From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [CI] drm/i915: Disable atomics in L3 for gen9
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 07:29:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLHRKI+RZ0nvIe/P@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210528172543.GA7385@fieldses.org>
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:25:43PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Would it be possible to apply
>
> 58586680ffad "drm/i915: Disable atomics in L3 for gen9"
>
> to stable kernels?
>
> I'm finding it quite easy to crash my Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th gen with
> Blender on Fedora 34 (which is using the 5.11.y kernels). It applies
> cleanly, and I've been running 5.11.16 with the patch applied and seeing
> no obvious ill effects.
As 5.11.y is now end-of-life, and has been for a week or so, what
kernel(s) would you want this applied to given that 5.12.y is the latest
stable kernel tree?
What prevents you from moving to 5.12.y now?
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Disable atomics in L3 for gen9
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 07:29:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLHRKI+RZ0nvIe/P@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210528172543.GA7385@fieldses.org>
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:25:43PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Would it be possible to apply
>
> 58586680ffad "drm/i915: Disable atomics in L3 for gen9"
>
> to stable kernels?
>
> I'm finding it quite easy to crash my Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th gen with
> Blender on Fedora 34 (which is using the 5.11.y kernels). It applies
> cleanly, and I've been running 5.11.16 with the patch applied and seeing
> no obvious ill effects.
As 5.11.y is now end-of-life, and has been for a week or so, what
kernel(s) would you want this applied to given that 5.12.y is the latest
stable kernel tree?
What prevents you from moving to 5.12.y now?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-29 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 17:25 [CI] drm/i915: Disable atomics in L3 for gen9 J. Bruce Fields
2021-05-28 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " J. Bruce Fields
2021-05-29 5:29 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-05-29 5:29 ` Greg KH
2021-05-29 21:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-05-29 21:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YLHRKI+RZ0nvIe/P@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.