_FS:
>>> tst_supported_fs_types.c:148: TINFO: Skipping ntfs as requested by the test
>>> ...
>>> Summary:
>>> passed 15
>>> failed 0
>>> broken 0
>>> skipped 0
>>> warnings 0
>
>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS is configured, are you sure there is no ntfs
>> in skip_filesystems? Why does it output "Skipping ntfs as requested by
>> the test"?
>> There should be no mount.ntfs command provided by ntfs-3g in your
>> system.
> See above.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system
2021-04-27 14:36 ` zhanglianjie
@ 2021-04-27 19:14 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2021-04-27 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi,
> > > > Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"?
> > > Can't replace fuse.
> > Not sure if we understand each other: I mean add "ntfs" and *remove* "fuse",
> > as "fuse" is now redundant when we whitelist ntfs (see
> > tst_get_supported_fs_types()), unless there is problem with other fuse
> > filesystems. I tested with CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m.
> > But maybe removing "fuse" should be a separate step.
> I can understand what you mean, but I can't remove the fuse. If the fuse is
> removed and the kernel is not configured with CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m, it will
> cause the test exfat to fail.
You're right, I didn't notice I tested it without mount.exfat. Sorry for being
slow. Interesting that while NTFS kernel module does not work on the test, exfat
from Samsung does.
Anyway merged. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Petr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-27 19:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-25 3:04 [LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system zhanglianjie
2021-04-26 19:25 ` Petr Vorel
2021-04-27 12:25 ` zhanglianjie
2021-04-27 13:27 ` Petr Vorel
2021-04-27 14:36 ` zhanglianjie
2021-04-27 19:14 ` Petr Vorel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.