From: Patrick Wildt <patrick@blueri.se> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [PATCH 3/3] pci: pcie_dw_rockchip: Use udelay instead of msleep Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 22:08:39 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YIcdx6MZ02IKm7ni@mone.fritz.box> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210426132632.10221-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com> Am Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 01:26:32PM +0000 schrieb Anand Moon: > Use udelay instead of msleep fix the below warning. You sure that's correct? the m in msleep means milli, while the u in udelay means micro. That's a factor of 1000 of a difference. > drivers/pci/pcie_dw_rockchip.c:254:3: warning: implicit > declaration of function 'msleep' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> > Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pci/pcie_dw_rockchip.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_rockchip.c > index e7f42604ab..6c87ee1ea0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_rockchip.c > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int rk_pcie_link_up(struct rk_pcie *priv, u32 cap_speed) > * some wired devices need much more, such as 600ms. > * Add a enough delay to cover all cases. > */ > - msleep(PERST_WAIT_MS); > + udelay(PERST_WAIT_MS); > dm_gpio_set_value(&priv->rst_gpio, 1); > } > > @@ -271,12 +271,12 @@ static int rk_pcie_link_up(struct rk_pcie *priv, u32 cap_speed) > dev_info(priv->dw.dev, "PCIe Linking... LTSSM is 0x%x\n", > rk_pcie_readl_apb(priv, PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS)); > rk_pcie_debug_dump(priv); > - msleep(1000); > + udelay(1000); > } > > dev_err(priv->dw.dev, "PCIe-%d Link Fail\n", dev_seq(priv->dw.dev)); > /* Link maybe in Gen switch recovery but we need to wait more 1s */ > - msleep(1000); > + udelay(1000); > return -EIO; > } > > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct udevice *dev) > } > } > > - msleep(1000); > + udelay(1000); > > ret = generic_phy_init(&priv->phy); > if (ret) { > -- > 2.31.1 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 20:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-26 13:26 [PATCH 1/3] pci: pcie_dw_rockchip: Fixed the below compilation error Anand Moon 2021-04-26 13:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] pci: pcie_dw_rockchip: Drop the unused variable warning Anand Moon 2021-05-21 13:21 ` Kever Yang 2021-04-26 13:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] pci: pcie_dw_rockchip: Use udelay instead of msleep Anand Moon 2021-04-26 20:08 ` Patrick Wildt [this message] 2021-04-27 5:41 ` Anand Moon 2021-04-27 19:27 ` Patrick Wildt 2021-05-06 18:40 ` Anand Moon 2021-05-21 13:20 ` Kever Yang 2021-04-26 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] pci: pcie_dw_rockchip: Fixed the below compilation error Patrick Wildt 2021-04-27 5:40 ` Anand Moon 2021-05-21 13:21 ` Kever Yang 2021-05-21 16:58 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YIcdx6MZ02IKm7ni@mone.fritz.box \ --to=patrick@blueri.se \ --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: pcie_dw_rockchip: Use udelay instead of msleep' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.